Advertisement

Effects of Stemflow on Soil Water Dynamics in Forest Stands

  • Wei-Li LiangEmail author
Chapter
  • 154 Downloads
Part of the Ecological Studies book series (ECOLSTUD, volume 240)

Abstract

Stemflow contributes to an uneven water input and preferential infiltration and percolation that increases the heterogeneity of soil water dynamics in forested stands. These aboveground and underground effects are referred to as the double-funneling effect of a tree. Stemflow serves as a principal source of the rainwater input around a tree, and tends to enter the soil over a small infiltration area and then preferentially flow along the network of root channels. This kind of concentrated infiltration and channelization of stemflow could generate perched water in soil layers or at the soil–bedrock interface. The double-funneling effect also influences the soil water redistribution process and the spatial pattern of soil water during the drying process. The double-funneling effect has been qualitatively demonstrated for various species with links to soil erosion, subsurface flow, slope stability, groundwater recharge, and runoff generation at various scales. A comprehensive and integrated understanding of the double-funneling effect is needed. This chapter reviews the current understanding of how stemflow affects soil water dynamics in both wetting and drying processes. After discussing field evidence of the effects of stemflow on soil water responses, their modeling and issues requiring future study are highlighted.

Keywords

Double-funneling effect Infiltration modeling Perched water table Preferential flow Slope stability Soil water redistribution Throughfall 

Notes

Acknowledgments

This chapter was supported by the grant from the Ministry of Science and Technology, Taiwan (107-2313-B-002-016). The author thanks Dr. Takahisa Mizuyama and Dr. Ken’ichirou Kosugi at Kyoto University, Japan, for providing valuable suggestions. Special thanks are given to Dr. Delphis Levia, an Editor of the book, for his encouragement on writing this chapter.

References

  1. Aboal JR, Morales D, Hernandez M, Jimenez MS (1999) The measurement and modelling of the variation of stemflow in a laurel forest in Tenerife, Canary Islands. J Hydrol 221:161–175.  https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-1694(99)00086-4 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Anderson SA, Sitar N (1995) Analysis of rainfall induced debris flows. J Geotech Eng-Asce 121:544–552.  https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9410(1995)121:7(544) CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Archer NAL, Quinton JN, Hess TM (2012) Patch vegetation and water redistribution above and below ground in south-east Spain. Ecohydrology 5:108–120.  https://doi.org/10.1002/eco.210 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Bachmair S, Weiler M (2011) New dimensions of hillslope hydrology. In: Levia DF, Carlyle-Moses D, Tanaka T (eds) Forest hydrology and biogeochemistry: synthesis of past research and future directions. Springer, Dordrecht, pp 455–481.  https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-1363-5_23 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Beier C, Hansen K, Gundersen P (1993) Spatial variability of throughfall fluxes in a spruce forest. Environ Pollut 81:257–267.  https://doi.org/10.1016/0269-7491(93)90208-6 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Belk EL, Markewitz D, Rasmussen TC, Maklouf Carvalho EJ, Nepstad DC et al (2007) Modeling the effects of throughfall reduction on soil water content in a Brazilian Oxisol under a moist tropical forest. Water Resour Res 43:W08432.  https://doi.org/10.1029/2006WR005493 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Beven K, Germann P (1982) Macropores and water flow in soils. Water Resour Res 18:1311–1325.  https://doi.org/10.1029/WR018i005p01311 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Beven K, Germann P (2013) Macropores and water flow in soils revisited. Water Resour Res 49:3071–3092.  https://doi.org/10.1002/wrcr.20156 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Bouten W, Heimovaara TJ, Tiktak A (1992a) Spatial patterns of throughfall and soil water dynamics in a Douglas fir stand. Water Resour Res 28:3227–3233.  https://doi.org/10.1029/92WR01764 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Bouten W, Schaap MG, Bakker DJ, Verstraten JM (1992b) Modeling soil water dynamics in a forested ecosystem.1. A site specific evaluation. Hydrol Process 6:435–444.  