Duplex Ultrasound in Peripheral Arterial Disease

  • Randy K. Ramcharitar
  • Sundeep Shenoy
  • Michael Gyampoh
  • Aditya M. SharmaEmail author


Peripheral arterial disease is a complex condition that can be evaluated with many imaging techniques, but only duplex ultrasound can provide fast, cost-effective, and real-time results. This chapter will review the imaging techniques and criteria necessary to diagnose and monitor peripheral arterial disease in native arteries, stents, and grafts of the lower extremities.


Stenosis Arterial duplex Peripheral artery disease Graft surveillance Stent surveillance Pseudoaneurysm Arteriovenous fistula 


  1. 1.
    Jager KA, Ricketts HJ, Strandness DE Jr. Duplex scanning for the evaluation of lower limb arterial disease. In: Bernstien EF, editor. Noninvasive diagnostic techniques in vascular disease. St. Louis: CV Mosby; 1985. p. 619–31.Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Hatsukami TS, Primozich J, Zierler RE, Strandness DEJR. Color Doppler characteristics in normal lower extremity arteries. Ultrasound Med Biol. 1992;18:167–71.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Gerhard-Herman M, Gardin JM, Jaff M, Mohler E, Roman M, Naqvi TZ, AMERICAN SOCIETY OF, E., SOCIETY FOR VASCULAR, M. & BIOLOGY. Guidelines for noninvasive vascular laboratory testing: a report from the American Society of Echocardiography and the Society for Vascular Medicine and Biology. Vasc Med. 2006;11:183–200.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Jager KA, Phillips DJ, Martin RL, Hanson C, Roederer GO, Langlois YE, Ricketts HJ, Strandness DEJR. Noninvasive mapping of lower limb arterial lesions. Ultrasound Med Biol. 1985;11:515–21.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Kohler TR, Nance DR, Cramer MM, Vandenburghe N, Strandness DEJR. Duplex scanning for diagnosis of aortoiliac and femoropopliteal disease: a prospective study. Circulation. 1987;76:1074–80.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Moneta GL, Yeager RA, Antonovic R, Hall LD, Caster JD, Cummings CA, Porter JM. Accuracy of lower extremity arterial duplex mapping. J Vasc Surg. 1992;15:275–83; discussion 283-4CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Allard L, Cloutier G, Durand LG, Roederer GO, Langlois YE. Limitations of ultrasonic duplex scanning for diagnosing lower limb arterial stenoses in the presence of adjacent segment disease. J Vasc Surg. 1994;19:650–7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    De Smet AA, Ermers EJ, Kitslaar PJ. Duplex velocity characteristics of aortoiliac stenoses. J Vasc Surg. 1996;23:628–36.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Sacks D, Robinson ML, Marinelli DL, Perlmutter GS. Peripheral arterial Doppler ultrasonography: diagnostic criteria. J Ultrasound Med. 1992;11:95–103.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Sensier Y, Hartshorne T, Thrush A, Nydahl S, Bolia A, London NJ. A prospective comparison of lower limb color-coded Duplex scanning with arteriography. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg. 1996;11:170–5.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Sobieszczyk P, Eisenhauer A. Management of patients after endovascular interventions for peripheral artery disease. Circulation. 2013;128:749–57.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Spijkerboer AM, Nass PC, De Valois JC, Eikelboom BC, Overtoom TT, Beek FJ, Moll FL, Mali WP. Iliac artery stenoses after percutaneous transluminal angioplasty: follow-up with duplex ultrasonography. J Vasc Surg. 1996;23:691–7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Bandyk DF, Chauvapun JP. Duplex ultrasound surveillance can be worthwhile after arterial intervention. Perspect Vasc Surg Endovasc Ther. 2007;19:354–9; discussion 360-1CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Baril DT, Rhee RY, Kim J, Makaroun MS, Chaer RA, Marone LK. Duplex criteria for determination of in-stent stenosis after angioplasty and stenting of the superficial femoral artery. J Vasc Surg. 2009;49:133–8; discussion 139CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Connors G, Todoran TM, Engelson BA, Sobieszczyk PS, Eisenhauer AC, Kinlay S. Percutaneous revascularization of long femoral artery lesions for claudication: patency over 2.5 years and impact of systematic surveillance. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2011;77:1055–62.