Advertisement

Renal Cancer pp 361-386 | Cite as

Postoperative Surveillance Protocols for Renal Cell Carcinoma

  • Megan M. Merrill
  • Jose A. KaramEmail author
Chapter

Abstract

Patients with renal cell carcinoma (RCC) are at risk of recurrence even after definitive surgical extirpation. Without prompt identification and treatment of recurrent disease, prognosis is poor. Literature suggests that early intervention in the form of metastasectomy and/or targeted therapy can lead to prolonged survival in those who develop recurrent or metastatic RCC. Therefore, surveillance in the postoperative setting is of paramount importance.

Currently, there is no single consensus on the optimal surveillance strategy following radical or partial nephrectomy or ablative therapies used to treat RCC. The purpose of this chapter is to provide a comprehensive review of the existing data on postoperative surveillance strategies and how prognostic factors and patterns of recurrence have contributed to the establishment of such protocols.

The specific components of surveillance are described, and several evidence-based recommendations are reviewed, including the most recent AUA guidelines, the 2018 National Comprehensive Cancer Network (NCCN) guidelines, and a surveillance algorithm based on the UCLA-Integrated Scoring System (UISS). Briefly, new frontiers in surveillance are also discussed, such as the use of PET imaging and the incorporation of molecular biomarkers into existing surveillance models.

Keywords

Renal cell carcinoma Surgery Partial nephrectomy Radical nephrectomy Radiofrequency ablation Cryoablation Biomarkers Surveillance Protocol Guidelines Follow-up 

References

  1. 1.
    Siegel R, Miller KD, Jemal A. Cancer statistics, 2017. CA Cancer J Clin. 2017;67:7–30.Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Janzen NK, Kim HL, Figlin RA, Belldegrun AS. Surveillance after radical or partial nephrectomy for localized renal cell carcinoma and management of recurrent disease. Urol Clin North Am. 2003;30(4):843–52.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Rabinovitch RA, Zelefsky MJ, Gaynor JJ, Fuks Z. Patterns of failure following surgical resection of renal cell carcinoma: implications for adjuvant local and systemic therapy. J Clin Oncol. 1994;12(1):206–12.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Ramon J, Goldwasser B, Raviv G, Jonas P, Many M. Long-term results of simple and radical nephrectomy for renal cell carcinoma. Cancer. 1991;67(10):2506–11.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Maldazys JD, deKernion JB. Prognostic factors in metastatic renal carcinoma. J Urol. 1986;136(2):376–9.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Negrier S, Escudier B, Gomez F, Douillard JY, Ravaud A, Chevreau C, Bucion M, Perol D, Lasset C. Prognostic factors of survival and rapid progression in 782 patients with metastatic renal carcinomas treated by cytokines: a report from the Groupe Francais d’ Immunotherapie. Ann Oncol. 2002;13(9):1460–8.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Motzer RJ, Rini BI, Bukowski RM, Curti BD, George DJ, Hudes GR, Redman BG, Margolin KA, Merchan JR, Wilding G, Ginsberg MS, Bacik J, Kim ST, Baum CM, Michaelson MD. Sunitinib in patients with metastatic renal cell carcinoma. JAMA. 2006;295(21):2516–24.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Hofmann HS, Neef H, Krohe K, Andreev P, Silber RE. Prognostic factors and survival after pulmonary resection of metastatic renal cell carcinoma. Eur Urol. 2005;48(1):77–81.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Baloch KG, Grimer RJ, Carter SR, Tillman RM. Radical surgery for the solitary bony metastasis from renal cell carcinoma. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2000;82(1):62–7.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Sandhu SS, Symes A, A’Hern R, Sohaib SA, Eisen T, Gore M, Christmas TJ. Surgical excision of isolated renal-bed recurrence after radical nephrectomy for renal cell carcinoma. BJU Int. 2005;95(4):522–5.