https://doi.org/10.1002/hyp.3360060405 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Brooks JR, Barnard HR, Coulombe R, McDonnell JJ (2010) Ecohydrologic separation of water between trees and streams in a Mediterranean climate. Nat Geosci 3:100–104.  https://doi.org/10.1038/ngeo722 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Carleton TJ, Kavanagh T (1990) Influence of stand age and spatial location on throughfall chemistry beneath black spruce. Can J For Res 20:1917–1925.  https://doi.org/10.1139/x90-257 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Carlyle-Moses DE, Lishman CE (2015) Temporal persistence of throughfall heterogeneity below and between the canopies of juvenile lodgepole pine (Pinus contorta). Hydrol Process 29:4051–4067.  https://doi.org/10.1002/hyp.10494 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Carlyle-Moses DE, Iida S, Germer S, Llorens P, Michalzik B, Nanko K, Tischer A, Levia DF (2018) Expressing stemflow commensurate with its ecohydrological importance. Adv Water Resour 121:472–479.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.advwatres.2018.08.015 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Chang SC, Matzner E (2000) The effect of beech stemflow on spatial patterns of soil solution chemistry and seepage fluxes in a mixed beech/oak stand. Hydrol Process 14:135–144.  https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1099-1085(200001)14:1<135::AID-HYP915>3.3.CO;2-I CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Cloke HL, Anderson MG, McDonnell JJ, Renaud JP (2006) Using numerical modelling to evaluate the capillary fringe groundwater ridging hypothesis of streamflow generation. J Hydrol 316:141–162.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2005.04.017 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Coenders-Gerrits AMJ, Hopp L, Savenije HHG, Pfister L (2013) The effect of spatial throughfall patterns on soil moisture patterns at the hillslope scale. Hydrol Earth Syst Sci 17:1749–1763.  https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-17-1749-2013 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Crockford RH, Richardson DP (2000) Partitioning of rainfall into throughfall, stemflow and interception: effect of forest type, ground cover and climate. Hydrol Process 14:2903–2920.  https://doi.org/10.1002/1099-1085(200011/12)14:16/17<2903::AID-HYP126>3.0.CO;2-6 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Dasgupta S, Mohanty BP, Kohne JM (2006) Impacts of juniper vegetation and karst geology on subsurface flow processes in the Edwards Plateau, Texas. Vadose Zone J 5:1076–1085.  https://doi.org/10.2136/vzj2005.0073 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Deguchi A, Hattori S, Park H-T (2006) The influence of seasonal changes in canopy structure on interception loss: application of the revised Gash model. J Hydrol 318:80–102.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2005.06.005 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Dhakal AS, Sidle RC (2004) Pore water pressure assessment in a forest watershed: simulations and distributed field measurements related to forest practices. Water Resour Res 40:W02405.  https://doi.org/10.1029/2003WR002017 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Durocher MG (1990) Monitoring spatial variability of forest interception. Hydrol Process 4:215–229.  https://doi.org/10.1002/hyp.3360040303 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Ebel BA, Loague K, Montgomery DR, Dietrich WE (2008) Physics-based continuous simulation of long-term near-surface hydrologic response for the Coos Bay experimental catchment. Water Resour Res 44:W07417.  https://doi.org/10.1029/2007wr006442 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Emanuel RE, Hazen AG, McGlynn BL, Jencso KG (2014) Vegetation and topographic influences on the connectivity of shallow groundwater between hillslopes and streams. Ecohydrology 7:887–895.  https://doi.org/10.1002/eco.1409 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Evaristo J, Jasechko S, McDonnell JJ (2015) Global separation of plant transpiration from groundwater and streamflow. Nature 525:91–94.  https://doi.org/10.1038/nature14983 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Ford ED, Deans JD (1977) Growth of a Sitka spruce plantation: spatial distribution and seasonal fluctuations of lengths, weights and carbohydrate concentrations of fine roots. Plant Soil 47:463–485.  