The Theoretical and Methodological Basis of the Change Laboratory
The aim of this chapter is to briefly introduce the most important principles and concepts used in the Change Laboratory (CL) method. First, we introduce Vygotsky’s theory of culturally mediated human actions for understanding human agency. Second, we introduce Engeström’s model of activity system as the basic unit of analysis for depicting the structure of an activity, analyzing its historical contradictions, and simulating and modeling new practices. We proceed by introducing the concept of contradictions as force of change and the theory of expansively learning for understanding the development of human activity. We continue with the principle of double stimulation and how it is applied in the CL. Finally, the variations of the method and their expected results are briefly discussed.
KeywordsExpansive learning Formative interventions Activity theory
- Engeström, Y. (1987). Learning by expanding. An activity-theoretical approach to developmental research. Helsinki: Orienta-Konsultit.Google Scholar
- Engeström, Y. (2007). Putting Vygotsky to Work: The Change Laboratory as an Application of Double Stimulation. In H. Daniels, M. Cole, & J. Wertsch (Eds.), The Cambridge Companion to Vygotsky (pp. 363–382). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CCOL0521831040.015.
- Engeström, Y. (2015). Learning by expanding. An activity-theoretical approach to developmental research. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
- Engeström, Y., Virkkunen, J., Helle, M., Pihlaja, J., & Poikela, R. (1996). The change laboratory as a tool for transforming work. Lifelong Learning in Europe., 1(2), 10–17.Google Scholar
- Helle M., Töyry, M., & Ruoranen A. (2010). We all do our own thing. Proceedings of the MeCCSA10 Conference:2010 January 6–8; London, UK.Google Scholar
- Kerosuo, H. (2001). Boundary encounters’ as a place for learning and development at work. Outlines, 3(1), 53–65.Google Scholar
- Kerosuo, H. (2004). Examining boundaries in health care - outline of a method for studying organizational boundaries in interaction. Outlines, 6(1), 35–60.Google Scholar
- Lektorsky, V. (2009). Mediation as a means of collective activity. In A. Sannino, H. Daniels, & K. D. Gutierrez (Eds.), Learning and expanding with activity theory. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
- Leontiev, A. N. (1978). Activity. Consciousness. Personality. Englewood Cliffs: Prentice Hall.Google Scholar
- Leontiev, A. N. (1981). Problems of the development of the mind. Moscow: Progress.Google Scholar
- Long, N. (2001). Development sociology: Actor perspectives. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
- Marx, K. (1990), Capital, Vol. 1, Penguin Books, LondonGoogle Scholar
- Pereira-Querol, M. A. (2011). Learning challenges for sustainability: An activity theoretical study of a network from a swine industry chain [dissertation]. Helsinki:University of Helsinki.Google Scholar
- Teräs, M. (2007). Intercultural learning and hybridity in the culture laboratory [dissertation]. Helsinki: University of Helsinki.Google Scholar
- Virkkunen, J. (2006). Dilemmas in building shared transformative agency. Activités, 3–1. https://doi.org/10.4000/activites.1850.
- Vygotsky, L. S. (1978). Mind and society: The development of higher mental processes. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
- Vygotsky, L. S. (1997). The history of the development of higher mental functions. The collected works of L. S. Vygotsky. Vol. 4. The history of the development of higher mental functions. New York: Plenum.Google Scholar