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Mewissen MW, Kinney EV, Bandyk DF, Reifsnyder T, Seabrook GR, Lipchik EO, Towne JB. The role of duplex scanning versus angiography in predicting outcome after balloon angioplasty in the femoropopliteal artery. J Vasc Surg. 1992;15:860–5; discussion 865-6CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Keeling WB, Shames ML, Stone PA, Armstrong PA, Johnson BL, Back MR, Bandyk DF. Plaque excision with the Silverhawk catheter: early results in patients with claudication or critical limb ischemia. J Vasc Surg. 2007;45:25–31.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Idu MM, Blankenstein JD, De Gier P, Truyen E, Buth J. Impact of a color-flow duplex surveillance program on infrainguinal vein graft patency: a five-year experience. J Vasc Surg. 1993;17:42–52; discussion 52-3CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Erickson CA, Towne JB, Seabrook GR, Freischlag JA, Cambria RA. Ongoing vascular laboratory surveillance is essential to maximize long-term in situ saphenous vein bypass patency. J Vasc Surg. 1996;23:18–26; discussion 26-7CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Armstrong PA, Bandyk DF, Wilson JS, Shames ML, Johnson BL, Back MR. Optimizing infrainguinal arm vein bypass patency with duplex ultrasound surveillance and endovascular therapy. J Vasc Surg. 2004;40:724–30; discussion 730-1CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Mofidi R, Kelman J, Berry O, Bennett S, Murie JA, Dawson AR. Significance of the early postoperative duplex result in infrainguinal vein bypass surveillance. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg. 2007;34:327–32.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Tinder CN, Chavanpun JP, Bandyk DF, Armstrong PA, Back MR, Johnson BL, Shames ML. Efficacy of duplex ultrasound surveillance after infrainguinal vein bypass may be enhanced by identification of characteristics predictive of graft stenosis development. J Vasc Surg. 2008;48:613–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Lundell A, Lindblad B, Bergqvist D, Hansen F. Femoropopliteal-crural graft patency is improved by an intensive surveillance program: a prospective randomized study. J Vasc Surg. 1995;21:26–33; discussion 33-4CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Bandyk DF. Infrainguinal vein bypass graft surveillance: how to do it, when to intervene, and is it cost-effective? J Am Coll Surg. 2002;194:S40–52.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Bandyk DF, Schmitt DD, Seabrook GR, Adams MB, Towne JB. Monitoring functional patency of in situ saphenous vein bypasses: the impact of a surveillance protocol and elective revision. J Vasc Surg. 1989;9:286–96.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Mills JLSR, Wixon CL, James DC, Devine J, Westerband A, Hughes JD. The natural history of intermediate and critical vein graft stenosis: recommendations for continued surveillance or repair. J Vasc Surg. 2001;33:273–8; discussion 278-80CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Arvela E, Dick F. Surveillance after distal revascularization for critical limb ischaemia. Scand J Surg. 2012;101:119–24.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Davies AH, Hawdon AJ, Sydes MR, Thompson SG, Participants V. Is duplex surveillance of value after leg vein bypass grafting? Principal results of the Vein Graft Surveillance Randomised Trial (VGST). Circulation. 2005;112:1985–91.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Chaikof EL, Dalman RL, Eskandari MK, Jackson BM, Lee WA, Mansour MA, Mastracci TM, Mell M, Murad MH, Nguyen LL, Oderich GS, Patel MS, Schermerhorn ML, Starnes BW. The Society for Vascular Surgery practice guidelines on the care of patients with an abdominal aortic aneurysm. J Vasc Surg. 2018;67:2–77 e2.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Wolf YG, Kobzantsev Z, Zelmanovich L. Size of normal and aneurysmal popliteal arteries: a duplex ultrasound study. J Vasc Surg. 2006;43:488–92.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Sanjay P, Lewis MH. Deep vein thrombosis and pulmonary embolus associated with a ruptured popliteal aneurysm – a cautionary note. World J Emerg Surg. 2007;2:34.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Johnston KW, Rutherford RB, Tilson MD, Shah DM, Hollier L, Stanley JC. Suggested standards for reporting on arterial aneurysms. Subcommittee on Reporting Standards for Arterial Aneurysms, Ad Hoc Committee on Reporting Standards, Society for Vascular Surgery and North American Chapter, International Society for Cardiovascular Surgery. J Vasc Surg. 1991;13:452–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Dent TL, Lindenauer SM, Ernst CB, Fry WJ. Multiple arteriosclerotic arterial aneurysms. Arch Surg. 1972;105:338–44.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    Oweida SW, Roubin GS, Smith RB 3rd, Salam AA. Post-catheterization vascular complications associated with percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty. J Vasc Surg. 1990;12:310–5.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    Lamar R, Berg R, Rama K. Femoral arteriovenous fistula as a complication of percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty. A report of five cases. Am Surg. 1990;56:702–6.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  36. 36.