https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00011504 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Ford ED, Deans JD (1978) Effects of canopy structure on stemflow, throughfall and interception loss in a young Sitka spruce plantation. J Appl Ecol 15:905–917.  https://doi.org/10.2307/2402786 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Gaiser RN (1952) Root channels and roots in forest soils. Soil Sci Soc Am Proc 16:62–65.  https://doi.org/10.2136/sssaj1952.03615995001600010019x CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Garcia-Estringana P, Latron J, Llorens P, Gallart F (2012) Spatial and temporal dynamics of soil moisture in a Mediterranean mountain area (Vallcebre, NE Spain). Ecohydrology 6:741–753.  https://doi.org/10.1002/eco.1295 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Gardenas AI, Simunek J, Jarvis N, van Genuchten MT (2006) Two-dimensional modelling of preferential water flow and pesticide transport from a tile-drained field. J Hydrol 329:647–660.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2006.03.021 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Germer S (2013) Development of near-surface perched water tables during natural and artificial stemflow generation by babassu palms. J Hydrol 507:262–272.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2013.10.026 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Gersper PL, Holowaychuk N (1970) Effects of stemflow water on a Miami soil under a beech tree. 2. Chemical properties. Soil Sci Soc Am Proc 34:786–794.  https://doi.org/10.2136/sssaj1970.03615995003400050033x CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Ghestem M, Sidle RC, Stokes A (2011) The influence of plant root systems on subsurface flow: implications for slope stability. Bio Science 61:869–879.  https://doi.org/10.1525/bio.2011.61.11.6 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Giacomin A, Trucchi P (1992) Rainfall interception in a beech coppice (Acquerino, Italy). J Hydrol 137:141–147.  https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-1694(92)90052-w CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Glover PE, Glover J, Gwynne MD (1962) Light rainfall and plant survival in E. Africa. 2. Dry grassland vegetation. J Ecol 50:199–206.  https://doi.org/10.2307/2257204 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Grayson RB, Western AW, Chiew FHS, Blöschl G (1997) Preferred states in spatial soil moisture patterns: local and nonlocal controls. Water Resour Res 33:2897–2908.  https://doi.org/10.1029/97wr02174 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Gwak Y, Kim S (2017) Factors affecting soil moisture spatial variability for a humid forest hillslope. Hydrol Process 31:431–445.  https://doi.org/10.1002/hyp.11039 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Helvey JD, Patric JH (1965) Canopy and litter interception of rainfall by hardwoods of eastern United States. Water Resour Res 1:193–206.  https://doi.org/10.1029/WR001i002p00193 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Herwitz SR (1986a) Episodic stemflow inputs of magnesium and potassium to a tropical forest floor during heavy rainfall events. Oecologia 70:423–425.  https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00379506 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Herwitz SR (1986b) Infiltration-excess caused by stemflow in a cyclone-prone tropical rainforest. Earth Surf Process Landf 11:401–412.  https://doi.org/10.1002/esp.3290110406 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Herwitz SR (1987) Raindrop impact and water flow on the vegetative surfaces of trees and the effects on stemflow and throughfall generation. Earth Surf Process Landf 12:425–432.  https://doi.org/10.1002/esp.3290120408 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Herwitz SR, Levia DF (1997) Mid-winter stemflow drainage from bigtooth aspen (Populus grandidentata Michx) in Central Massachusetts. Hydrol Process 11:169–175.  https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1099-1085(199702)11:2<169::AID-HYP428>3.0.CO;2-J CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Hopp L, McDonnell JJ (2009) Connectivity at the hillslope scale: identifying interactions between storm size, bedrock permeability, slope angle and soil depth. J Hydrol 376:378–391.