Advertisement

Introduction

  • Lara Bezzina
Chapter
Part of the Palgrave Studies in Disability and International Development book series (PSDID)

Abstract

This chapter starts by introducing the topic of disability in development and the reasons as to why there is a great need to delve deeper into this subject. The second part then looks at the role of international NGOs (INGOs) in the ‘developing’ world today, and more specifically in the disability domain in Global South contexts, where western NGOs are major players. It explores how disabled people are represented by both INGOs and the hegemonic non-disabled members of society, both in western and in Global South contexts. This sets the context for the discussions and arguments presented in this book, in attempting to address critiques by disability scholars targeted at the absence of (participatory) research engaging with the lived experiences of disabled people in low-income countries. The discussions contained in this book, based on work and research in the West African country of Burkina Faso, explore the need and significance of opening up spaces where disabled people can be heard. In order to lay the foundations of the book, the chapter then explores the two main concepts on which this book is based: disability and development. It also looks at the necessity of looking at both concepts through the lenses of postcolonial theory, which links to the penultimate section, delving into the research the book is based on. This section explores the need for participatory research in the context of disability in Global South contexts, but also the pitfalls of these methods. It includes an exploration of the ethical ramifications of conducting research with disabled people in countries like Burkina Faso, including the translation necessarily involved in such research. Finally, the chapter outlines the content of the rest of the book.

References

  1. AbleChildAfrica. n.d. “You Can Help.” Accessed December 15, 2018. http://www.ablechildafrica.org.
  2. Alexander, Catherine, Natalie Beale, Mike Kesby, Sara Kindon, Julia McMillan, Rachel Pain, and Friederike Ziegler. 2007. “Participatory Diagramming: A Critical View from North East England.” In Participatory Action Research Approaches and Methods: Connecting People, Participation and Place, edited by Sara Kindon, Rachel Pain, and Mike Kesby. Oxon: Routledge.Google Scholar
  3. Alkire, Sabina, José Manuel Roche, and Andy Sumner. 2013. “Where Do the World’s Multidimensionally Poor People Live?” Working Paper: No. 61, Oxford Poverty & Human Development Initiative (OPHI), March. http://ophi.org.uk/where-do-the-worlds-multidimensionally-poor-people-live.
  4. Atkinson, Rebecca. 2015. “Viewpoint: Is It Time to Stop Using the Word “Disability”?” September 30. http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/blogs-ouch-34385738.
  5. Baird, Vanessa. 1992. “Difference and Defiance.” July 5. http://newint.org/features/1992/07/05/keynote.
  6. Barnes, Colin. 1992. Disabling Imagery and the Media: An Exploration of the Principles for Media Representations of Disabled People. Halifax: The British Council of Organisations of Disabled People and Ryburn Publishing.Google Scholar
  7. Barnes, Colin. 2001. “Emancipatory’ Disability Research: Project or Process?” Public Lecture at City Chambers, Glasgow, Scotland, October 24. https://disability-studies.leeds.ac.uk/wp-content/uploads/sites/40/library/Barnes-glasgow-lecture.pdf.
  8. Barnes, Colin, and Geof Mercer. 2003. Disability. Cambridge: Polity Press.Google Scholar
  9. Barnes, Colin, and Geof Mercer (eds.). 2005. The Social Model of Disability: Europe and the Majority World. Leeds: The Disability Press.Google Scholar
  10. Berberi, Tammy, and Christian Flaugh. 2016. “Disability in French and Francophone Worlds.” Journal of Literary & Cultural Disability Studies 10 (2): 129–137. https://muse.jhu.edu/article/625069.
