Advertisement

Opportunities and Challenges to Data Sharing with American Indian Tribal Nations

  • Sean BrunaEmail author
Chapter

Abstract

In this chapter I argue that data sharing, new as it is to cultural anthropology, must be carefully considered by researchers and tribes at the conceptual stages of research. In my opinion, sharing all research data with tribes presents an opportunity to decolonize the discipline’s history of exploitative research by challenging disciplinary notions of control, ownership, and management of ethnographic data, not to mention it recognizes and reaffirms the sovereign status of tribes. I provide some useful definitions, provide a brief review of various data, and list the types of data I collected in my most recent research partnership. In doing so, I show the diverse range of data that is collected in research while also foregrounding the ethical methodological concerns of sharing data. Next, I introduce the federal Indian trust relationship and a brief history of exploitative research in Indian country, both of which provide a context for developing data-sharing policies. In the final section, I provide a list of questions tribes and researchers may wish to consider as they discuss and negotiate data-sharing agreements.

Keywords

Ysleta del Sur Pueblo El Paso Texas Diabetes Tribes Pueblo Trust relationship National Institutes of Health Health policy Decolonization Community-based participatory research (CBPR) Mistrust Data-sharing guidelines Data archive Data enclave 

Works Cited

  1. American Anthropological Association. (2012). Principles of Professional Responsibility of the American Anthropological Association. Available at http://ethics.americananthro.org/category/statement/. Accessed 30 Mar 2019.
  2. Anderson, K. (2005). Tending the Wild: Native American Knowledge and the Management of California’s Natural Resources. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
  3. Anderson, N. R., et al. (2007). Issues in Biomedical Research Data Management and Analysis: Needs and Barriers. Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association, 14(4), 478–488.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Barton, S. S. (2004). Narrative Inquiry: Locating Aboriginal Epistemology in a Relational Methodology. Journal of Advanced Nursing, 45(5), 519–526.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Bernard, H. R., & Gravlee, C. C. (Eds.). (2015). Handbook of Methods in Cultural Anthropology. Lanham: Rowman & Littlefield.Google Scholar
  6. Brugge, D., & Missaghian, M. (2006). Protecting the Navajo People Through Tribal Regulation of Research. Science and Engineering Ethics, 12(3), 491–507.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Bruna, S. (2003). Issues of Tigua Recognition: Negotiating Legal and Ethnic Identity on the U.S.-Mexico Border. M.A. Thesis, Program in the Social Sciences, University of Chicago, Chicago.Google Scholar
  8. Bruna, S. (2015). Religious Gardens, Pilgrimages and Dancing: A Critique of Translated Interventions in a Tribal Community. In C. T. Morris & A. G. DeLaricheliere (Eds.), The Applied Anthropology of Obesity: Prevention, Intervention and Identity. Washington, DC: Rowman & Littlefield.Google Scholar
  9. Bruna-Lewis, S. (2013). “Sowing Seeds for the Future with Tigua History and Tradition: Diabetes Prevention and Management at Ysleta del Sur Pueblo. Department of Anthropology, University of New Mexico, Albuquerque, New Mexico, p. 353.Google Scholar
  10. Cohen, F. S. (2018). Cohen’s Handbook of Federal Indian Law. New York: LexisNexis.Google Scholar
  11. Field, L. W., & Fox, R. G. (2007). Anthropology Put to Work. Wenner-Gren International Symposium Series. New York: Berg.Google Scholar
  12. Fluehr-Lobban, C. (2008). Collaborative Anthropology as Twenty-First-Century Ethical Anthropology. Collaborative Anthropologies, 1, 175–182.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Freire, P. (2000). Pedagogy of the Oppressed. New York: Continuum.Google Scholar
  14. Garrison, N. A. (2013). Genomic Justice for Native Americans: Impact of the Havasupai Case on Genetic Research. Science, Technology, & Human Values, 38(2), 201–223.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Harding, A., Harper, B., Stone, D., O’Neill, C., Berger, P., Harris, S., & Donatuto, J. (2011). Conducting Research with Tribal Communities: Sovereignty, Ethics, and Data-Sharing Issues. Environmental Health Perspectives, 120(1), 6–10.Google Scholar
  16. Hart, E. M., et al. (2016). Ten Simple Rules for Digital Data Storage. PLoS Computational Biology, 12(10), e1005097.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Havasupai Tribe of the Havasupai Reservation v. Arizona Board of Regents and Therese Ann Markow. (2009). Arizona Court of Appeals, No. 1 CA-CV 07-0454 and 1 CA-CV 07-0801.Google Scholar