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Chawla SN, Crispen PL, Hanlon AL, Greenberg RE, Chen DY, Uzzo RG. The natural history of observed enhancing renal masses: metaanalysis and review of the world literature. J Urol. 2006;175(2):425–31.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Johnsen JA, Hellsten S. Lymphatogenous spread of renal cell carcinoma: an autopsy study. J Urol. 1997;157(2):450–3.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Hafez KS, Novick AC, Campbell SC. Patterns of recurrence and guidelines for follow-up after nephron-sparing surgery for sporadic renal cell carcinoma. J Urol. 1997;157(6):2067–70.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Levy DA, Slaton JW, Swanson DA, Dinney CP. Stage specific guidelines for surveillance after radical nephrectomy for local renal cell carcinoma. J Urol. 1998;159(4):1163–7.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Ljungberg B, Alamdari FI, Rasmuson T, Roos G. Follow-up guidelines for nonmetastatic renal cell carcinoma based on the occurrence of metastases after radical nephrectomy. BJU Int. 1999;84(4):405–11.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Sandock DS, Seftel AD, Resnick MI. A new protocol for the followup of renal cell carcinoma based on pathological stage. J Urol. 1995;154(1):28–31.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Stephenson AJ, Chetner MP, Rourke K, Gleave ME, Signaevsky M, Palmer B, Kuan J, Brock GB, Tanguay S. Guidelines for the surveillance of localized renal cell carcinoma based on the patterns of relapse after nephrectomy. J Urol. 2004;172(1):58–62.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Lam JS, Leppert JT, Figlin RA, Belldegrun AS. Surveillance following radical or partial nephrectomy for renal cell carcinoma. Curr Urol Rep. 2005;6(1):7–18.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Chin AI, Lam JS, Figlin RA, Belldegrun AS. Surveillance strategies for renal cell carcinoma patients following nephrectomy. Rev Urol. 2006;8(1):1–7.PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Skolarikos A, Alivizatos G, Laguna P, de la Rosette J. A review on follow-up strategies for renal cell carcinoma after nephrectomy. Eur Urol. 2007;51(6):1490–500.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Shvarts O, Lam JS, Kim HL, Han KR, Figlin R, Belldegrun A. Eastern cooperative oncology group performance status predicts bone metastasis in patients presenting with renal cell carcinoma: implication for preoperative bone scans. J Urol. 2004;172(3):867–70.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Lam JS, Shvarts O, Leppert JT, Pantuck AJ, Figlin RA, Belldegrun AS. Postoperative surveillance protocol for patients with localized and locally advanced renal cell carcinoma based on a validated prognostic nomogram and risk group stratification system. J Urol. 2005;174(2):466–72.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Breda A, Konijeti R, Lam JS. Patterns of recurrence and surveillance strategies for renal cell carcinoma following surgical resection. Expert Rev Anticancer Ther. 2007;7(6):847–62.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Itano NB, Blute ML, Spotts B, Zincke H. Outcome of isolated renal cell carcinoma fossa recurrence after nephrectomy. J Urol. 2000;164(2):322–5.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Psutka SP, Heidenreich M, Boorjian SA, Bailey GC, Cheville JC, Stewart-Merrill SB, Lohse CM, Atwell TD, Costello BA, Leibovich BC, Thompson RH. Renal fossa recurrence after nephrectomy for renal cell carcinoma: prognostic features and oncological outcomes. BJU Int. 2017;119:116–27.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Margulis V, McDonald M, Tamboli P, Swanson DA, Wood CG. Predictors of oncological outcome after resection of locally recurrent renal cell carcinoma. J Urol. 2009;181(5):2044–51.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Fergany AF, Hafez KS, Novick AC. Long-term results of nephron-sparing surgery for localized renal cell carcinoma: 10-year followup. J Urol. 2000;163(2):442–5.