Advertisement

Contributions from the Change Laboratory to the Analysis and Prevention of Accidents’ Model

  • Sandra Lorena Beltran HurtadoEmail author
  • Rodolfo Andrade de Gouveia Vilela
  • Ildeberto Muniz de Almeida
  • José Marçal Jackson Filho
  • Marco Antonio Pereira Querol
  • Raoni Rocha Simões
  • Eugenio Paceli Haten Diniz
  • Manoela Gomes Reis Lopes
  • Alessandro José Nunes da Silva
  • Marcos Hister Pereira Gomes
  • Susana Vicentina Costa
Chapter

Abstract

Analysis and Prevention of Accidents’ Model (MAPA) was structured with the objective of replacing old practices that condemn work accidents on the victim. Applied to different activities, MAPA was able to explain accidents as a product of multiple interacting factors. However, a few changes have been implemented on underlying conditions. Overall, the agency was limited to the teams carrying out the analysis. In order to address this limitation, an interdisciplinary group participated in three workshops intended to reconstruct and improve the MAPA by using the principles of the Change Laboratory (CL). This chapter aims to present a new model of activity system of analysis and prevention of work accidents. The text aims to answer the question: what are the new dimensions brought in from MAPA’s development? We will present the stages and challenges of the new model.

Keywords

Accident analysis Formative intervention 

References

  1. Almeida, I. M., & Vilela, R. A. G. (2010). Modelo de Análise e Prevenção de Acidentes de Trabalho – MAPA. Piracicaba: CEREST.Google Scholar
  2. Almeida, I. M., Vilela, R. A. G., Silva, A. J. N., & Beltran, S. L. (2014). Modelo de Análise e Prevenção de Acidentes – MAPA: ferramenta para a vigilância em Saúde do trabalhador. Ciênc Saúde Colet, 19(12), 4679–4688.  https://doi.org/10.1590/1413-812320141912.12982014.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Binder, M. C. P., & Almeida, I. M. (1997). Estudo de caso de dois acidentes do trabalho investigados com o método de árvore de causas. Cad Saúde Pública, 13(4), 749–760.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Cedergren, A. (2013). Implementing recommendations from accident investigations: A case study of inter-organisational challenges. Accident Analysis and Prevention, 53, 133–141.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aap.2013.01.010.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. Clot, Y. (1999). La fonction psychologique du travail. Paris: PUF.Google Scholar
  6. Dien, Y., Dechy, N., & Guillaume, E. (2012). Accident investigation: From searching direct causes to finding in-depth causes - problem of analysis or/and of analyst? Safety Science, 50(6), 1398–1407.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssci.2011.12.010.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Engeström, Y. (2001). Expansive learning at work: Toward an activity theoretical reconceptualization. Journal of Education and Work, 14(1), 133–156.  https://doi.org/10.1080/13639080020028747.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Engeström, Y. (2015). Learning by expanding: An activity-theoretical approach to developmental research. New York: Cambridge Press.Google Scholar
  9. Engeström, Y., Virkkunen, J., Helle, M., Pihlaja, J., & Poikela, R. (1996). The Change Laboratory as a tool for transforming work. Lifelong Learning in Europe, 1(2), 10–17.Google Scholar
  10. Engeström, Y. (1987). Learning by expanding: An activity-theoretical approach to developmental research. Helsinki: Orienta-Konsultit.Google Scholar
  11. Ferreira, L. L. (2015). Análise coletiva do trabalho: quer ver? Escuta. Revista Ciências do Trabalho, 4, 125–137.Google Scholar
  12. Guérin, F., Laville, A., Daniellou, F., Duraffourg, J., & Kerguelen, A. (1997). Comprendre le travail pour le transformer – La pratique de l’ergonomie. Lyon: ANACT.Google Scholar
  13. Hale, A. R., Ale, B. J. M., Goossens, L. H. J., Heijer, T., Bellamy, L. J., Mud, M. L., et al. (2007). Modeling accidents for prioritizing prevention. Reliability Engineering and System Safety, 92(12), 1701–1715.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ress.2006.09.025.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Hollnagel, E. (2008). Risk + barriers = safety? Safety Science, 46(2), 221–229.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssci.2007.06.028.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Leplat, J. R. (1984). Analysis of human errors in industrial incidents and accidents for improvement of work safety. Accident Analysis and Prevention, 16(2), 77–88.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Levitt, B., & March, J. G. (1988). Organizational learning. Annual Review of Sociology, 14, 319–338.  https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.so.14.080188.001535.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Lindberg, A. K., Hansson, S. O., & Rollenhagen, C. (2010). Learning from accidents – What more do we need to know? Safety Science, 48(6), 714–721.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssci.2010.02.004.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Llory, M., & Montmayeul, R. (2010). L’accident et l’organisation. Bordeaux: Préventique.Google Scholar
  19. Ministério da Saúde (BR). (2009). Portaria n° 3.252, de 22 dezembro 2009. Aprova as diretrizes para execução e financiamento das ações de Vigilância em Saúde pela União, Estados, Distrito Federal e Municípios e dá outras providências. Diário Oficial da União. 22 dez 2009. Seção 1, pp. 45–50.Google Scholar
  20. Norros, L. (2004). Acting under uncertainty. The core-task analysis in ecological study of work. Espoo: VTT publications.Google Scholar
  21. Reason, J. (2000). Human error: Models and management. BMJ, 320(7237), 768–770.  https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.320.7237.768.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  22. Revuelta, R. (2004). Operational experience feedback in the World Association of Nuclear Operators (WANO). Journal of Hazardous Materials, 111(1–3), 67–71.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhazmat.2004.02.025.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. Sewell, J. R., & William, H. (1996). Historical events as transformation of structures: Inventing revolution at the bastille. Theory and Society, 25, 841–881.  https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00159818.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Suchman, L. (1987). Plans and situated actions: The problem of human/machine communication. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  25. Vilela, R. A. G., Iguti, A. M., & Almeida, I. M. (2004). Culpa da vítima: Um modelo para perpetuar a impunidade nos acidentes do trabalho. Cadernos de Saúde Pública. 20(2), 570–579.  https://doi.org/10.1590/S0102-311X2004000200026.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  26. Virkkunen, J., & Newnham, D. S. (2013). The Change Laboratory: A tool for collaborative development of work and education. Rotterdam: Sense Publishers.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Wisner, A. (1995). Réflexions sur l’ergonomie (1962–1995). Toulouse: Octarès.Google Scholar
  28. Yoon, Y. S., Ham, D. H., & Yoon, W. C. (2016). Application of activity theory to analysis of human-related accidents: Method and case studies. Reliability Engineering and System Safety, 150, 22–34.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ress.2016.01.013.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2020