  18. Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act of 1996. (1996). Public Law 104–191. US Statut Large, 1996. 110, 1936–2103.Google Scholar
  19. Ho-Chunk Nation. (n.d.). Ho-Chunk Nation Code (HCC) Title 3 – Health and Safety Code Section 3 – Tribal Research Code, in 3 HCC 3. 2005. Black River Falls: Ho-Chunk Nation.Google Scholar
  20. James, R., et al. (2014). Exploring Pathways to Trust: A Tribal Perspective on Data Sharing. Genetics in Medicine, 16(11), 820–826.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Kim, Y. (2017). Fostering Scientists’ Data Sharing Behaviors Via Data Repositories, Journal Supplements, and Personal Communication Methods. Information Processing & Management, 53(4), 871–885.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Kim, Y., & Adler, M. (2015). Social Scientists’ Data Sharing Behaviors: Investigating the Roles of Individual Motivations, Institutional Pressures, and Data Repositories. International Journal of Information Management, 35(4), 408–418.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Kirkman, M., Hammarberg, K., & de Lacey, S. (2016). Qualitative Research Methods: When to Use Them and How to Judge Them. Human Reproduction, 31(3), 498–501.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Lai, J. C. (2014). Indigenous Cultural Heritage and Intellectual Property Rights: Learning from the New Zealand Experience? Heidelberg: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Lamphere, L. (2004). The Convergence of Applied, Practicing, and Public Anthropology in the 21st Century. Human Organization, 63(4), 431–443.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Lassiter, L. E. (2005). Collaborative Ethnography and Public Anthropology. Current Anthropology, 46(1), 83–106.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Mark, M. (2010). Sample Size and Saturation in PhD Studies Using Qualitative Interviews. Forum: Qualitative Social Research, 11, 3.Google Scholar
  28. Mason, M. (2010). Sample Size and Saturation in PhD Studies Using Qualitative Interviews. Forum Qualitative Sozialforschung/Forum: Qualitative Social Research, 11(3).  https://doi.org/10.17169/fqs-11.3.1428.
  29. Minkler, M., & Wallerstein, N. (2008). Community-Based Participatory Research for Health from Process to Outcomes. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.Google Scholar
  30. Modzelewski, D. (2018). Pueblo Water Rights. In J. Hendry et al. (Eds.), Indigenous Justice: New Tools, Approaches, and Spaces (pp. 53–68). London: Palgrave Macmillan UK.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. National Institutes of Health. (2018, July 2). NIH Data Sharing Policy. Available from: https://grants.nih.gov/grants/policy/data_sharing/
  32. Navajo Nation. (2009). Navajo Nation Research Program: Human Research Review Board. [cited 2018 July 10]. Available from: http://www.nnhrrb.navajonsn.gov/
  33. O’Rourke, P. P., et al. (2015). Harmonization and Streamlining of Research Oversight for Pragmatic Clinical Trials. Clinical Trials, 12(5), 449–456.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Reardon, S. (2017). Navajo Nation Reconsiders Ban on Genetic Research. Nature News, 550(7675), 165.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Tribal Epi Center. (2018, July 10). Tribal Epidemiology Centers. Available from: https://tribalepicenters.org/
  36. Tsai, A. C., et al. (2016). Promises and Pitfalls of Data Sharing in Qualitative Research. Social Science & Medicine, 169, 191–198.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Tsosie, R. (2007). Cultural Challenges to Biotechnology: Native American Genetic Resources and the Concept of Cultural Harm. The Journal of Law, Medicine & Ethics, 35(3), 396–411.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. UNM. (2017). University of New Mexico (UNM) Community Environmental Health Program and National Institutes of Health, Meeting Summary. Tribal Data Sharing and Genetics Policy Development Workshop. Albuquerque: University of New Mexico.Google Scholar
  39. Wallerstein, N., & Duran, B. (2010). Community-Based Participatory Research Contributions to Intervention Research: The Intersection of Science and Practice to Improve Health Equity. American Journal of Public Health, 100, S40–S46.  https://doi.org/10.2105/AJPH.2009.184036.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Warren-Mears, V. (n.d.). Principles and Models for Data Sharing Agreements with American Indian/Alaska Native Communities. Portland: Northwest Portland Area Indian Health Board.Google Scholar
  41. Wutich, A., & Bernard, H. R. (2016). Sharing Qualitative Data & Analysis. With Whom and How Widely?: A Response to ‘Promises and Pitfalls of Data Sharing in Qualitative Research’. Social Science & Medicine, 169, 199–200.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2020

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of AnthropologyWestern Washington UniversityBellinghamUSA

Personalised recommendations