Advertisement

Feedback in EFL Writing: Arab World Contexts, Issues, and Challenges

  • Abdelhamid M. AhmedEmail author
Chapter
  • 30 Downloads

Abstract

Feedback in foreign-language writing in most universities in the Arab world is a problematic and context-specific issue. This chapter reviews the existing literature on feedback on L2 English writing in eighteen Arab countries. First, it introduces the main issues around feedback outlined by previous scholarship. Then, it critically reviews previous studies conducted in the following eighteen Arab countries: Algeria, Bahrain, Egypt, Iraq, Jordan, Kuwait, Lebanon, Libya, Morocco, Oman, Palestine, Qatar, Saudi Arabia, Sudan, Syria, Tunisia, UAE, and Yemen. Finally, the main findings of the critically reviewed studies are synthesised and discussed by focusing on the following crucial issues: lack of teachers’ feedback, effective and ineffective types of feedback, peer feedback, students’ reactions to feedback, and technological tools/applications used to give feedback.

Keywords

Feedback—L2 English writing Challenges Contexts Issues Arab world universities 

References

  1. Abu Shawish, J., & Abd Al-Raheem, M. (2015). Palestinian university writing professors’ feedback practices and students’ reactions towards them. Journal of Teaching and Teacher Education, 3(1), 57–73.Google Scholar
  2. AbuSeileek, A. (2013). Using track changes and word processor to provide corrective feedback to learners in writing. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 29(4), 319–333.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Adas, D., & Bakir, A. (2013). Writing difficulties and new solutions: Blended learning as an approach to improve writing abilities. International Journal of Humanities and Social Sciences, 3(9), 254.Google Scholar
  4. Ahmed, A. (2010). Students’ problems with cohesion and coherence in EFL essay writing in Egypt: Different perspectives. Literacy Information and Computer Education Journal (LICEJ), 1(4), 211–221.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Ahmed, A. (2011). The EFL essay writing difficulties of Egyptian student teachers of English: Implications for essay writing curriculum and instruction. An Unpublished PhD thesis, Graduate School of Education, University of Exeter, UK.Google Scholar
  6. Ahmed, A. (2016). EFL writing instruction in an Egyptian university classroom: An emic view. In A. Ahmed & H. Abouabdelkader (Eds.), Teaching EFL writing in the 21st century Arab world: Realities & challenges (1st ed.). London: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
  7. Ahmed, A., & Abouabdelkader, H. (2016). Introduction. In A. Ahmed & H. Abouabdelkader (Eds.), Teaching EFL writing in the 21st century Arab world: Realities & challenges (1st ed.). London: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
  8. Ahmed, A., & Abouabdelkader, H. (Eds.). (2018). Assessing EFL writing in the 21st century Arab world: Revealing the unknown. Springer.Google Scholar
  9. Ahmed, A., & Myhill, D. (2016). The impact of the socio-cultural context on L2 English writing of Egyptian university students. Learning, Culture and Social Interaction, 11, 117–129.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Al Ajmi, A. (2015). The effect of written corrective feedback on Omani students’ accuracy in the use of English prepositions. Advances in Language and Literary Studies, 6(1), 61–71.Google Scholar
  11. Al-Badwawi, H. (2011). The perceptions and practices of first-year students’ academic writing at the Colleges of Applied Sciences in Oman. An Unpublished PhD thesis, The University of Leeds.Google Scholar
  12. Al-Bakri, S. (2016). Written corrective feedback: Teachers’ beliefs, practices and challenges in an Omani context. Arab Journal of Applied Linguistics, 1(1), 44–73.Google Scholar
  13. Al-Buainain, H. (2011). Students’ writing errors in EFL: A case study. QNRS Repository, 2011(1), 2601.Google Scholar
  14. Al-Hammadi, F., & Sidek, H. (2015). Academic writing in the Yemeni EFL context: History, challenges and future research. The Effects of Brief Mindfulness Intervention on Acute Pain Experience: An Examination of Individual Difference, 1, 167–174.Google Scholar
  15. Alhumidi, H., & Uba, S. (2016). The effect of indirect written corrective feedback to Arabic language intermediate students’ in Kuwait. European Scientific Journal, ESJ, 12(28), 361.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Ali, A. (2014). The role of written feedback in improving Sudanese secondary school students English language writing skill. An Unpublished PhD thesis, Sudan University of Science and Technology, Sudan.Google Scholar
