Advertisement

Person-Centred Research in Vocational Psychology: An Overview and Illustration

  • Harsha N. PereraEmail author
  • Danette Barber
  • Peter McIlveen
Chapter
  • 154 Downloads

Abstract

This chapter provides an introduction to person-centred research approaches in vocational psychology with a specific focus on modern latent variable mixture approaches to examining unobserved population heterogeneity. First, we provide a general overview of the concept of unobserved population heterogeneity as a crucial assumption that underlies person-centred analytic approaches and discuss the way in which latent variable mixture models overcome the limitations of traditional person-centred analytic techniques. We then discuss the utility of person-centred strategies in vocational psychology research via the consideration of empirical applications of mixture analyses. Next, we provide an introduction to one of the more widely-used person-centred approaches—Latent Profile Analysis (LPA)—in vocational psychology, drawing comparisons of these approaches with more traditional person-centred analytic techniques as well as the common factor model. We demonstrate the LPA procedure using data on the RIASEC vocational interests, and briefly consider implications of the LPA model for practice. It is our hope that this non-technical introduction to person-centred approaches will foster further interest in applying these methods to test crucial assumptions of homogeneity and heterogeneity in sample data typically used in vocational psychology research and practice.

Keywords

Latent variable mixture models Mixture models Latent profile analysis Person-centred Vocational interests Interest profiles Heterogeneity 

