Advertisement

Introduction: The Problem of Partnerships Between Galleries and Youth Organisations

  • Nicola Sim
Chapter
Part of the New Directions in Cultural Policy Research book series (NDCPR)

Abstract

This chapter makes the case for critically examining partnership work between galleries and youth organisations. It sets out the challenges that typically face partners, as well as the potential rewards of this type of collaborative work. Pierre Bourdieu’s theory of fields is introduced as a framework for analysing distinct occupational cultures and traditions, and the conflicts that arise when different fields come together. Bourdieu’s concept of ‘symbolic violence’ is also introduced as a core issue in partnerships involving marginalised young people, where there are uneven distributions of power and agency. This chapter offers examples of key partnership literature that currently exists and identifies why a specific examination of relations between the visual arts and youth sectors is needed and relevant today.

Keywords

Partnership Galleries Youth organisations Tate Bourdieu 

References

  1. Alldred, Pam, Fin Cullen, Kathy Edwards, and Dana Fusco. 2018. Introduction. In The Sage handbook of youth work practice, ed. Pam Alldred, Fin Cullen, Kathy Edwards, and Dana Fusco, xxix–xxxvi. London: Sage Publications.Google Scholar
  2. A New Direction. 2013. Schools forum: Effective partnership working. A New Direction. Accessed 25 April 2014. http://www.anewdirection.org.uk/knowledge/resources/a-new-direction-schools-forum-effective-partnership-working.
  3. Bak Mortensen, Marie, and Judith Nesbitt, eds. 2012. On collaboration. London: Tate.Google Scholar
  4. Batsleer, Janet. 2008. Informal learning in youth work. London: Sage Publications Ltd.Google Scholar
  5. Belton, Brian. 2015. The impact of art analysis and interpretation on the role and practice of youth work. Youth work, informal learning and the arts: Exploring the research and practice agenda, The University of Nottingham, 18 November 2015.Google Scholar
  6. Bienkowski, Piotr. 2016. No longer us and them: How to change into a participatory museum and gallery: Learning from the Our Museum programme. London: Paul Hamlyn Foundation.Google Scholar
  7. Brown, Colin. 2012. Six degrees of collaboration. In On collaboration, ed. Marie Bak Mortensen and Judith Nesbitt, 94–103. London: Tate.Google Scholar
  8. Butler, David, and Vivienne Reiss, eds. 2007. Art of negotiation. London: Arts Council England.Google Scholar
  9. Byrne, John, Elinor Morgan, November Paynter, Aida Sánchez de Serdio, and Adela Železnik, eds. 2018. The constituent museum: Constellations of knowledge, politics and mediation: A generator of social change. Amsterdam: Valiz.Google Scholar
  10. Circuit. 2013a. Circuit programme handbook. London: Tate.Google Scholar
  11. ———. 2013b. A guide to Circuit evaluation framework. London: Tate.Google Scholar
  12. Clark, Nick. 2012. Riots spark £5m Tate arts project for the young. The Independent, December 13. Accessed 7 April 2014. http://www.independent.co.uk/arts-entertainment/art/news/riots-spark-5m-tate-arts-project-for-the-young-8411694.html.
  13. Connell, Raewyn, Dean Ashenden, Sandra Kessler, and Gary Dowsett, eds. 1982. Making the difference: Schools, families and social division. Sydney: Allen & Unwin.Google Scholar
  14. Create. 2015. Panic! Create London. Accessed 3 December 2015. http://www.createlondon.org/panic/survey/.
  15. Creating Change. 2013. Creating change: A network for targeted youth arts. Accessed 13 May 2014. http://creating-change.org.uk/.
  16. Daly, Eileen, ed. 2012. Engage 30 Arts and healthcare. London: Engage.Google Scholar
  17. Douglas, Anthony. 2009. Partnership working. Oxon: Routledge.Google Scholar
  18. ECORYS. 2016. Non-arts partnerships. Creative People and Places.Google Scholar