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2009.07.047 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Hopp L, McDonnell JJ (2011) Examining the role of throughfall patterns on subsurface stormflow generation. J Hydrol 409:460–471.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2011.08.044 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Huber A, Iroume A (2001) Variability of annual rainfall partitioning for different sites and forest covers in Chile. J Hydrol 248:78–92.  https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-1694(01)00394-8 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Iida S, Tanaka T, Sugita M (2005) Change of interception process due to the succession from Japanese red pine to evergreen oak. J Hydrol 315:154–166.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2005.03.024 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Jackson NA, Wallace JS, Ong CK (2000) Tree pruning as a means of controlling water use in an agroforestry system in Kenya. Forest Ecol Manag 126:133–148.  https://doi.org/10.1016/S0378-1127(99)00096-1 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Johnson MS, Lehmann J (2006) Double-funneling of trees: stemflow and root-induced preferential flow. Ecoscience 13:324–333.  https://doi.org/10.2980/i1195-6860-13-3-324.1 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Jost G, Schume H, Hager H, Markart G, Kohl B (2012) A hillslope scale comparison of tree species influence on soil moisture dynamics and runoff processes during intense rainfall. J Hydrol 420–421:112–124.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2011.11.057 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Katsura S, Kosugi K, Mizutani T, Mizuyama T (2009) Hydraulic properties of variously weathered granitic bedrock in headwater catchments. Vadose Zone J 8:557–573.  https://doi.org/10.2136/vzj2008.0142 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Keim RF, Skaugset AE (2003) Modelling effects of forest canopies on slope stability. Hydrol Process 17:1457–1467.  https://doi.org/10.1002/hyp.5121 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Keim RF, Skaugset AE, Weiler M (2005) Temporal persistence of spatial patterns in throughfall. J Hydrol 314:263–274.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2005.03.021 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Keim RF, Tromp-van Meerveld HJ, McDonnell JJ (2006) A virtual experiment on the effects of evaporation and intensity smoothing by canopy interception on subsurface stormflow generation. J Hydrol 327:352–364.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2005.11.024 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Kellman M, Roulet N (1990) Stemflow and throughfall in a tropical dry forest. Earth Surf Process Landf 15:55–61.  https://doi.org/10.1002/esp.3290150106 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Kosugi K, Katsura S, Katsuyama M, Mizuyama T (2006) Water flow processes in weathered granitic bedrock and their effects on runoff generation in a small headwater catchment. Water Resour Res 42:W02414.  https://doi.org/10.1029/2005WR004275 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Krämer I, Hölscher D (2010) Soil water dynamics along a tree diversity gradient in a deciduous forest in Central Germany. Ecohydrology 3:262–271.  https://doi.org/10.1002/eco.103 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Kulli B, Stamm C, Papritz A, Fluhler H (2003) Discrimination of flow regions on the basis of stained infiltration patterns in soil profiles. Vadose Zone J 2:338–348.  https://doi.org/10.2113/2.3.338 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Lange B, Luescher P, Germann PF (2009) Significance of tree roots for preferential infiltration in stagnic soils. Hydrol Earth Syst Sci 13:1809–1821.  https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-13-1809-2009 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Levia DF, Frost EE (2003) A review and evaluation of stemflow literature in the hydrologic and biogeochemical cycles of forested and agricultural ecosystems. J Hydrol 274:1–29.  https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-1694(02)00399-2 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. Levia DF, Frost EE (2006) Variability of throughfall volume and solute inputs in wooded ecosystems. Prog Phys Geogr 30:605–632.  https://doi.org/10.1177/0309133306071145 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. Levia DF, Germer S (2015) A review of stemflow generation dynamics and stemflow-environment interactions in forests and shrublands. Rev Geophys 53:673–714.  