Advertisement

Aims of a Community-Based Research Program

  • Steven L. ArxerEmail author
Chapter
Part of the International Perspectives on Social Policy, Administration, and Practice book series (IPSPAP)

Abstract

Clearly, research plays a key role in community-based health work. Understanding the health needs of a community is vital to the success of any healthcare project. From an organizational perspective, however, the focus of a research program is often methodological. That is, developing scientifically sound data collection instruments is often the focus. However, such an emphasis leaves little room for appreciating how knowledge is socially produced and legitimized. Moreover, an overemphasis on methodological concerns can diminish the ability of researchers to appreciate the underlying assumptions of a community’s world-view and frustrate their entrance to that world. In this chapter, by Steven L. Arxer, examines the philosophical and practical considerations of implementing a research program in health projects that preserves the knowledge production of community members.

Keywords

Community-based research Data collection Positivism Qualitative Anti-realism Cultural sensitivity Cultural humility Praxis 

References

  1. Barthes, R. (1977). Image, music, text. New York, NY: Hill and Wang.Google Scholar
  2. Betancourt, J. R., Green, A. R., Carrillo, J. E., & Park, E. R. (2005). Cultural competence and health care disparities: Key perspectives and trends. Health Affairs, 24(2), 499–505.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Blumer, H. (1969). Symbolic interactionism: Perspective and method. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.Google Scholar
  4. Cornwall, A., & Jewkes, R. (1995). What is participatory research? Social Science & Medicine, 41, 1667–1676.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Dabbs Jr., J. M. (1982). Making things visible. In J. Van Maanen (Ed.), Varieties of qualitative Research (pp. 31–66). Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
  6. de Man, P. (1983). Blindness and insight. Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota Press.Google Scholar
  7. Deardorff, D. K. (2009). The SAGE handbook of intercultural competence. California, USA: Sage Publications.Google Scholar
  8. Derrida, J. (1976). Of grammatology. Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press.Google Scholar
  9. Derrida, J. (1978). Writing and difference. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  10. Derrida, J. (1980). The archeology of the frivolous: Reading Condillac. Pittsburgh, PA: Duquesne University Press.Google Scholar
  11. Durkheim, E. (1965). The rules of sociological method. New York, NY: The Free Press.Google Scholar
  12. Fals-Borda, O. (1987). The application of participatory action-research in Latin America. International Sociology, 2, 329–347.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Fish, S. (1989). Doing what comes naturally. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Foucault, M. (1975). The birth of the clinic. New York, NY: Vintage Books.Google Scholar
  15. Foucault, M. (1989). The archaeology of knowledge. London, UK: Routledge.Google Scholar
  16. Freire, P. (1970). Pedagogy of the oppressed. New York, NY: Seabury Press.Google Scholar
  17. Gilgun, J. F. (2005). The four cornerstones of evidence-based practice in social work. Research on Social Work Practice, 15(1), 52–61.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Gouldner, A. W. (1970). The coming crisis of Western sociology. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
  19. Gubrium, J. F., & Holstein, J. A. (1997). The new language of qualitative method. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  20. Gubrium, J. F. (2009). Analyzing narrative reality. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Hall, B. L. (1992). From margins to center: The development and purpose of participatory action research. The American Sociologist, 22, 15–28.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Heron, J., & Reason, P. (1997). A participatory inquiry paradigm. Qualitative Inquiry, 3(3), 274–294.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Hughes, J., & Sharrock, W. (1997). The philosophy of social research. New York, NY: Longman.Google Scholar
  24. Lacan, J. (1977). Ecrits. New York, NY: Norton.Google Scholar
  25. Lake, R. W. (1993). Planning and applied geography: Positivism, ethics, and geographic information systems. Profess in Human Geography, 17(3), 404–413.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Lasker, R. D., Weis, E. S., & Miller, R. (2001). Partnership synergy: A practical framework for studying and strengthening the collaborative advantage. Milbank Quarterly, 79, 179–205, III–IV.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Lewin, K. (1946). Action research and minority problems. Journal of Social Issues, 2, 34–46.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Lyotard, J. F. (1984). The postmodern condition: A report on knowledge. Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota Press.Google Scholar
  29. McTaggert, R. (1991). Principles for participatory action research. Adult Education Quarterly, 41(3), 168–187.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. McTaggert, R. (1997). Sixteen tenants of participatory action-research. In Y. Wadsworth (Ed.), Everyday evaluation on the run. Sydney, Australia: Allen & Unwin.Google Scholar
  31. Miles, M. B., & Huberman, M. A. (2002). The qualitative researcher’s companion. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
  32. Minkler, M. (2005). Community-based research partnerships: Challenges and opportunities. Journal of Urban Health, 82(2), ii3–ii12.PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  33. Minkler, M., & Wallerstein, N. (2003). Community based participatory research for health. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.Google Scholar
  34. Murphy, J. W. (1986). Phenomenological social science: Researcher in the public interest. Social Science Journal, 23(3), 327–343.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Murphy, J. W. (2014). Community-based interventions. New York, NY: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Pollner, M. (1991). Left of ethnomethodology: The rise and decline of radical reflexivity. American Sociological Review, 56(3), 370–380.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Reid, W. J. (1994). The empirical practice movement. Social Service Review, 68(2), 165–184.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Rorty, R. (1991). Objectivism, relativism, and truth. Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  39. Tucker, W. (1994). The science and politics of racial research. Urbana, IL: University of Illinois Press.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Sociology and PsychologyUniversity of North Texas at DallasDallasUSA

Personalised recommendations