Advertisement

Practice 5: Allowing the Crowd to Play Any Innovation-Enabling Roles They Choose

  • Ann MajchrzakEmail author
  • Arvind Malhotra
Chapter

Abstract

In traditional Idea-Sharing crowdsourcing, crowds are told what role to play: they are to be either Ideators (offering Ideas) or Idea Commenters and Refiners (offering comments to help others’ idea be refined). People who don’t have ideas, but just have thoughts, personal experiences, and assumptions about the nature of the problem are left OUT, without a voice. But such people are the bedrock of innovation in crowdsourcing since they provide the creative associations. In unmindcuffed crowds, some participants just offer facts while others just offer creative associations, and others just offer ideas. This allows everyone to have a voice.

References

  1. Allen, T. (1977). Managing the Flow of Technology: Technology Transfer and the Dissemination of Technological Information Within the R&D Organization. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
  2. Arazy, O., Daxenberger, J., Lifshitz-Assaf, H., Nov, O., & Gurevych, I. (2016). Turbulent Stability of Emergent Roles: The Dualistic Nature of Self-Organizing Knowledge Coproduction. Information Systems Research, 27(4), 792–812.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Biddle, B. (1979). Role Theory: Expectations, Identities, and Behaviors. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
  4. Burt, R. (2009). Structural Holes: The Social Structure of Competition. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  5. Faraj, S., Jarvenpaa, S., & Majchrzak, A. (2011). Knowledge Collaboration in Online Communities. Organization Science, 22(5), 1224–1239.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Füller, J., Hutter, K., Hautz, J., & Matzler, K. (2014). User Roles and Contributions in Innovation-Contest Communities. Journal of Management Information Systems, 31(1), 273–308.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Goffman, E. (1959). The Presentation of Self in Everyday Life. Garden City, NY: Doubleday.Google Scholar
  8. Hutter, K., Hautz, J., Fuller, J., Mueller, J., & Matzler, K. (2011). Communitition: The Tension Between Competition and Collaboration in Community-Based Design Contests (Report). Creativity and Innovation Management, 20(1), 3–21.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Kane, G., Johnson, J., & Majchrzak, A. (2014). Emergent Life Cycle: The Tension Between Knowledge Change and Knowledge Retention in Open Online Coproduction Communities. Management Science, 60(12), 3026–3048.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Katz, D., & Kahn, R. (1978). The Social Psychology of Organizations (2nd ed.). New York: Wiley.Google Scholar
  11. Leimeister, J., Huber, M., Bretschneider, U., & Krcmar, H. (2009). Leveraging Crowdsourcing: Activation-Supporting Components for IT-Based Ideas Competition. Journal of Management Information Systems, 26(1), 197–224.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Levina, N., & Fayard, A.-L. (2018). Tapping into Diversity Through Open Innovation Platforms: The Emergence of Boundary-Spanning Practices. In C. L. Tucci, A. Afuah, & G. Viscusi (Eds.), Creating and Capturing Value Through Crowdsourcing (pp. 204–235). Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  13. Malhotra, A., & Majchrzak, A. (2014). Managing Crowds in Innovation Challenges. California Management Review, 56(4), 103–123.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Parsons, T. (1951). The Social System. Glencoe, IL: Free Press.Google Scholar
  15. Sluss, D. M., van Dick, R., & Thompson, B. S. (2011). Role Theory in Organizations: A Relational Perspective. APA Handbook of Industrial and Organizational Psychology, 1, 505–534.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2020

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.University of Southern CaliforniaLos AngelesUSA
  2. 2.University of North CarolinaChapel HillUSA

Personalised recommendations