Advertisement

Turning Self-Assessment into Self-Feedback

  • Ernesto Panadero
  • Anastasiya Lipnevich
  • Jaclyn Broadbent
Chapter

Abstract

This chapter proposes moving our conceptualization of self-assessment to that of self-feedback, in which the final goal is for students to produce and search for feedback to close the gap between their current and desired performance. We propose six main venues to achieve self-feedback: (a) making the implicit aspects of self-assessment explicit to correct for self-bias, (b) shifting from scoring accuracy to content accuracy, (c) using a developmental approach: the power of practice/expertise, (d) connecting self-feedback and self-regulated learning, (e) exploring the role of individual characteristics and interpersonal variables and (f) anchoring self-feedback to evaluative judgment: changing the view from task-specific to long-term learning. Additionally, the impact of self-feedback on learning is analyzed.

References

  1. Andrade, H. (2018). Feedback in the context of self-assessment. In A. A. Lipnevich & J. K. Smith (Eds.), The Cambridge handbook of instructional feedback (pp. 376–408). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  2. Andrade, H., & Valtcheva, A. (2009). Promoting learning and achievement through self-assessment. Theory into Practice, 48(1), 12–19.  https://doi.org/10.1080/00405840802577544.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Bjork, E. L., Storm, B. C., & de Winstanley, P. A. (2010). Learning from the consequences of retrieval: Another test effect. In A. S. Benjamin (Ed.), Successful remembering and successful forgetting: A festschrift in honor of Robert A. Bjork (1st ed.). New York: Psychology Press.Google Scholar
  4. Boud, D. (1999). Avoiding the traps: Seeking good practice in the use of self-assessment and reflection in professional courses. Social Work Education, 18(2), 121–132.  https://doi.org/10.1080/02615479911220131.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Boud, D., & Falchikov, N. (1989). Quantitative studies of student self-assessment in higher-education: A critical analysis of findings. Higher Education, 18(5), 529–549.  https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00138746.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Boud, D., Lawson, R., & Thompson, D. G. (2013). Does student engagement in self-assessment calibrate their judgement over time? Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 38(8), 941–956.  https://doi.org/10.1080/02602938.2013.769198.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Brown, G. T. L., Andrade, H., & Chen, F. (2015). Accuracy in student self-assessment: Directions and cautions for research. Assessment in Education: Principles, Policy & Practice, 1–14.  https://doi.org/10.1080/0969594x.2014.996523.Google Scholar
  8. Brown, G. T. L., & Harris, L. R. (2013). Student self-assessment. In J. McMillan (Ed.), The Sage handbook of research on classroom assessment (pp. 367–393). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Butler, D. L., & Winne, P. H. (1995). Feedback and self-regulated learning: A theoretical synthesis. Review of Educational Research, 65(3), 245–281.  https://doi.org/10.3102/00346543065003245.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Dunning, D., Heath, C., & Suls, J. M. (2004). Flawed self-assessment: Implications for health, education, and the workplace. Psychological Science in the Public Interest, 5(3), 69–106.  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1529-1006.2004.00018.x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Eccles, J. S., & Wigfield, A. (2002). Motivational beliefs, values, and goals. Annual Review of Psychology, 53, 109–132.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Eva, K. W., & Regehr, G. (2008). “I’ll never play professional football” and other fallacies of self-assessment. Journal of Continuing Education in the Health Professions, 28(1), 14–19.  https://doi.org/10.1002/chp.150.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Falchikov, N., & Boud, D. (1989). Student self-assessment in higher education: A meta-analysis. Review of Educational Research, 59(4), 395–430.  https://doi.org/10.3102/00346543059004395.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Ibabe, I., & Jauregizar, J. (2010). Online self-assessment with feedback and metacognitive knowledge. Higher Education, 59(2), 243–258.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10734-009-9245-6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Jonsson, A., & Panadero, E. (2018). Facilitating students’ active engagement with feedback. In A. A. Lipnevich & J. K. Smith (Eds.), The Cambridge handbook of instructional feedback. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  16. Kirschner, P. A. (2002). Cognitive load theory: Implications of cognitive load theory on the design of learning. Learning and Instruction, 12(1), 1–10.  https://doi.org/10.1016/S0959-4752(01)00014-7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Lipnevich, A. A., Berg, D. A. G., & Smith, J. K. (2016). Toward a model of student response to feedback. In G. T. L. Brown & L. R. Harris (Eds.), Handbook of human and social conditions in assessment (pp. 169–185). New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  18. Lipnevich, A. A., & Gjikali, K. (2019, January). What we know about feedback: Teacher beliefs and practices in a nutshell. Paper presented at CUNY Graduate Student Summit, New York, NY.Google Scholar
