Advertisement

Is Beauty in the Eye of the Beholder or an Objective Truth? A Neuroscientific Answer

  • Hassan AleemEmail author
  • Maria Pombo
  • Ivan Correa-Herran
  • Norberto M. Grzywacz
Chapter
Part of the Springer Series on Bio- and Neurosystems book series (SSBN, volume 10)

Abstract

Is beauty subjective or objective? Once limited to Philosophy, this question is increasingly capturing scientists’ attention. Here, we discuss neuroscientific support for both viewpoints. Our discussion includes the Processing Fluency Theory and a reinforcement-learning model of aesthetic values. We conclude both aspects of beauty derive from utilitarian brain mechanisms.

Keywords

Processing fluency Reinforcement learning Aesthetics Objectivity Subjectivity 

References

  1. 1.
    Alberti, L.B., Leoni, G.: The Architecture of Leon Batista Alberti in Ten Books. E. Owen (1755)Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Aleem, H., Correa-Herran, I., Grzywacz, N.M.: Inferring master painters’ esthetic biases from the statistics of portraits. Front. Hum. Neurosci. 11, 94 (2017)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Arnheim, R.: Art and Visual Perception: A Psychology of the Creative Eye. Univ of California Press (1956)Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Berlyne, D.E.: Aesthetics and psychobiology. JSTOR (1971)Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Bode, C., Helmy, M., Bertamini, M.: A cross-cultural comparison for preference for symmetry: comparing British and Egyptians non-experts. Psihologija 50(3), 383–402 (2017)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Brown, S., Gao, X., Tisdelle, L., Eickhoff, S.B., Liotti, M.: Naturalizing aesthetics: brain areas for aesthetic appraisal across sensory modalities. Neuroimage 58(1), 250–258 (2011)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Bryson, N.: Vision and Painting: The Logic of the Gaze. Springer (1983)Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Chatterjee, A.: Neuroaesthetics: a coming of age story. J. Cogn. Neurosci. 23(1), 53–62 (2011)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Donderi, D.C.: Visual complexity: a review. Psychol. Bull. 132(1), 73 (2006)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Furnham, A., Walker, J.: Personality and judgements of abstract, pop art, and representational paintings. Eur. J. Pers. 15(1), 57–72 (2001)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Han, S., Northoff, G.: Culture-sensitive neural substrates of human cognition: a transcultural neuroimaging approach. Nat. Rev. Neurosci. 9(8), 646 (2008)Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Hume, D.: 1985 of the standard of taste. In: Essays: Moral, Political and Literary (1757)Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Itti, L., Koch, C., Niebur, E.: A model of saliency-based visual attention for rapid scene analysis. IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell. 20(11), 1254–1259 (1998)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Kanwisher, N., McDermott, J., Chun, M.M.: The fusiform face area: a module in human extrastriate cortex specialized for face perception. J. Neurosci. 17(11), 4302–4311 (1997)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Kawabata, H., Zeki, S.: Neural correlates of beauty. J. Neurophysiol. 91(4), 1699–1705 (2004)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Kontson, K., Megjhani, M., Brantley, J.A., Cruz-Garza, J.G., Nakagome, S., Robleto, D., et al.: ‘Your brain on art’: emergent cortical dynamics during aesthetic experiences. Front. Hum. Neurosci. 9, 626 (2015)PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Lindell, A.K., Mueller, J.: Can science account for taste? Psychological insights into art appreciation. J. Cog. Psychol. 23(4), 453–475 (2011)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Locke, J.: An Essay Concerning Human Understanding (1689)Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Martindale, C., Moore, K.: Priming, prototypicality, and preference. J. Exp. Psychol. Hum. Percept. Perform. 14(4), 661 (1988)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Masuda, T., Gonzalez, R., Kwan, L., Nisbett, R.E.: Culture and aesthetic preference: comparing the attention to context of East Asians and Americans. Pers. Soc. Psychol. Bull. 34(9), 1260–1275 (2008)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    O’doherty, J., Dayan, P., Schultz, J., Deichmann, R., Friston, K., and Dolan, R.J.: Dissociable roles of ventral and dorsal striatum in instrumental conditioning. Science 304(5669), 452–454 (2004)Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    Park, D.C., Huang, C.-M.: Culture wires the brain: a cognitive neuroscience perspective. Perspect. Psychol. Sci. 5(4), 391–400 (2010)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Pope-Hennessy, J.W.: The portrait in the renaissance. Princeton University Press (1966)Google Scholar
  24. 24.
    Reber, R., Schwarz, N., Winkielman, P.: Processing fluency and aesthetic pleasure: is beauty in the perceiver’s processing experience? Pers. Soc. Psychol. Rev. 8(4), 364–382 (2004)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Sartwell, C.: “Beauty”. In: Zalta, E.N. (ed.) The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy (Winter 2017). Metaphysics Research Lab, Stanford University (2017)Google Scholar
  26. 26.
    Sasaki, Y., Vanduffel, W., Knutsen, T., Tyler, C., Tootell, R.: Symmetry activates extrastriate visual cortex in human and nonhuman primates. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. 102(8), 3159–3163 (2005)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Scheib, J.E., Gangestad, S.W., Thornhill, R.: Facial attractiveness, symmetry and cues of good genes. Proc. Roy. Soc. London B: Biol. Sci. 266(1431), 1913–1917 (1999)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Skov, M.: The pleasure of art. Pleasures of the brain 270–283 (2010)Google Scholar
  29. 29.
    Street, N., Forsythe, A.M., Reilly, R., Taylor, R., and Helmy, M.S. (2016). A complex story: Universal preference vs. individual differences shaping aesthetic response to fractals patterns. Frontiers in human neuroscience 10, 213Google Scholar
  30. 30.
    Sutton, R.S., Barto, A.G.: Introduction to Reinforcement Learning. MIT press Cambridge (1998)Google Scholar
  31. 31.
    Treder, M.S.: Behind the looking-glass: a review on human symmetry perception. Symmetry 2(3), 1510–1543 (2010)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Tyler, C.W.: The symmetry magnification function varies with detection task. J. Vis. 1(2), 7–7 (2001)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Vessel, E.A., Rubin, N.: Beauty and the beholder: highly individual taste for abstract, but not real-world images. J. Vis. 10(2), 18–18 (2010)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  • Hassan Aleem
    • 1
    Email author
  • Maria Pombo
    • 2
  • Ivan Correa-Herran
    • 3
    • 4
  • Norberto M. Grzywacz
    • 1
    • 3
    • 5
    • 6
  1. 1.Interdisciplinary Program in NeuroscienceGeorgetown UniversityWashington D.CUSA
  2. 2.Department of PsychologyGeorgetown UniversityWashington D.CUSA
  3. 3.Department of NeuroscienceGeorgetown UniversityWashington D.CUSA
  4. 4.Facultad de ArtesUniversidad Nacional de ColombiaBogotáColombia
  5. 5.Department of PhysicsGeorgetown UniversityWashington D.CUSA
  6. 6.Graduate School of Arts and SciencesGeorgetown UniversityWashington D.CUSA

Personalised recommendations