Conjuncturally Teaching: Cultural Studies Pedagogy Beyond Common Sense

  • Megan M. WoodEmail author


In this chapter, Wood argues that Cultural Studies does not have a pedagogy; it is a pedagogy: its purpose, through its intellectual work and within the conditions of its given context, is to invigorate critical thinking and praxis, knowledge production, and change in new and important ways. Rather than approaching the question of pedagogy and Cultural Studies as the need to develop (or formalize or assess) methods, texts, assignments, or forms of authority in the classroom for cultural studies, Wood approaches the question in terms of what it might mean to teach and practice Cultural Studies as a particular pedagogical sensibility. This approach presumes that pedagogy concerns a realm of force extending well beyond formal education and the classroom, and so the responsibility of practitioners of cultural studies is much broader than the classroom, even as the classroom is a very specific site in which public pedagogy takes place. She describes some of what this responsibility to conjunctural thinking has looked like for her own and her undergraduate students’ experiences practicing cultural studies in the “Cultural Studies classroom.”

Works Cited

  1. Ang, I. (2016). Stuart Hall and the Tension between Academic and Intellectual Work. International Journal of Cultural Studies, 19(1), 29–41.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Brunsdon, C. (2014). On Being Made History. Cultural Studies, 29(1), 88–99.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Clarke, J. (2008). Living with/in and Without Neo-Liberalism. Focaal, 51, 135–147.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Cruz, J. D. (2012). Cultural Studies and Social Movements: A Crucial Nexus in the American Case. European Journal of Cultural Studies, 15(3), 254–301.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Giroux, H. A. (2003). Public Spaces, Private Lives: Democracy Beyond 9/11. Lanham/Oxford: Rowman & Littlefield.Google Scholar
  6. Grossberg, L. (1996). On Postmodernism and Articulation: An Interview with Stuart Hall. In D. Morley & K.-h. Chen (Eds.), Stuart Hall: Critical Dialogues (pp. 131–150). London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  7. Grossberg, L. (2010a). Cultural Studies in the Future Tense. Durham: Duke University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Grossberg, L. (2010b). On the Political Responsibilities of Cultural Studies. Inter-Asia Cultural Studies, 11, 241–247.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Grossberg, L. (2014, February 15). Rage Against the Dying of a Light: Stuart Hall (1932–2014). Truthout.Google Scholar
  10. Hall, S. (1990). The Emergence of Cultural Studies and the Crisis of the Humanities. October, 53, 11–23.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Hall, S. (1992). Cultural Studies and Its Theoretical Legacies. In L. Grossberg (Ed.), Cultural Studies.Google Scholar
  12. Pearce, K. (2016, December 16). Understanding Trumpism: Syllabus Co-Compiled by Johns Hopkins Historian Goes Viral Post-Election. Hub.Google Scholar
  13. Williams, R. (2014). The Future of Cultural Studies (1989). In J. McGuigan (Ed.), Raymond Williams on Culture & Society: Essential Writings. London: Sage.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.University of North Carolina Chapel HillChapel HillUSA

Personalised recommendations