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Campbell SC, Novick AC, Belldegrun AS, Blute ML, Chow GK, Derweesh IH, Faraday MM, Kaouk JH, Leveillee RJ, Matin SF, Russo P, Uzzo RG. Guideline for management of the clinical T1 renal mass. J Urol. 2009;182(4):1271–9.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Leibovich BC, Blute M, Cheville JC, Lohse CM, Weaver AL, Zincke H. Nephron sparing surgery for appropriately selected renal cell carcinoma between 4 and 7 cm results in outcome similar to radical nephrectomy. J Urol. 2004;171(3):1066–70.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Yossepowitch O, Thompson RH, Leibovich BC, Eggener SE, Pettus JA, Kwon ED, Herr HW, Blute ML, Russo P. Positive surgical margins at partial nephrectomy: predictors and oncological outcomes. J Urol. 2008;179:2158–63.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Bensalah K, Pantuck AJ, Rioux-Leclercq N, Thuret R, Montorsi F, Karakiewicz PI, Mottet N, Zini L, Bertini R, Salomon L, Villers A, Soulie M, Bellec L, Rischmann P, De La Taille A, Avakian R, Crepel M, Ferriere JM, Bernhard JC, Dujardin T, Pouliot F, Rigaud J, Pfister C, Albouy B, Guy L, Joniau S, Van Poppel H, Lebret T, Culty T, Saint F, Zisman A, Raz O, Lang H, Spie R, Wille A, Roigas J, Aguilera A, Rambeaud B, Pineiro LM, Nativ O, Farfara R, Richard F, Roupret M, Doehn C, Bastian PJ, Muller SC, Tostain J, Belldegrun AS, Patard JJ. Positive surgical margin appears to have negligible impact on survival of renal cell carcinoma treated by nephron-sparing surgery. Eur Urol. 2010;57:466–73.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Wood EL, Adibi M, Qiao W, Brandt J, Zhang M, Tamboli P, Matin SF, Wood CG, Karam JK. Local tumor bed recurrence following partial nephrectomy in patients with small renal masses. J Urol. 2018;199(2):393–400.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Desai MM, Gill IS. Current status of cryoablation and radiofrequency ablation in the mangagement of renal tumors. Curr Opin Urol. 2002;12(5):387–93.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    Karam JA, Wood CG. The role of surgery in advanced renal cell carcinoma: cytoreductive nephrectomy and metastasectomy. Hematol Oncol Clin North Am. 2011;25(4):753–64.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    Alt AL, Boorjian SA, Lohse CM, Costello BA, Leibovich BC, Blute ML. Survival after complete surgical resection of multiple metastases from renal cell carcinoma. Cancer. 2011;117(13):2873–82.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. 36.
    Motzer RJ, Bacik J, Murphy BA, Russo P, Mazumdar M. Interferon-alfa as a comparative treatment for clincal trials of new therapies against advanced renal cell carcinoma. J Clin Oncol. 2002;20(1):289–96.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. 37.
    Levey AS, Coresh J, Balk E, Kausz AT, Levin A, Steffes MW, Hogg RJ, Perrone RD, Lau J, Eknoyan G, National Kidney Foundation. National Kidney Foundation practice guidelines for chronic kidney disease: evaluation, classification, and stratification. Ann Intern Med. 2003;139(2):137–47.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  38. 38.
    Go AS, Chertow GM, Fan D, McCulloch CE, Hsu CY. Chronic kidney disease and the risks of death, cardiovascular events, and hospitalization. N Engl J Med. 2004;351(13):1296–305.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  39. 39.
    Chae EJ, Kim JK, Kim SH, Bae SJ, Cho KS. Renal cell carcinoma: analysis of postoperative recurrence patterns. Radiology. 2005;234:189–96.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. 40.
    Bianchi M, Becker A, Hansen J, Trinh Q, Tian Z, Abdollah F, Briganti A, Shariat SF, Perrotte P, Montorsi F, Karakiewicz PI, Sun M. Conditional survival after nephrectomy for renal cell carcinoma (RCC): changes in future survival probability over time. BJU Int. 2013;111(8):E283–9.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  41. 41.
