Doing Time/Time Done: Exploring the Temporalities of Datafication in the Smart Prison
The aim of this chapter is to explore emerging temporalities linked to datafication through the lens of a specific place: the smart prison. Datafication and the consequent regimes of anticipation, prediction and pre-emption are increasingly discussed from a critical perspective in terms of discriminatory bias, processes of exclusion and as reinforcing inequality. However, there is currently little knowledge and research about how forms of anticipation, prediction and pre-emption are applied in the prison context. The chapter explores this connection by looking into current debates on establishing smart prisons. It concludes with the argument that rather than understanding prisons as removed and secluded from society, they are magnifying glasses for media-related social change and are crucial for exploring emerging-mediated temporalities.
- Akrap, M. (2016). RFID implementation: Testing in prisons and parolees for the greater good. The John Marshall Journal of Information Technology & Privacy Law, 33(1/1), 22–45.Google Scholar
- Carvalho, R. G., Capelo, R., & Nuñez, D. (2015). Perspectives concerning the future when time is suspended: Analysing inmates’ discourse. Time & Society, 27(3), 296–311.Google Scholar
- Dencik, L. (2018). Surveillance realism and the politics of imagination: Is there no alternative? Krise: Journal for Contemporary Philosophy, 1, 31–43.Google Scholar
- Eubanks, V. (2017). Automating inequality: How high-tech tools profile, police, and punish the poor. New York: St Martin’s Press.Google Scholar
- Foster, R. (2016). ‘Doing the wait’: An exploration into the waiting experiences of prisoners’ families. OnlineFirst: Time & Society.Google Scholar
- Foucault, M. (1975). Surveiller et punir: naissance de la prison. Paris: Gallimard.Google Scholar
- Gandy, O. (2000). Exploring identity and identification in cyberspace. Notre Dame Journal of Ethics and Public Policy, 14(2000), 1089.Google Scholar
- GTL. (2019). https://www.gtl.net/correctional-facility-services/enterprise-management-solutions/offender-management-system/. Accessed 8 Apr 2019.
- GUARDIAN RFID. (2019). https://guardianrfid.com/about. Accessed 8 Apr 2019.
- Knight, V. (2018). Developing digital strategies: Becoming a smart prison. Paper presented at the ICT Workshop Stockholm, Stockholm.Google Scholar
- Knight, V., & Van de Steen, S. (2017). Digitizing the prison: The light and dark future. Prison Service Journal, 231, 22–30.Google Scholar
- Kotova, A. (2019). ‘Time… lost time’: Exploring how partners of long-term prisoners experience the temporal pains of imprisonment. Time & Society, 28(2), 478–498.Google Scholar
- Kriminalvården. (2018). https://www.kriminalvarden.se/. Accessed 8 Apr 2019.
- Mayer-Schönberger, V., & Cukier, K. (2013). Big data: A revolution that will transform how we live, work, and think. Boston: Houghton Mifflin Harcourt.Google Scholar
- Memoori. (2017). Correctional facilities can be smart buildings too. https://www.memoori.com/correctional-facilities-can-smart-buildings/. Accessed 8 Apr 2019.
- Nowotny, H. (1994). Time: The modern and postmodern experience. Cambridge: Polity Press.Google Scholar
- O’Neill, C. (2016). Weapons of math destruction: How big data increases inequality and threatens democracy. New York: Crown Publishing.Google Scholar
- Scharff Smith, P. (2012). Imprisonment and internet-access. Human rights, the principle of normalisation and the question of access to digital communications technology. Nordic Journal of Human Rights, 30(4), 454–482.Google Scholar
- Sykes, G. (1958). The society of captives: A study of a maximum security prison. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar