Advertisement

Senior Cohousing—History and Theory

  • Sherry CummingsEmail author
  • Nancy P. Kropf
Chapter
Part of the SpringerBriefs in Aging book series (BRIEFSAGING)

Abstract

The first modern cohousing community was developed in Denmark just outside of Copenhagen in 1972. Twenty-seven families who desired a greater sense of community and collaboration than found in typical neighborhoods of the time came together to develop a fresh approach to housing (McCamant & Durrett, 1988). With the guiding principles of community and cooperation in mind these families developed the physical characteristics and the governing structure for their new community that have now become hallmarks of the modern cohousing movement. Architectural features such as community kitchens, communal play areas for children, and common gardens and courtyards served to heighten residents’ natural interactions with one another.

References

  1. Bamford, G. (2005). Cohousing for older people: Housing innovation in the Netherlands and Denmark. Australian Journal on Ageing, 24(1), 44–46.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Cohousing Association of the United States (2019). https://www.cohousing.org/. Accessed 1 February 2019.
  3. Durrett, C. (2005). Senior cohousing handbook: A community approach to independent living (1st ed.). Berkeley, CA: Habitat Press.Google Scholar
  4. Durrett, C. (2009). Senior cohousing handbook: A community approach to independent living (2nd ed.). Gabriola Island, BC, Canada: New Society Publishers.Google Scholar
  5. Fellowship for Intentional Community. https://www.ic.org/. Accessed 17 February 2019.
  6. Glass, A. P. (2009). Aging in a community of mutual support: The emergence of an elder intentional cohousing community in the United States. Journal of Housing for the Elderly, 23, 283–303.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Glass, A. P. (2013). A conceptual model for aging better together intentionally. Jounal of Aging Studies, 27, 428–442.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. McMamant, K., & Durrett, C. (1988). Cohousingg: A contemporary approach to housing ourselves. Berkeley, CA: Habitat Press/Ten Speed Press.Google Scholar
  9. McMamant, K. & Durrett, C. (1994). Cohousing: A contemporary approach to housing ourselves (2nd ed.). Berkeley, CA: Ten Speed Press.Google Scholar
  10. Pendersen, M. (2015). Senior cohousing communities in Denmark. Journal of Housing for the Elderly, 29, 126–145.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Tornstam, L. (2005). Gerotranscendence: A development theory of positive aging. New York: Springer Publishing.Google Scholar
  12. Tornstam, L. (2011). Maturing into gerotranscendence. The Journal of Transpersonal Psychology, 43(2), 166–180.Google Scholar
  13. Verde, T. (January 20, 2018). There’s Community and Consensus. But It’s No Commune. New York Times. https://www.nytimes.com/2018/01/20/business/cohousing-communities.html. Accessed 10 February 2019.

Copyright information

© The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2020

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.College of Social WorkUniversity of TennesseeKnoxvilleUSA
  2. 2.School of Social Work, Perimeter CollegeGeorgia State UniversityAtlantaUSA

Personalised recommendations