  17. Ali, A. (2016). Effectiveness of using screencast feedback on EFL students’ writing and perception. English Language Teaching, 9(8), 106–121.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Alkhatib, N. (2015). Written corrective feedback at a Saudi university: English language teachers’ beliefs, students’ preferences, and teachers’ practices. An Unpublished PhD thesis, University of Essex, United Kingdom.Google Scholar
  19. Al-Omari, E. (1998). EFL instructors’ practices for writing assessment in Jordanian universities. Master’s dissertation, Yarmouk University, Jordan.Google Scholar
  20. Al-Sawalha, A. (2016). EFL Jordanian students’ reaction to written comments on their written work: A case study. Arab World English Journal (AWEJ), 7(1), 63–77.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Alshahrani, A., & Storch, N. (2014). Investigating teachers’ written corrective feedback practices in a Saudi EFL context. Australian Review of Applied Linguistics, 37(2), 101–122.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Amara, T. (2015). Learners’ perceptions of teacher written feedback commentary in an ESL writing classroom. International Journal of English language teaching, 3(2), 38–53.Google Scholar
  23. Arnold, L., Nebel, A., & Ronesi, L. (2017). Introduction. In L. R. Arnold, A. Nebel, & L. Ronesi (Eds.), Emerging writing research from the Middle East-North Africa Region (pp. 3–24). Fort Collins, CO: The WAC Clearinghouse.Google Scholar
  24. Assaggaf, H., & Bamahra, Y. (2016). The effects of portfolio use in teaching report writing: EFL students’ perspective. International Journal of Applied Linguistics and English Literature, 5(3), 26–34.Google Scholar
  25. Association of American Colleges & Universities (AAC&U). https://www.aacu.org/value/rubrics.
  26. Athimni, M. (2018). Investigating assessment literacy in Tunisia: The case of EFL university writing teachers. In A. Ahmed & H. Abouabdelkader (Eds.), Assessing EFL writing in the Arab world universities in 21st century Arab world: Revealing the unknown (1st ed.). London: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
  27. Athimni, M. (2019). Feedback practices in university English writing classes in Tunisia: An exploratory study. In A. Ahmed, S. Troudi, & S. Riley (Eds.), Feedback in L2 English writing in the Arab world: Inside the black box (1st ed.). London: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
  28. Baghzou, S. (2011). The effects of content feedback on students’ writing. Retrieved December 24, 2016, from http://dergiler.Ankara.edu.tr/.
  29. Bouziane, A. (1996). Six ways of feedback to student writing. MATE Newsletter, 16(4), 4–9.Google Scholar
  30. Bouziane, A., & Zyad, H. (2018). The impact of self and peer assessment on L2 writing: The case of Moodle workshops. In A. Ahmed & H. Abouabdelkader (Eds.), Assessing EFL writing in the 21st century Arab world: Revealing the unknown (1st ed., pp. 111–135). Morocco: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
  31. Cinkara, E., & Galaly, F. (2018). EFL students’ and teachers’ attitudes towards written feedback in writing classes: A case of Iraqi high-schools. i-Manager’s Journal on English Language Teaching, 8(1), 44.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Denman, C., & Al-Mahrooqi, R. (2014). Peer feedback in the writing classrooms of an Omani university: Perceptions and practice. In Proceedings of Bilkent University School of English Language 13th International Conference: Teachers Exploring Practice for Professional Learning.Google Scholar
  33. Diab, N. (2010). Effects of peer- versus self-editing on students’ revision of language errors in revised drafts. System, 38, 85–95.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Diab, N. (2011). Assessing the relationship between different types of student feedback and the quality of revised writing. Assessing Writing, 16(4), 274–292.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Diab, N. (2015). Effectiveness of written corrective feedback: Does type of error and type of correction matter? Assessing Writing, 24, 16–34.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Diab, R. (2005). EFL university students’ preferences for error correction and teacher feedback on writing. TESL Reporter, 38(1), 27–51.Google Scholar
  37. El Ebyary, K., & Windeatt, S. (2010). The impact of computer-based feedback on students’ written work. International Journal of English Studies, 10(2), 121–142.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Farrah, M. (2012). The impact of peer feedback on improving the writing skills among Hebron university students. An-Najah University Journal of Research (Humanities), 26(1), 179–209.Google Scholar