    Kattan MW, Reuter V, Motzer R, Katz J, Russo P. A postoperative prognostic nomogram for renal cell carcinoma. J Urol. 2001;166(1):63–7.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  42. 42.
    Rini BI, Vogelzang NJ. Prognostic factors in renal carcinoma. Semin Oncol. 2000;27(2):213–20.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  43. 43.
    Delahunt B, Kittelson JM, McCredie MR, Reeve AE, Stewart JH, Bilous AM. Prognostic importance of tumor size for localized conventional (clear cell) renal cell carcinoma: assessment of TNM T1 and T2 tumor categories and comparison with other prognostic parameters. Cancer. 2002;94(3):658–64.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  44. 44.
    Cheville JC, Blute ML, Zincke H, Lohse CM, Weaver AL. Stage pT1 conventional (clear cell) renal cell carcinoma: pathological features associated with cancer specific survival. J Urol. 2001;166(2):453–6.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  45. 45.
    Giuliani L, Giberti C, Martorana G, Rovida S. Radical extensive surgery for renal cell carcinoma: long-term results and prognostic factors. J Urol. 1990;143(3):468–73.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  46. 46.
    Sorbellini M, Kattan MW, Snyder ME, Reuter V, Motzer R, Goetzi M, McKiernan J, Russo P. A postoperative prognostic nomogram predicting recurrence for patients with conventional clear cell renal cell carcinoma. J Urol. 2005;173(1):48–51.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  47. 47.
    Delahunt B, Eble J, McCredie MR, Bethwaite PB, Stewart JH, Bilous AM. Morphologic typing of papillary renal cell carcinoma: comparison of growth kinetics and patient survival in 66 cases. Hum Pathol. 2001;32(6):590–5.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  48. 48.
    Amin MB, Amin MB, Tamboli P, Javidan J, Stricker H, de-Peralta Venturina M, Deshpande A, Menon M. Prognostic impact of histologic subtyping of adult renal epithelial neoplasms: an experience of 405 cases. Am J Surg Pathol. 2002;26(3):281–91.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  49. 49.
    Patard JJ, Leray E, Rioux-Leclercq N, Cindolo L, Ficarra V, Zisman A, De La Taille A, Tostain J, Artibani W, Abbou CC, Lobel B, Guille F, Chopin DK, Mulders PF, Wood CG, Swanson DA, Figlin RA, Belldegrun AS, Pantuck AJ. Prognostic value of histologic subtypes in renal cell carcinoma: a multicenter experience. J Clin Oncol. 2005;23(12):2763–71.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  50. 50.
    Abel EJ, Culp SH, Meissner M, Matin SF, Tamboli P, Wood CG. Identifying the risk of disease progression after surgery for localized renal cell carcinoma. BJU Int. 2010;106(9):1277–83.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  51. 51.
    Sella A, Logothetis CJ, Ro JY, Swanson DA, Samuels ML. Sarcomatoid renal cell carcinoma. A treatable entity. Cancer. 1987;60(6):1313–8.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  52. 52.
    Narayan V, Puligandla M, Haas NB, Subramanian P, DiPaola RS, Uzzo R. Patterns of relapse and implications for post-nephrectomy surveillance for patients with high-risk non-clear cell renal cell carcinoma: subgroup analysis of the phase 3 ECOG-ACRIN E2805 trial. J Urol. 2019;201(1):62–8.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  53. 53.
    Frank I, Blute ML, Cheville JC, Lohse CM, Weaver AL, Zincke H. An outcome prediction model for patients with clear cell renal cell carcinoma treated with radical nephrectomy based on tumor stage, size, grade and necrosis: the SSIGN score. J Urol. 2002;168(6):2395–400.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  54. 54.