  19. Lipnevich, A. A., & Smith, J. K. (2009). Effects of differential feedback on students’ examination performance. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Applied, 15(4), 319–333.  https://doi.org/10.1037/a0017841.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Narciss, S. (2008). Feedback strategies for interactive learning tasks. In J. M. Spector, M. D. Merrill, J. J. G. van Merriënboer, & M. P. Driscoll (Eds.), Handbook of research on educational communications and technology (pp. 125–144). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.Google Scholar
  21. Nicol, D., & McFarlane-Dick, D. (2006). Formative assessment and self-regulated learning: A model and seven principles of good feedback practice. Studies in Higher Education, 31(2), 199–218.  https://doi.org/10.1080/03075070600572090.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Panadero, E., & Alonso-Tapia, J. (2013). Self-assessment: Theoretical and practical connotations. When it happens, how is it acquired and what to do to develop it in our students. Electronic Journal of Research in Educational Psychology, 11(2), 551–576. http://dx.doi.org/10.14204/ejrep.30.12200.
  23. Panadero, E., Brown, G. T. L., & Strijbos, J. W. (2016a). The future of student self-assessment: A review of known unknowns and potential directions. Educational Psychology Review, 28(4), 803–830.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10648-015-9350-2.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Panadero, E., Jonsson, A., & Botella, J. (2017). Effects of self-assessment on self-regulated learning and self-efficacy: Four meta-analyses. Educational Research Review, 22, 74–98.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.edurev.2017.08.004.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Panadero, E., Jonsson, A., & Strijbos, J. W. (2016b). Scaffolding self-regulated learning through self-assessment and peer assessment: Guidelines for classroom implementation. In D. Laveault & L. Allal (Eds.), Assessment for learning: Meeting the challenge of implementation (pp. 311–326). New York: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Panadero, E., Broadbent, J., Boud, D., & Lodge, J. M. (2019). Using formative assessment to influence self- and co-regulated learning: The role of evaluative judgement. European Journal of Psychology of Education, 34(3), 535–557.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10212-018-0407-8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Ross, J. A. (2006). The reliability, validity, and utility of self-assessment. Practical Assessment Research & Evaluation, 11. Retrieved from http://pareonline.net/getvn.asp?v=11&n=10.
  28. Sanchez, C. E., Atkinson, K. M., Koenka, A. C., Moshontz, H., & Cooper, H. (2017). Self-grading and peer-grading for formative and summative assessments in 3rd through 12th grade classrooms: A meta-analysis. Journal of Educational Psychology, No Pagination Specified.  https://doi.org/10.1037/edu0000190.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Sitzmann, T., Ely, K., Brown, K. G., & Bauer, K. N. (2010). Self-assessment of knowledge: A cognitive learning or affective measure? Academy of Management Learning & Education, 9(2), 169–191.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Tai, J., Ajjawi, R., Boud, D., Dawson, P., & Panadero, E. (2018). Developing evaluative judgement: Enabling students to make decisions about the quality of work. Higher Education, 76(3), 467–481.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10734-017-0220-3.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Tan, K. H. K. (2012). Student self-assessment: Assessment, learning and empowerment. Singapore: Research Publishing.Google Scholar
  32. Winstone, N. E., Nash, R. A., Parker, M., & Rowntree, J. (2016). Supporting learners’ agentic engagement with feedback: A systematic review and a taxonomy of recipience processes. Educational Psychologist, 1–21.  https://doi.org/10.1080/00461520.2016.1207538.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Yan, Z., & Brown, G. T. L. (2017). A cyclical self-assessment process: Towards a model of how students engage in self-assessment. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 42(8), 1247–1262.  https://doi.org/10.1080/02602938.2016.1260091.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Zimmerman, B. J. (2000). Attaining self-regulation: A social cognitive perspective. In M. Boekaerts, P. R. Pintrich, & M. Zeidner (Eds.), Handbook of self-regulation (pp. 13–40). San Diego, CA: Academic Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Departamento de Psicología Evolutiva y de La EducaciónUniversidad Autónoma de MadridMadridSpain
  2. 2.Centre for Research in Assessment and Digital Learning (CRADLE)Deakin UniversityGeelongAustralia
  3. 3.Queens College and the Graduate CenterCity University of New YorkNew YorkUSA
  4. 4.Centre for Research in Assessment and Digital Learning (CRADLE)Deakin UniversityGeelongAustralia

Personalised recommendations