  19. Eddo-Lodge, Reni. 2017. Why I’m no longer talking to white people about race. London: Bloomsbury Publishing.Google Scholar
  20. Edmonds, Kathy. 2008. Making connections: Widening participation in the arts for young people through dynamic partnerships. Engage 22 Young People and Agency, 57–62.Google Scholar
  21. Ellison, Jane. 2015. The art of partnering. London: King’s College London.Google Scholar
  22. Facer, Keri, and Bryony Enright. 2016. Creating living knowledge. Bristol: The University of Bristol and AHRC Connected Communities programme.Google Scholar
  23. Facer, Keri, and Kate Pahl, eds. 2017. Valuing interdisciplinary collaborative research: Beyond impact. Bristol: Policy Press.Google Scholar
  24. Francke, Andrea. 2012. Invisible spaces of parenthood. London: The Showroom.Google Scholar
  25. Freeman, Hadley. 2013. Check your privilege! Whatever that means. The Guardian, June 5. Accessed 3 February 2019. https://www.theguardian.com/society/2013/jun/05/check-your-privilege-means.
  26. Gannon, Emma. 2018. The multi-hyphen method. London: Hodder & Stoughton.Google Scholar
  27. Gibson, Alan, and Tom Wylie. 2015. Albemarle years and the emergence of modern youth and community education. One hundred years of youth and community work education: A celebration, YMCA George Williams College, London, 8 October 2016.Google Scholar
  28. Graham, Janna, et al., eds. 2012. On the Edgware road. London: Serpentine Gallery; Koenig Books.Google Scholar
  29. Hall, Roz. 2001. Tailor-made practice. Engage 11 Inclusion Under Pressure: 43–49.Google Scholar
  30. Hanley, Lynsey. 2016. Respectable: The experience of class. London: Penguin Random House UK.Google Scholar
  31. Horlock, Naomi, ed. 2000. Testing the water: Young people and galleries. Liverpool: Liverpool University Press and Tate Liverpool.Google Scholar
  32. Howard, Frances. 2017. The arts in youth work: A spectrum of instrumentality? Youth & Policy. Accessed 20 July 2017. http://www.youthandpolicy.org/articles/the-arts-in-youth-work/.
  33. Isaacs, Hedy Leonie. 2004. The allure of partnerships: Beyond the rhetoric. Social and Economic Studies 53 (4): 125–134.Google Scholar
  34. Kemshall, Hazel. 2009. Risk, social policy and young people. In Work with young people: Theory and policy for practice, ed. Jason Wood and Jean Hine, 154–162. London: Sage.Google Scholar
  35. Kester, Grant H. 2013. Conversation pieces: Community and communication in modern art. 2nd ed. London: University of California Press.Google Scholar
  36. Kuby, Candace R. 2013. Critical literacy in the early childhood classroom: Unpacking histories, unlearning privilege. New York: Teachers College Press.Google Scholar
  37. Lisicki, Barbara. 2017. Social model of disability. Shape Arts. Accessed 1 July 2017. https://www.shapearts.org.uk/News/social-model-of-disability.
  38. Lohmann, Ingrid, and Christine Mayer. 2009. Lessons from the history of education for a “century of the child at risk”. Paedagogica Historica 45 (1): 1–16.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Lynch, Bernadette. 2011. Whose cake is it anyway?: A collaborative investigation into engagement and participation in twelve museums and galleries in the UK. London: Paul Hamlyn Foundation.Google Scholar
  40. Madison, D. Soyini. 2012. Critical ethnography: Methods, ethics, and performance. Los Angeles: Sage.Google Scholar
  41. Matarasso, François. 2019. A restless art: How participation won, and why it matters. London: Calouste Gulbenkian Foundation.Google Scholar
  42. McKenzie, Lisa. 2015. Getting by: Estates, class and culture in austerity Britain. Bristol: Policy Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Miessen, Markus. 2010. The nightmare of participation. Berlin: Sternberg Press.Google Scholar
  44. Mills, David, and Missy Morton. 2013. Ethnography in education. London: Sage.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Morford, Roger. 2009. Arts work with socially excluded young people. Leicester: The National Youth Agency.Google Scholar
