In this chapter I outline a key element of animal neopragmatism: relational hedonism. Relational hedonism is a psychological-cum-anthropological thesis about public concern for pain. The central claim is that to show concern for the pain of an individual is to betray concern for them in a much broader sense. The basic idea is that concern for pain is concern for more than pain. This concern can be variously expressed as concern for life, well-being, intrinsic value, inherent value, or simply concern for the individual for their own sake. The theory of relational hedonism draws upon Helm’s theory of love and friendship. In line with Helm’s view, to show concern for a particular aspect of a person’s life is to show concern for them in a holistic sense. I adapt Helm’s theory to explain the broad-based conception of welfare that the attitudes-to-animals data suggests is the folk’s conception of welfare.
KeywordsHedonism Friendship Love Helm Welfare Attitudes-to-animals Relational hedonism Pain
- Gaita, Raimond. 2002. The philosopher’s dog. Melbourne: Text Publishing.Google Scholar
- Harrison, Ruth. 1964. Animal machines: The new factory farming industry. London: Vincent Stuart.Google Scholar
- Kahane, Guy. 2016. Pain, experience and well-being. In The Routledge handbook of the philosophy of well-being, ed. Guy Fletcher, 209–220. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
- Mancilla, Alejandra. 2009. Nonhuman animals in Adam Smith’s moral theory. Between the Species 13 (9). https://digitalcommons.calpoly.edu/bts/vol13/iss9/2/. Accessed 1 March 2019.
- Parfit, Derek. 1984. Reasons and persons. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
- Rowlands, Mark. 2008. The philosopher and the wolf: Lessons from the wild on love, death and happiness. London: Granta.Google Scholar
- Taylor, Charles. 1989. Sources of the self: The making of modern identity. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar