Advertisement

Agency and Independence: “It Is Not the End of the World!”*

  • Lara Bezzina
Chapter
Part of the Palgrave Studies in Disability and International Development book series (PSDID)

Abstract

The preceding chapters explored the inextricable connection of self- and societal perceptions of disability in Burkina Faso to notions of autonomy and economic self-sufficiency. Those disabled people who are more or less financially independent tend to identify less with being defined as disabled than those who are less autonomous. Among the former, there is also an emerging sense of disability affirmation and of non-tragedy. This chapter explores what lies behind this positive outlook and what leads disabled people to be autonomous and to assert their agency. Disabled people’s narratives—emerging through both the participatory video and other exchanges—reveal not only disabled people’s struggles in overcoming the hurdles they encounter, but also their views on how development can be more beneficial to them. Such narratives also point to the significance of intersectionality in understanding disabled people’s lived experiences, which the chapter explores through the various factors affecting disabled people’s life courses. The chapter ends with reflections on the way in which disabled people are challenging the images of passivity, but also on what such affirmation—often pushed forward by the more ‘elite’ disabled people—implies. It also looks at what it means for disabled people and DPOs to negotiate development interventions in a context where development ‘beneficiaries’ are ultimately dependent on the agencies (mostly INGOs) which intervene with them.