  11. Blunt, Alison, and Jane Wills. 2000. Dissident Geographies: An Introduction to Radical Ideas and Practice. Harlow: Pearson Education.Google Scholar
  12. Brock, Karen. 2002. “Introduction: Knowing Poverty—Critical Reflections on Participatory Research and Policy.” In Knowing Poverty: Critical Reflections on Participatory Research and Policy, edited by Karen Brock, and Rosemary McGee. London: Earthscan Publications.Google Scholar
  13. Bujra, Janet. 2006. “Lost in Translation? The Use of Interpreters in Fieldwork.” In Doing Development Research, edited by Vandana Desai, and Robert Potter. London: Sage.Google Scholar
  14. Cahill, Caitlin (based on work with the Fed up Honeys). 2007. “Participatory Data Analysis.” In Participatory Action Research Approaches and Methods: Connecting People, Participation and Place, edited by Sara Kindon, Rachel Pain, and Mike Kesby. Oxon: Routledge.Google Scholar
  15. Cahill, Caitlin, and María Elena Torre. 2007. “Beyond the Journal Article: Representations, Audience, and the Presentation of Participatory Action Research.” In Participatory Action Research Approaches and Methods: Connecting People, Participation and Place, edited by Sara Kindon, Rachel Pain, and Mike Kesby. Oxon: Routledge.Google Scholar
  16. Cameron, Colin. 2008. “Further Towards an Affirmation Model.” In Disability Studies: Emerging Insights and Perspectives, edited by Thomas Campbell, Fernando Fontes, Laura Hemingway, Armineh Soorenian, and Chris Till. Leeds: The Disability Press.Google Scholar
  17. Cameron, Colin. 2015. “Why We Are Disabled People, Not People with Disabilities.” July 2. https://www.disabilityartsonline.org.uk/why-we-are-disabled-people-not-people-with-disabilities.
  18. Carvalho, Soniya, and Howard White. 1997. “Combining the Quantitative and Qualitative Approaches to Poverty Measurement and Analysis: The Practice and the Potential.” Technical Paper No. 366, The World Bank. http://documents.worldbank.org/curated/en/443151468739272919/Combining-the-quantitative-and-qualitative-approaches-to-poverty-measurement-and-analysis-the-practice-and-the-potential.
  19. CBM International. 2016. “Series on Disability-Inclusive Development.” August 5. https://www.cbm.org/Series-on-Disability-Inclusive-Development-514454.php.
  20. Chakrabarty, Dipesh. 2002. Habitations of Modernity: Essays in the Wake of the Subaltern. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  21. Chambers, Robert. 1983. Rural Development: Putting the Last First. Harlow: Longman Group.Google Scholar
  22. Christiaensen, Luc. 2001. “The Qual-Quant Debate Within Its Epistemological Context: Some Practical Implications.” Contribution to the Qual-Quant: Qualitative and Quantitative Poverty Appraisal—Complementarities, Tensions and the Way Forward Workshop, Cornell University, New York, March 15–16. http://www.oerafrica.org/FTPFolder/SharedFiles/ResourceFiles/36144/33531/33511/Quantitative%20and%20Qualitative%20Appraisal.pdf.
  23. Chouinard, Vera. 1997. “Making Space for Disabling Differences: Challenging Ableist Geographies.” Environment and Planning D: Society and Space 15: 379–387.Google Scholar
  24. Cleaver, Frances. 2001. “Institutions, Agency and the Limitations of Participatory Approaches to Development.” In Participation: The New Tyranny? edited by Bill Cooke and Uma Kothari. London: Zed Books.Google Scholar
  25. Cobley, David. 2018. Disability and International Development: A Guide for Students and Practitioners. Oxon: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Cocks, Errol, and Judith Cockram. 1995. “The Participatory Research Paradigm and Intellectual Disability.” Mental Handicap Research 8 (1) (March): 25–37.  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-3148.1995.tb00140.x.
  27. Conklin, Alice L. 1997. A Mission to Civilise: The Republican Idea of Empire in France and West Africa, 1895–1930. Stanford: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
  28. Cooke, Bill, and Uma Kothari (eds.). 2001. Participation: The New Tyranny?. London: Zed Books.Google Scholar
  29. Cornwall, Andrea, and Rachel Jewkes. 1995. “What Is Participatory Research?” Social Science & Medicine 41 (12) (December): 1667–1676.  https://doi.org/10.1016/0277-9536(95)00127-S.
  30. Cowen, Michael P., and Robert W. Shenton. 1996. Doctrines of Development. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  31. Crotty, Michael. 1998. The Foundations of Social Research: Meaning and Perspective in the Research Process. St Leonards: Allen & Unwin.Google Scholar
  32. Davis, Lennard J. (ed.). 2006. The Disability Studies Reader, 2nd ed. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  33. Department for International Development. 2000. Disability, Poverty and Development. London: Stairway Communications.Google Scholar
  34. Derrida, Jacques. 1985. Des Tours de Babel. In Difference in Translation, ed. Joseph F. Graham. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
  35. Devlieger, Patrick J. 1999. “Frames of Reference in African Proverbs on Disability.” International Journal of Disability, Development and Education 46 (4): 439–451.  https://doi.org/10.1080/103491299100425.
