Advertisement

Spatiality of Engagement

  • Ehsan Akbari
Chapter

Abstract

In the “Spatiality of Engagement,” Akbari examines the role of spatiality in the MonCoin curriculum. Spatiality in the MonCoin project refers specifically to how the online spaces of our closed network and the physical spaces of the classroom, school, and surroundings impacted students’ learning and engagement. A central theme in this chapter is that online and physical learning spaces affected and were affected by one another, and photography created a bridge between these spaces, motivating students to engage with peers, and their everyday educational and civic spaces in new ways. School and neighborhood walks serve as examples of classroom activities that enriched engagement with the project, peers, photography, and students’ everyday spaces.

Keywords

Mobile media Social media Art education Spatiality Photography 

Notes

Acknowledgements

I would like to thank Lina Moreno for her contributions to the literature review and for helping me develop some key concepts in this chapter. Our conversations about the spatiality of engagement in the MonCoin curriculum have been pivotal for forming the central thesis of this chapter.

References

  1. Akbari, E., Castro, J. C., Lalonde, M., Moreno, L., & Pariser, D. (2016). “This allowed us to see what others were thinking”: Curriculum for peer-initiated learning in art. Art Education, 69(5), 20–25.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Ball, L. B., & Lai, A. (2006). Place-based pedagogy for the arts and humanities. Pedagogy, 6(2), 261–287.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Barbour, M. K. (2007). Portrait of rural virtual schooling. Canadian Journal of Educational Administration and Policy, 59, 1–21.Google Scholar
  4. Barbour, M., & Hill, J. (2011). What are they doing and how are they doing it? Rural student experiences in virtual schooling. International Journal of E-Learning and Distance Education, 25(1). Retrieved from http://www.ijede.ca/index.php/jde/article/view/725/1248.
  5. Brown, M. (2005). Chapter 12: Learning spaces. In D. G. Oblinger & J. L. Oblinger (Eds.), Educating the net generation. Boulder, CO: EDUCAUSE. Retrieved from https://www.educause.edu/research-and-publications/books/educating-net-generation/learning-spaces.
  6. Castro, J. C. (2012). Learning and teaching art through social media. Studies in Art Education, 52(2), 153–170.Google Scholar
  7. Castro, J. C., Lalonde, M., & Pariser, D. (2016). Understanding the (im)mobilities of engaging at-risk youth through art and mobile media. Studies in Art Education, 57(3), 238–251.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Cooney, M. H., Gupton, P., & O’Laughlin, M. (2000). Blurring the lines of play and work to create blended classroom learning experiences. Early Childhood Education Journal, 27(3), 165–171.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Dziuban, C. D., Hartman, J. L., & Moskal, P. D. (2004). Blended learning. Educause Center for Analysis and Research—Research Bulletins, 7, 1–12.Google Scholar
  10. Fenwick, T., Edwards, R., & Sawchuk, P. (2011). Emerging approaches to educational research: Tracing the socio-material. London, UK: Routledge.Google Scholar
  11. Garrison, D. R., & Vaughan, N. (2008). Blended learning in higher education: Framework, principles, and guidelines. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.Google Scholar
  12. Geith, C., & Vignare, K. (2008). Access to education with online learning and open educational resources: Can they close the gap? Journal of Asynchronous Learning Networks, 12(1), 105–126.Google Scholar
  13. Graham, M. A. (2007). Art, ecology and art education: Locating art education in a critical place-based pedagogy. Studies in Art Education, 48(4), 375–391.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Gruenewald, D. A. (2003). The best of both worlds: A critical pedagogy of place. Educational Researcher, 32(4), 3–12.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Güzer, B., & Caner, H. (2014). The past, present and future of blended learning: An in-depth analysis of literature. Procedia—Social and Behavioral Sciences, 116, 4596–4603.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2014.01.992.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Massey, D. (2005). For space. London, U.K.: Sage.Google Scholar
  17. McInerney, P., Smyth, J., & Down, B. (2011). “Coming to a place near you?” The politics and possibilities of a critical pedagogy of place-based education. Asia-Pacific Journal of Teacher Education, 39(1), 3–16.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Milne, A. J. M. (n.d.). Chapter 11: Designing blended learning space to the student experience. In D. G. Oblinger (Ed.), Learning Spaces. Boulder, CO: EDUCAUSE. Retrieved from https://www.educause.edu/ir/library/pdf/PUB7102k.pdf.
  19. Moore, M. G., & Kearsley, G. (2011). Distance education: A systems view of online learning (3rd ed.). Belmont, CA: Wadsworth Publishing.Google Scholar
  20. Oblinger, D. G. (Ed.). (2006). Learning spaces. Boulder, CO: EDUCAUSE. Retrieved from https://www.educause.edu/research-and-publications/books/learning-spaces.
  21. Osguthorpe, R. E., & Graham, C. R. (2003). Blended learning environments: Definitions and directions. The Quarterly Review of Distance Education, 4(3), 227–233.Google Scholar
  22. Partridge, H., Ponting, D., & McCay, M. (2011). Good practice report: Blended learning. Sydney, NSW: Australian Learning & Teaching Council. Google Scholar
  23. Rovai, A. P. (2002). Building sense of community at a distance. The International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning, 3(1), 1–16. Google Scholar
  24. Sobel, D. (2004). Place-based education: Connecting classroom and community. Nature and Listening, 4(1), 1–7.Google Scholar
  25. Styres, S., Haig-Brown, C., & Blimkie, M. (2013). Towards a pedagogy ofand: The urban context. Canadian Journal of Education, 36(2), 34–67.Google Scholar
  26. Tuck, E., McKenzie, M., & McCoy, K. (2014). Land education: Indigenous, post-colonial, and decolonizing perspectives on place and environmental education research. Journal Environmental Education Research, 20(1), 1–23.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Ubon, N. A., & Kimble, C. (2004, July). Exploring social presence in asynchronous text-based online learning communities (OLCS). In Proceedings of the 5th International Conference on Information Communication Technologies in Education (pp. 292–297).Google Scholar
  28. Vaughan, N. (2014). Student engagement and blended learning: Making the assessment connection. Education Sciences, 4(4), 247–264.  https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci4040247.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  • Ehsan Akbari
    • 1
  1. 1.Concordia UniversityMontrealCanada

Personalised recommendations