Advertisement

Is it Possible to Run a Change Laboratory if the Company Does not Recognize its Demand as Legitimate?

  • Manoela Gomes Reis LopesEmail author
  • Rodolfo Andrade de Gouveia Vilela
  • Ildeberto Muniz de Almeida
  • Silvana Zuccolotto
  • Flora Maria Gomide Vezzá
Chapter

Abstract

In recent years, there have been 12 fatal work accidents at a metropolitan passenger railway company. The Labor Prosecution Office contacted the School of Public Health to carry out a research making a deep analysis to understand the accidents and implementation of changes in this company to prevent accidents. Considering the presence of a civil accident inquiry and that the demand did not come from the company, the negotiation process for implementing the research was delayed and resulted in difficulties during the ethnographic phase. The research is still under progress. This chapter presents partial results of the application of the methodology, highlighting difficulties and strategies adopted by researchers in order to overcome difficulties. One of the strategies was the realization of workshops at the end of the ethnographic phase, aiming at presenting Cultural-Historical Activity Theory (CHAT) concepts and consolidating cooperation between researchers and participants, a crucial point for the activity development.

Keywords

Work accidents Safety and health Negotiation process Railway sector 

References

  1. Almeida, I. M., & Vilela, R. A. G. (2010). Modelo de análise e prevenção de acidente de trabalho – MAPA. Piracicaba: CEREST.Google Scholar
  2. Almeida, I. M., Vilela, R. A. G., Silva, A. J. N., & Beltran, S. L. (2014). Modelo de Análise e Prevenção de Acidentes - MAPA: ferramenta para a vigilância em Saúde do trabalhador. Ciência & Saúde Coletiva, 19(12), 4679–4688.  https://doi.org/10.1590/1413-812320141912.12982014.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Engeström, Y. (1987). Learning by expanding: An activity-theoretical approach to developmental research. Helsinki: Orienta-Konsultit.Google Scholar
  4. Engeström, Y. (2007). In H. Daniels, M. Cole, & J. M. Wertsch (Eds.), Putting Vygotsky to work: The change laboratory as an application of double stimulation (pp. 363–425). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  5. Engeström, Y. (2015). Learning by expanding: An activity-theoretical approach to developmental research. New York: Cambridge Press.Google Scholar
  6. Engeström, Y., Virkkunen, J., Helle, M., Pihlaja, J., & Poikela, R. (1996). The change laboratory as a tool for transforming work. Lifelong Learning in Europe, 1(2), 10–17.Google Scholar
  7. Ferreira, L. L. (1993). Análise Coletiva do Trabalho. Revista Brasileira de Saúde Ocupacional, 78(21), 7–19.Google Scholar
  8. Jackson Filho, J. M., Vilela, R. A. G., Garcia, E. G., & Almeida, I. M. (2013). Sobre a “aceitabilidade social” dos acidentes do trabalho e o inaceitável conceito de ato inseguro. Revista Brasileira de Saúde Ocupacional, 38(127), 6–8.  https://doi.org/10.1590/S0303-76572013000100001.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Lopes, M. G. R., Vilela, R. A. G., & Querol, M. A. P. (2018). Anomalies and contradictions in an airport construction project: A historical analysis based on Cultural-Historical Activity Theory. Cadernos de Saúde Pública, 34, ePub 00130816.  https://doi.org/10.1590/0102-311X00130816.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Nuutinen, M., & Norros, L. (2009). Core task analysis in accident investigation: Analysis of maritime accidents in piloting situations. Cognition, Technology & Work, 11(2), 129–150.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10111-007-0104-x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Osório, C., Machado, J. M. H., & Minayo-Gomez, C. (2005). Proposição de um método de análise coletiva dos acidentes de trabalho no hospital. Cadernos de Saúde Pública, 21(2), 517–524.  https://doi.org/10.1590/S0102-311X2005000200018.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. Querol, M. A. P., Jackson Filho, J. M., & Cassandre, M. P. (2011). Change Laboratory: uma proposta metodológica para pesquisa e desenvolvimento da aprendizagem organizacional. Administração: ensino e pesquisa., 11(4), 609–640.  https://doi.org/10.13058/raep.2011.v12n4.143.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Virkkunen, J., & Newnham, D. (2013). The Change Laboratory: A tool for collaborative development of work and education. Rotterdam: Sense Publishers.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Yoon, Y. S., Ham, D. H., & Yoon, W. C. (2016). Application of activity theory to analysis of human-related accidents: Method and case studies. Reliability Engineering & System Safety, 150, 22–34.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ress.2016.01.013.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2020

Authors and Affiliations

  • Manoela Gomes Reis Lopes
    • 1
    Email author
  • Rodolfo Andrade de Gouveia Vilela
    • 2
  • Ildeberto Muniz de Almeida
    • 3
  • Silvana Zuccolotto
    • 3
  • Flora Maria Gomide Vezzá
    • 4
  1. 1.Department of Biological Sciences and HealthFederal University of AmapáMacapáBrazil
  2. 2.Department of Environmental HealthSchool of Public Health, University of São PauloSão PauloBrazil
  3. 3.Department of Public HealthBotucatu School of Medicine, São Paulo State University “Júlio de Mesquita Filho”BotucatuBrazil
  4. 4.Sports and Health Promotion Executive ManagementIndustry Social Service - SESISão PauloBrazil

Personalised recommendations