  36. Devlieger, Patrick J. 2006. “Experience of Disability: Sub-Saharan Africa.” In Encyclopedia of Disability: Volume 5, edited by Gary L. Albrecht. Thousand Oaks: Sage.Google Scholar
  37. Devlieger, Patrick J. 2010. “At the Interstices of Classification: Notes on the Category of Disability in Sub-Saharan Africa.” In Disability as a Fluid State—Research in Social Science and Disability: Volume 5, edited by Sharon N. Barnartt. Bingley: Emerald Publishing.Google Scholar
  38. Disability Africa. 2018. “Improving Outcomes for Disabled Young People in Africa.” https://www.disability-africa.org/home.
  39. Domosh, Mona. 1991. “Toward a Feminist Historiography of Geography.” Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers 16 (1): 95–104. https://www.jstor.org/stable/622908.
  40. Education for All. 2006. EFA Global Monitoring Report: Literacy for Life. Paris: United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization.Google Scholar
  41. Education for All. 2007. EFA Global Monitoring Report: Strong Foundations—Early Childhood Care and Education. Paris: United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization.Google Scholar
  42. Education for All. 2010. EFA Global Monitoring Report: Reaching the Marginalized. Paris: United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization.Google Scholar
  43. Edwards, Michael, and David Hulme (eds.). 1995. Non-governmental Organisations—Performance and Accountability: Beyond the Magic Bullet. London: Earthscan Publications.Google Scholar
  44. Egan, Lisa. 2012. “I’m Not a ‘Person with a Disability’: I’m a Disabled Person.” November 9. http://www.xojane.com/issues/i-am-not-a-person-with-a-disability-i-am-a-disabled-person.
  45. Escobar, Arturo. 2005. “Imagining a Post-development Era.” In Power of Development, edited by Jonathan Crush. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  46. European Commission. 2004. Guidance Note on Disability and Development for European Union Delegations and Services. Belgium: European Commission Directorate-General for Development.Google Scholar
  47. Fals-Borda, Orlando. 1988. Knowledge and People’s Power: Lessons with Peasants in Nicaragua, Mexico and Colombia. New Delhi: Indian Social Institute.Google Scholar
  48. Fals-Borda, Orlando. 1991. “Some Basic Ingredients.” In Action and Knowledge: Breaking the Monopoly with Participatory Action-Research, edited by Orlando Fals-Borda, and Muhammad Anisur Rahman. New York: The Apex Press.Google Scholar
  49. Fanon, Frantz. 2008. Black Skin, White Masks. Translated by Charles Lam Markmann. London: Pluto Press.Google Scholar
  50. Fine, Michelle. 1994. “Working the Hyphens: Reinventing Self and Other in Qualitative Research.” In Handbook of Qualitative Research, edited by Norman K. Denzin, and Yvonna S. Lincoln. Thousand Oaks: Sage.Google Scholar
  51. Fine, Michelle. 2008. “An Epilogue, of Sorts.” In Revolutionizing Education: Youth Participatory Action Research in Motion, edited by Julio Cammarota, and Michelle Fine. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  52. Finlay, W. M. L., and E. Lyons. 2005. “Rejecting the Label: A Social Constructionist Analysis.” Mental Retardation 43 (2): 120–134.  https://doi.org/10.1352/0047-6765(2005)43%3c120:RTLASC%3e2.0.CO;2.
  53. Foote Whyte, William (ed.). 1991. Participatory Action Research. Newbury Park: Sage.Google Scholar
  54. Gilbert, Melissa R. 1994. “The Politics of Location: Doing Feminist Research at ‘Home’.” The Professional Geographer 46 (1): 90–96.  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.0033-0124.1994.00090.x.
  55. Golden, Anne V. 2003. “An Analysis of the Dissimilar Coverage of the 2002 Olympics and Paralympics: Frenzied Pack Journalism Versus the Empty Press Room.” Disability Studies Quarterly 23 (3/4). http://dsq-sds.org/article/view/437/614.
