Advertisement

Ethnic Identity and Morphosyntactic Variation in San Francisco Chinatown

  • Adina Staicov
Chapter

Abstract

Staicov begins this chapter with methodological considerations regarding the collection and analysis of spoken data. As Staicov employs an exploratory method in her description of ethnic identity, she outlines some of the steps that are necessary for quantifying qualitative data. Discussing her results, Staicov draws attention to the role of heritage language proficiency and self-labelling. Finally, Staicov presents the analysis of the correlation between morphosyntactic variation and ethnic identity, which does not seem as straightforward as described in other studies. While she observes some weak correlation between ethnic identity and morphosyntactic variation, Staicov finds more traditional sociolinguistic patterns to be at work, with gender and generation having a stronger effect on morphosyntactic variation than ethnic identification.

References

  1. Artstein, Ron, and Massimo Poesio. 2008. Inter-coder agreement for computational linguistics. Computational Linguistics 34 (4): 555–596.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Bayley, Robert. 1996. Competing constraints in variation in the speech of adult Chinese learners of English. In Second language acquisition and language variation, ed. Robert Bayley and Dennis R. Preston, 97–120. Amsterdam: Benjamins.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Bell, Allan. 1984. Language style as audience design. Language in Society 13: 145–204.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. ———. 2002. Back in style: Reworking audience design. In Style and sociolinguistic variation, ed. Penelope Eckert and John R. Rickford, 139–169. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Biewer, Carolin. 2015. South Pacific Englishes. A sociolinguistic and morphosyntactic profile of Fiji English, Samoan English and Cook Island English. Amsterdam: Benjamins.Google Scholar
  6. Edwards, John. 2009. Language and identity. Cambridge/New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Giles, Howard. 1973. Accent mobility: A model and some data. Anthropological Linguistics 15 (2): 87–105.Google Scholar
  8. ———. 1978. Linguistic differentiation in ethnic groups. In Differentiation between social groups: Studies in the social psychology of intergroup relations, ed. Henri Tajfel, 361–393. London: Academic Press.Google Scholar
  9. Giles, Howard, and Peter F. Powesland. 1975. Speech style and social evaluation. London: Academic Press.Google Scholar
  10. Hall-Lew, Lauren. 2009. Ethnicity and phonetic variation in a San Francisco neighborhood. PhD dissertation, Stanford University. PQDT Open. https://pqdtopen.proquest.com/pubnum/3382940.html?FMT=AI. Accessed 23 Oct 2018.
  11. Hansen Edwards, Jette G. 2011. Deletion of /t, d/ and the acquisition of linguistic variation by second language learners of English. Language Learning 61 (4): 1256–1301.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Hoffman, Michol F., and James A. Walker. 2010. Ethnolects and the city: Ethnic orientation and linguistic variation in Toronto English. Language Variation and Change 22: 37–67.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Holliday, Adrian. 2010. Analysing qualitative data. In Continuum companion to research methods in applied linguistics, ed. Brian Paltridge and Aek Phakiti, 98–110. London/New York: Continuum.Google Scholar
  14. Huddleston, Rodney, and Geoffrey K. Pullum. 2002. The Cambridge grammar of the English language. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Hughes, Arthur, Peter Trudgill, and Dominic Watt. 2005. English accents and dialects: An introduction to social and regional varieties of English in the British Isles. 4th ed. London: Hodder Arnold.Google Scholar
  16. Hundt, Marianne. 2014a. Home is where you’re born: Negotiating identity in the diaspora. Studia Neophilologica 86: 125–137.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. ———. 2014b. Zero articles in Indian English: A comparison of primary and secondary diaspora situations. In English in the Indian diaspora, ed. Marianne Hundt and Devyani Sharma, 131–170. Amsterdam: Benjamins.Google Scholar
  18. Hundt, Marianne, and Adina Staicov. 2018. Identity in the London Indian diaspora: Towards the quantification of qualitative data. World Englishes 37: 166–184.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. James, Deborah. 2013. Women, men, and prestige speech forms: A critical review. In Rethinking language and gender research: Theory and practice, ed. Victoria L. Bergvall, Janer M. Bing, and Alice F. Freed, 98–125. New York: Routledge, 1996.Google Scholar
  20. Joseph, John E. 2004. Language and identity: National, ethnic, religious. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Kiang, Lisa. 2008. Ethnic self-labeling in young adults from Chinese background. Journal of Youth and Adolescence 37: 97–111.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Kiang, Lisa, Krista M. Perreira, and Andrew J. Fuligni. 2011. Ethnic label use in adolescents from traditional and non-traditional immigrant communities. Journal of Youth and Adolescence 40: 719–729.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Labov, William. 1966. The social stratification of English in New York City. Washington, DC: Centre for Applied Linguistics.Google Scholar
  24. ———. 1972. Language in the inner city: Studies in the Black English vernacular. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press.Google Scholar