https://doi.org/10.1002/2015RG000479 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. Levia DF, Herwitz SR (2005) Interspecific variation of bark water storage capacity of three deciduous tree species in relation to stemflow yield and solute flux to forest soils. Catena 64:117–137.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.catena.2005.08.001 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. Levia DF, Michalzik B, Näthe K, Bischoff S, Richter S, Legates DR (2015) Differential stemflow yield from European beech saplings: the role of individual canopy structure metrics. Hydrol Process 29:43–51.  https://doi.org/10.1002/hyp.10124 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  64. Li X-Y, Yang Z-P, Li Y-T, Lin H (2009) Connecting ecohydrology and hydropedology in desert shrubs: stemflow as a source of preferential flow in soils. Hydrol Earth Syst Sci 13:1133–1144.  https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-13-1133-2009 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  65. Liang W-L, Chan M-C (2017) Spatial and temporal variations in the effects of soil depth and topographic wetness index of bedrock topography on subsurface saturation generation in a steep natural forested headwater catchment. J Hydrol 546:405–418.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2017.01.033 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  66. Liang W-L, Uchida T (2014) Effects of topography and soil depth on saturated-zone dynamics in steep hillslopes explored using the three-dimensional Richards’ equation. J Hydrol 510:124–136.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2013.12.029 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  67. Liang W-L, Kosugi K, Mizuyama T (2007) Heterogeneous soil water dynamics around a tree growing on a steep hillslope. Vadose Zone J 6:879–889.  https://doi.org/10.2136/vzj2007.0029 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  68. Liang W-L, Kosugi K, Mizuyama T (2009a) Characteristics of stemflow for tall stewartia (Stewartia monadelpha) growing on a hillslope. J Hydrol 378:168–178.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2009.09.027 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  69. Liang W-L, Kosugi K, Mizuyama T (2009b) A three-dimensional model of the effect of stemflow on soil water dynamics around a tree on a hillslope. J Hydrol 366:62–75.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2008.12.009 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  70. Liang W-L, Kosugi K, Mizuyama T, Musashi Y (2010) Field observations and numerical experiments to assess the effect of trees on slope stability. In: Chen S-C (ed) INTERPRAEVENT 2010, The International Research Society INTERPRAEVENT, pp 476–485Google Scholar
  71. Liang W-L, Kosugi K, Mizuyama T (2011) Soil water dynamics around a tree on a hillslope with or without rainwater supplied by stemflow. Water Resour Res 47:W02541.  https://doi.org/10.1029/2010wr009856 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  72. Liang W-L, Kosugi K, Mizuyama T (2015) Soil water redistribution processes around a tree on a hillslope: the effect of stemflow on the drying process. Ecohydrology 8:1381–1395.  https://doi.org/10.1002/eco.1589 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  73. Liang W-L, Li S-L, Hung F-X (2017) Analysis of the contributions of topographic, soil, and vegetation features on the spatial distributions of surface soil moisture in a steep natural forested headwater catchment. Hydrol Process 31:3796–3809.  https://doi.org/10.1002/hyp.11290 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  74. Lin H (2006) Temporal stability of soil moisture spatial pattern and subsurface preferential flow pathways in the shale hills catchment. Vadose Zone J 5:317–340.  https://doi.org/10.2136/vzj2005.0058 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  75. Lin H (2010) Earth’s Critical Zone and hydropedology: concepts, characteristics, and advances. Hydrol Earth Syst Sci 14:25–45.  https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-14-25-2010 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  76. Lin H, Zhou X (2008) Evidence of subsurface preferential flow using soil hydrologic monitoring in the Shale Hills catchment. Eur J Soil Sci 59:34–49.  