    Raj GV, Thompson RH, Leibovich BC, Blute ML, Russo P, Kattan MW. Preoperative nomogram predicting 12-year probability of metastatic renal cancer. J Urol. 2008;179(6):2146–51.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  55. 55.
    Zisman A, Pantuck AJ, Dorey F, Said JW, Shvarts O, Quintana D, Gitlitz BJ, deKernion JB, Figlin RA, Belldegrun AS. Improved prognostication of RCC using an integrated staging system (UISS). J Clin Oncol. 2001;19(6):1649–57.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  56. 56.
    Mickisch G, Carballido J, Hellsten S, Schulze H, Mensink H. Guidelines on renal cell cancer. Eur Urol. 2001;40:252–5.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  57. 57.
    Stephenson AJ, Chetner MP, Rourke K, Gleave ME, Signaevsky M, Palmer B, et al. Guidelines for the surveillance of localized renal cell carcinoma based on the patterns of relapse after nephrectomy. J Urol [Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov’t Research Support, U.S. Gov’t, P.H.S.]. 2004;172(1):58–62.Google Scholar
  58. 58.
    Novick AC, Derweesh I. Open partial nephrectomy for renal tumours: current status. BJU Int. 2005;95(Suppl 2):35–40.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  59. 59.
    Kassouf W, Siemens R, Morash C, Lacombe L, Jewett M, Goldenberg L, Chin J, Chetner M, Wood CG, Tanguay S, Aprikian AG. Follow-up guidelines after radical or partial nephrectomy for localized and locally advanced renal cell carcinoma. Can Urol Assoc J. 2009;3(1):73–6.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  60. 60.
    Montie JE. Follow-up after partial or total nephrectomy for renal cell carcinoma. Urol Clin North Am. 1994;21(4):589–92.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  61. 61.
    Saidi JA, Newhouse JH, Sawczuk IS. Radiologic follow-up of patients with T1-3a,b,c or T4N+M0 renal cell carcinoma after radical nephrectomy. Urology [Clinical Trial Randomized Controlled Trial Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov’t]. 1998;52(6):1000–3.Google Scholar
  62. 62.
    Frank I, Blute ML, Cheville JC, Lohse CM, Weaver AL, Leibovich BC, et al. A multifactorial postoperative surveillance model for patients with surgically treated clear cell renal cell carcinoma. J Urol. 2003;170(6 Pt 1):2225–32.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  63. 63.
    Antonelli A, Cozzoli A, Zani D, Zanotelli T, Nicolai M, Cunico SC, Simeone C. The follow-up management of non-metastatic renal cell carcinoma: definition of a surveillance protocol. BJU Int. 2006;99(2):296–300.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  64. 64.
    Patard JJ, Kim HL, Lam JS, Dorey FJ, Pantuck AJ, Zisman A, Ficarra V, Han KR, Cindolo L, De La Taille A, Tostain J, Artibani W, Dinney CP, Wood CG, Swanson DA, Abbou CC, Lobel B, Mulders PF, Chopin DK, Figlin RA, Belldegrun AS. Use of the University of California Los Angeles integrated staging system to predict survival in renal cell carcinoma: an international multicenter study. J Clin Oncol. 2004;22(16):3316–22.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  65. 65.
    Capogrosso P, Larcher A, Sjoberg DD, Vertosick EA, Cianflone F, Dell’Oglio P, Carenzi C, Salonia A, Vickers AJ, Montorsi F, Bertini R, Capitanio U. Risk based surveillance after surgical treatment of renal cell carcinoma. J Urol. 2018;200(1):61–7.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  66. 66.
    Siddiqui SA, Frank I, Cheville JC, Lohse CM, Leibovich BC, Blute ML. Postoperative surveillance for renal cell carcinoma: a multifactorial histological subtype specific protocol. BJU Int. 2009;104(6):778–85.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  67. 67.
