Advertisement

Practice 4: Reconstructing Needs for Creative Associations

  • Ann MajchrzakEmail author
  • Arvind Malhotra
Chapter

Abstract

In this chapter, we examine the participants’ behaviors during a crowdsourcing event undertaken by a managed health-care insurance company. The executives conducted an internal crowdsourcing event to solicit from the claims professionals innovative ways to service customers. We found that those posts initially offering a specific need coupled with a specific solution garnered the most attention by participants, but did not necessarily lead to innovative solutions. What led to innovative solutions were participants peeling away the need, then reconstructing the need into a creative association only tangentially related to the initial need. Thus, innovation in crowds does not emerge from simply listing requirements for the solution, but rather, from needs being creatively reconstructed to inspire others to think of new solutions.

References

  1. Amabile, T. M., & Pratt, M. G. (2016). The Dynamic Componential Model of Creativity and Innovation in Organizations: Making Progress, Making Meaning. Research in Organizational Behavior, 36, 157–183.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Anderson, N., Potočnik, K., & Zhou, J. (2014). Innovation and Creativity in Organizations: A State-of-the-Science Review, Prospective Commentary, and Guiding Framework. Journal of Management, 40(5), 1297–1333.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Arguello, J., Butler, B. S., Joyce, E., Kraut, R., Ling, K. S., Rose, C., et al. (2006). Talk to Me: Foundations for Successful Individual-Group Interactions in Online Communities. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (pp. 959–968). New York, NY: ACM.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Baer, M., Dirks, K. T., & Nickerson, J. A. (2013). Microfoundations of Strategic Problem Formulation. Strategic Management Journal, 342, 197–214.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Baralou, E., & Tsoukas, H. (2015). How Is New Organizational Knowledge Created in a Virtual Context? An Ethnographic Study. Organization Studies, 36(5), 593–620.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Bashshur, M. R., & Oc, B. (2015). When Voice Matters a Multilevel Review of the Impact of Voice in Organizations. Journal of Management, 41(5), 1530–1554.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Biscaro, C., & Comacchio, A. (2018). Knowledge Creation Across Worldviews: How Metaphors Impact and Orient Group Creativity. Organization Science, 29(1), 58–79.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Bishop, L., & Levine, D. I. (1999). Computer-Mediated Communication as Employee Voice: A Case Study. Industrial & Labor Relations Review, 52(2), 217.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Bjelland, O. M., & Wood, R. C. (2008). An Inside View of IBM’s ‘Innovation Jam’. MIT Sloan Management Review, 5(1), 32–40.Google Scholar
  10. Burke, M., Joyce, E., Kim, T., Anand, V., & Kraut, R. (2007). Introductions and Requests: Rhetorical Strategies That Elicit Response in Online Communities. In C. Steinfield, B. T. Pentland, M. Ackerman, & N. Contractor (Eds.), Communities and Technologies (pp. 21–39). London: Springer.Google Scholar
  11. Burris, E. R. (2012). The Risks and Rewards of Speaking Up: Managerial Responses to Employee Voice. Academy of Management Journal, 55(4), 851–875.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Burris, E. R., Detert, J. R., & Chiaburu, D. S. (2008). Quitting Before Leaving: The Mediating Effects of Psychological Attachment and Detachment on Voice. Journal of Applied Psychology, 93(4), 912.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Burris, E. R., Detert, J. R., & Romney, A. C. (2013). Speaking Up vs. Being Heard: The Disagreement Around and Outcomes of Employee Voice. Organization Science, 24(1), 22–38.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Detert, J. R., & Burris, E. R. (2007). Leadership Behavior and Employee Voice: Is the Door Really Open? Academy of Management Journal, 50(4), 869–884.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Detert, J. R., & Treviño, L. K. (2010). Speaking Up to Higher-Ups: How Supervisors and Skip-Level Leaders Influence Employee Voice. Organization Science, 21(1), 249–270.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Detert, J. R., Burris, E. R., Harrison, D. A., & Martin, S. R. (2013). Voice Flows to and Around Leaders: Understanding When Units Are Helped or Hurt by Employee Voice. Administrative Science Quarterly, 58(4), 624–668.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Dutton, J. E., & Ashford, S. J. (1993). Selling Issues to Top Management. Academy of Management Review, 18(3), 397–428.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Faraj, S., Jarvenpaa, S. L., & Majchrzak, A. (2011). Knowledge Collaboration in Online Communities. Organization Science, 22(5), 1224–1239.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Fast, N. J., Burris, E. R., & Bartel, C. A. (2014). Managing to Stay in the Dark: Managerial Self-Efficacy, Ego Defensiveness, and the Aversion to Employee Voice. Academy of Management Journal, 57(4), 1013–1034.