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2389.2007.00988.x CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  77. Lloyd CR, Marques AD (1988) Spatial variability of throughfall and stemflow measurements in Amazonian rainforest. Agric For Meteorol 42:63–73.  https://doi.org/10.1016/0168-1923(88)90067-6 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  78. Loustau D, Berbigier P, Granier A, Moussa FEH (1992) Interception loss, throughfall and stemflow in a maritime pine stand I Variability of throughfall and stemflow beneath the pine canopy. J Hydrol 138:449–467.  https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-1694(92)90130-n CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  79. Lozano-Parra J, van Schaik NLMB, Schnabel S, Gómez-Gutiérrez Á (2016) Soil moisture dynamics at high temporal resolution in a semiarid Mediterranean watershed with scattered tree cover. Hydrol Process 30:1155–1170.  https://doi.org/10.1002/hyp.10694 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  80. Ludwig JA, Wilcox BP, Breshears DD, Tongway DJ, Imeson AC (2005) Vegetation patches and runoff-erosion as interacting ecohydrological processes in semiarid landscapes. Ecology 86:288–297.  https://doi.org/10.1890/03-0569 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  81. Martinez-Meza E, Whitford WG (1996) Stemflow, throughfall and channelization of stemflow by roots in three Chihuahuan desert shrubs. J Arid Environ 32:271–287.  https://doi.org/10.1006/jare.1996.0023 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  82. Masaoka N, Kosugi K, Yamakawa Y, Tsutsumi D (2016) Processes of bedrock groundwater seepage and their effects on soil water fluxes in a foot slope area. J Hydrol 535:160–172.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2016.01.081 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  83. Metzger JC, Wutzler T, Dalla Valle N, Filipzik J, Grauer C et al (2017) Vegetation impacts soil water content patterns by shaping canopy water fluxes and soil properties. Hydrol Process 31:3783–3795.  https://doi.org/10.1002/hyp.11274 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  84. Montgomery DR, Dietrich WE (2002) Runoff generation in a steep, soil-mantled landscape. Water Resour Res 38:1168.  https://doi.org/10.1029/2001WR000822 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  85. Montgomery DR, Dietrich WE, Heffner JT (2002) Piezometric response in shallow bedrock at CB1: implications for runoff generation and landsliding. Water Resour Res 38:1274.  https://doi.org/10.1029/2002WR001429 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  86. Nanko K, Watanabe A, Hotta N, Suzuki M (2013) Physical interpretation of the difference in drop size distributions of leaf drips among tree species. Agric For Meteorol 169:74–84.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agrformet.2012.09.018 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  87. Neal C, Robson AJ, Bhardwaj CL, Conway T, Jeffery HA, Neal M et al (1993) Relationships between precipitation, stemflow and throughfall for a lowland beech plantation, Black Wood, Hampshire, southern England: findings on interception at a forest edge and the effects of storm damage. J Hydrol 146:221–233.  https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-1694(93)90277-g CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  88. Neave M, Abrahams AD (2002) Vegetation influences on water yields from grassland and shrubland ecosystems in the Chihuahuan Desert. Earth Surf Process Landf 27:1011–1020.  https://doi.org/10.1002/esp.389 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  89. Noguchi S, Tsuboyama Y, Sidle RC, Hosoda I (1999) Morphological characteristics of macropores and the distribution of preferential flow pathways in a forested slope segment. Soil Sci Soc Am J 63:1413–1423.  https://doi.org/10.2136/sssaj1999.6351413x CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  90. Park A, Cameron JL (2008) The influence of canopy traits on throughfall and stemflow in five tropical trees growing in a Panamanian plantation. Forest Ecol Manag 255:1915–1925.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foreco.2007.12.025 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  91. Pressland AJ (1976) Soil moisture redistribution as affected by throughfall and stemflow in an arid zone shrub community. Aust J Bot 24:641–649.  https://doi.org/10.1071/bt9760641 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  92. Raat KJ, Draaijers GPJ, Schaap MG, Tietema A, Verstraten JM (2002) Spatial variability of throughfall water and chemistry and forest floor water content in a Douglas fir forest stand. Hydrol Earth Syst Sci 6:363–374.  https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-6-363-2002 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  93. Rassam D, Šimůnek J, Mallants D, van Genuchten MT (2018) The HYDRUS-1D software package for simulating the one-dimensional movement of water, heat, and multiple solutes in variably-saturated media: tutorial. CSIRO Land and Water, AdelaideGoogle Scholar
