Advertisement

Corrective Feedback and Its Implications on Students’ Confidence-Based Assessment

  • Rabia MaqsoodEmail author
  • Paolo Ceravolo
Conference paper
Part of the Communications in Computer and Information Science book series (CCIS, volume 1014)

Abstract

Students’ confidence about their knowledge may yield high or low discrepancy in contrast to actual performance. Therefore, investigating students’ behavior towards corrective feedback (received after answering a question) becomes of particular interest. We conducted three experimental sessions with 94 undergraduate students using a computer-based assessment system wherein students specified confidence level (as high or low) with each submitted response. This research study exploits their logged data to provide analyses of: (1) students’ behaviors towards corrective feedback in relation to their confidence (about his/her answers), and, (2) impact of seeking corrective feedback on student’s subsequent attempt. In conformance with previous studies, we determine that students tend to overestimate their abilities. Data analysis also shows a significant difference infv students’ feedback seeking behavior with respect to distinct confidence-outcome categories. Interestingly, feedback seeking was predicted by (student) response’s outcome irrespective of its related confidence level, whereas, feedback reading time shows dependency on the confidence level. Our most important finding is that feedback seeking behavior shows a positive impact on students’ confidence-outcome category in the next attempt. Different possibilities for utilizing these results for future work and supporting adaptation based on students’ needs are discussed in the conclusions.

Keywords

Confidence-based assessment Certitude level Confidence-outcome category Feedback seeking Feedback reading time Computer-based assessment 

Notes

Acknowledgments

We are thankful for the support and contribution of Mr. Abdul Wahab (Instructor at NUCES CFD campus, Pakistan) and his students who participated in this experimental study.

References

  1. 1.
    Gardner-Medwin, A.R., Gahan, M.: Formative and summative confidence-based assessment (2003)Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Hattie, J., Timperley, H.: The power of feedback. Rev. Educ. Res. 77(1), 81–112 (2007).  https://doi.org/10.3102/003465430298487CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Hunt, D.P.: The concept of knowledge and how to measure it. J. Intellect. Cap. 4(1), 100–113 (2003).  https://doi.org/10.1108/14691930310455414CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Van der Kleij, F.M., Eggen, T.J., Timmers, C.F., Veldkamp, B.P.: Effects of feedback in a computer-based assessment for learning. Comput. Educ. 58(1), 263–272 (2012).  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2011.07.020CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Van der Kleij, F.M., Feskens, R.C., Eggen, T.J.: Effects of feedback in a computer-based learning environment on students’ learning outcomes: a meta-analysis. Rev. Educ. Res. 85(4), 475–511 (2015).  https://doi.org/10.3102/0034654314564881CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Kulhavy, R.W., Stock, W.A.: Feedback in written instruction: the place of response certitude. Educ. Psychol. Rev. 1(4), 279–308 (1989).  https://doi.org/10.1007/bf01320096CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Lang, C., Heffernan, N., Ostrow, K., Wang, Y.: The impact of incorporating student confidence items into an intelligent tutor: a randomized controlled trial. International Educational Data Mining Society (2015)Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Maqsood, R., Ceravolo, P.: Modeling behavioral dynamics in confidence-based assessment. In: 2018 IEEE 18th International Conference on Advanced Learning Technologies (ICALT), pp. 452–454. IEEE (2018).  https://doi.org/10.1109/icalt.2018.00112
  9. 9.
    McMillan, J.H., Hearn, J.: Student self-assessment: the key to stronger student motivation and higher achievement. Educ. Horiz. 87(1), 40–49 (2008)Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Mory, E.H.: Adaptive feedback in computer-based instruction: effects of response certitude on performance, feedback-study time, and efficiency. J. Educ. Comput. Res. 11(3), 263–290 (1994).  https://doi.org/10.2190/ym7u-g8un-8u5h-hd8nCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Mory, E.H.: Feedback research revisited. Handb. Res. Educ. Commun. Technol. 2, 745–783 (2004)Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Shute, V.J.: Focus on formative feedback. Rev. Educ. Res. 78(1), 153–189 (2008).  https://doi.org/10.3102/0034654307313795CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Timmers, C.F., Braber-Van Den Broek, J., Van Den Berg, S.M.: Motivational beliefs student effort and feedback behaviour in computer-based formative assessment. Comput. Educ. 60(1), 25–31 (2013).  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2012.07.007CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Vasilyeva, E., Pechenizkiy, M., De Bra, P.: Tailoring of feedback in web-based learning: the role of response certitude in the assessment. In: Woolf, B.P., Aïmeur, E., Nkambou, R., Lajoie, S. (eds.) ITS 2008. LNCS, vol. 5091, pp. 771–773. Springer, Heidelberg (2008).  https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-69132-7_104CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Computer Science DepartmentUniveristà degli Studi di MilanoMilanItaly

Personalised recommendations