Art and Myth: Beyond Binaries
Employing the Agambean analysis of sovereign power as always involving a state of exception, as well as Heidegger’s ideas on art and truth as aletheia, an analysis of von Trier’s Antichrist is undertaken so as to demonstrate that the film ought best be understood as a work of art that acknowledges yet challenges the standard and ruling binaries of man and woman, masculine and feminine, culture and nature, and the paradigm of which they are a part, so as to make possible the unconcealment of an alternative “truth” that is hidden and obscured by the ruling paradigm and its binaries. Thus, new possibilities for both meaning and human being are discovered.
KeywordsAgamben Aletheia Binaries Heidegger Lilith Myth
- Agamben, Giorgio. 1998. Homo Sacer. Stanford: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
- Bachrach, Naftali Hertz. 2013. Sefer Emek haMelech. New York: Hebrew Books.Google Scholar
- Brannan, Alex. 2016. The Philosophy of Antichrist: Expulsion from Eden. https://cinefilesreviews.com/2016/04/23/the-philosophy-of-antichrist-expulsion-from-eden/4/.
- Brooks, Xan. 2009. Antichrist: A Work of Genius or the Sickest Film in the History of Cinema? https://www.theguardian.com/film/2009/jul/16/antichrist-lars-von-trier-feminism.
- Claxton, Susanne. 2017. Heidegger’s Gods: An Ecofeminist Perspective. London: Rowman & Littlefield International.Google Scholar
- Heidegger, Martin. 1966. Discourse on Thinking. Trans. John M. Anderson and E. Hans Freund. New York: Harper and Row.Google Scholar
- ———. 1977. The Question Concerning Technology. Trans. William Lovitt. New York: Harper and Row.Google Scholar
- ———. 2002. The Essence of Truth: On Plato’s Cave Allegory and Theaetetus. Trans. Ted Sadler. London: Continuum.Google Scholar
- ———. 2004. What Is Called Thinking? Trans. J. Glenn Gray. New York: Harper and Row.Google Scholar