  94. Robinson DA, Campbell CS, Hopmans JW, Hornbuckle BK, Jones SB, Knight R et al (2008) Soil moisture measurement for ecological and hydrological watershed-scale observatories: a review. Vadose Zone J 7:358–389.  https://doi.org/10.2136/vzj2007.0143 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  95. Robinson JL, Slater LD, Schäfer KVR (2012) Evidence for spatial variability in hydraulic redistribution within an oak–pine forest from resistivity imaging. J Hydrol 430–431:69–79.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2012.02.002 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  96. Robson AJ, Neal C, Ryland GP, Harrow M (1994) Spatial variations in throughfall chemistry at the small plot scale. J Hydrol 158:107–122.  https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-1694(94)90048-5 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  97. Sander T, Gerke HH (2007) Preferential flow patterns in paddy fields using a dye tracer. Vadose Zone J 6:105–115.  https://doi.org/10.2136/vzj2006.0035 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  98. Sansoulet J, Cabidoche Y-M, Cattan P, Ruy S, Simunek J (2008) Spatially distributed water fluxes in an andisol under banana plants: experiments and three-dimensional modeling. Vadose Zone J 7:819–829.  https://doi.org/10.2136/vzj2007.0073 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  99. Schume H, Jost G, Hager H (2004) Soil water depletion and recharge patterns in mixed and pure forest stands of European beech and Norway spruce. J Hydrol 289:258–274.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2003.11.036 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  100. Schwärzel K, Menzer A, Clausnitzer F, Spank U, Häntzschel J, Grünwald T, Köstner B, Bernhofer C, Feger K-H (2009) Soil water content measurements deliver reliable estimates of water fluxes: a comparative study in a beech and a spruce stand in the Tharandt forest (Saxony, Germany). Agric For Meteorol 149:1994–2006.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agrformet.2009.07.006 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  101. Schwärzel K, Ebermann S, Schalling N (2012) Evidence of double-funneling effect of beech trees by visualization of flow pathways using dye tracer. J Hydrol 470–471:184–192.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2012.08.048 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  102. Schweingruber FH (1996) Influence of mass movement. In: Schweingruber FH (ed) Tree rings and environment dendroecology. Haupt Publ, Bern, pp 271–287Google Scholar
  103. Sidle RC, Bogaard TA (2016) Dynamic earth system and ecological controls of rainfall-initiated landslides. Earth-Sci Rev 159:275–291.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.earscirev.2016.05.013 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  104. Sidle RC, Noguchi S, Tsuboyama Y, Laursen K (2001) A conceptual model of preferential flow systems in forested hillslopes: evidence of self-organization. Hydrol Process 15:1675–1692.  https://doi.org/10.1002/hyp.233 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  105. Sraj M, Brilly M, Mikos M (2008) Rainfall interception by two deciduous Mediterranean forests of contrasting stature in Slovenia. Agric For Meteorol 148:121–134.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agrformet.2007.09.007 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  106. Staelens J, De Schrijver A, Verheyen K, Verhoest NEC (2008) Rainfall partitioning into throughfall, stemflow, and interception within a single beech (Fagus sylvatica L.) canopy: influence of foliation, rain event characteristics, and meteorology. Hydrol Process 22:33–45.  https://doi.org/10.1002/hyp.6610 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  107. Tanaka T, Tsujimura M, Taniguchi M (1991) Infiltration area of stemflow-induced water. Annu Rep Inst Geosci, Univ Tsukuba 17:30–32Google Scholar