  25. ———. 1984. Field methods of the project on linguistic change and variation. In Language in use: Readings in sociolinguistics, ed. John Baugh and Joel Sherzer, 28–59. Englewood Cliffs: Prentice-Hall.Google Scholar
  26. ———. 1989. The child as linguistic historian. Language Variation and Change 1: 85–98.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Matthews, Stephen, and Virginia Yip. 1994. Cantonese: A comprehensive grammar. London/New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  28. Mendoza-Denton, Norma. 2002. Language and identity. In The handbook of language variation and change, ed. Jack K. Chambers, Peter Trudgill, and Natalie Schilling-Estes, 475–499. Malden: Blackwell.Google Scholar
  29. Mesthrie, Rajend, and Rakes Bhatt. 2008. World Englishes: The study of new English varieties. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Nagy, Naomi, Joanna Chociej, and Michol F. Hoffman. 2014. Analyzing Ethnic Orientation in the quantitative sociolinguistic paradigm. Language and Communication 25: 9–26.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Noels, Kimberly A. 2014. Language variation and ethnic identity: A social psychological perspective. Language and Communication 35: 88–96.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Phinney, Jean S. 1992. The multigroup ethnic identity measure: A new scale for use with diverse groups. Journal of Adolescent Research 7 (2): 156–176.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Phinney, Jean S., and Anthony D. Ong. 2007. Conceptualization and measurement of ethnic identity: Current status and future directions. Journal of Counseling Psychology 54 (3): 271–281.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Poplack, Shana, and Sali Tagliamonte. 1994. –S or nothing: Marking the plural in the African-American diaspora. American Speech 69 (3): 227–259.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Poplack, Shana, Sali Tagliamonte, and Ejike Eze. 2000. Reconstructing the source of early African American English plural marking: A comparative study of English and Creole. In The English history of African American English, ed. Shana Poplack, 73–105. Malden: Blackwell.Google Scholar
  36. Quirk, Randolph, Sidney Greenbaum, Geoffrey Leech, and Jan Svartvik. 1985. A comprehensive grammar of the English language. London/New York: Longman.Google Scholar
  37. Rathore-Nigsch, Claudia. 2015. Dialect variation and change among twice migrants: A sociophonetic study of the East African Indian community in Leicester, UK. PhD dissertation, University of Zurich. OPAC Nebis. http://opac.nebis.ch/ediss/20152376.pdf. Accessed 23 Oct 2018.
  38. Rathore-Nigsch, Claudia, and Daniel Schreier. 2016. “Our heart is still in Africa”: Twice migration and its sociolinguistic consequences. Language in Society 45: 163–191.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Schreier, Daniel. 2005. Consonant change in English worldwide: Synchrony meets diachrony. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Sharma, Devyani. 2005. Language transfer and discourse universals in Indian English article use. Studies in Second Language Acquisition 27: 535–566.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. ———. 2011. Style repertoire and social change in British Asian English. Journal of Sociolinguistics 15 (4): 464–492.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. ———. 2012. Stylistic activation in ethnolinguistic repertoires. University of Pennsylvania Working Papers in Linguistics 18 (2): 127–136.Google Scholar
  43. Smith, Jennifer, and Mercedes Durham. 2012. Bidialectalism or dialect death? Explaining generational change in the Shetland Islands, Scotland. American Speech 87 (1): 57–88.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Tabouret-Keller, Andrée. 1998. Language and identity. In The handbook of sociolinguistics, ed. Florian Coulmas, 315–326. Malden: Blackwell.Google Scholar
  45. Tagliamonte, Sali A. 2006. Analysing sociolinguistic variation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Tagliamonte, Sali A., and Rosalind Temple. 2005. New perspectives on an ol’ variable: (t, d) in British English. Language Variation and Change 17: 281–302.Google Scholar
  47. Trudgill, Peter. 1972. Sex, covert prestige, and linguistic change in the urban British English of Norwich. Language in Society 1: 179–195.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Tse, Grace Y.W. 2003. Validating the logistic model of article usage preceding multi-word organization names with the aid of computer corpora. Literary and Linguistic Computing 18 (3): 287–313.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Walker, James. 2013. Variation analysis. In Research methods in linguistics, ed. Robert J. Podesva and Devyani Sharma, 440–459. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  50. Young, Richard. 1988. Variation and the interlanguage hypothesis. Studies in Second Language Acquisition 10: 281–302.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Zipp, Lena, and Adina Staicov. 2016. English in San Francisco Chinatown. Indexing identity with speech rhythm? In World Englishes: New theoretical and methodological considerations, ed. Elena Seoane and Cristina Suárez-Gómez, 205–228. Amsterdam: Benjamins.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2020

Authors and Affiliations

  • Adina Staicov
    • 1
  1. 1.Writing CenterHiroshima UniversityHiroshimaJapan

Personalised recommendations