Advertisement

An Introduction to Radiology and Cytopathology Considerations in a Collaborative Biopsy Service

  • Ajit S. Paintal
  • Ritu Nayar
  • Albert A. NemcekJr.
Chapter

Abstract

Image-guided procurement of tissue or fluid for diagnostic purposes has become one of the most commonly performed procedures in medicine. Although the focus of this Atlas is cytologic analysis of tissue specimens, we would note that cytologic, biochemical, and microbiologic evaluation of fluids obtained in this manner is similarly important, and for the purposes of this text the term “biopsy” will be assumed to cover both settings.

The basic elements of image-guided biopsy are the following: a lesion or organ is identified as amenable and appropriate for biopsy; a method of imaging guidance is chosen; an approach to the lesion or organ is plotted; needle(s) or other devices are used to obtain tissue or fluid; and the material is processed and reviewed.

Keywords

Interventional radiology Cytopathology Rapid on site evaluation (ROSE) Adequacy Triage Multidisciplinary FNA Biopsy technique 

References

  1. 1.
    Mueller PR, Miketic LM, Simeone JF, Silverman SG, Saini S, Wittenberg J, et al. Severe acute pancreatitis after percutaneous biopsy of the pancreas. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 1988;151:493–4.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Rastegar RF, Hou D, Harris A, Yoshida E, Lum B, Ho S, et al. Is a liver biopsy necessary? Investigation of a suspected hepatocellular carcinoma: a pictorial essay of hepatocellular carcinoma and the revised American Association for the Study of Liver Disease criteria. Can Assoc Radiol J. 2012;63:329–40.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Kim SY, Chung SW. Small musculoskeletal soft-tissue lesions: US-guided core needle biopsy—comparative study of diagnostic yields according to lesion size. Radiology. 2016;278:156–63.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Montaudon M, Latrabe V, Pariente A, Corneloup D, Begueret H, Laurent F. Factors influencing accuracy of CT-guided percutaneous biopsies of pulmonary lesions. Eur Radiol. 2004;14:1234–40.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Wu CC, Maher MM, Shepard JA. Complications of CT-guided percutaneous needle biopsy of the chest: prevention and management. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2011;196:W678–82.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Klein JS, Zarka MA. Transthoracic needle biopsy: an overview. J Thorac Imaging. 1997;12:232–49.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Winter TC, Lee FT Jr, Hinshaw JL. Ultrasound-guided biopsies in the abdomen and pelvis. Ultrasound Q. 2008;24:45–68.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Eckman MH, Erban JK, Singh SK, Kao GS. Screening for the risk of bleeding or thrombosis. Ann Intern Med. 2003;138:W15–24.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Vanderveen KA, Thompson SM, Callstrom MR, Young WF Jr, Grant CS, Farley DR, et al. Biopsy of pheochromocytomas and paragangliomas: potential for disaster. Surgery. 2009;146:1158–66.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Magabe PC, Bloom AL. Sudden death from carcinoid crisis during image-guided biopsy of a lung mass. J Vasc Interv Radiol. 2014;25:484–7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Silva MA, Hegab B, Hyde C, Guo B, Buckels JA, Mirza DF. Needle track seeding following biopsy of liver lesions in the diagnosis of hepatocellular cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Gut. 2008;57:1592–6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Huang DY, Yusuf GT, Daneshi M, Husainy MA, Ramnarine R, Sellars ME, et al. Contrast-enhanced US-guided interventions: improving success rate and avoiding complications using US contrast agents. Radiographics. 2017;37:652–64.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Paparo F, Piccazzo R, Cevasco L, Piccardo A, Pinna F, Belli F, et al. Advantages of percutaneous abdominal biopsy under PET-CT/ultrasound fusion imaging guidance: a pictorial essay. Abdom Imaging. 2014;39:1102–13.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Hakime A, Barah A, Deschamps F, Farouli G, Joskin J, Tselikas L, et al. Prospective comparison of freehand and electromagnetic needle tracking for US-guided percutaneous liver biopsy. J Vasc Interv Radiol. 2013;24:1682–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Abi-Jaoudeh N, Duffy AG, Greten TF, Kohn EC, Clark TW, Wood BJ. Personalized oncology in interventional radiology. J Vasc Interv Radiol. 2013;24:1083–92.