Advertisement

Jane Austen as ‘Prose Shakespeare’: Early Comparisons

  • Joanne Wilkes
Chapter

Abstract

In an 1821 review of Northanger Abbey and Persuasion, Richard Whately compared Austen to Shakespeare on account of her ability to create characters who are universal types as well as individuals. In the 1840s and 1850s, Thomas Babington Macaulay and George Henry Lewes took up this point.

This analogy between Austen and Shakespeare continued during the rest of the nineteenth and early twentieth century, and obviously boosted Austen’s reputation. This chapter examines the less obvious implications of such frequent comparison: on the one hand, it meant that Austen, a female practitioner of a genre generally considered inferior to poetry and drama, was aligned with the most elevated male poet/dramatist in English literature. On the other hand, this also induced some critics to identify the differences between the two. Austen was, for some of these critics, fully in control of what she attempted, but she did not attempt much.

It is these problematic implications of the Austen/Shakespeare comparison that the current chapter examines. It surveys the work of a range of late nineteenth and early twentieth-century critics. These critics’ studies bring into focus the question of how far writers’ works survive because they express putatively ‘universal’ aspects of human life.

Bibliography

  1. Austen, Henry. ‘The Biographical Notice, 1817’. In Jane Austen: The Critical Heritage, 1811–1870. Edited by B. C. Southam. New York: Routledge & Kegan Paul, 1968.Google Scholar
  2. Austen, Jane. Mansfield Park. Edited by R. W. Chapman. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1934.Google Scholar
  3. Austen-Leigh, James Edward. A Memoir of Jane Austen and Other Family Recollections (1870). Edited by Kathryn Sutherland. London and Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2002.Google Scholar
  4. Bradley, A. C. ‘Jane Austen’. In Essays and Studies by Members of the English Association, vol. 2, collected by H. C. Beeching. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1911.Google Scholar
  5. Carlyle, Thomas. ‘The Hero as Poet’ (1840). In The Romantics on Shakespeare. Edited by Jonathan Bate. London: Penguin, 1992, 248–56.Google Scholar
  6. Carroll, David R. Richard Simpson as Critic. London and Boston: Routledge & Kegan Paul, 1977.Google Scholar
  7. Chapman, R. W. ed. The Works of Jane Austen. London: Oxford University Press, 1933–1988.Google Scholar
  8. Farrer, Reginald. ‘Jane Austen, ob. July 18, 1817’. In Jane Austen: The Critical Heritage, 1870–1940. Edited by B. C. Southam. New York: Routledge & Kegan Paul, 1995.Google Scholar
  9. Forster, E. M. ‘Notes on the English Character’. Atlantic Monthly 137, January 1926, 30–7.Google Scholar
  10. Gay, Penny. Jane Austen and the Theatre. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2002.Google Scholar
  11. Gladstone, Annie. ‘Another View of Jane Austen’s Novels’. The Nineteenth Century and After 53, January 1903, 113–21.Google Scholar
  12. Harris, Jocelyn. Jane Austen and the Art of Memory. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1989.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Johnson, Claudia L. Jane Austen’s Cults and Cultures. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 2012.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Kebbel, T. E. ‘Miss Austen and George Eliot’. National Review 28, October 1883, 273.Google Scholar
  15. ‘Lady Novelists’. Eclectic Review 15, October 1868, 305.Google Scholar
  16. Lewes, George Henry. ‘The Lady Novelist’. Westminster Review 58, July 1852, 134–5.Google Scholar
  17. ———. ‘The Novels of Jane Austen’. Blackwood’s Edinburgh Magazine 86, July 1859, 99–113.Google Scholar
  18. ———. ‘Recent Novels, French and English’. Fraser’s Magazine 36, December 1847, 687.Google Scholar
  19. ———. ‘Review of The Fair Carew’. Leader, 22 November 1851, 115.Google Scholar
  20. Looser, Devoney. The Making of Jane Austen. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press, 2017.Google Scholar
  21. Lord, Walter Frewen. ‘Jane Austen’s Novels’. The Nineteenth Century and After 52, October 1902, 665.Google Scholar
  22. Macaulay, Thomas Babington. ‘The Life and Letters of Madame d’Arblay’. Edinburgh Review 76, July 1843, 560–2.Google Scholar
  23. Mais, S. P. B. ‘The Centenary of Jane Austen’. Fortnightly Review 102, August 1917, 264.Google Scholar
  24. Meredith, George. ‘On the Idea of Comedy and of the Uses of the Comic Spirit’. New Quarterly Magazine 8, January 1877, 7.Google Scholar
  25. Pollack-Pelzner, Daniel. ‘Jane Austen, The Prose Shakespeare’. Studies in English Literature 53, no. 4 (2013): 763–92.Google Scholar
  26. Poole, Adrian. Shakespeare and the Victorians. London: Arden Press, 2004.Google Scholar
  27. Raleigh, Walter. A History of the English Novel. London: John Murray, 1894.Google Scholar
  28. Robertson, W. ‘Jane Austen’. Time 2, February 1889, 197–200.Google Scholar
  29. Shakespeare, William. The Complete Works. Edited by Stanley Wells and Gary Taylor. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1986/2005.Google Scholar
  30. Shaughnessy, Robert. ‘Introduction’. In Shakespearean Tragedy by A.C. Bradley. Edited by Robert Shaughnessy. Houndmills and New York: Palgrave Macmillan, 2007.Google Scholar
  31. Simpson, Richard. ‘Memoir of Jane Austen’. North British Review 52, April 1870, 129–52.Google Scholar
  32. Southam, B. C., ed. Jane Austen: The Critical Heritage, 1811–1870. New York: Routledge & Kegan Paul, 1968.Google Scholar
  33. ———, ed. Jane Austen: The Critical Heritage, 1870–1940. New York: Routledge & Kegan Paul, 1979.Google Scholar
  34. Spurgeon, Caroline. ‘Jane Austen [Read February 23rd, 1927]’. In Essays by Divers Hands: Being the Transactions of the Royal Society of Literature. Edited by M. L. Woods. Woodbridge: The Boydell Press for the Society, 1928, 81–104.Google Scholar
  35. Stephen, Leslie. Dictionary of National Biography. Vol. 2. London: Smith, Elder & Co, 1885.Google Scholar
  36. Sutherland, Kathryn. Jane Austen’s Textual Lives. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2005.Google Scholar
  37. Taylor, Gary. Reinventing Shakespeare: A Cultural History from the Restoration to the Present. New York: Weidenfeld and Nicolson, 1989.Google Scholar
  38. Whately, Richard. ‘Review of Northanger Abbey and Persuasion’. Quarterly Review 24, January 1821, 352–76.Google Scholar
  39. Woolf, Virginia. ‘Jane Austen’ (1925). In The Common Reader. London: Hogarth Press, 1951, 168–83.Google Scholar
  40. ———. A Room of One’s Own (1929). In A Room of One’s Own; Three Guineas. Edited by Morag Shiach. Oxford and New York: Oxford University Press, 1992.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  • Joanne Wilkes
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of English, Drama and Writing StudiesUniversity of AucklandAucklandNew Zealand

Personalised recommendations