  39. Ferris, D. (2011). Treatment of error in second language student writing (2nd ed.). Ann Arbor, MI: The Michigan University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Ferris, D., Brown, J., Liu, H., & Stine, M. (2011). Responding to L2 students in college writing classes: Teacher perspectives. TESOL Quarterly, 45(2), 207–234.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Frodesen, J., & Holten, C. (2011). Grammar and the ESL writing class. In B. Kroll (Ed.), Exploring the dynamics of second language writing (5th ed.). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  42. Gashout, M. (2014). Incorporating the facilitative feedback strategies together with the process approach to improve students’ writing. International Journal of Education and Research, 2(10), 637–646.Google Scholar
  43. Ghgam, A. (2015). An investigation into face to face feedback for second language writing in the Libyan higher education context. An Unpublished PhD thesis, University of Huddersfield, UK.Google Scholar
  44. Ghosn-Chelala, M., & Al-Chibani, W. (2018). Screencasting: Supportive feedback for EFL remedial writing students. The International Journal of Information and Learning Technology, 35(3), 146–159.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Grami, G. (2010). The effects of integrating peer feedback into university-level ESL writing curriculum: A comparative study in a Saudi context. An Unpublished PhD thesis, Newcastle University, UK.Google Scholar
  46. Hammad, A. (2014). The effect of teacher direct written corrective feedback on Al-Aqsa university female students’ performance in English essay writing. An-Najah University Journal for Research—B (Humanities), 29(6), 1183–1205.Google Scholar
  47. Hammad, E. (2016). Palestinian university students’ problems with EFL essay writing in an instructional setting. In A. Ahmed & H. Abouabdelkader (Eds.), Teaching EFL writing in the 21st century Arab world: Realities & challenges (pp. 99–124). London: Palgrave Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Haoucha, M. (2005). The effects of a feedback-based instruction programme on developing EFL writing and revision skills of first-year Moroccan university students. An Unpublished PhD thesis, University of Warwick, UK.Google Scholar
  49. Haoucha, M. (2012). The role of peer feedback, teacher written and taped. International Journal of Arts & Sciences, 5(5), 73.Google Scholar
  50. Hattie, J., & Timperley, H. (2007). The power of feedback. Review of Educational Research, 77(1), 81–112.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Hojeij, Z., & Baroudi, S. (2018). Student perceptions on peer feedback training using a blended method: A UAE case. Issues in Educational Research, 28(3), 655.Google Scholar
  52. Hyland, K., & Hyland, F. (2010). Feedback in second language writing: Contexts and issues (2nd ed.). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  53. Irons, A. (2008). Enhancing learning through formative assessment and feedback. London and New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  54. Janoudi, H. (2011). Feedback on student writing in the Syrian EFL secondary class. An Unpublished PhD thesis, University of Salford, Salford.Google Scholar
  55. Johnson, A. (2009). The rise of English: The language of globalization in China and the European Union. Macalester International, 22(12), 1–38.Google Scholar
  56. Kasanga, L. (2004). Students’ response to peer and teacher feedback in a first-year writing course. Journal for Language Teaching, 38(1), 64–99.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Leki, I. (2011). A challenge to second language writing professionals: Is writing overrated? In B. Kroll (Ed.), Exploring the dynamics of second language writing (5th ed.). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  58. Leki, I., Cumming, A., & Silva, T. (2010). Synthesis of research on second language writing in English. New York and London: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Mahfoodh, O. (2017). “I feel disappointed”: EFL university students’ emotional responses towards teacher written feedback. Assessing Writing, 31, 53–72.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. Mahfoodh, O., & Pandian, A. (2011). A qualitative case study of EFL students’ affective reactions to and perceptions of their teachers’ written feedback. English Language Teaching, 4(3), 14–25.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. Mansouri, N. (2017). Algerian EFL students’ perceptions towards the development of writing through weblog- writing. Journal of Humanities and Cultural Studies R & D, 2(4), 1–7.Google Scholar
  62. Meygle, A. (1997). The development of students’ writing ability in English at university level in Syria. An Unpublished PhD thesis, University of Warwick, UK.Google Scholar
  63. Mhedhbi, M. (2011). Rewriting and teachers’ feedback. International Journal of the Humanities., 9(6), 1–16.Google Scholar
  64. Mohammedi, N. (2016). Exploring the perceived and the actual written feedback preferences between ELF students and teachers in the UAE. Unpublished MA dissertation, United Arab Emirates University, UAE.Google Scholar
  65. Moussaoui, S. (2012). An investigation of the effects of peer evaluation in enhancing Algerian student’s writing autonomy and positive affect. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 69, 1775–1784.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  66. Mubarak, M. (2013). Corrective feedback in L2 writing: A study of practices and effectiveness in the Bahrain context. An Unpublished PhD thesis, University of Sheffield, UK.Google Scholar
  67. Muthanna, A. (2016). Teaching and learning EFL writing at Yemeni universities: A review of current practices. In A. Ahmed & H. Abouabdelkader (Eds.), Teaching EFL writing in the 21st century Arab world: Realities & challenges. London: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
  68. Omar, N. (2014). The effectiveness of feedback on EFL Libyan writing context. Arab World English Journal, 5(1), 326–339.Google Scholar
  69. Pessoa, S., Miller, R., & Kaufer, D. (2014). Students’ challenges and development in the transition to academic writing at an English-medium university in Qatar. International Review of Applied Linguistics in Language Teaching, 52(2), 127–156.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  70. Rabab’ah, G. (2005). Communication problems facing Arab learners of English. Journal of Language and Learning, 3(1), 180–197.Google Scholar
  71. Seliem, S., & Ahmed, A. (2009, March). Missing electronic feedback in Egyptian EFL essay writing classes. Online Submission, Paper presented at the Centre for Developing English Language Teaching (CDELT) Conference, Cairo, Egypt. ERIC (ED505841).Google Scholar
  72. Shine, E. (2008). Written feedback in a freshman writing course in the UAE: Instructors’ and students’ perspectives on giving, getting and using feedback. An Unpublished PhD thesis, Massey University.Google Scholar
  73. Solloway, A. (2016). Do two wrongs make a write(r)? Some effects and non-effects of WCF on Arabic L1 students’ English academic writing. In A. Ahmed & H. Abouabdelkader (Eds.), Teaching EFL writing in the 21st century Arab world: Realities & challenges (1st ed.). London: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
  74. Sopin, G. (2015). Perceptions and preferences of ESL students regarding the effectiveness of corrective feedback in Libyan secondary schools. IOSR Journal of Research & Method in Education (IOSR-JRME), 5(4), 71–77.Google Scholar
  75. Wali, F. (2017). Process-oriented writing and peer reviewing in Bahraini English as a second language classroom: A case study. An Unpublished PhD thesis, Dublin City University.Google Scholar
  76. Wali, F., & Huijser, H. (2018). Write to improve: Exploring the impact of an online feedback tool on Bahraini learners of English. Learning and Teaching in Higher Education: Gulf Perspectives, 15(1), 1–22.Google Scholar
  77. Weber, A. (2018). English writing assessment and the Arabic speaker: A qualitative longitudinal retrospective on Arabic-speaking medical students in Qatar. In A. Ahmed & H. Abouabdelkader (Eds.), Assessing EFL writing in the 21st century Arab world: Revealing the unknown (pp. 137–162). London: Palgrave Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  78. Weigle, S. (2002). Assessing writing. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  79. Williams, J., Ahmed, A., & Bamigbade, W. (2017). Writing centers in higher education institutions in Qatar: A Critical review. In O. Barnawi (Ed.), Writing centers in the higher education landscape of the Arabian Gulf (pp. 41–59). London: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
  80. Zakaria, A., & Mugaddam, A. (2013). An assessment of the written performance of Sudanese English as foreign language university learners: A communicative approach to writing. World Journal of English Language, 3(4), 36–49.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2020

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Core Curriculum ProgramQatar UniversityDohaQatar

Personalised recommendations