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Marshall D, Laberge JM, Firetag B, Miller T, Kerlan RK. The changing face of percutaneous image-guided biopsy: molecular profiling and genomic analysis in current practice. J Vasc Interv Radiol. 2013;24:1094–103.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Diaz LA Jr, Bardelli A. Liquid biopsies: genotyping circulating tumor DNA. J Clin Oncol. 2014;32:579–86.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Zhang S, Ivanovic M, Nemcek AA Jr, Defrias DV, Lucas E, Nayar R. Thin core needle biopsy crush preparations in conjunction with fine-needle aspiration for the evaluation of thyroid nodules: a complementary approach. Cancer. 2008;114(6):512–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Leiman G. My approach to pancreatic fine needle aspiration. J Clin Pathol. 2007;60:43–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Mohanty SK, Pradhan D, Sharma S, Sharma A, Patnaik N, Feuerman M, et al. Endoscopic ultrasound guided fine-needle aspiration: what variables influence diagnostic yield? Diagn Cytopathol. 2018;46:293–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Zakowski MF. “…That which we call a rose…”: a critical analysis of rapid on-site evaluation. Cancer Cytopathol. 2016;124:857–61.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    de Koster EJ, Kist JW, Vriens MR, Borel Rinkes IH, Valik GD, de Keizer B. Thyroid ultrasound-guided fine-needle aspiration: the positive influence of on-site adequacy assessment and number of needle passes on diagnostic cytology rate. Acta Cytol. 2016;60:39–45.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Lal A, Nemcek AA, Ariga R, Gattuso P, Nayar R. Splenic fine needle aspiration and core biopsy: a review of 49 cases. Acta Cytol. 2003;47(6):951–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Nayar R, Nemcek A. Microcalcifications in a solitary thyroid nodule. Pathol Case Rev. 2003;8(1):22–5.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Rao P, Spies S, Angelos P, Nayar R. The case of the “vanishing” parathyroid adenoma. Pathol Case Rev. 2003;8(1):42–6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Nayar R, Bourtsos E, Lal A, Nemcek A, De Frias VS. Cytomorphology of pancreatic microcystic adenoma (MCA). Cancer Cytopathol. 2004;102(5):288–94.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Riaz A, Kulik L, Lewandowski RJ, Ryu RK, Spear GG, Mulcahy MF, et al. Radiologic–pathologic correlation of hepatocellular carcinoma treated with internal radiation using yttrium-90 microspheres. Hepatology. 2009;49(4):1185–93.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Riaz A, Kulik L, Lewandowski RJ, Ryu RK, Spear GG, Mulcahy MF, et al. Radiologic-pathologic correlation of hepatocellular carcinoma treated with transarterial chemoembolization. Hepatology. 2009;49(4):1185–93.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Oppenheimer J, Kasuganti D, Nayar R, Chrisman H, Lewandowski R, Nemcek A, Ryu R. How to interpret thyroid biopsy results: a three year retrospective interventional radiology experience. Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol. 2010;33(4):800–5.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Riaz A, Memon K, Miller FH, Nikolaidis P, Kulik LM, Lewandowski R, et al. Role of the EASL, RECIST, and WHO response guidelines alone or in combination for hepatocellular carcinoma: radiologic–pathologic correlation. J Hepatol. 2011;54(4):695–704.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Heller M, Zanocco K, Zydowicz S, Elaraj D, Nayar R, Sturgeon C. Cost-effectiveness analysis of repeat FNA for thyroid biopsies read as atypia of undetermined significance. Surgery. 2012;152(3):423–30.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Vouche M, Kulik L, Atassi R, Memon K, Hickey R, Ganger D, et al. Radiological-pathological analysis of WHO, RECIST, EASL, mRECIST and DWI: imaging analysis from a prospective randomized trial of Y90 +/− sorafenib. Hepatology. 2013;58(5):1655–66.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Berg N, Gehl J, Vande Haar M, Balco M, Kulesza P. The efficacy of on-site evaluation for identification of transplant pancreas. Acta Cytol. 2013;57(5):443–6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2020

Authors and Affiliations

  • Ajit S. Paintal
    • 1
  • Ritu Nayar
    • 2
  • Albert A. NemcekJr.
    • 3
  1. 1.Northshore Medical Group, Evanston HospitalEvanstonUSA
  2. 2.Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Northwestern Memorial HospitalChicagoUSA
  3. 3.Northwestern University Feinberg School of MedicineChicagoUSA

Personalised recommendations