Advertisement

Exploring “Heterochronias”

  • Karin DecknerEmail author
Chapter

Abstract

This contribution uses Foucault’s (1967) powerful concept of Heterotopias as theoretical input to discover and identify those times that are (or are becoming) rather uncommon, exotic, or margin in certain mediated contexts. The background of this exploration is delivered by Helga Nowtony’s concept of eigenzeit (1989) and media-based eigenzeit (2016): taken together, these will help to examine changed experienced time structures due to technological developments. The proposition is to follow Foucault’s general idea, but to shift the focus from analysing space to analysing time and therefore to use the term “heterochronia” in analogy to “heterotopias.” Hereby, the focus will be on those temporal structures that are associated with the use of digital media. This contribution aims at identifying some of those times in everyday life.

References

  1. Adam, B. (1998). Timescapes of modernity. The environment and invisible hazards. London/New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  2. Avanessian, A. (Ed.). (2013). #Akzeleration. Berlin: Merve.Google Scholar
  3. Ernst, W. (2013a). Gleichursprünglichkeit. Zeitwesen und Zeitgegebenheit technischer Medien. Berlin: Kadmos.Google Scholar
  4. Ernst, W. (2013b). Chronopoetik. Zeitweisen und Zeitgaben technischer Medien. Berlin: Kadmos.Google Scholar
  5. Foucault, M. (1967 [1984]). Of other spaces: Utopias and heterotopias (trans: Miskowiec, J.). Architecture/Mouvement/Continuité, 5(1), 1–9.Google Scholar
  6. Foucault, M. (1992). Andere Räume. In K. Barck et al. (Eds.), Aisthesis. Wahrnehmung heute oder Perspektiven einer anderen Ästhetik (pp. 34–46). Leipzig: Reclam.Google Scholar
  7. Hörning, K. H., Gerhard, A., & Michailow, M. (1990). Zeitpioniere. Flexible Arbeitszeit—neuer Lebensstil. Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp.Google Scholar
  8. Keightley, E. (2012). Time, media and modernity. New York: Palgrave.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Nowotny, H. (1989 [1996]). Time: The modern and postmodern experience. Wiley, Kindle-Version. https://www.wiley.com/encg/Time%3A+The+Modern+and+Postmodern+Experience-p-9780745618371
  10. Nowotny, H. (1992). Time and social theory. Towards a social theory of time. Time & Society, 1(3), 421–454.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Nowotny, H. (2017). Eigenzeit. Revisited. In H. Nowotny (Ed.), An orderly mess (pp. 61–93). Budapest/New York: CEU Press.Google Scholar
  12. Pentzold, C. (2018). Between moments and millennia: Temporalizing mediatisation. Media, Culture and Society, 40(6), 927–937.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Rosa, H. (2005). Beschleunigung. Die Veränderung der Zeitstrukturen in der Moderne. Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp.Google Scholar
  14. Rosa, H. (2013). Social acceleration, a new theory of modernity. Berlin/Boston: De Gruyter.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Sharma, S. (2014). In the meantime. London: Duke University Press.Google Scholar
  16. Wajcman, J. (2016 [2014]). Pressed for time: The acceleration of life in digital capitalism. Chicago/London: The University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  17. Wajcman, J., & Dodd, N. (Eds.). (2017). The sociology of speed: Digital, organizational, and social temporalities. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  18. Zintl, D. (2008). Andere Zeiten: Entwurf einer Theorie heterochroner Kultur-Objekte. Saarbrücken: VDM.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Berlin University of the ArtsBerlinGermany

Personalised recommendations