  46. National Portrait Gallery. 2014. Domino effect: Engaging NEET young people through photography. London: NPG.Google Scholar
  47. Patel, Raj. 2010. Creativity and partnership. In What is youth work? ed. Janet Batsleer and Bernard Davies, 61–72. Exeter: Learning Matters.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Rogers, Rebecca. 2018. Literacy research, racial consciousness, and equitable flows of knowledge. Literacy Research: Theory, Method, and Practice 67: 24–43.Google Scholar
  49. Ruigrok, Sophie. 2018. The White Pube are the world’s freshest, funniest art critics. Dazed, May 17. Accessed 4 February 2019. https://www.dazeddigital.com/art-photography/article/40004/1/the-white-pube-are-the-worlds-freshest-funniest-art-critics.
  50. Russell, Lisa. 2013. Researching marginalized young people. Ethnography and Education 8 (1): 46–60.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Sayers, Esther. 2014. Making ‘culture vultures’: An investigation into the socio-cultural factors that determine what and how young people learn in the art gallery. PhD thesis, Goldsmiths, University of London.Google Scholar
  52. Sennett, Richard. 2013. Together: The rituals, pleasures and politics of cooperation. London: Penguin Books.Google Scholar
  53. Slater, Imogen, Chrissie Tiller, and Alison Rooke. 2016. Taking risks: An evaluation of the Ovalhouse Future Stages programme methodology and impact. London: Ovalhouse.Google Scholar
  54. Smith, Emma. 2012. What does community mean? In Gallery as community: Art, education, politics, ed. Marijke Steedman, 19–42. London: Whitechapel Gallery.Google Scholar
  55. Smithens, Renee. 2008. Building partnerships. A New Direction. Accessed 5 May 2014. http://www.anewdirection.org.uk/knowledge/resources/building-partnerships.
  56. South London Gallery. 2011. The cat came as a tomato: Conversations on play and contemporary art practice. London: South London Gallery.Google Scholar
  57. Steedman, Marijke, ed. 2012. Gallery as community: Art, education, politics. London: Whitechapel Gallery.Google Scholar
  58. Steel, Patrick. 2018. MA launches pilot scheme to connect museums with third sector. Museums Association, July 4. Accessed 13 March 2019. https://www.museumsassociation.org/news/04072018-ma-launches-pilot-scheme-to-connect-museums-with-third-sector.
  59. Strong Voices. 2015. Strong Voices archive. Accessed 20 December 2015. https://strongvoicesarchive.wordpress.com/.
  60. Tate. 2012. Seeing through: The practice, process, delivery and value of working with young people in care. London: Tate.Google Scholar
  61. Taylor, Tony. 2014. IDYW statement 2014. In Defence of Youth Work. Accessed 5 October 2015. https://indefenceofyouthwork.com/idyw-statement-2014/.
  62. Thomson, Pat. 2002. Schooling the rustbelt kids: Making the difference in changing times. Stoke on Trent: Trentham Books.Google Scholar
  63. Turnbull, Gavin, and Jean Spence. 2011. What’s at risk? The proliferation of risk across child and youth policy in England. Journal of Youth Studies 14 (8): 939–959.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  64. UNISON. 2018. Axing millions from youth work puts futures at risk, says UNISON. UNISON, December 3. Accessed 11 March 2019. https://www.unison.org.uk/news/press-release/2018/12/axing-millions-youth-work-puts-futures-risk-says-unison/.
  65. Walsh, Aylwyn. 2014. Creating change, imagining futures: Participatory arts and young people ‘at risk’. London: Centre for Urban and Community Research, Goldsmiths, University of London.Google Scholar
  66. Wheeler, Jo, and Amber Walls. 2008. Envision: A handbook, supporting young people’s participation in galleries and the arts. London: Engage.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  • Nicola Sim
    • 1
  1. 1.University of NottinghamNottinghamUK

Personalised recommendations