    Muller DW, Shamir KJ, Ellis SG, Topol EJ. Peripheral vascular complications after conventional and complex percutaneous coronary interventional procedures. Am J Cardiol. 1992;69:63–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. 37.
    Nasser TK, Mohler ER 3rd, Wilensky RL, Hathaway DR. Peripheral vascular complications following coronary interventional procedures. Clin Cardiol. 1995;18:609–14.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. 38.
    Altin RS, Flicker S, Naidech HJ. Pseudoaneurysm and arteriovenous fistula after femoral artery catheterization: association with low femoral punctures. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 1989;152:629–31.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. 39.
    Kim D, Orron DE, Skillman JJ, Kent KC, Porter DH, Schlam BW, Carrozza J, Reis GJ, Baim DS. Role of superficial femoral artery puncture in the development of pseudoaneurysm and arteriovenous fistula complicating percutaneous transfemoral cardiac catheterization. Catheter Cardiovasc Diagn. 1992;25:91–7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. 40.
    Igidbashian VN, Mitchell DG, Middleton WD, Schwartz RA, Goldberg BB. Iatrogenic femoral arteriovenous fistula: diagnosis with color Doppler imaging. Radiology. 1989;170:749–52.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. 41.
    Upton J, Coombs CJ, Mulliken JB, Burrows PE, Pap S. Vascular malformations of the upper limb: a review of 270 patients. J Hand Surg Am. 1999;24:1019–35.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. 42.
    American College of Cardiology Foundation(ACCF), American College of Radiology(ACR), American Institute of Ultrasound in Medicine(AIUM), American Society of Echocardiography(ASE), American Society of Nephrology(ASN), Intersocietal Commission for the Accreditation of Vascular Laboratories(ICAVL), Society for Cardiovascular Angiography and Interventions(SCAI), Society of Cardiovascular Computed Tomography(SCCT), Society for Interventional Radiology(SIR), Society for Vascular Medicine(SVM), Society for Vascular Surgery(SVS), American Academy of Neurology, American Podiatric Medical Association, Society for Clinical Vascular Surgery, Society for Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance, Society for Vascular Ultrasound, Peripheral Vascular Ultrasound, Mohler ER 3rd, Gornik HL, Gerhard-Herman M, Misra S, Olin JW, Zierler E. ACCF/ACR/AIUM/ASE/ASN/ICAVL/SCAI/SCCT/SIR/SVM/SVS 2012 appropriate use criteria for peripheral vascular ultrasound and physiological testing part I: arterial ultrasound and physiological testing: a report of the American College of Cardiology Foundation Appropriate Use Criteria Task Force, American College of Radiology, American Institute of Ultrasound in Medicine, American Society of Echocardiography, American Society of Nephrology, Intersocietal Commission for the Accreditation of Vascular Laboratories, Society for Cardiovascular Angiography and Interventions, Society of Cardiovascular Computed Tomography, Society for Interventional Radiology, Society for Vascular Medicine, and Society for Vascular Surgery. J Vasc Surg. 2012;56:e17–51.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. 43.
    Dhanoa D, Baerlocher MO, Benko AJ, Benenati JF, Kuo MD, Dariushnia SR, Faintuch S, Midia M, Nikolic B. Position statement on noninvasive imaging of peripheral arterial disease by the Society of Interventional Radiology and the Canadian Interventional Radiology Association. J Vasc Interv Radiol. 2016;27:947–51.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2020

Authors and Affiliations

  • Randy K. Ramcharitar
    • 1
  • Sundeep Shenoy
    • 2
  • Michael Gyampoh
    • 3
  • Aditya M. Sharma
    • 1
    Email author
  1. 1.Division of Cardiovascular MedicineUniversity of VirginiaCharlottesvilleUSA
  2. 2.Division of Cardiovascular MedicineUniversity of ArizonaTucsonUSA
  3. 3.Division of Vascular SurgeryUniversity of VirginiaCharlottesvilleUSA

Personalised recommendations