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Garner, J. T. (2009). When Things Go Wrong at Work: An Exploration of Organizational Dissent Messages. Communication Studies, 60(2), 197–218.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Hambrick, D. C., Geletkanycz, M. A., & Fredrickson, J. W. (1993). Top Executive Commitment to the Status Quo: Some Tests of Its Determinants. Strategic Management Journal, 14(6), 401–418.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Hargadon, A. B., & Bechky, B. A. (2006). When Collections of Creatives Become Creative Collectives: A Field Study of Problem Solving at Work. Organization Science, 17(4), 484–500.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Harvey, S. (2014). Creative Synthesis: Exploring the Process of Extraordinary Group Creativity. Academy of Management Review, 39(3), 324–343.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Hirschman, A. O. (1970). Exit, Voice, and Loyalty: Responses to Decline in Firms, Organizations, and States. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  25. Joyce, E., & Kraut, R. E. (2006). Predicting Continued Participation in Newsgroups. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 11(3), 723–747.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Karlsson, J., & Skålén, P. (2015). Exploring Front-Line Employee Contributions to Service Innovation. European Journal of Marketing, 49(9/10), 1346–1365.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Kesting, P., & Parm Ulhøi, J. (2010). Employee-Driven Innovation: Extend-ing the License to Foster Innovation. Management Decision, 48(1), 65–84.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Kesting, P. J., & Ulhøi, P. (2010). Employee-Driven Innovation: Extending the License to Foster Innovation. Management Decision, 48(1), 65–84.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Lam, C. F., & Mayer, D. M. (2014). When Do Employees Speak Up for Their Customers? A Model of Voice in a Customer Service Context. Personnel Psychology, 67(3), 637–666.Google Scholar
  30. Leonardi, P. M. (2014). Social Media, Knowledge Sharing, and Innovation: Toward a Theory of Communication Visibility. Information Systems Research, 25(4), 810.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. LePine, J. A., & Van Dyne, L. (1998). Predicting Voice Behavior in Work Groups. Journal of Applied Psychology, 83(6), 853–868.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Liang, J., Farh, C. I., & Farh, J. L. (2012). Psychological Antecedents of Promotive and Prohibitive Voice: A Two-Wave Examination. Academy of Management Journal, 55(1), 71–92.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Lovelace, K., Shapiro, D. L., & Weingart, L. R. (2001). Maximizing Cross-Functional New Product Teams’ Innovativeness and Constraint Adherence: A Conflict Communications Perspective. Academy of Management Journal, 44(4), 779–793.Google Scholar
  34. MacKenzie, S. B., Podsakoff, P. M., & Podsakoff, N. P. (2011). Challenge-Oriented Organizational Citizenship Behaviors and Organizational Effectiveness: Do Challenge-Oriented Behaviors Really Have an Impact on the Organization’s Bottom Line? Personnel Psychology, 64(3), 559–592.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Majchrzak, A., & Malhotra, A. (2016). Effect of Knowledge-Sharing Trajectories on Innovative Outcomes in Temporary Online Crowds. Information Systems Research, 27(4), 685–703.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Malinen, S. (2015). Understanding User Participation in Online Communities: A Systematic Literature Review of Empirical Studies. Computers in Human Behavior, 46, 228–238.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Maynes, T. D., & Podsakoff, P. M. (2014). Speaking More Broadly: An Examination of the Nature, Antecedents, and Consequences of an Expanded Set of Employee Voice Behaviors. Journal of Applied Psychology, 99(1), 87–112.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. McClean, E. J., Burris, E. R., & Detert, J. R. (2013). When Does Voice Lead to Exit? It Depends on Leadership. Academy of Management Journal, 56(2), 525–548.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. McKinsey Quarterly. (2009). How Companies Are Benefiting from Web 2.0: McKinsey Global Survey Results. Business Technology Office. Retrieved September 12, 2017, from http://www.mckinsey.com/business-functions/digital-mckinsey/our-insights/how-companies-are-benefiting-from-web-20-mckinsey-global-survey-results.