References

  1. Armstrong, P. I., Allison, W., & Rounds, J. (2008). Development and initial validation of brief public domain RIASEC marker scales. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 73(2), 287–299.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jvb.2008.06.003.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Barbaranelli, C., Fida, R., Paciello, M., & Tramontano, C. (2018). ‘Possunt, quia posse videntur’: They can because they think they can. Development and validation of the work self-efficacy scale: Evidence from two studies. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 106, 249–269.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jvb.2018.01.006.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Bauer, D. J., & Curran, P. J. (2003). Distributional assumptions of growth mixture models: Implications for overextraction of latent trajectory classes. Psychological Methods, 8(3), 338–363.  https://doi.org/10.1037/1082-989X.8.3.338.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Everitt, B. S., Landau, S., Leese, M., & Stahl, D. (2011). Cluster analysis (5th ed.). New York: Wiley.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Finch, W. H., & Bronk, K. C. (2011). Conducting confirmatory latent class analysis using M plus. Structural Equation Modeling, 18(1), 132–151.  https://doi.org/10.1080/10705511.2011.532732.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Graves, L. M., Cullen, K. L., Lester, H. F., Ruderman, M. N., & Gentry, W. A. (2015). Managerial motivational profiles: Composition, antecedents, and consequences. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 87, 32–42.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jvb.2014.12.002.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Henson, J. M., Reise, S. P., & Kim, K. H. (2007). Detecting mixtures from structural model differences using latent variable mixture modeling: A comparison of relative model fit statistics. Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 14(2), 202–226.  https://doi.org/10.1080/10705510709336744.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Hirschi, A., & Valero, D. (2015). Career adaptability profiles and their relationship to adaptivity and adapting. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 88, 220–229.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jvb.2015.03.010.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Holland, J. L. (1997). Making vocational choices: A theory of vocational personalities and work environments (3rd ed.). Odessa: Psychological Assessment Resources.Google Scholar
  10. Howard, J., Gagne, M., Morin, A. J. S., & Van den Broeck, A. (2016). Motivation profiles at work: A self-determination theory approach. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 95(96), 74–89.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jvb.2016.07.004.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Iliescu, D., Ispas, D., Ilie, A., & Ion, A. (2013). The structure of vocational interests in Romania. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 60(2), 294–302.  https://doi.org/10.1037/a0032199.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Kunst, E. M., van Woerkom, M., van Kollenburg, G. H., & Poell, R. F. (2018). Stability and change in teachers’ goal orientation profiles over time: Managerial coaching behavior as a predictor of profile change. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 104, 115–127.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jvb.2017.10.003.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Lanza, S. T., Tan, X., & Bray, B. C. (2013). Latent class analysis with distal outcomes: A flexible model-based approach. Structural Equation Modeling, 20(1), 1–26.  https://doi.org/10.1080/10705511.2013.742377.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Leuty, M. E., Hansen, J. I. C., & Speaks, S. Z. (2016). Vocational and leisure interests: A profile-level approach to examining interests. Journal of Career Assessment, 24(2), 215–239.  https://doi.org/10.1177/1069072715580321.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Lo, Y., Mendell, N. R., & Rubin, D. B. (2001). Testing the number of components in a normal mixture. Biometrika, 88(3), 767–778.  https://doi.org/10.1093/biomet/88.3.767.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Lubke, G. H., & Muthén, B. (2005). Investigating population heterogeneity with factor mixture models. Psychological Methods, 10, 21–39.  https://doi.org/10.1037/1082-989X.10.1.21.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Lubke, G., & Muthén, B. O. (2007). Performance of factor mixture models as a function of model size, covariate effects, and class-specific parameters. Structural Equation Modeling, 14(1), 26–47.  https://doi.org/10.1080/10705510709336735.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Lubke, G., & Neale, M. C. (2006). Distinguishing between latent classes and continuous factors: Resolution by maximum likelihood? Multivariate Behavioral Research, 41(4), 499–532.  https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327906mbr4104_4.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Magidson, J., & Vermunt, J. (2002). Latent class models for clustering: A comparison with K-means. Canadian Journal of Marketing Research, 20(1), 36–43.Google Scholar
  20. Marsh, H. W., Hau, K. T., & Wen, Z. (2004). In search of golden rules: Comment on hypothesis-testing approaches to setting cutoff values for fit indexes and dangers in overgeneralizing Hu and Bentler’s (1999) findings. Structural Equation Modeling, 11(3), 320–341.  https://doi.org/10.1207/s15328007sem1103_2.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Maysn, L. (2013). Latent class analysis and finite mixture modeling. In T. D. Little (Ed.), The Oxford handbook of quantitative methods (Vol. 2, pp. 551–611). Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  22. McLachlan, G., & Peel, D. (2000). Finite mixture models. New York: Wiley.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. McLarnon, M. J. W., Carswell, J. J., & Schneider, T. J. (2015). A case of mistaken identity? Latent profiles in vocational interests. Journal of Career Assessment, 23(1), 166–185.  https://doi.org/10.1177/1069072714523251.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Meldahl, J. M., & Muchinsky, P. M. (1997). The neurotic dimension of vocational indecision: Gender comparability? Journal of Career Assessment, 5(3), 317–331.  https://doi.org/10.1177/106907279700500305.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Meredith, W. (1993). Measurement invariance, factor analysis and factorial invariance. Psychometrika, 58(4), 525–543.  https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02294825.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Meyer, J. P., Morin, A. J., & Vandenberghe, C. (2015). Dual commitment to organization and supervisor: A person-centered approach. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 88, 56–72.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jvb.2015.02.001.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Millsap, R. E., & Yun-Tein, J. (2004). Assessing factorial invariance in ordered-categorical measures. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 39(3), 479–515.  https://doi.org/10.1207/S15327906MBR3903_4.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Molenaar, P., & von Eye, A. (1994). On the arbitrary nature of latent variables. In C. Clogg & A. von Eye (Eds.), Latent variables analysis: Applications for developmental research (pp. 226–242). Thousand Oaks: Sage.Google Scholar
