Advertisement

Mothering Theo-Political Ideology: Natural Law, Empirical Facts, and Discourse Politics

  • Jon Kara Shields
Chapter

Abstract

This chapter describes the teaching practice of CanaVox, a pro-marriage social movement, examining its relationship to Catholic teaching, particularly the discourse of the common good. Having established that CanaVox’s platform is an interpretation and extension of Catholic teaching on marriage, gender essentialism, and the role of women, it examines the moral warrants and methods of self-tutelage practiced by members through an examination of the group’s syllabus of literature and leader’s guide. This selection of readings offers a flattened, partisan politicization of natural law discourse, alienated from its religious roots. A highly selective appropriation of empirical research and personal testimony is discussed as corroborative evidence in a format which seems strategically aimed at affective conditioning through affirmation, rather than engaging the public controversy with an openness to rational disagreement. As such, CanaVox encourages its participants to strengthen their identification with a raft of unreflective, politicized values unmoored from their originating ritual community, its public virtues, and authorities. The chapter concludes by noting the obligations of Catholic moral theologians and Christian ethicists drawn from this example. Ethicists have an obligation to combat political vices of condescension and inoculation to critique through making plain the ideological quality of seemingly universal rules expressed in political discourse that are in fact rooted in particular historically religious commitments. They must press for greater caution and clarity in the use of empirical research to confirm theologically based presuppositions. Most expansively, they must educate ordinary religious practitioners in norms of just political engagement and evangelization in a pluralist society, using examples and authorities drawn from their own traditions.

