Advertisement

Looking Forward: Adjusting to the New Paradigm

  • Sharon H. MastracciEmail author
  • Mary E. Guy
  • Seung-Bum Yang
Chapter

Abstract

This chapter offers a broadened frame of reference for what constitutes knowledge, extending it beyond the cognitive to embrace the emotive. It explains embodied knowledge and discusses the shift toward emotive competency in public service practice and training. Neuroscience research findings underscore the centrality of emotions to reasoning. Emotive thought is essential to embodied knowledge, which is a far fuller and more appropriate depiction of knowledge for practice and education. Embodied knowledge is especially suited to shared-power governing in the post-bureaucratic present where traditional chains of command function alongside networks to determine processes of public service delivery.

References

  1. Damasio, Antonio. 1994. Descartes’ Error: Emotion, Reason, and the Human Brain. London: Penguin Books.Google Scholar
  2. Follett, Mary Parker. 1919. “Community is a Process.” The Philosophical Review 28 (6): 576–88.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Follett, Mary Parker. 1940a. “The Giving of Orders.” In Dynamic Administration: The Collected Papers of Mary Parker Follett, edited by Henry C. Metcalf and Lyndall Urwick, 50–70. New York, NY: Harper & Row.Google Scholar
  4. Follett, Mary Parker. 1940b. “The Psychology of Consent and Participation.” In Dynamic Administration: The Collected Papers of Mary Parker Follett, edited by Henry C. Metcalf and Lyndall Urwick, 210–29. New York, NY: Harper & Row.Google Scholar
  5. Goodsell, Charles T., ed. 1981. The Public Encounter: Where State and Citizen Meet. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.Google Scholar
  6. Guy, Mary E., and Sharon H. Mastracci. 2018. “Making the Affective Turn: The Importance of Feelings in Theory, Praxis, and Citizenship.” Administrative Theory & Praxis 40 (3): 281–88.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Guy, Mary E., and Todd L. Ely. 2018. Essentials of Public Service: Introduction to Contemporary Public Administration. Irvine, CA: Melvin & Leigh Publishers.Google Scholar
  8. Hsieh, Chih-Wei, Kaifeng Yang, and Kai-Jo Fu. 2012. “Motivational Bases and Emotional Labor: Assessing the Impact of Public Service Motivation.” Public Administration Review 72 (2): 241–51.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Immordino-Yang, Mary Helen, and Antonio Damasio. 2007. “We Feel, Therefore We Learn: The Relevance of Affective and Social Neuroscience to Education.” Mind, Brain, and Education 1 (1): 3–10.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Inglehart, Ronald. 1971. “The Silent Revolution in Europe: Intergenerational Change in Post-industrial Societies.” American Political Science Review 65 (4): 991–1017.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Ljungholm, Doina Popescu. 2014. “The Role of Emotional Labor in the Delivery of Public Services.” Review of Contemporary Philosophy 13 (1): 11–16.Google Scholar
  12. Loughran, J. John. 2002. “Effective Reflective Practice: In Search of Meaning in Learning About Teaching.” Journal of Teacher Education 53 (1): 33–43.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Mastracci, Sharon, and Yvonne Sawbridge. 2019. “Showing You Care: Emotional Labor and Public Service Work.” In (Re)imagining the Future Public Service Workforce, edited by Helen Dickinson, Catherine Needham, Catherine Mangan, and Helen Sullivan, 39–54. Singapore: Routledge.Google Scholar
  14. Miller-Fox, Geri-Anne. 2018. “Emotional Labor Training Typology for Basic Peace Officer Training Curricula.” Administrative Theory & Praxis 40 (4): 357–79.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Newman, Meredith A., and Mary E. Guy. 1998. “Taylor’s Triangles, Follett’s Web.” Administrative Theory & Praxis 20 (3): 287–97.Google Scholar
  16. Pearce, Jone L., and Jessica E. Sowa. 2019. Organizational Behavior: Real Research for Public and Nonprofit Managers. Irvine, CA: Melvin & Leigh Publishers.Google Scholar
  17. Perkins, Frances. 1934. People at Work. New York: John Day Company.Google Scholar
  18. Rubaii, Nadia. 2016. “Bringing the 21st-Century Governance Paradigm to Public Affairs Education: Reimagining How We Teach What We Teach.” Journal of Public Affairs Education 22 (4): 467–82.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Sawbridge, Yvonne, and Alasdair Hewison. 2012. Time to Care: Responding to Concerns About Poor Nursing Care. HSMC Policy Paper. Birmingham, UK: University of Birmingham.Google Scholar
  20. Schon, Donald A. 1983. The Reflective Practitioner: How Professionals Think in Action. New York, NY: Basic Books.Google Scholar
  21. Schon, Donald A. 1987. “Changing Patterns of Inquiry in Work and Living.” Journal of the Royal Society of Arts 135 (5367): 225–37.Google Scholar
  22. Shields, Patricia, ed. 2017. Jane Addams: Progressive Pioneer of Peace, Philosophy, Sociology, Social Work, and Public Administration. Cham, Switzerland: Springer International Publishing.Google Scholar
  23. Stivers, Camilla. 2018. Creativity in the Face of Uncertainty: PA Theory as a Generative Force. Video retrieved from https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yJ5oR-FQR6Y.
  24. United Nations Development Programme. 2014. Civil Services Competency Dictionary. Material downloaded March 8, 2019. http://persmin.gov.in/otraining/Competency%20Dictionary%20for%20the%20Civil%20Services.pdf.
  25. United States Merit Systems Protection Board. 2015. “Emotional Labor: Often Overlooked, Always Present.” Issues of Merit Newsletter (Winter), 1 and 7. Accessed at https://www.mspb.gov/MSPBSEARCH/viewdocs.aspx?docnumber=1130380&version=1134867&application=ACROBAT.
  26. United States Merit Systems Protection Board. 2019. “The Price of Masking Our True Emotions at Work.” Issues of Merit Newsletter, February 7. Accessed at https://www.mspb.gov/MSPBSEARCH/viewdocs.aspx?docnumber=1585933&version=1591693&application=ACROBAT.
  27. Wallbank, Sonya. 2013. “Maintaining Professional Resilience Through Group Restorative Supervision.” Community Practitioner 86 (8): 26–81.Google Scholar
  28. Wilson, Edward. 1998. Consilience: The Unity of Knowledge. New York, NY and Cambridge, UK: Knopf and Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  • Sharon H. Mastracci
    • 1
    Email author
  • Mary E. Guy
    • 2
  • Seung-Bum Yang
    • 3
  1. 1.Department of Political ScienceUniversity of UtahSalt Lake CityUSA
  2. 2.School of Public AffairsUniversity of Colorado DenverDenverUSA
  3. 3.Department of Public AdministrationKonkuk UniversitySeoulSouth Korea

Personalised recommendations