  56. Gore, Charles. 2015. “The Post-2015 Moment: Towards Sustainable Development Goals and a New Global Development Paradigm.” Journal of International Development 27 (6): 717–732.  https://doi.org/10.1002/jid.3109.
  57. Grech, Shaun. 2011. “Recolonising Debates or Perpetuated Coloniality? Decentring the Spaces of Disability, Development and Community in the Global South.” International Journal of Inclusive Education 15 (1): 87–100. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/13603116.2010.496198.
  58. Grech, Shaun. 2015. Disability and Poverty in the Global South: Renegotiating Development in Guatemala. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Grech, Shaun. 2016. “Disability and Development: Critical Connections, Gaps and Contradictions.” In Disability in the Global South: The Critical Handbook, edited by Shaun Grech, and Karen Soldatic. Cham: Springer.Google Scholar
  60. Grech, Shaun, and Karen Soldatic. 2014. “Introducing Disability and the Global South (DGS): We Are Critical, We Are Open Access!” Disability and the Global South 1 (1): 1–4. https://dgsjournal.org/volume-1-number-1.
  61. Groce, Nora, and Maria Kett. 2013. “The Disability and Development Gap.” Working Paper Series: No. 21, Leonard Cheshire Disability and Inclusive Development Centre, UCL. http://www.ucl.ac.uk/iehc/research/epidemiology-public-health/research/leonard-cheshire-research/research/active-research-programmes/esrc-bridging-the-gap.
  62. Groce, Nora, Maria Kett, Raymond Lang, and Jean-François Trani. 2011. “Disability and Poverty: The Need for a More Nuanced Understanding of Implications for Development Policy and Practice.” Third World Quarterly 32 (8): 1493–1513. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/01436597.2011.604520.
  63. Hall, Edward, and Robin Kearns. 2001. “Making Space for the ‘Intellectual’ in Geographies of Disability.” Health & Place 7 (September): 237–246.  https://doi.org/10.1016/S1353-8292(01)00007-7.
  64. Handicap International. 2005. “Les Représentations du Handicap au Burkina Faso: Processus de Marginalisation et d’Intégration des Personnes en Situation de Handicap” [The Representations of Disability in Burkina Faso: The Process of Marginalisation and Integration of People with Disabilities]. http://www.hiproweb.org/fileadmin/cdroms/raise-awareness-0909/files/Y10.pdf.
  65. Handicap International. 2016. “Burkina Faso 2016.” https://www.handicapinternational.be/fr/burkina-faso-0.
  66. Hart, Gillian. 2006. “Post-apartheid Developments in Historical and Comparative Perspective.” In The Development Decade? Economic and Social Change in South Africa, 1994–2004, edited by Vishnu Padayachee. Cape Town: Human Sciences Research Council.Google Scholar
  67. Hettne, Björn. 2008. “Current Trends and Future Options in Development Studies.” In The Companion to Development Studies, edited by Vandana Desai, and Robert B. Potter, 2nd ed. London: Hodder Education.Google Scholar
  68. Humanity & Inclusion UK. 2018. “Disability: The Global Picture.” Last updated 2018. https://humanity-inclusion.org.uk/en/disability-the-global-picture.
  69. Humanity & Inclusion U.S. n.d. “Burkina Faso.” Accessed June 6, 2018. http://www.hi-us.org/burkina_faso.
  70. Inclusion International. 2004. Status Report on Poverty and Disability in the Americas: Voices from the Americas. London: Inclusion International.Google Scholar
  71. Kapoor, Ilan. 2004. “Hyper-Self-Reflexive Development? Spivak on Representing the Third World ‘Other’.” Third World Quarterly 25 (4): 627–647.  https://doi.org/10.1080/01436590410001678898.
  72. Kindon, Sara. 2003. “Video in Geographic Research: A Feminist Practice of Looking?” Area 35 (2): 142–153. https://www.jstor.org/stable/20004304.
  73. Kindon, Sara, Rachel Pain, and Mike Kesby, (eds.). 2007. Participatory Action Research Approaches and Methods: Connecting People, Participation and Place. Oxon: Routledge.Google Scholar
  74. Kindon, Sara, Rachel Pain, and Mike Kesby. 2009. “Participatory Action Research.” International Encyclopedia of Human Geography: 90–95. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/B978-008044910-4.00490-9.