Bibliography

  1. Anderson, Ryan T. 2015. Truth Overruled: The Future of Marriage and Religious Freedom. New York: Simon and Schuster.Google Scholar
  2. Bucar, Elizabeth M. 2008. Methodological Invention as a Constructive Project: Exploring the Production of Ethical Knowledge through the Interaction of Discursive Logics. Journal of Religious Ethics 36 (3): 355–373.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. ———. 2010. Bodies at the Margins: The Case of Transsexuality in Catholic and Shia Ethics. Journal of Religious Ethics 38 (4): 601–615.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. ———. 2011. Creative Conformity: The Feminist Politics of U.S. Catholic and Iranian Shi’i Women. Washington, DC: Georgetown University Press.Google Scholar
  5. CanaVox. 2015. For CanaVox Reading Group Participants. https://canavox.com/wp-content/uploads/2017/06/ForParticipantsofReadingGroups_Print.docx.pdf. Accessed 1 Sept 2018.
  6. ———. 2018a. Who We Are.https://canavox.com/who-we-are/. Accessed 1 Sept 2018.
  7. ———. 2018b. What We Cheer For. https://canavox.com/what-we-cheer-for/a-deeper-look/. Accessed 1 Sept 2018 (See also Canavox. 2017. What we Cheer For. https://canavox.com/wp-content/uploads/2018/09/What-We-Cheer-For-24.pdf.)
  8. Case, Mary Anne. 2016. The Role of the Popes in the Invention of Complementarity and the Vatican’s Anathematization of Gender. University of Chicago Public Law & Legal Theory Working Paper No. 565.Google Scholar
  9. Cherlin, Andrew J. 2010. One Thousand and Forty-Nine Reasons Why It’s Hard to Know when a Fact Is a Fact. In Families as They Really Are, ed. Barbara J. Risman and Virginia Rutter, 10–14. New York: W.W. Norton.Google Scholar
  10. Coontz, Stephanie. 1992. The Way We Never Were: American Families and the Nostalgia Trap. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
  11. Dowd, Nancy Elizabeth. 2010. (Re)Constructing the Framework of Work/Family. Wash. & Lee J. Civil Rts. & Soc. Just. 331: 331–348.Google Scholar
  12. Fricker, Miranda. 2007. Epistemic Injustice: Power and the Ethics of Knowing. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Hasson, Mary Rice, ed. 2015. Promise and Challenge: Catholic Women Reflect on Feminism, Complementarity, and the Church. Huntington: Our Sunday Visitor.Google Scholar
  14. Heim, Maria, and Anne Monius. 2014. Recent Work in Moral Anthropology. Journal of Religious Ethics 42 (3): 385–392.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Jones, David Albert. 2017. The American College of Pediatricians Statement on “‘Gender Ideology’: A Note of Caution”. Catholic Medical Quarterly 67 (3): 11–15.Google Scholar
  16. ———. 2018a. Gender Reassignment Surgery: A Catholic Bioethical Analysis. Theological Studies 79 (2): 314–338.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. ———. 2018b. Truth in Transition? Gender Identity and Catholic Anthropology. New Blackfriars 99 (1084): 756–774.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Katzenstein, Mary Fainsod. 1995. Discursive Politics and Feminist Activism in the Catholic Church. In Feminist Organizations: Harvest of the New Women’s Movement, ed. Myra Marx Ferree and Patricia Yancee Martin, 35–52. Philadelphia: Temple University Press.Google Scholar
  19. Lemmons, Mary Hayden, ed. 2016. Woman as Prophet in the Home and the World: Interdisciplinary Investigations. Lanham: Rowman & Littlefield.Google Scholar
  20. Mainwaring, Doug. 2017. Your Marriage: You Have No Idea of the Good You Are Doing. The Public Discourse. https://www.thepublicdiscourse.com/2017/03/18600/
  21. McGee, Michael. 1980. The ‘Ideograph:’ A Link between Rhetoric and Ideology. Quarterly Journal of Speech 66 (I): 1–16.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Moore, Mignon R., and Michael Stambolis-Ruhstorfer. 2013. LGBT Sexuality and Families at the Start of the Twenty-First Century. Annual Review of Sociology 39: 491–507.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Murray, John Courtney. 1949. The One Work of the One Church. Address at the Jesuit Philippine Bureau Dinner, New York City, December 1. https://www.library.georgetown.edu/woodstock/murray/1950b
  24. Newport, Frank, and Joy Wilke. 2013. Most in U.S. Want Marriage, but Its Importance Has Dropped. Gallup, August 2. https://news.gallup.com/poll/163802/marriage-importance-dropped.aspx.
  25. Nice, Julie. 2007. Promoting Marriage Experimentation: A Class Act. Wash. UJL & Pol’y 24: 31–45.Google Scholar
  26. Nickerson, Michelle M. 2012. Mothers of Conservatism: Women and the Postwar Right. Princeton: Princeton University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Nota, N.M., M.J.H.J. Dekker, M. Klaver, C.M. Wiepjes, M.A. van Trotsenburg, A.C. Heijboer, and M. den Heijer. 2017. Prolactin Levels during Short-and Long-Term Cross-Sex Hormone Treatment: An Observational Study in Transgender Persons. Andrologia 49 (6): e12666.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Obergefell v. Hodges 410 U. S 2015. p. 3–6. https://www.supremecourt.gov/opinions/14pdf/14-56_3204.pdf
  29. Riley, Glenda. 1997. Divorce: An American Tradition. Lincoln: University of Nebraska Press.Google Scholar
  30. Salzman, Todd A., and Michael G. Lawler. 2006. New Natural Law Theory and Foundational Sexual Ethical Principles: A Critique and a Proposal. The Heythrop Journal 47 (2): 182–205.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Sarah, Cardinal Robert. 2015. God or Nothing: A Conversation on Faith with Nicolas Diat. Ignatius Press.Google Scholar
  32. Skolnick, Arlene S. 1991. Embattled Paradise: The American Family in an Age of Uncertainty. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
  33. Smith, Ted A. 2014. Political Theology or Social Ethics?: One Conversation, Two Tasks. Political Theology Network Blog. November 13. https://politicaltheology.com/political-theology-or-social-ethics-one-conversation-two-tasks-ted-smith/
  34. Spizzirri, Giancarlo, Fábio Luis Souza Duran, Tiffany Moukbel Chaim-Avancini, Mauricio Henriques Serpa, Mikael Cavallet, Carla Maria Abreu Pereira, Pedro Paim Santos, et al. 2018. Grey and White Matter Volumes Either in Treatment-naïve or Hormone-Treated Transgender Women: A Voxel-Based Morphometry Study. Scientific Reports 8 (1): 736.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Stalnaker, Aaron. 2008. Judging Others: History, Ethics, and the Purposes of Comparison. Journal of Religious Ethics 36 (4): 425–444.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Tufaro, Katrina, and Ana Samuel. n.d. Noteworthy Notes on the Causes of SSA. https://canavox.com/wp-content/uploads/2017/06/Noteworthy-Notes-On-the-Causes-of-SSA-24-FINAL.pdf
  37. Weithman, Paul J. 1997. Natural Law, Morality, and Sexual Complementarity. In Sex, Preference, and Family: Essays on Law and Nature, ed. David Estlund and Martha Nussbaum, 227–246. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  38. Wenger, Tisa. 2018. How Conservative Christians Co-opted the Rhetoric of Religious Freedom. Zócalo Public Square, January 23. http://www.zocalopublicsquare.org/2018/01/23/conservative-christians-co-opted-rhetoric-religious-freedom/ideas/essay/

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  • Jon Kara Shields
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of TheologyUniversity of Notre DameNotre DameUSA

Personalised recommendations