  40. Milliken, F. J., & Morrison, E. W. (2003). Shades of Silence: Emerging Themes and Future Directions for Research on Silence in Organizations. Journal of Management Studies, 40(6), 1563–1568.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Morrison, E. W. (2011). Employee Voice Behavior: Integration and Directions for Future Research. The Academy of Management Annals, 5(1), 373–412.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Morrison, E. W., & Milliken, F. J. (2000). Organizational Silence: A Barrier to Change and Development in a Pluralistic World. Academy of Management Review, 25(4), 706–725.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Morrison, E. W., & Milliken, F. J. (2003). Speaking Up, Remaining Silent: The Dynamics of Voice and Silence in Organizations. Journal of Management Studies, 40(6), 1353–1358.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Mumford, M. D., Costanza, D. E., Threlfall, K. V., Baughman, W. A., & Reiter-Palmon, R. (1993). Personality Variables and Problem Construction Activities: An Exploratory Investigation. Creativity Research Journal, 6, 365.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Ng, T. W., & Feldman, D. C. (2012). Employee Voice Behavior: A Meta-Analytic Test of the Conservation of Resources Framework. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 33(2), 216–234.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Nickerson, J. A., & Zenger, T. R. (2004). A Knowledge-Based Theory of the Firm—The Problem-Solving Perspective. Organization Science, 15(6), 617–632.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Nickerson, J., Yen, C. J., & Mahoney, J. T. (2012a). Exploring the Problem-Finding and Problem-Solving Approach for Designing Organizations. Academy of Management Perspectives, 26(1), 52–72.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Nickerson, J. A., Yen, C. J., & Mahoney, J. T. (2012b). Exploring the Problem-Finding and Problem-Solving Approach for Designing Organizations. The Academy of Management Perspectives, 26(1), 52–72.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Nickerson, J. A., Wuebker, R., & Zenger, T. (2017). Problems, Theories, and Governing the Crowd. Strategic Organization, 15(2), 275–288.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. O’Reilly, C. A., & Tushman, M. L. (2004). The Ambidextrous Organization. Harvard Business Review, 82(4), 74–83.Google Scholar
  51. Posen, H. E., Keil, T., Kim, S., & Meissner, F. D. (2018). Renewing Research on Problemistic Search—A Review and Research Agenda. The Academy of Management Annals, 12(1), 208–251.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Redding, W. C. (1985). Rocking Boats, Blowing Whistles, and Teaching Speech Communication. Communication Education, 34, 245–258.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Santos-Vijande, M. L., López-Sánchez, J. Á., & Rudd, J. (2016). Frontline Employees’ Collaboration in Industrial Service Innovation: Routes of Co-creation’s Effects on New Service Performance. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 44(3), 350–375.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Stamper, C. L., & Van Dyne, L. (2001). Work Status and Organizational Citizenship Behavior: A Field Study of Restaurant Employees. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 22(5), 517–536.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Stieger, D., Matzler, K., Chatterjee, S., & Ladstaetter-Fussenegger, F. (2012). Democratizing Strategy: How Crowdsourcing Can Be Used for Strategy Dialogues. California Management Review, 54(4), 44–68.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Tausczik, Y. R., Kittur, A., & Kraut, R. E. (2014, February). Collaborative Problem Solving: A Study of Math Overflow. In Proceedings of the 17th ACM Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work & Social Computing (pp. 355–367). New York, NY: ACM.Google Scholar
  57. Tsoukas, H. (2009). A Dialogical Approach to the Creation of New Knowledge in Organizations. Organization Science, 20(6), 941–957.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Van Dyne, L., Ang, S., & Botero, I. C. (2003). Conceptualizing Employee Silence and Employee Voice as Multidimensional Constructs. Journal of Management Studies, 40(6), 1359–1392.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Van Osch, W., & Avital, M. (2009). Collective Generativity: The Emergence of IT-Induced Mass Innovation. Sprouts: Working Papers on Information Systems, 9(54), 1–33.Google Scholar
  60. von Hippel, E., & von Krogh, G. (2016). Crossroads—Identifying Viable ‘Need–Solution Pairs’: Problem Solving Without Problem Formulation. Organization Science, 27(1), 207–221.Google Scholar
  61. Wasko, M. M., & Faraj, S. (2000). ‘It Is What One Does’: Why People Participate and Help Others in Electronic Communities of Practice. The Journal of Strategic Information Systems, 9(2), 155–173.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. Zhou, J., & George, J. M. (2001). When Job Dissatisfaction Leads to Creativity: Encouraging the Expression of Voice. Academy of Management Journal, 44(4), 682–696.Google Scholar
  63. Zuchowski, O., Posegga, O., Schlagwein, D., & Fischbach, K. (2016). Internal Crowdsourcing: Conceptual Framework, Structured Review, and Research Agenda. Journal of Information Technology, 31(2), 166–184.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2020

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.University of Southern CaliforniaLos AngelesUSA
  2. 2.University of North CarolinaChapel HillUSA

Personalised recommendations