  29. Morin, A. J. S. (2016). Person-centered research strategies in commitment research. The handbook of employee commitment (pp. 490–508). Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.Google Scholar
  30. Morin, A. J. S., & Wang, J. C. K. (2016). A gentle introduction to mixture modeling using physical fitness data. In N. Ntoumanis & N. Myers (Eds.), An introduction to intermediate and advanced statistical analyses for sport and exercise scientists (pp. 183–210). London: Wiley.Google Scholar
  31. Morin, A. J., Meyer, J. P., Creusier, J., & Biétry, F. (2016). Multiple-group analysis of similarity in latent profile solutions. Organizational Research Methods, 19(2), 231–254.  https://doi.org/10.1177/1094428115621148.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Morin, A. J., Boudrias, J. S., Marsh, H. W., McInerney, D. M., Dagenais-Desmarais, V., Madore, I., & Litalien, D. (2017). Complementary variable-and person-centered approaches to the dimensionality of psychometric constructs: Application to psychological wellbeing at work. Journal of Business and Psychology, 32(4), 395–419.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10869-016-9448-7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Muthén, B. O. (2002). Beyond SEM: General latent variable modeling. Behaviormetrika, 29(1), 81–117.  https://doi.org/10.2333/bhmk.29.81.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Muthén, L. K., & Muthén, B. O. (1998–2015). Mplus user’s guide (7th ed). Los Angeles: Muthén and Muthén.Google Scholar
  35. Nylund, K. L., Asparouhov, T., & Muthén, B. O. (2007). Deciding on the number of classes in latent class analysis and growth mixture modeling: A Monte Carlo simulation study. Structural Equation Modeling, 14(4), 535–569.  https://doi.org/10.1080/10705510701575396.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Perera, H. N., & McIlveen, P. (2017). Profiles of career adaptivity and their relations with adaptability, adapting, and adaptation. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 98, 70–84.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jvb.2016.10.001.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Perera, H. N., & McIlveen, P. (2018). Vocational interest profiles: Profile replicability and relations with the STEM major choice and the big-five. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 106, 84–100.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Perera, H. N., McIlveen, P., Burton, L. J., & Corser, D. M. (2015). Beyond congruence measures for the evaluation of personality factor structure replicability: An exploratory structural equation modeling approach. Personality and Individual Differences, 84, 23–29.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2015.01.004.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Perera, H. N., Granziera, H., & McIlveen, P. (2018a). Profiles of teacher personality and relations with teacher self-efficacy, work engagement, and job satisfaction. Personality and Individual Differences, 120, 171–178.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2017.08.034.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Perera, H. N., Vosicka, L., Granziera, H., & McIlveen, P. (2018b). Towards an integrative perspective on the structure of teacher work engagement. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 108, 28–41.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jvb.2018.05.006.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Peugh, J., & Fan, X. (2013). Modeling unobserved heterogeneity using latent profile analysis: A Monte Carlo simulation. Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 20(4), 616–639.  https://doi.org/10.1080/10705511.2013.824780.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Rogers, C. R. (1957). The necessary and sufficient conditions of therapeutic personality change. Journal of Consulting Psychology, 21(2), 95–103.  https://doi.org/10.1037/h0045357.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Saunders, D. E., Peterson, G. W., Sampson, J. P., & Reardon, R. C. (2000). Relation of depression and dysfunctional career thinking to career indecision. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 56(2), 288–298.  https://doi.org/10.1006/jvbe.1999.1715.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Savickas, M. L. (2005). The theory and practice of career construction. In S. D. Brown & R. W. Lent (Eds.), Career development and counseling: Putting theory and research to work (pp. 42–70). Hoboken: Wiley.Google Scholar
  45. Su, R., Rounds, J., & Armstrong, P. I. (2009). Men and things, women and people: A meta-analysis of sex differences in interests. Psychological Bulletin, 135, 859–884.  https://doi.org/10.1037/a0017364.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Tein, J. Y., Coxe, S., & Cham, H. (2013). Statistical power to detect the correct number of classes in latent profile analysis. Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 20, 640–657.  https://doi.org/10.1080/10705511.2013.824781.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Valero, D., & Hirschi, A. (2016). Latent profiles of work motivation in adolescents in relation to work expectations, goal engagement, and changes in work experiences. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 93, 67–80.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jvb.2016.01.003.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Vermunt, J. K. (2011). K-means may perform as well as mixture model clustering but may also be much worse: Comment on Steinley and Brusco (2011). Psychological Methods, 16(1), 82–88.  https://doi.org/10.1037/a0020144.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Vermunt, J. K., & Magidson, J. (2002). Latent class cluster analysis. In J. A. Hagenaars & McCutcheon (Eds.), Applied latent class analysis (pp. 89–106). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Wang, M. T., & Peck, S. C. (2013). Adolescent educational success and mental health vary across school engagement profiles. Developmental Psychology, 49, 1266–1276.  https://doi.org/10.1037/a0030028.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. West, S. G., Taylor, A. B., & Wu, W. (2012). Model fit and model selection in structural equation modeling. In R. H. Hoyle (Ed.), Handbook of structural equation modeling (pp. 209–231). New York: Guilford.Google Scholar
  52. Xu, R., & Wunsch, D. C. (2005). Survey of Clustering Algorithms. IEEE Transactions on Neural Networks, 16, 645–678.  https://doi.org/10.1109/TNN.2005.845141.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.College of EducationUniversity of NevadaLas VegasUSA
  2. 2.School of EducationUniversity of Southern QueenslandToowoombaAustralia

Personalised recommendations