Advertisement

The Aroma of Time: An Introduction

  • Kaustuv RoyEmail author
Chapter

Abstract

We are entirely possessed by a world already made (objectified); thus, we become unmindful of the emergent world or the world-in-making. We incessantly measure the finished world and are not concerned with addressing that which lies behind the patterned immobilities, which is duration, or that which endures. When we train ourselves, that is, develop our intuition to see all things under the aspect of duration, a new movement begins that stretches us beyond ourselves. Our existential problematizations and their solutions, which had so far been defined and conditioned by object relations obtaining within the political and the technological spheres, now present themselves differently to us. In our “galvanized perceptions,” a new hope awakens that is independent of the prevailing conditions. It is not something science or technology or politics can bring about. It is an ontological intuition born of contact with duration, which is creative becoming. For education, this is an entirely new canvas on which to map out possibilities. Starting with the development of intuition, a new language must be created that opens out toward vision. Time that was blanked out of view and pushed to the background of consciousness becomes a topic of discussion and is no longer treated as a priori. We learn to “see” and feel time as conditioning everything in the outer world, and from there learn to become aware of the inner rhythm of time that makes us what we are.

References

  1. Albert Einstein, “On the Electrodynamics of Moving Bodies,” originally published in German as “Zur Elektrodynamik Bewegter Körper.” Annalen der Physik, Vol. 322, No. 10, 1905. Retrieved from http://hermes.ffn.ub.es/luisnavarro/nuevo_maletin/Einstein_1905_relativity.pdf.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Dwayne Huebner, “Curriculum as Concern for Man’s Temporality.” Theory into Practice, Vol. 26:S1, pp. 324–331. https://doi.org/10.1080/00405848709543294.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. E. Husserl, Meditations Cartesiennes (Transl.) Gabrielle Peiffer and Emmanuel Levinas (Paris: Colin, 1931).Google Scholar
  4. H. Edward Thompson III, “The Fallacy of Misplaced Concreteness: Its Importance for Critical and Creative Inquiry.” Interchange, Vol. 28, Nos. 2–3, 1997, pp. 219–230.Google Scholar
  5. H. Wildon Carr, Philosophy of Change: A Study of the Fundamental Principle of the Philosophy of Bergson (London: Macmillan, 1914).Google Scholar
  6. Jimena Canales, The Physicist and the Philosopher: Einstein, Bergson, and the Debate That Changed Our Understanding of Time (Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 2015).Google Scholar
  7. Leon Jacobson, “Translator’s Preface.” In Henri Bergson, Duration and Simultaneity with Reference to Einstein’s Theory (New York: Bobbs-Merrill Company, 1965).Google Scholar
  8. Maurice Merleau-Ponty, Phenomenology of Perception (Transl.) Colin Smith (New York: Humanities Press, 1965).Google Scholar
  9. Maurice Merleau-Ponty, The Visible and the Invisible (Transl.) Alphonso Lingis (Evanston, IL: Northwestern University Press, 1968).Google Scholar
  10. Maurice Merleau-Ponty, The Prose of the World (Transl.) John O’Neill (Evanston, IL: Northwestern University Press, 1973).Google Scholar
  11. Meister Eckhart, The Complete Mystical Works of Meister Eckhart (Transl.) Maurice O’C. Walshe (New York: Crossroads Publishing Company, 1979).Google Scholar
  12. Mircea Eliade, A History of Religious Ideas, Vol. 3 (Cambridge: University of Cambridge Press, 1988).Google Scholar
  13. St. Augustine, Confessions (Transl.) F. J. Sheed (New York: Sheed and Ward, 1943).Google Scholar
  14. Tatyana Fedosova, “Reflection of Time in Postmodern Literature.” Athens Journal of Philology, Vol. 2, No. 2, June 2015, pp. 77–87.  https://doi.org/10.30958/ajp.2-2-1.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Azim Premji UniversityBengaluruIndia

Personalised recommendations