  75. Kitchin, Rob. 2001. “Using Participatory Action Research Approaches in Geographical Studies of Disability: Some Reflections.” Disability Studies Quarterly 21 (4): 61–69. http://dx.doi.org/10.18061/dsq.v21i4.318.
  76. Krut, Riva. 1997. “Globalization and Civil Society: NGO Influence in International Decision-Making.” Discussion Paper: No. 83, United Nations Research Institute for Social Development. http://www.unrisd.org/80256B3C005BCCF9/(httpPublications)/87428A38D3E0403380256B650043B768.
  77. Landry, Donna, and Gerald MacLean (eds.). 1996. The Spivak Reader: Selected Works of Gayatri Chakravorty Spivak. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  78. Lang, Raymond. 2000. “The Role of NGOs in the Process of Empowerment and Social Transformation of People with Disabilities.” Asia Pacific Disability Rehabilitation Journal 1 (1): 1–19. http://english.aifo.it/disability/apdrj/selread100/full_document.pdf.
  79. Laws, Glenda, and John Radford. 1998. “Place, Identity, and Disability: Narratives of Intellectually Disabled People in Toronto.” In Putting Health into Place: Landscape, Identity, & Well-Being, edited by Robin A. Kearns, and Wilbert M. Gesler. New York: Syracuse University Press.Google Scholar
  80. Les Amitiés Franco-Burkinabè. 2007. Traditions et modernité au Burkina-Faso (Traditions and Modernity in Burkina Faso). Paris: L’Harmattan.Google Scholar
  81. Lunch, Nick, and Chris Lunch. 2006. Insights into Participatory Video: A Handbook for the Field. Oxford: Insightshare. https://insightshare.org/resources/insights-into-participatory-video-a-handbook-for-the-field.
  82. Madge, Clare. 1993. “Boundary Disputes: Comments on Sidaway (1992).” Area 25 (3): 294–299. http://www.jstor.org/stable/20003310.
  83. Mayoux, Linda. 2006. “Quantitative, Qualitative or Participatory? Which Method, for What and When?” In Doing Development Research, edited by Vandana Desai, and Robert Potter. London: Sage.Google Scholar
  84. McEwan, Cheryl. 2008. “Post-colonialism.” In The Companion to Development Studies, edited by Vandana Desai, and Robert B. Potter, 2nd ed. London: Hodder Education.Google Scholar
  85. McEwan, Cheryl. 2009. Postcolonialism and Development. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  86. McEwan, Cheryl, and Ruth Butler. 2007. “Disability and Development: Different Models, Different Places.” Geography Compass 1 (3): 448–466.  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1749-8198.2007.00023.x.
  87. McLafferty, Sara L. 1995. “Counting for Women.” The Professional Geographer 47 (4): 436–442. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.0033-0124.1995.436_j.x.
  88. Meekosha, Helen. 2008. “Contextualizing Disability: Developing Southern/Global Theory.” Keynote Paper Given at the 4th Biennial Disability Studies Conference, Lancaster University, UK, September 2–4. http://wwda.org.au/papers/confpaps/confpaps2006/meekosha2008.
  89. Meekosha, Helen. 2011. “Decolonising Disability: Thinking and Acting Globally.” Disability & Society 26 (6): 667–682.  https://doi.org/10.1080/09687599.2011.602860.
  90. Meekosha, Helen, and Karen Soldatic. 2011. “Human Rights and the Global South: The Case of Disability.” Third World Quarterly 32 (8): 1383–1398. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/01436597.2011.614800.
  91. Memmi, Albert. 1967. The Colonizer and the Colonized. Translated by Howard Greenfield. New York: The Orion Press.Google Scholar
  92. Mohan, Giles. 1999. “Not so Distant, Not so Strange: The Personal and the Political in Participatory Research.” Ethics, Place & Environment 2 (1): 41–54.  https://doi.org/10.1080/1366879x.1999.11644237.
  93. Morris, Jenny. 1991. Pride Against Prejudice: Transforming Attitudes to Disability. London: The Women’s Press.Google Scholar
  94. Morris, Jenny. 2015. “Please Don’t Talk About the ‘Most Vulnerable’.” September 30. https://jennymorrisnet.blogspot.com.mt/2015/09/please-dont-talk-about-most-vulnerable.html.
