Advertisement

Perceptual Evaluation of Voice

  • Maia N. BradenEmail author
  • Sarah D. M. Blakeslee
Chapter

Abstract

Perceptual evaluation of the voice is necessary to identify and characterize a voice disorder, to assess change over time, and to determine need for intervention. In this chapter, we discuss the importance of perceptual evaluation, differences between children’s and adults’ voices, perceptual aspects of voice, and how to conduct a perceptual evaluation of the pediatric voice.

Keywords

Perceptual evaluation of voice Voice evaluation Perceptual features of children’s voices Children’s voice disorders Voice disorders 

References

  1. 1.
    Aronson A, Bless D. Clinical Voice Disorders. 4th ed. New York: Thieme; 2009.Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Hirano M. Clinical examination of voice. New York: Springer-Verlag; 1981.Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Kempster GB, Gerratt BR, Verdolini Abbott K, Barkmeier-Kraemer J, Hillman RE. Consensus auditory-perceptual evaluation of voice: development of a standardized clinical protocol. Am J Speech Lang Pathol. 2009;18. United States:124–32.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Hartley NA, Braden M, Thibeault SL. Practice patterns of speech-language pathologists in pediatric vocal health. Am J Speech Lang Pathol. 2017;26(2):281–300.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Maturo S, Hill C, Bunting G, Ballif C, Maurer R, Hartnick C. Establishment of a normative pediatric acoustic database. Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2012;138(10):956–61.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Hirano M, Kurita S, Nakashima T. Growth, development and aging of human vocal folds. In: Bless D, Abbs J, editors. Vocal fold physiology. San Diego: College-Hill Press; 1983.Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Schweinfurth JM, Thibeault SL. Does hyaluronic acid distribution in the larynx relate to the newborn’s capacity for crying? Laryngoscope. 2008;118(9):1692–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Hill CA, Ojha S, Maturo S, Maurer R, Bunting G, Hartnick CJ. Consistency of voice frequency and perturbation measures in children. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2013;148:637–41. England.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Stathopoulos ET, Sapienza CM. Developmental changes in laryngeal and respiratory function with variations in sound pressure level. J Speech Lang Hear Res. 1997;40(3):595–614.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Lopes LW, Barbosa Lima IL, Alves Almeida LN, Cavalcante DP, de Almeida AA. Severity of voice disorders in children: correlations between perceptual and acoustic data. J Voice. 2012;26(6):819.e7–12.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Patel RR, Dixon A, Richmond A, Donohue KD. Pediatric high speed digital imaging of vocal fold vibration: a normative pilot study of glottal closure and phase closure characteristics. Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol. 2012;76(7):954–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Barsties B, De Bodt M. Assessment of voice quality: current state-of-the-art. Auris Nasus Larynx. 2015;42(3):183–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Wilson DK. Voice problems of children. 3rd ed. Baltimore: Williams and Wilkins; 1987.Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Kent RD. Hearing and believing: some limits to the auditory-perceptual assessment of speech and voice disorders. Am J Speech Lang Pathol. 1996;5(3):7–23.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Zraick RI, Kempster GB, Connor NP, Thibeault S, Klaben BK, Bursac Z, et al. Establishing validity of the consensus auditory-perceptual evaluation of voice (CAPE-V). Am J Speech Lang Pathol. 2011;20. United States:14–22.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Wolfe VI, Ratusnik DL. Acoustic and perceptual measurements of roughness influencing judgments of pitch. J Speech Hear Disord. 1988;53(1):15–22.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Sauder C, Eadie T. Does the accuracy of medical diagnoses affect novice listeners’ auditory-perceptual judgments of dysphonia severity? J Voice. 2018. pii: S0892-1997(18)30156-5.Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Kreiman J, Gerratt BR, Kempster GB, Erman A, Berke GS. Perceptual evaluation of voice quality: review, tutorial, and a framework for future research. J Speech Hear Res. 1993;36(1):21–40.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Anand S, Skowronski MD, Shrivastav R, Eddins DA. Perceptual and quantitative assessment of dysphonia across vowel categories. J Voice. 2018. pii: S0892-1997(17)30492-7.Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Gerratt BR, Kreiman J, Garellek M. Comparing measures of voice quality from sustained phonation and continuous speech. J Speech Lang Hear Res. 2016;59(5):994–1001.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Kelchner LN, Brehm SB, Weinrich B, Middendorf J, deAlarcon A, Levin L, et al. Perceptual evaluation of severe pediatric voice disorders: rater reliability using the consensus auditory perceptual evaluation of voice. J Voice. 2010;24(4):441–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Baker S, Kelchner L, Weinrich B, Lee L, Willging P, Cotton R, et al. Pediatric laryngotracheal stenosis and airway reconstruction: a review of voice outcomes, assessment, and treatment issues. J Voice. 2006;20(4):631–41.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Chan KM, Yiu EM. The effect of anchors and training on the reliability of perceptual voice evaluation. J Speech Lang Hear Res. 2002;45(1):111–26.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    American Speech Language and Hearing Association. CAPE-V procedures and form. Available from: https://www.asha.org/uploadedFiles/ASHA/SIG/03/CAPE-V-Procedures-and-Form.pdf.
  25. 25.
    Karnell MP, Melton SD, Childes JM, Coleman TC, Dailey SA, Hoffman HT. Reliability of clinician-based (GRBAS and CAPE-V) and patient-based (V-RQOL and IPVI) documentation of voice disorders. J Voice. 2007;21(5):576–90.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Goodglass H, Kaplan E, Barresi B. The assessment of aphasia and related disorders. 3rd ed. Philadelphia: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins; 2001.Google Scholar
  27. 27.
    Berube S, Nonnemacher J, Demsky C, Glenn S, Saxena S, Wright A, et al. Stealing cookies in the twenty-first century: measures of spoken narrative in healthy versus speakers with aphasia. Am J Speech Lang Pathol. 2018;28:1–9.Google Scholar
  28. 28.
    Martens JW, Versnel H, Dejonckere PH. The effect of visible speech in the perceptual rating of pathological voices. Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2007;133(2):178–85.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Gerratt BR, Kreiman J. Measuring vocal quality with speech synthesis. J Acoust Soc Am. 2001;110(5 Pt 1):2560–6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Kreiman J, Gerratt BR, Ito M. When and why listeners disagree in voice quality assessment tasks. J Acoust Soc Am. 2007;122(4):2354–64.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2020

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.UW Voice and Swallow Clinics, UW HealthAmerican Family Children’s HospitalMadisonUSA
  2. 2.Department of Surgery, Division of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck SurgeryUniversity of Wisconsin School of Medicine and Public HealthMadisonUSA
  3. 3.SSM Health, Department of Therapy ServicesSpeech Language PathologyMadisonUSA

Personalised recommendations