    Stewart-Merrill SB, Thompson RH, Psutka SP, Cheville JC, Lohse CM, Boorjian SA, Leibovich BC. Evaluation of the National Comprehensive Cancer Network and American Urological Association renal cell carcinoma surveillance guidelines. J Clin Oncol. 2014;32(36):4059–65.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  68. 68.
    Stewart-Merrill SB, Thompson RH, Boorjian SA, Psutka SP, Lohse CM, Cheville JC, Leibovich BC, Frank I. Oncologic surveillance after surgical resection for renal cell carcinoma: a novel risk-based approach. J Clin Oncol. 2015;33(35):4151–7.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  69. 69.
    NCCN Clinical Practice Guidelines in Oncology (NCCN Guidelines®) for Kidney Cancer (V.4.2018) © 2018 National Comprehensive Cancer Network, Inc. Available at: NCCN.org. Accessed 21 Aug 2018. To view the most recent and complete version of the NCCN Guidelines®, go on-line to NCCN.org.
  70. 70.
    AUA Clincal Practice Guidelines: follow-up for clinically localized renal neoplasms. 2013. Available at auanet.org. Accessed 21 Aug 2018.
  71. 71.
    Steinbach F, Novick AC, Zincke H, Miller DP, Williams RD, Lund G, Skinner DG, Esrig D, Richie JP, Dekernion JB, et al. Treatment of renal cell carcinoma in von Hippel-Lindau disease: a multicenter study. J Urol. 1995;153(6):1812–6.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  72. 72.
    Duffey BG, Choyke PL, Glenn G, Grubb RL, Venzon D, Linehan WM, et al. The relationship between renal tumor size and metastases in patients with von Hippel-Lindau disease. J Urol. 2004;172(1):63–5.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  73. 73.
    Meister M, Choyke P, Anderson C, Patel U. Radiological evaluation, management, and surveillance of renal masses in von hippel-lindau disease. Clin Radiol. 2009;64(6):589–600.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  74. 74.
    Lotfi MA, McCue P, Gomella LG. Laparoscopic interstitial contact laser ablation of renal lesions: an experimental model. J Endourol. 1994;8:153–6.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  75. 75.
    Yoshimura K, Okubo K, Ichioka K, Terada N, Matsuta Y, Arai Y. Laparoscopic partial nephrectomy with a microwave tissue coagulator for small renal tumor. J Urol. 2001;165:1893–6.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  76. 76.
    Vallancien G, Chartier-Kastler E, Chopin D, Veillon B, Brisset JM, Andre-Bougaran J. Focussed extracorporeal pyrotherapy: experimental results. Eur Urol. 1991;20:211–9.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  77. 77.
    Watkin NA, Morris SB, Rivens IH, ter Haar GR. High-intensity focused ultrasound ablation of the kidney in a large animal model. J Endourol. 1997;11:191–6.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  78. 78.
    Klatte T, Mauermann J, Heinz-Peer G, Waldert M, Weibi P, Klingler HC, Remzi M. Perioperative, oncologic, and functional outcomes of laparoscopic renal cryoablation and open parital nephrectomy: a matched pair analysis. J Endourol. 2011;25(6):991–7.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  79. 79.
    Guazzoni G, Cestari A, Buffi N, Lughezzani G, Nava L, Cardone G, Balconi G, Lazzeri M, Montorsi F, Rigatti P. Oncologic results of laparoscopic renal cryoablation for clinical T1a tumors: 8 years of experience in a single institution. Urology. 2010;76(3):624–9.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  80. 80.
    Aron M, Kamoi K, Remer E, Berger A, Desai M, Gill IS. Laparoscopic renal cryoablation: 8-year, single surgeon outcomes. J Urol. 2010;183(3):889–95.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  81. 81.
    El Dib R, Touma NJ, Kapoor A. Cryoablation vs radiofrequency ablation for the treatment of renal cell carcinoma: a meta-analysis of case series studies. BJU Int. 2012;110(4):510–6.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  82. 82.