  95. Mosse, David. 1994. “Authority, Gender and Knowledge: Theoretical Reflections on the Practice of Participatory Rural Appraisal.” Development and Change 25: 497–526.  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-7660.1994.tb00524.x.
  96. Nelson, Nici, and Susan Wright (eds.). 1995. Power and Participatory Development: Theory and Practice. Rugby: Intermediate Technology Publications.Google Scholar
  97. Nyoni, Sithembiso. 1987. “Indigenous NGOs: Liberation, Self-Reliance, and Development.” World Development 15: 51–56.  https://doi.org/10.1016/0305-750x(87)90142-2.
  98. Ohnuki-Tierney, Emiko. 1981. “Phases in Human Perception/Conception/Symbolization Processes: Cognitive Anthropology and Symbolic Classification.” American Ethnologist 8 (3) (August): 451–467. http://www.jstor.org/stable/644296.
  99. Oliver, Mike. 1992. “Changing the Social Relations of Research Production?” Disability, Handicap & Society 7 (2): 101–114. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/02674649266780141.
  100. Opie, Anne. 1992. “Qualitative Research, Appropriation of the ‘Other’ and Empowerment.” Feminist Review 40: 52–69.  https://doi.org/10.2307/1395277.
  101. Potter, Robert B. 2008. “Theories, Strategies and Ideologies of Development: An Overview.” In The Companion to Development Studies, edited by Vandana Desai, and Robert B. Potter, 2nd ed. London: Hodder Education.Google Scholar
  102. Power, Marcus. 2001. “Geographies of Disability and Development in Southern Africa.” Disability Studies Quarterly 21 (4): 84–97. http://dsq-sds.org/article/view/320/388.
  103. Power, Marcus. 2003. Rethinking Development Geographies. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  104. Power, Marcus. 2008. “Enlightenment and the Era of Modernity.” In The Companion to Development Studies, edited by Vandana Desai, and Robert B. Potter, 2nd ed. London: Hodder Education.Google Scholar
  105. Power, Marcus. 2009. “The Commonwealth, ‘Development’ and Post-colonial Responsibility.” Geoforum 40 (3): 14–24.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geoforum.2008.04.008.
  106. Quinn, Gerard, and Theresia Degener (eds.). 2002. Human Rights and Disability: The Current Use and Future Potential of United Nations Human Rights Instruments in the Context of Disability. New York: United Nations Publications.Google Scholar
  107. Raghuram, Parvati, and Clare Madge. 2006. “Towards a Method for Postcolonial Development Geography? Possibilities and Challenges.” Singapore Journal of Tropical Geography 27 (3) (November): 270–288.  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9493.2006.00262.x.
  108. Rahman, Muhammad Anisur. 1990. “Qualitative Dimensions of Social Development Evaluation: Thematic Paper.” In Evaluating Social Development Projects: Development Guidelines No. 5, edited by David Marsden, and Peter Oakley, 40–50. Oxford: Oxfam.Google Scholar
  109. Rahnema, Majid. 1992. “Participation.” In The Development Dictionary: A Guide to Knowledge as Power, edited by Wolfgang Sachs. London: Zed Books.Google Scholar
  110. Rahnema, Majid. 1997. “Introduction.” In The Post-development Reader, edited by Majid Rahnema, and Victoria Bawtree. Dhaka: The University Press.Google Scholar
  111. Rahnema, Majid. 2000. “Towards Post-development: Searching for Signposts, a New Language and New Paradigms.” In Development: Critical Concepts in the Social Sciences. Volume V: Identities, Representations, Alternatives, edited by Stuart Corbridge. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  112. Rapley, Mark. 2004. The Social Construction of Intellectual Disability. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  113. Reason, Peter, and Hilary Bradbury (eds.). 2008. The Sage Handbook of Action Research: Participative Inquiry and Practice, 2nd ed. London: Sage.Google Scholar
  114. Rigg, Jonathan. 2007. An Everyday Geography of the Global South. Oxon: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  115. Robinson-Pant, Anna. 1996. “PRA: A New Literacy?” Journal of International Development 8 (4): 531–551.  https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1099-1328(199607)8:4%3c531::AID-JID381%3e3.0.CO;2-N.
