Advertisement

DNA Methylation Markers to Assess Biological Age

  • Dmitriy I. PodolskiyEmail author
  • Vadim N. Gladyshev
Chapter
Part of the Healthy Ageing and Longevity book series (HAL, volume 10)

Abstract

Among the different biomarkers of aging based on omics and clinical data, DNA methylation clocks stand apart providing unmatched accuracy in assessing the biological age of both humans and animal models of aging. Here, we discuss robustness of DNA methylation clocks and bounds on their out-of-sample performance and review computational strategies for development of the clocks.

Keywords

DNA methylation Biomarker of aging Epigenetic clocks Elastic net regression 

Notes

Acknowledgement

Supported by NIH grants.

References

  1. Alexandrov LB et al (2015) Clock-like mutational processes in human somatic cells. Nat Genet 47:1402–1407CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. de Magalhães JP, Curado J, Church GM (2009) Meta-analysis of age-related gene expression profiles identifies common signatures of aging. Bioinformatics 25:875–881CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Dollé ME, Snyder WK, Gossen JA, Lohman PH, Vijg J (2000) Distinct spectra of somatic mutations accumulated with age in mouse heart and small intestine. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 97:8403–8408CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Field AE et al (2018) DNA methylation clocks in aging: categories, causes, and consequences. Mol Cell 71:882–895CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Geary RC (1930) The frequency distribution of the quotient of two normal variates. J R Stat Soc 93:442CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Hannum G et al (2013) Genome-wide methylation profiles reveal quantitative views of human aging rates. Mol Cell 49:359–367CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Harley CB, Futcher AB, Greider CW (1990) Telomeres shorten during ageing of human fibroblasts. Nature 345:458–460CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Horvath S (2013) DNA methylation age of human tissues and cell types. Genome Biol 14:R115CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Meissner A et al (2005) Reduced representation bisulfite sequencing for comparative high-resolution DNA methylation analysis. Nucleic Acids Res 33:5868–5877CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Petkovich DA et al (2017) Using DNA methylation profiling to evaluate biological age and longevity interventions. Cell Metab 25:954–960.e6CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Podolskiy DI, Gladyshev VN (2016) Intrinsic versus extrinsic cancer risk factors and aging. Trends Mol Med 22:833–834CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Podolskiy DI, Lobanov AV, Kryukov GV, Gladyshev VN (2016) Analysis of cancer genomes reveals basic features of human aging and its role in cancer development. Nat Commun 7:12157CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Polanowski AM, Robbins J, Chandler D, Jarman SN (2014) Epigenetic estimation of age in humpback whales. Mol Ecol Resour 14Google Scholar
  14. Stubbs TM et al (2017) Multi-tissue DNA methylation age predictor in mouse. Genome Biol 18:68CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Thompson MJ, vonHoldt B, Horvath S, Pellegrini M (2017) An epigenetic aging clock for dogs and wolves. Aging (Albany, NY) 9:1055–1068CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Wang T et al (2017) Epigenetic aging signatures in mice livers are slowed by dwarfism, calorie restriction and rapamycin treatment. Genome Biol 18:57CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Zou H, Hastie T (2005) Regularization and variable selection via the elastic net. J R Stat Soc Ser B Stat Methodol 67:301–320CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Division of Genetics, Department of MedicineBrigham and Women’s Hospital and Harvard Medical SchoolBostonUSA

Personalised recommendations