Advertisement

Optimal Manoeuver Trajectory Synthesis for Autonomous Space and Aerial Vehicles and Robots

  • Ranjan VepaEmail author
Conference paper
Part of the Lecture Notes in Computer Science book series (LNCS, volume 11650)

Abstract

In this paper the problem of the synthesis of optimal manoeuver trajectories for autonomous space vehicles and robots is revisited. It is shown that it is entirely feasible to construct optimal manoeuver trajectories from considerations of only the rigid body kinematics rather than the complete dynamics of the space vehicle or robot under consideration. Such an approach lends itself to several simplifications which allow the optimal angular velocity and translational velocity profiles to be constructed, purely from considerations of the body kinematic relations. In this paper the body kinematics is formulated, in general, in terms of the quaternion representation attitude and the angular velocities are considered to be the steering inputs. The optimal inputs for a typical attitude manoeuver is synthesized by solving for the states and co-states defined by a two point boundary value problem. A typical example of a space vehicle pointing problem is considered and the optimal torque inputs for the synthesis of a reference attitude trajectory and the reference trajectories are obtained.

Keywords

Attitude manoeuvers Optimal manoeuver trajectory Trajectory optimization Trajectory tracking 

References

  1. Bryson Jr., A.E., Ho, Y.C.: Applied Optimal Control. Ginn & Co., Waltham (1969)Google Scholar
  2. Cowling, I.D., Whidborne, J.F., Cooke, A.K.: Optimal trajectory planning and LQR control for a quadrotor UAV. In: Proceedings of the International Conference Control-2006, Glasgow, Scotland, 30 August–11 September 2006Google Scholar
  3. Dugar, V., Choudhury, S., Scherer, S.: A κITE in the wind: smooth trajectory optimization in a moving reference frame. In: 2017 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation (ICRA), pp. 109–116 (2017)Google Scholar
  4. Etchemendy, M.: Flight Control and Optimal Path Planning for UAVs, MSc Thesis, School of Engineering, Cranfield University, August 2007Google Scholar
  5. Filipe, N., Tsiotras, P.: Adaptive position and attitude-tracking controller for satellite proximity operations using dual quaternions. J. Guid. Control Dyn. 38(4), 566–577 (2014)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Lagache, M.-A., Serres, U., Andrieu, V.: Minimal time synthesis for a kinematic drone model. Math. Control Relat. Fields 7(2), 259–288 (2017)Google Scholar
  7. Lukacs, J.A, Yakimenko, O.A.: Trajectory-shape-varying missile guidance for interception of ballistic missiles during the boost phase. In: AIAA Guidance, Navigation and Control Conference and Exhibit, Hilton Head, South Carolina, 20–23 August 2007Google Scholar
  8. Özgür, E., Mezouar, Y.: Kinematic modeling and control of a robot arm using unit dual quaternions. Robot. Autom. Syst. 77, 66–73 (2016)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Sjøberg, A.M., Egeland, O.: Kinematic feedback control using dual quaternions. In: Proceedings of the 26th Mediterranean Conference on Control and Automation. IEEE, Zadar, Croatia, 19–22 June 2018.  https://doi.org/10.1109/med.2018.8442800
  10. Valverde, A., Tsiotras, P.: Spacecraft robot kinematics using dual quaternions. Robotics 7(64), 1–24 (2018)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Vepa, R.: Nonlinear Control of Robots and Unmanned Aerial Vehicles: An Integrated Approach. CRC Press, Boca Raton (2016)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Vepa, R.: Dynamics and Control of Autonomous Space Vehicles and Robotics. Cambridge University Press, New York (2019)Google Scholar
  13. Vukobratovic, M., Kircanski, M.: Kinematics and Trajectory Synthesis of Manipulation Robots. Springer, Heidelberg (2013).  https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-82195-0CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Wolek, A., Cliff, E.M., Woolsey, C.A.: Time-optimal path planning for a kinematic car with variable speed. J. Guid. Control Dyn. 39(10), 2374–2390 (2016)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Yakimenko, O.A.: Direct method for rapid prototyping of near-optimal aircraft trajectories. J. Guid. Control Dyn. 23(5), 865–875 (2000)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.School of Engineering and Material ScienceQueen Mary University of LondonLondonUK

Personalised recommendations