  116. Rose, Gillian. 1997. “Situating Knowledges: Positionality, Reflexivities and Other Tactics.” Progress in Human Geography 21 (3): 305–320.  https://doi.org/10.1191/030913297673302122.
  117. Sachs, Wolfgang (ed.). 2009. The Development Dictionary: A Guide to Knowledge as Power, 2nd ed. London: Zed Books.Google Scholar
  118. Said, Edward W. 1993. Culture & Imperialism. London: Chatto & Windus.Google Scholar
  119. Schwartz-Marín, Ernesto, and Eduardo Restrepo. 2013. “Biocoloniality, Governance, and the Protection of ‘Genetic Identities’ in Mexico and Colombia.” Sociology 47 (5): 993–1010.  https://doi.org/10.1177/0038038513494506.
  120. Shakespeare, Tom. 1994. “Cultural Representation of Disabled People: Dustbins for Disavowal?” Disability & Society 9 (3): 283–299.  https://doi.org/10.1080/09687599466780341.
  121. Shakespeare, Tom. 1996. “Disability, Identity and Difference.” In Exploring the Divide: Illness and Disability, edited by Colin Barnes, and Geof Mercer. Leeds: The Disability Press.Google Scholar
  122. Shakespeare, Tom. 2006. Disability Rights and Wrongs. Oxon: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  123. Shakespeare, Tom, and Nicholas Watson. 2001. “The Social Model of Disability: An Outdated Ideology?” In Exploring Theories and Expanding Methodologies: Where We Are and Where We Need to Go, Research in Social Science and Disability: Volume 2, edited by Sharon N. Barnartt, and Barbara M. Altman. Bingley: Emerald Publishing.Google Scholar
  124. Sharp, Robin. 1990. Burkina Faso: New Life for the Sahel? Oxford: Oxfam.Google Scholar
  125. Sheldon, Alison. 2005. “One World, One People, One Struggle? Towards the Global Implementation of the Social Model of Disability.” In The Social Model of Disability: Europe and the Majority World, edited by Colin Barnes, and Geof Mercer. Leeds: The Disability Press.Google Scholar
  126. Sherry, Mark. 2007. “(Post)Colonising Disability.” Wagadu 4 (Summer): 10–22.Google Scholar
  127. Sidaway, James D. 2000. “Postcolonial Geographies: An exploratory essay.” Progress in Human Geography 24 (4): 591–612.  https://doi.org/10.1191/030913200100189120.
  128. Sidaway, James D. 2008. “Post-development.” In The Companion to Development Studies, edited by Vandana Desai, and Robert B. Potter, 2nd ed. London: Hodder Education.Google Scholar
  129. Smith, Fiona M. 1996. “Problematising Language: Limitations and Possibilities in ‘Foreign Language’ Research.” Area 28 (2): 160–166. http://www.jstor.org/stable/20003653.
  130. Soldatic, Karen, and Janaka Biyanwila. 2010. “Tsunami and the Construction of Disabled Southern Body.” Global South SEPHIS e-magazine: Special Issue—History of Medicine in the Global South 6 (3) (July): 75–84. https://espace.curtin.edu.au/bitstream/handle/20.500.11937/5546/153346_153346.pdf?sequence=2.
  131. Spivak, Gayatri Chakravorty. 1994. “Can the Subaltern Speak?” In Colonial Discourse and Post-colonial Theory: A Reader, edited by Patrick Williams, and Laura Chrisman. New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
  132. Spivak, Gayatri Chakravorty. 2014. “Humanities and Development.” Lecture Given as Part of the Durham Castle Lecture Series 2013/14, Durham University, UK. Audio. https://www.dur.ac.uk/castle.lectures/programme/cls201314.
  133. Sylvester, Christine. 1999. “Development Studies and Postcolonial Studies: Disparate Tales of the ‘Third World’.” Third World Quarterly 20 (4): 703–721.  https://doi.org/10.1080/01436599913514.
  134. Swartz, Leslie. 2014. “Five Challenges for Disability-Related Research in sub-Saharan Africa.” African Journal of Disability 3 (2): 1–6. http://dx.doi.org/10.4102/ajod.v3i2.149.
