Advertisement

What Is Study Abroad?

  • Christina L. Isabelli-García
  • Casilde A. Isabelli
Chapter

Abstract

In this chapter, we introduce a number of concepts fundamental to our discussion of study abroad and language gains. As researchers, we must identify appropriate participants in order for our findings to be scientifically relevant. Therefore, we begin with an overview of the varying reasons sojourners might live, work, and/or study in a host country. We then limit the discussion to those sojourns that are primarily undertaken with the purpose of learning the host country’s language, and we focus on what education abroad means to these learners. We continue with a description of typical study abroad program durations, types, and housing options, and consider their varying benefits and limitations on language learning. The chapter concludes with an overall summary as well as questions for reflection and suggestions for further reading.

Keywords

Sojourners abroad Program types and components Program duration Housing abroad 

References

  1. American Council on the Teaching of Foreign Languages (ACTFL). (2012). ACTFL proficiency guidelines. Alexandria, VA: ACTFL.Google Scholar
  2. Bown, J., Dewey, D., Martinsen, R., & Baker, W. (2011). Foreign language houses: Identities in transition. Critical Inquiry in Language Studies, 8, 203–235.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Brecht, R., & Robinson, J. (1993). Qualitative analysis of second language acquisition in study abroad: The ACTR/NFLC project. Washington, DC: National Foreign Language Center.Google Scholar
  4. Diao, W., Freed, B., & Smith, L. (2011). Confirmed beliefs or false assumptions? A study of home stay experiences in the French study abroad context. Frontiers: The Interdisciplinary Journal of Study Abroad, 21, 109–142.Google Scholar
  5. Dwyer, M. (2004). More is better: The impact of study abroad program duration. Frontiers: The Interdisciplinary Journal of Study Abroad, 10, 151–163.Google Scholar
  6. Engle, L., & Engle, J. (2003). Study abroad levels: Toward a classification of program types. Frontiers: The Interdisciplinary Journal of Study Abroad, 9, 1–20.Google Scholar
  7. Glossary. (n.d.). https://forumea.org/resources/glossary/?letter=I. Accessed 3 June 2019.
  8. Ife, A., Vives Boix, G., & Meara, P. (2000). The impact of study abroad on vocabulary development among different proficiency groups. Spanish Applied Linguistics, 4(1), 55–84.Google Scholar
  9. Iino, M. (2006). Norms of interaction in a Japanese homestay setting: Toward two-way flow of linguistic and cultural resources. In M. Dufon & E. Churchill (Eds.), Language learners in study abroad contexts (pp. 151–174). Clevedon, UK: Multilingual Matters.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Institute of International Education. (2018a). Detailed duration of U.S. study abroad, 2006/07–2016/17. Open Doors Report on International Educational Exchange. https://www.iie.org/Research-and-Insights/Open-Doors/Data/US-Study-Abroad/Duration-of-Study-Abroad. Accessed 3 June 2019.
  11. Institute of International Education. (2018b). Enrollment. https://www.iie.org/Research-and-Insights/Open-Doors/Data/International-Students/Enrollment. Accessed 3 June 2019.
  12. Isabelli, C. A. (2004). Study abroad for advanced foreign language majors: Optimal duration for developing complex structures. In H. Byrnes & H. Maxim (Eds.), Advanced foreign language learning: A challenge to college programs (AAUSC series, pp. 14–130). Boston: Heinle and Heinle.Google Scholar
  13. Kinginger, C., & Blattners, G. (2007). Assessing the development of sociolinguistic awareness in study abroad: Colloquial French. In L. Ortega & H. Byrnes (Eds.), The longitudinal study of advanced L2 capabilities (pp. 223–246). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
  14. Knight, S. M., & Schmidt-Rinehart, B. C. (2010). Exploring conditions to enhance students/host family interaction abroad. Foreign Language Annals, 43, 64–79.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Pellegrino, V. A. (2005). Study abroad and second language use: Constructing the self. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Rivers, W. P. (1998). Is being there enough? The effects of homestay placements on language gain during study abroad. Foreign Language Annals, 31, 492–500.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Stephan, P., Scellato, G., & Franzoni, C. (2015). International competition for PhDs and Postdoctoral scholars: What does (and does not) matter. Innovation Policy and the Economy, 15(1), 73–113.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. U.S. Department of State. (2019, April 20). FSI’s [Foreign Service Institute’s] experience with language learning. https://www.state.gov/m/fsi/sls/c78549.htm. Accessed 3 June 2019.
  19. Wilkinson, S. (1998). Study abroad from the participants’ perspective: A challenge to common beliefs. Foreign Language Annals, 31, 23–39.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Suggestions for Further Reading

  1. Avello, P., & Lara, A. R. (2014). Phonological production and length of stay in study abroad. In C. Pérez-Vidal (Ed.), Language acquisition in study abroad and formal instruction contexts (pp. 137–165). Philadelphia: John Benjamins.Google Scholar
  2. Coleman, J. A. (1997). Residence abroad within language study. Language Teaching, 30(1), 1–20.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Coleman, J. A. (1998). Language learning and study abroad: The European perspective. Frontiers: The Interdisciplinary Journal of Study Abroad, 4, 167–203.Google Scholar
  4. Dixon, B. (2013). Education abroad in China: Literature review of study abroad program types, outcomes and benefits. Frontiers: The Interdisciplinary Journal of Study Abroad, 24, 105–122.Google Scholar
  5. Duperron, L. (2006). Study abroad and the second language acquisition of tense and aspect in French: Is longer better? In S. Wilkinson (Ed.), Insights from study abroad for language programs (pp. 45–71). Boston: Heinle.Google Scholar
  6. Dwyer, M. (2004). Charting the impact of studying abroad. International Educator, 13, 14–17.Google Scholar
  7. Freed, B., Segalowitz, N., & Dewey, D. (2004). Context of learning and second language fluency in French: Comparing regular classroom, study abroad and intensive domestic immersion programs. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 26, 275–301.Google Scholar
  8. Kinginger, C. (2009). American students abroad: Negotiation of difference? Language Teaching, 43(2), 116–227.Google Scholar
  9. Kurata, N. (2010). Opportunities for foreign language learning and use within a learner’s informal social networks. Mind, Culture, and Activity, 17(4), 382–396.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Lord, G. (2009). Second-language awareness and development during study abroad: A case study. Hispania, 92(1), 127–141.Google Scholar
  11. Martinsen, R., Baker, W., Dewey, D., Bown, J., & Johnson, C. (2010). Exploring diverse settings for language acquisition and use: Comparing study abroad, service learning abroad, and foreign language housing. Applied Language Learning, 20(1/2), 45–69.Google Scholar
  12. Mendelson, V. G. (2004). ‘Hindsight is 20/20’: Students perceptions of language learning. Frontiers: The Interdisciplinary Journal of Study Abroad, 10(3), 43–63.Google Scholar
  13. Serrano, R., Llanes, A., & Tragant, E. (2011). Analyzing the effect of context of second language learning: Domestic intensive and semi-intensive courses vs. study abroad in Europe. System, 39, 133–143.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2020

Authors and Affiliations

  • Christina L. Isabelli-García
    • 1
  • Casilde A. Isabelli
    • 2
  1. 1.Gonzaga UniversitySpokaneUSA
  2. 2.University of Nevada, RenoRenoUSA

Personalised recommendations