References

  1. Atampugre, Nicholas. 1997. “Aid, NGOs and Grassroots Development: Northern Burkina Faso.” Review of African Political Economy 24 (71) (March): 57–73. https://www.jstor.org/stable/4006395.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Bhabha, Homi K. 1994. The Location of Culture, 2nd ed. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  3. Bignall, Simone. 2010. Postcolonial Agency: Critique and constructivism. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Becker, Gaylene. 1980. Growing Old in Silence. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
  5. Campos, Mavis. 1995. “Developing livelihoods.” In Innovations in Developing Countries for People with Disabilities, edited by Brian O’Toole and Roy McConkey. Chorley: Lisieux Hall Publications.Google Scholar
  6. Chambers, Robert. 1994. “Paradigm Shifts and the Practice of Participatory Research and Development.” Working Paper No. 2, Institute of Development Studies, UK. https://opendocs.ids.ac.uk/opendocs/handle/123456789/1761.
  7. Connell, Raewyn. 2011. “Southern Bodies and Disability: Re-thinking concepts.” Third World Quarterly 32 (8): 1369–1381.  https://doi.org/10.1080/01436597.2011.614799.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Deegan, Mary Jo. 2010. “‘Feeling Normal’ and ‘Feeling Disabled’.” In Disability as a Fluid State. Research in Social Science and Disability: Volume 5, edited by Sharon N. Barnartt. Bingley: Emerald Publishing.Google Scholar
  9. Handicap International. 2005. “Les Représentations du Handicap au Burkina Faso: Processus de Marginalisation et d’Intégration des Personnes en Situation de Handicap” [The Representations of Disability in Burkina Faso: The Process of Marginalisation and Integration of People with Disabilities]. http://www.hiproweb.org/fileadmin/cdroms/raise-awareness-0909/files/Y10.pdf.
  10. Imrie, Rob. 1996. “Ableist Geographies, Disablist Spaces: Towards a Reconstruction of Golledge’s ‘Geography and the Disabled’.” Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers 21 (2): 397–403.  https://doi.org/10.2307/622489.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Kama, Amit. 2004. “Supercrips Versus the Pitiful Handicapped: Reception of Disabling Images by Disabled Audience Members.” Communications 29 (4): 447–466.  https://doi.org/10.1515/comm.2004.29.4.447.
  12. Kapoor, Ilan. 2002. “Capitalism, Culture, Agency: Dependency Versus Postcolonial Theory.” Third World Quarterly 23 (4): 647–664.  https://doi.org/10.1080/0143659022000005319.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Kapoor, Ilan. 2004. “Hyper-Self-Reflexive Development?: Spivak on Representing the Third World ‘Other’.” Third World Quarterly 25 (4): 627–647.  https://doi.org/10.1080/01436590410001678898.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Lang, Raymond. 2000. “The Role of NGOs in the Process of Empowerment and Social Transformation of People with Disabilities.” Asia Pacific Disability Rehabilitation Journal 1 (1): 1–19. http://english.aifo.it/disability/apdrj/selread100/full_document.pdf.
  15. Laws, Glenda, and John Radford. 1998. “Place, Identity, and Disability: Narratives of Intellectually Disabled People in Toronto.” In Putting Health into Place: Landscape, Identity, & Well-Being, edited by Robin A. Kearns and Wilbert M. Gesler. New York: Syracuse University Press.Google Scholar
  16. Loomba, Ania. 2005. Colonialism/Postcolonialism, 2nd ed. Abingdon: Routledge.Google Scholar
  17. Manzo, Kate. 2005. “Black Consciousness and the Quest for a Counter-Modernist Development.” In Power of Development, edited by Jonathan Crush. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  18. McEwan, Cheryl. 2009. Postcolonialism and Development. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  19. Meekosha, Helen. 2008. “Contextualizing Disability: Developing Southern/Global Theory.” Keynote paper given at the 4th Biennial Disability Studies Conference, Lancaster University, UK, September 2–4. http://wwda.org.au/papers/confpaps/confpaps2006/meekosha2008.
  20. Moore-Gilbert, Bart. 1997. Postcolonial Theory: Contexts, Practices, Politics. London: Verso.Google Scholar
  21. Nash, Jennifer C. 2008. “Re-thinking Intersectionality.” Feminist Review 89 (1): 1–15.  https://doi.org/10.1057/fr.2008.4.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Nelson, Hilde Lindemann. 2001. Damaged Identities, Narrative Repair. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
  23. Njenga, Frank. 2009. “Perspectives of Intellectual Disability in Africa: Epidemiology and Policy Services for Children and Adults.” Current Opinion in Psychiatry 22 (5): 457–461.  https://doi.org/10.1097/yco.0b013e32832e63a1.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Power, Marcus. 2001. “Geographies of Disability and Development in Southern Africa.” Disability Studies Quarterly 21 (4): 84–97. http://dsq-sds.org/article/view/320/388.
  25. Quayson, Ato. 2002. “Looking Awry: Tropes of Disability in Postcolonial Writing.” In Relocating Postcolonialism, edited by David Theo Goldberg and Ato Quayson. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
  26. Quinn, Gerard, and Theresia Degener (eds.). 2002. Human Rights and Disability: The Current Use and Future Potential of United Nations Human Rights Instruments in the Context of Disability. New York: United Nations Publications.Google Scholar
  27. Roenigk, Emily. 2014. “5 Reasons ‘Poverty Porn’ Empowers the Wrong Person.” The Huffington Post, April 16. http://www.huffingtonpost.com/emily-roenigk/poverty-charity-media_b_5155627.html.
  28. Rupley, Lawrence, Lamissa Bangali, and Boureima Diamitani. 2013. Historical Dictionary of Burkina Faso, 3rd ed. Lanham: Scarecrow Press.Google Scholar
  29. Shakespeare, Tom. 1996. “Disability, Identity and Difference.” In Exploring the Divide: Illness and Disability, edited by Colin Barnes and Geof Mercer. Leeds: The Disability Press.Google Scholar
  30. Shaw, Linda R., Fong Chan, and Brian T. McMahon. 2012. “Intersectionality and Disability Harassment: The Interactive Effects of Disability, Race, Age, and Gender.” Rehabilitation Counseling Bulletin 55 (2): 82–91.  https://doi.org/10.1177/0034355211431167.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Soldatic, Karen, and Janaka Biyanwila. 2010. “Tsunami and the Construction of Disabled Southern Body.” Global South SEPHIS E-magazine: Special Issue—History of Medicine in the Global South 6 (3) (July): 75–84. https://espace.curtin.edu.au/bitstream/handle/20.500.11937/5546/153346_153346.pdf?sequence=2.
  32. Soldatic, Karen, and Helen Meekosha. 2012. “Disability and Neoliberal State Formations.” In Routledge Handbook of Disability Studies, edited by Nick Watson, Alan Roulstone, and Carol Thomas. Abingdon: Routledge.Google Scholar
  33. Spivak, Gayatri Chakravorty. 1990. “Poststructuralism, Marginality, Post-coloniality and Value.” In Literary Theory Today, edited by Peter Collier and Helga Geyer-Ryan. Cambridge: Polity Press.Google Scholar
  34. Spivak, Gayatri Chakravorty. 1994. “Can the Subaltern Speak?” In Colonial Discourse and Post-colonial Theory: A Reader, edited by Patrick Williams and Laura Chrisman. New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
  35. Swartz, Leslie. 2014. “Five Challenges for Disability-Related Research in Sub-Saharan Africa.” African Journal of Disability 3 (2): 1–6. http://dx.doi.org/10.4102/ajod.v3i2.149.
  36. Trani, Jean-François, and Mitchell Loeb. 2012. “Poverty and Disability: A Vicious Circle? Evidence from Afghanistan and Zambia.” Journal of International Development (24): 19–52.  https://doi.org/10.1002/jid.1709.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Wolfensberger, Wolf. 1972. Normalization: The Principle of Normalization in Human Services. Toronto: National Institute on Mental Retardation.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2020

Authors and Affiliations

  • Lara Bezzina
    • 1
  1. 1.Independent ResearcherMostaMalta

Personalised recommendations