  135. Tregaskis, Claire. 2002. “Social Model Theory: The Story so Far.” Disability & Society 17 (4): 457–470.  https://doi.org/10.1080/09687590220140377.
  136. Truman, Harry. S. 1949. “The 41st Presidential Inauguration: Inaugural Address.” January 20. http://www.inaugural.senate.gov/about/past-inaugural-ceremonies/41st-inaugural-ceremonies.
  137. Turner, Mark, David Hulme, and Willy McCourt. 2015. Governance, Management and Development: Making the State Work, 2nd ed. London: Palgrave.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  138. United Nations. 2006. “Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities.” https://www.un.org/development/desa/disabilities/convention-on-the-rights-of-persons-with-disabilities.html.
  139. United Nations. 2016. “Toolkit on Disability for Africa.” November 18. https://www.un.org/development/desa/technical-cooperation/2016/11/18/toolkit-on-disability-for-africa.
  140. United Nations. n.d.-a. “Persons with Disabilities.” Accessed May 9, 2018. http://www.un.org/en/sections/issues-depth/persons-disabilities/index.html.
  141. United Nations. n.d.-b. “We Can End Poverty: Millennium Development Goals and Beyond 2015.” Accessed May 5, 2019. https://www.un.org/millenniumgoals/?.
  142. United Nations Development Programme. 2018. “Democratic Governance and Peacebuilding: Disability-Inclusive Development.” Last updated 2018. http://www.undp.org/content/undp/en/home/democratic-governance-and-peacebuilding/rule-of-law–justice–security-and-human-rights/disability-inclusive-development.html.
  143. United Nations Economic and Social Council. 2008. Mainstreaming Disability in the Development Agenda: Note by the Secretariat, E/CN.5/2008/6. www.un.org/disabilities/documents/reports/e-cn5-2008-6.doc.
  144. United Nations Enable. 2004. “International Day of Disabled Persons 2004: Nothing About Us, Without Us.” http://www.un.org/esa/socdev/enable/iddp2004.htm.
  145. United Nations Enable. 2007. “Disability and Employment: Fact Sheet 1—Employment of Persons with Disabilities.” https://www.un.org/development/desa/disabilities/resources/factsheet-on-persons-with-disabilities/disability-and-employment.html.
  146. United Nations General Assembly. 2015. Draft Outcome Document of the United Nations Summit for the Adoption of the Post-2015 Development Agenda, A/69/L.85. https://sustainabledevelopment.un.org/post2015/transformingourworld.
  147. United Nations Sustainable Development Knowledge Platform. n.d. “Sustainable Development Goals.” Accessed May 9, 2018. https://sustainabledevelopment.un.org/sdgs.
  148. Van Dam, Julie C. 2016. “Re-viewing Disability in Postcolonial West Africa: Ousmane Sembène’s Early Resistant Bodies in Xala.” Journal of Literary & Cultural Disability Studies 10 (2): 207–221. https://muse.jhu.edu/article/625074.
  149. Ville, Isabelle, and Jean-François Ravaud. 2007. “French Disability Studies: Differences and Similarities.” Scandinavian Journal of Disability Research 9 (3–4): 138–145.  https://doi.org/10.1080/15017410701685877.
  150. Waddington, Lisa, and Aart Hendriks. 2002. “The Expanding Concept of Employment Discrimination in Europe: From Direct and Indirect Discrimination to Reasonable Accommodation Discrimination.” The International Journal of Comparative Labour Law and Industrial Relations 18 (3) (Winter): 403–427. https://heinonline.org/HOL/LandingPage?handle=hein.kluwer/cllir0018&div=37&id=&page=.
  151. White, Shirley A. (ed.). 2003. Participatory Video: Images That Transform and Empower. New Delhi: Sage.Google Scholar
  152. The World Bank. 2015. “Why Disability Inclusive Development Matters: The Promise of Social Inclusion.” April 22. http://www.worldbank.org/en/events/2015/04/13/why-disability-inclusive-development-matters.
  153. The World Bank. 2018. “Disability Inclusion.” http://www.worldbank.org/en/topic/disability.

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2020

Authors and Affiliations

  • Lara Bezzina
    • 1
  1. 1.Independent ResearcherMostaMalta

Personalised recommendations