Advertisement

Training Community-Based Health Workers

  • Tashina J. Vavuris
Chapter
Part of the International Perspectives on Social Policy, Administration, and Practice book series (IPSPAP)

Abstract

This chapter focuses on the training of community-based health workers from a participatory organizational perspective. Tashina Vavuris argues that health practitioners receive a significant amount of training before and after they enter the field. But often, this education is mostly pragmatic, that is, focused on how to conduct needs assessments, evaluate interventions, or implement accreditation standards. Of course, these tasks are important. But this education does not necessarily begin with the philosophy that sustains community-based work. When beginning with the principle that community knowledge matters, training must be initiated with how to enter the world constructed by a community’s members. Every task, accordingly, must be thought of as a mode of engaging a community, instead of simply gathering data or making observations. Valid knowledge, communities, and norms, for example, must be rethought in the training process to produce persons who can work effectively in community-based interventions. This shift in orientation is not often currently the centerpiece of training.

Keywords

Community-based training Community-based health workers Health practitioners Needs assessments 

References

  1. Berger, P., & Luckmann, T. (1967). The social construction of reality. New York, NY: Anchor Books.Google Scholar
  2. Buber, M. (1958). I and thou. New York, NY: Scribner.Google Scholar
  3. Cahill, C. (2007). Repositioning ethical commitments: Participatory action research as a relational praxis of social change. ACME: An International E-Journal for Critical Geographies, 6(3), 360–373.Google Scholar
  4. Cahill, C., Sultana, F., & Pain, R. (2007). Participatory ethics: Politics, practices, institutions. ACME: An International E-Journal for Critical Geographies, 6(3), 304–318.Google Scholar
  5. Chambers, R. (1997). Whose reality counts? Putting the first last. London,UK: Intermediate Technology Publications.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Darder, A. (1994). Institutional research as a tool for cultural democracy. New Directions for Institutional Research, 1994(81), 21–34.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Delgado, R. (1989). Storytelling for oppositionists and others: A plea for narrative. Michigan Law Review, 87(8), 2411–2441.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Fals Borda, O. (1979). Investigation reality in order to transform it: The Colombian experience. Dialectical Anthropology, 4(1), 33–55.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Fals Borda, O. (1987). The application of participatory action research in Latin America. International Sociology, 2(4), 329–347.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Fals Borda, O. (1988). Knowledge and people’s power. New York, NY: New Horizons.Google Scholar
  11. Ferreira, F. (2017). Critical sustainability studies: A holistic and visionary conception of socioecological conscientization. Journal of Sustainability Education, 13.Google Scholar
  12. Freire, P. (1970). Pedagogy of the oppressed. New York, NY: Continuum.Google Scholar
  13. Freire, P. (2000). Pedagogy of freedom: Ethics, democracy, and civic courage. Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield Publishers.Google Scholar
  14. Gadamer, H.-G. (1996). The enigma of health: The art of healing in a scientific age. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
  15. Gutiérrez, K., & Vossoughi, S. (2010). Lifting off the ground to return anew: Mediated praxis, transformative learning, and social design experiments. Journal of Teacher Education, 61(1–2), 100–117.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Kretzman, J., & McKnight, J. (1993). Building communities from the inside out. Chicago, IL: Acta Publications.Google Scholar
  17. Krieger, N. (2011). Epidemiology and the people’s health. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Long, J., Ballard, H., Fisher, L., & Belsky, J. (2016). Questions that won’t go away in participatory research. Society and Natural Resources, 29(2), 250–263.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Lykes, M. B. (2013). Participatory and action research as a transformative praxis: Responding to humanitarian crises from the margins. American Psychologist, 68(8), 774–783.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Medin, D. L., & Bang, M. (2014). The cultural side of science communication. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 111(Supplement 4), 13621–13626.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Munck, R. (2014). Community-based research: Genealogy and prospects. In R. Munck, L. McIlrath, B. Hall, & R. Tandon (Eds.), Higher education and community-based research (pp. 11–26). New York, NY: Palgrave Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Murphy, J. W., & Casanova, F. (2018). Community-based work and the accompanying changes in sociology. Unpublished Manuscript, Department of Sociology, Miami University.Google Scholar
  23. Murphy, J. W. (2014). Community based interventions: Philosophy and action. New York, NY: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Parsons, E. R. C. (2017). Interfaces between critical race theory and sociocultural perspectives. In I. Esmonde & A. Booker (Eds.), Power and privilege in the learning sciences: Critical and sociocultural theories of learning sciences (pp. 24–46). New York, NY: Routledge.Google Scholar
  25. Schutz, A. (1967). The phenomenology of the social world. Evanston, IL: Northwestern University Press.Google Scholar
  26. Smith, L. T. (2012). Decolonizing methodologies: Research and indigenous peoples. New York, NY: Zed Books.Google Scholar
  27. Torre, M. E., & Ayala, J. (2009). Envisioning participatory action research entremundos. Feminism and Psychology, 19(3), 387–393.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Tuck, E. (2009). Re-visioning action: Participatory action research and indigenous theories of change. The Urban Review, 41(1), 47–65.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Tuck, E., & Guishard, M. (2013). Uncollapsing ethics: Racialized sciencism, settler coloniality, and an ethical framework of decolonial participatory action research. In T. M. Kress, C. S. Malott, & B. J. Portfilio (Eds.), Challenging status quo retrenchment: New directions in critical qualitative research (pp. 3–27). Charlotte, NC: Information Age Publishing.Google Scholar
  30. Tuck, E., Smith, M., Guess, A. M., Benjamin, T., & Jones, B. K. (2014). Geo-theorizing Black/Land: Contestations and contingent collaborations. Departures in Critical Qualitative Research, 3(1), 52–74.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Wallerstein, N., & Bernstein, E. (1994). Introduction to community empowerment, participatory education, and health. Health Education Quarterly, 21(3), 141–148.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Whitman, G. P., Pain, R., & Milledge, D. G. (2015). Going with the flow? Using participatory action research in physical geography. Progress in Physical Geography, 39(5), 622–639.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  • Tashina J. Vavuris
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Environmental StudiesUniversity of California, Santa CruzSanta CruzUSA

Personalised recommendations