    Tracy CR, Raman JD, Donnally C, Trimmer CK, Cadeddu JA. Durable oncologic outcomes after radiofrequency ablation: experience from treating 243 small renal masses over 7.5 years. Cancer. 2010;116(13):3135–42.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  83. 83.
    Matsumoto ED, Watumull L, Johnson DB, Ogan K, Taylor GD, Joseph S, Cadeddu JA. The radiographic evolution of radio frequency ablated renal tumors. J Urol. 2004;172(1):45–8.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  84. 84.
    Kawamoto S, Permpongkosol S, Bluemke DA, Fishman EK, Solomon SB. Sequential changes after radiofrequency ablation and cryoablation of renal neoplasms: role of CT and MR imaging. Radiographics. 2007;27(2):343–55.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  85. 85.
    Svatek RS, Sims R, Anderson JK, Abdel-Aziz K, Cadeddu JA. Magnetic resonance imaging characteristics of renal tumors after radiofrequency ablation. Urology. 2006;67(3):508–12.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  86. 86.
    Rendon RA, Kachura JR, Sweet JM, Gertner MR, Sherar MD, Robinette M, Tshlias J, Trachtenberg J, Sampson H, Jewett MA. The uncertainty of radio frequency treatment of renal cell carcinoma: findings at immediate and delayed nephrectomy. J Urol. 2002;167(4):1587–92.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  87. 87.
    Weight CJ, Kaouk JH, Hegarty NJ, Remer EM, O’Malley CM, Lane BR, Gill IS, Novick AC. Correlation of radiographic imaging and histopathology following cryoablation and radio frequency ablation for renal tumors. J Urol. 2008;179(4):1277–81.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  88. 88.
    Cadeddu JA. Correlation of radiographic imaging and histopathology following cryoablation and radio frequency ablation for renal tumors – Editorial Comment. J Urol. 2008;179:1281–2.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  89. 89.
    Campbell SC, Krishnamurthi V, Chow G, Hale J, Myles J, Novick AC. Renal cryosurgery: experimental evaluation of treatment parameters. Urology. 1998;52(1):33–4.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  90. 90.
    Rukstalis DB, Khorsandi M, Garcia FU, Hoenig DM, Cohen JK. Clinical experience with open renal cryoablation. Urology. 2001;172:1267–70.Google Scholar
  91. 91.
    Gill IS, Remer EM, Hasan WA, Strzempkowski B, Spaliviero M, Steinberg AP, Kaouk JH, Desai MM, Novick AC. Renal cryoablation: outcome at 3 years. J Urol. 2005;173(6):1903–7.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  92. 92.
    Beemster P, Phoa S, Wijkstra H, de la Rosette J, Laguna P. Follow-up of renal masses after cryosurgery using computed tomography; enhancement patterns and cryolesion size. BJU Int. 2008;101(10):1237–42.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  93. 93.
    Matin SF, Ahrar K, Cadeddu JA, Gervais DA, McGovern FJ, Zagoria RA, Uzzo RG, Haaga J, Resnick MI, Kaouk J, Gill IS. Residual and recurrent disease following renal energy ablative therapy: a multi-institutional study. J Urol. 2006;176(5):1973–7.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  94. 94.
    Crispen PL, Boorjian SA, Lohse CM, Leibovich BC, Kwon ED. Predicting disease progression after nephrectomy for localized renal cell carcinoma: the utility of prognostic models and molecular biomarkers. Cancer. 2008;113(3):450–60.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  95. 95.
    Nogueira M, Kim HL. Molecular markers for predicting prognosis of renal cell carcinoma. Urol Oncol. 2008;26(2):113–24.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  96. 96.
    Johnson TV, Abbasi A, Owen-Smith A, Young AN, Kucuk O, Harris WB, et al. Postoperative better than preoperative C-reactive protein at predicting outcome after potentially curative nephrectomy for renal cell carcinoma. Urology. 2010;76(3):766.e1–5.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  97. 97.