Authors and Affiliations

  • Sandra Lorena Beltran Hurtado
    • 1
    Email author
  • Rodolfo Andrade de Gouveia Vilela
    • 1
  • Ildeberto Muniz de Almeida
    • 2
  • José Marçal Jackson Filho
    • 3
  • Marco Antonio Pereira Querol
    • 4
  • Raoni Rocha Simões
    • 5
  • Eugenio Paceli Haten Diniz
    • 6
  • Manoela Gomes Reis Lopes
    • 7
  • Alessandro José Nunes da Silva
    • 8
  • Marcos Hister Pereira Gomes
    • 8
  • Susana Vicentina Costa
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Environmental HealthSchool of Public Health, University of São PauloSão PauloBrazil
  2. 2.Department of Public HealthBotucatu School of Medicine, São Paulo State University “Júlio de Mesquita Filho”BotucatuBrazil
  3. 3.Occupational Safety and Medicine Foundation Jorge Duprat Figueiredo – FundacentroCuritibaBrazil
  4. 4.Department of Agronomic EngineeringFederal University of SergipeSão CristóvãoBrazil
  5. 5.Institute of Pure and Applied Sciences, Federal University of ItajubáItajubáBrazil
  6. 6.Occupational Safety and Medicine Foundation “Jorge Duprat Figueiredo” – FundacentroBelo HorizonteBrazil
  7. 7.Department of Biological Sciences and HealthFederal University of AmapáMacapáBrazil
  8. 8.Workers’ Health Reference Center - CERESTPiracicabaBrazil

Personalised recommendations