Literacy: Articulations of Unity Across Development, Education, and Enthusiast Contexts

  • Benjamin Nicoll
  • Brendan Keogh


This chapter considers the different ways that audiences invest meanings in a cultural software. Inherent in any of these understandings of the role and mediations of a cultural software are assumptions as to just which skills, knowledges, and aesthetic decisions are fundamental to the process of creating works within any given medium. This chapter thus considers the literacies that mediate the perceptions of three different groups towards Unity: videogame developers, tertiary students and educators, and the enthusiast videogame press. Through an overview of these varied perspectives of what it means to use Unity, this chapter provides ways of considering how different literacies influence different understandings, positive and negative, of the role of a cultural software within a cultural field and within society more broadly.


Unity game engine Videogame development Literacy Education Enthusiast press Gamer culture Asset flips 


  1. Arsenault, Dominic. 2017. Super Power, Spoony Bards, and Silverware: The Super Nintendo Entertainment System. Cambridge: MIT Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Banks, John. 2013. Co-creating Videogames. New York: Bloomsbury.Google Scholar
  3. Bourdieu, Pierre. 1983. “The Field of Cultural Production, or: The Economic World Reversed”. Poetics 12: 311–356.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Bridgstock, Ruth, and Stuart Cunningham. 2016. “Creative Labour and Graduate Outcomes: Implications for Higher Education and Cultural Policy.” International Journal of Cultural Policy 22 (1): 10–26.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Clays, Simon. 1997. “Return of the Vampire!” Nintendo Official Magazine 57: 4–5.Google Scholar
  6. Cote, Amanda C. 2018. “Writing ‘Gamers’: The Gendered Construction of Gamer Identity in Nintendo Power (1994–1999).” Games and Culture 13 (5): 479–503.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Deterding, Sebastian, and Casey O’Donnell. 2016. “Game Engines in Game Education: Thinking Inside the Toolbox?” GDC Vault.
  8. Economic Graph Team. 2017. “LinkedIn’s 2017 U.S. Emerging Jobs Report.” Linkedin, December 7.
  9. Freedman, Eric. 2018. “Engineering Queerness in the Game Development Pipeline.” Game Studies 18 (3).
  10. Harvey, Alison. 2014. “Twine’ Revolution: Democratization, Depoliticization, and the Queering of Game Design.” Game 3: 95107.Google Scholar
  11. Harvey, Alison. 2019. “Becoming Gamesworkers: Diversity, Higher Education, and the Future of the Game Industry.” Television & New Media (OnlineFirst): 111.Google Scholar
  12. Hecker, Chris. 2013. “Fair Use.” Youtube, March 29.
  13. Keighley, Geoff. 2014. “The Final Hours of Titanfall.”
  14. Keogh, Brendan. 2019. “From Aggressively Formalised to Intensely In/Formalised: Accounting for a Wider Range of Videogame Development Practices.” Creative Industries Journal 12 (1): 14–33.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Kirkpatrick, Graeme. 2013. Computer Games and the Social Imaginary. Cambridge: Polity Press.Google Scholar
  16. Kirkpatrick, Graeme. 2015. The Formation of Gaming Culture: UK Gaming Magazines, 1981–1995. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. kopas, merritt. 2015. Videogames for Humans: Twine Authors in Conversation. New York: Instar Books.Google Scholar
  18. McRobbie, Angela. 2016. Be Creative: Making a Living in the New Culture Industries. Cambridge: Polity Press.Google Scholar
  19. Mol, Annemarie. 2002. The Body Multiple: Ontology in Medical Practice. Durham: Duke University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Nicoll, Benjamin. 2019 (forthcoming). Minor Platforms in Videogame History. Amsterdam, the Netherlands: Amsterdam University Press.Google Scholar
  21. Oakley, Kate. 2014. “Good Work? Rethinking Cultural Entrepreneurship.” In Handbook of Management and Creativity, edited by Chris Bilton and Stephen Cummings, 145–159. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.Google Scholar
  22. Shaw, Adrienne. 2012. “Do You Identify as a Gamer? Gender, Race, Sexuality, and Gamer Identity.” New Media Society 14 (1): 28–44.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Shaw, Adrienne, and Shira Chess. 2015. “Reflections on the Casual Games Market in a Post-GamerGate World.” In Social, Casual, and Mobile Videogames: The Changing Gaming Landscape, edited by Tama Leaver and Michele Wilson, 277–289. New York: Bloomsbury.Google Scholar
  24. Therrien, Carl, and Martin Picard. 2016. “Enter the Bit Wars: A Study of Video Game Marketing and Platform Crafting in the Wake of the TurboGrafx-16 Launch.” New Media & Society 18 (10): 23232339.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. UNESCO. 2006. Education for All Global Monitoring Report: Literacy for Life. Paris: United Nations Educational Scientific and Cultural Organization.Google Scholar
  26. Vanderhoef, John. 2019 (forthcoming). Passion, Pixels, and Profit: The New Creative Economy of Indie Game Production. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.Google Scholar
  27. Warner, John. 2018. “It’s Time We Stopped Encouraging Indies.”, October 2.
  28. Wright, Steven. 2018. “There Are Too Many Video Games. What Now?” Polygon, September 28.
  29. Yang, Robert. 2018. “What Is the Game University For?” Radiator, May 4.
  30. Young, Christopher J. 2018. “Game Changers: Everyday Gamemakers and the Development of the Video Game Industry.” PhD diss., University of Toronto.Google Scholar
  31. Zagal, José P., and Amy Bruckman. 2008. “Novices, Gamers, and Scholars: Exploring the Challenges of Teaching About Games.” Game Studies 8 (2).Google Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  • Benjamin Nicoll
    • 1
  • Brendan Keogh
    • 1
  1. 1.Digital Media Research Centre, School of CommunicationQueensland University of TechnologyBrisbaneAustralia

Personalised recommendations