    Abel JE, Bauman TM, Weiker M, Shi F, Downs TM, Jarrard DF, Huang W. Analysis and validation of tissue biomarkers for renal cell carcinoma using automated high-throughput evaluation of protein expression. Hum Pathol. 2014;45(5):1092–9.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  98. 98.
    Brenner DJ, Hall EJ. Computed tomography--an increasing source of radiation exposure. N Engl J Med. 2007;357(22):2277–84.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  99. 99.
    Smith-Bindman R. Is computed tomography safe? N Engl J Med. 2010;363(1):1–4.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  100. 100.
    Society RR. Radiation exposures in medicine: biological and public health significance american statistical association conference on radiation and health. Annapolis, Maryland, June 13-16, 2010. Radiat Res. 2010;175(1):131–42.Google Scholar
  101. 101.
    Kang DE, White RL Jr, Zuger JH, Sasser HC, Teigland CM. Clinical use of fluorodeoxyglucose F 18 positron emission tomography for detection of renal cell carcinoma. J Urol. 2004;171(5):1806–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  102. 102.
    Janzen NK, Laifer-Narin S, Han KR, Seltzer M, Thomas MA, Pantuck AJ, Belldegrun AS. Emerging technologies in uroradiologic imaging. Urol Oncol. 2003;21(5):317–26.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  103. 103.
    Kocher F, Grimmel S, Hautman R, et al. Preoperative lymph node staging in patients with kidney and urinary bladder neoplasm. J Nucl Med. 1994;35(suppl):233P.Google Scholar
  104. 104.
    Nakatani K, Nakamoto Y, Saga T, Higashi T, Togashi K. The potential clinical value of FDG-PET for recurrent renal cell carcinoma. Eur J Radiol. 2011;79(1):29–35.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  105. 105.
    Elahmadawy MA, Saied Elazab MS, Ahmed S, Salama M. Diagnostic value of F-18 FDG PET/CT for local and distant disease relapse surveillance in surgically treated RCC patients: can it aid in establishing consensus follow up strategy? Nucl Med Rev Cent East Eur. 2018;21(2):85–91.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  106. 106.
    Dion M, Martínez CH, Williams AK, Chalasani V, Nott L, Pautler SE. Cost analysis of two follow-up strategies for localized kidney cancer: a Canadian cohort comparison. Can Urol Assoc J. 2010;4(5):322–6.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  107. 107.
    Lobo JM, Nelson M, Nandanan N, Krupski TL. Comparison of renal cell carcinoma surveillance guidelines: competing trade-offs. J Urol. 2016;195(6):1664–70.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  108. 108.
    Dabestani S, Beisland C, Stewart GD, Bensalah K, Gudmundsson E, Lam TB, Gietzmann W, Zakikhani P, Marconi L, Fernandéz-Pello S, Monagas S, Williams SP, Torbrand C, Powles T, Van Werkhoven E, Meijer R, Volpe A, Staehler M, Ljungberg B, Bex A. Long-term outcomes of follow-up for initially localised clear cell renal cell carcinoma: RECUR Database Analysis. Eur Urol Focus. 2018;  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.euf.2018.02.010.
  109. 109.
    Dabestani S, Beisland C, Stewart GD, Bensalah K, Gudmundsson E, Lam TB, Gietzmann W, Zakikhani P, Marconi L, Fernandéz-Pello S, Monagas S, Williams SP, Torbrand C, Powles T, Van Werkhoven E, Meijer R, Volpe A, Staehler M, Ljungberg B, Bex A. Intensive imaging-based follow-up of surgically treated localised renal cell carcinoma does not improve post-recurrence survival: results from a European Multicentre Database (RECUR). Eur Urol. 2019;75(2):261–4.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2020

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of UrologyKaiser Permanente South SacramentoSacramentoUSA
  2. 2.Urology and Translational Molecular PathologyMD Anderson Cancer CenterHoustonUSA

Personalised recommendations