  108. Tanaka T, Taniguchi M, Tsujimura M (1996) Significance of stemflow in groundwater recharge.2. A cylindrical infiltration model for evaluating the stemflow contribution to groundwater recharge. Hydrol Process 10:81–88.  https://doi.org/10.1002/(sici)1099-1085(199601)10:1<81::aid-hyp302>3.0.co;2-m CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  109. Tanaka T, Iida S, Kakubari J, Hamada Y (2008) Effect of forest stand succession from conifer trees to broad-leaved evergreen trees on infiltration and groundwater recharge processes. In: Abesser C, Wagener T, Nuetzmann G (eds) Groundwater-surface water interaction: process understanding, conceptualization and modelling, vol 321. IAHS, Wallingford, pp 54–60Google Scholar
  110. Taniguchi M, Tsujimura M, Tanaka T (1996) Significance of stemflow in groundwater recharge.1. Evaluation of the stemflow contribution to recharge using a mass balance approach. Hydrol Process 10:71–80.  https://doi.org/10.1002/(sici)1099-1085(199601)10:1<71::aid-hyp301>3.3.co;2-h CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  111. Tromp-van Meerveld HJ, McDonnell JJ (2006) On the interrelations between topography, soil depth, soil moisture, transpiration rates and species distribution at the hillslope scale. Adv Water Resour 29:293–310.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.advwatres.2005.02.016f CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  112. Van Dam JC, Feddes RA (2000) Numerical simulation of infiltration, evaporation and shallow groundwater levels with the Richards equation. J Hydrol 233:72–85.  https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-1694(00)00227-4 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  113. Van Stiphout TPJ, Van Slanen HAJ, Boersma OH, Bouma J (1987) The effect of bypass flow and internal catchment of rain on the water regime in a clay loam grassland soil. J Hydrol 95:1–11.  https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-1694(87)90111-9 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  114. Vereecken H, Huisman JA, Bogena H, Vanderborght J, Vrugt JA, Hopmans JW (2008) On the value of soil moisture measurements in vadose zone hydrology: a review. Water Resour Res 44:W00D06.  https://doi.org/10.1029/2008wr006829 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  115. Voigt GK (1960) Distribution of rainfall under forest stands. For Sci 6:2–10.  https://doi.org/10.1093/forestscience/6.1.2 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  116. Wang GH, Sassa K (2003) Pore-pressure generation and movement of rainfall-induced landslides: effects of grain size and fine-particle content. Eng Geol 69:109–125.  https://doi.org/10.1016/S0013-7952(02)00268-5 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  117. Weiler M (2017) Macropores and preferential flow-a love-hate relationship. Hydrol Process 31:15–19.  https://doi.org/10.1002/hyp.11074 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  118. Weiler M, McDonnell J (2004) Virtual experiments: a new approach for improving process conceptualization in hillslope hydrology. J Hydrol 285:3–18.  https://doi.org/10.1016/s0022-1694(03)00271-3 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  119. Weiler M, McDonnell JJ, Tromp-van Meerveld I, Uchida T (2006) Subsurface stormflow. In: Anderson MG, JJ MD (eds) Encyclopedia of hydrological sciences. Wiley, Hoboken, 14 p.  https://doi.org/10.1002/0470848944.hsa119 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  120. Western AW, Grayson RB, Blöschl G, Willgoose GR, McMahon TA (1999) Observed spatial organization of soil moisture and its relation to terrain indices. Water Resour Res 35:797–810.  https://doi.org/10.1029/1998wr900065 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  121. Western AW, Grayson RB, Blöschl G (2002) Scaling of soil moisture: a hydrologic perspective. Annu Rev Earth Planet Sci 30:149–180.  https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.earth.30.091201.140434 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  122. Yunusa I, Mele P, Rab M, Schefe C, Beverly C (2002) Priming of soil structural and hydrological properties by native woody species, annual crops, and a permanent pasture. Aust J Soil Res 40:207–220.  https://doi.org/10.1071/sr01038 CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2020

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.School of Forestry and Resource ConservationNational Taiwan UniversityTaipeiTaiwan

Personalised recommendations