Assessment of Cardiovascular Disorders Based on 3D Left Ventricle Model of Cine Cardiac MR Sequence

  • Muthunayagam MuthulakshmiEmail author
  • Ganesan Kavitha
Conference paper
Part of the Learning and Analytics in Intelligent Systems book series (LAIS, volume 3)


The assessment of cardiovascular disorder acuteness is of great concern worldwide to provide appropriate therapeutic interventions. 3D models aid the examination of complex heart anatomy and orientation that could improve surgical planning. In this work, an attempt is made to develop a computationally efficient framework for reconstruction of 3D left ventricle (LV) models to assess the severity level of cardiovascular abnormality from segmented cardiac magnetic resonance (CMR) images. The novelty of this work relies on the reconstruction of 3D LV models in different dimensions to measure the significant variations in cardiac abnormality. The short-axis view CMR images for healthy, mild, moderate and severe abnormal subjects are obtained from second Annual Data Science Bowl database. Initially, the LV is segmented in all the slices and 3D models are reconstructed. Here, 600 surface models of ventricle have been created from 9600 2D slices of 20 subjects. The measured end-diastole and end-systole volume is correlated with the manual volumes provided in the database. It also presents the assessment of cardiovascular disorder severity based on variations in ventricular volume over a cardiac cycle. It is observed that, the calculated volumes correlates with the manual volumes. The performed study reveals that variation in cardiac volume indicates the level of deformation in ventricular chamber in a cardiac cycle. This study shows the potential usefulness of 3D reconstructed LV models in the understanding of heterogeneous ventricle anatomy and discrimination of different categories of cardiac abnormality. Thus, this proposed frame of work can assess the heart functionality that could assist the radiologist in the diagnosis of severity of cardiovascular disorder.


Cardiovascular disorder Magnetic resonance images 3D reconstruction Volume tracking Segmentation 



This research is funded by Department of Science & Technology – Science and Engineering Research Board (DST-SERB), Government of India, SERB sanction No. EEQ/2016/000351, dated 06.02.2017.


  1. 1.
    Prabhakaran D, Singh DK, Roth GA, Banerjee A, Pagidipati NJ, Huffman MD (2018) Cardiovascular diseases in India compared with the United States. J Am Coll Cardiol 72(1):79–95CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Lu X, Yang R, Xie Q, Ou S, Zha Y, Wang D (2017) Nonrigid registration with corresponding points constraint for automatic segmentation of cardiac DSCT images. BioMedical Eng OnLine 16(1):39CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Irshad M, Muhammad N, Sharif M, Yasmeen M (2018) Automatic segmentation of the left ventricle in a cardiac MR short axis image using blind morphological operation. Eur Phys J Plus 133(4):133–148CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Fathi A, Weir-McCall JR, Struthers AD, Lipworth BJ, Houston G (2018) Effects of contrast administration on cardiac MRI volumetric, flow and pulse wave velocity quantification using manual and software-based analysis. Br J Radiol 91(1084):1–14Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Punithakumar K, Ben Ayed I, Afshin M, Goela A, Islam A, Li S, Boulanger P, Becher H (2016) Detecting left ventricular impaired relaxation in cardiac MRI using moving mesh correspondences. Comput Methods Programs Biomed 124:58–66CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Zhang D, Icke I, Dogdas B, Parimal S, Sampath S, Forbes J, Bagchi A, Chin C, Chen A (2018) Segmentation of left ventricle myocardium in porcine cardiac cine MR images using a hybrid of fully convolutional neural networks and convolutional LSTM. In: SPIE 10574, medical imaging 2018: Image processing, 105740A, TexasGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Tao Q, Yan W, Wang Y, Paiman EHM, Shamonin DP, Garg P, Plein S, Huang L, Xia L, Sramko M, Tintera J, de Roos A, Lamb HJ, van der Geest RJ (2018) Deep learning–based method for fully automatic quantification of left ventricle function from cine MR images: A multivendor, multicenter study. Radiology 290(1):81–88CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Tan LK, McLaughlin RA, Lim E, Abdul Aziz YF, Liew YM (2018) Fully automated segmentation of the left ventricle in cine cardiac MRI using neural network regression. J Magn Reson Imaging 48(1):140–152CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Stough JV, DiPalma J, Ma Z, Fornwalt BK, Haggerty CM (2018) Ventricular segmentation and quantitative assessment in cardiac MR using convolutional neural networks. In: SPIE 10578, medical imaging 2018: biomedical applications in molecular, structural, and functional imaging, 1057826, TexasGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Folland ED, Parisi AF, Moynihan PF, Jones DR, Feldman CL, Tow DE (1979) Assessment of left ventricular ejection fraction and volumes by real-time, two-dimensional echocardiography. A comparison of cineangiographic and radionuclide techniques. Circulation 60(4):760–766Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Yang D, Wu P, Tan C, Pohl KM, Axel L, Metaxas D (2017) 3D motion modeling and reconstruction of left ventricle wall in cardiac MRI: In: International conference on functional imaging and modeling of the heart, pp 481–492 (2017)Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Gallo D, Vardoulis O, Monney P, Piccini D, Antiochos P, Schwitter J, Stergiopulos N, Morbiducci U (2017) Cardiovascular morphometry with high-resolution 3D magnetic resonance: first application to left ventricle diastolic dysfunction. Med Eng Phys 47:64–71CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Vukicevic M, Mosadegh B, Min JK, Little SH (2017) Cardiac 3D printing and its future directions. JACC: Cardiovasc. Imaging 10(2):171–184Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Wu Y, Zhang SX, Luo N, Qiu MG, Tan LW, Li QY, Liu GJ, Li K (2010) Creation of the digital three-dimensional model of the prostate and its adjacent structures based on Chinese visible human. Surg Radiol Anat 32(7):629–635CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Asghar A, Agrawal D, Yunus SM, Sharma PK, Zaidi SHH, Sinha A (2011) Standard splenic volume estimation in north Indian adult population: using 3D reconstruction of abdominal CT scan images. Anatomy research international 2011(707325)Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Shin DS, Park JS, Shin BS, Chung MS (2011) Surface models of the male urogenital organs built from the visible Korean using popular software. Anat Cell Biol 44(2):151–159CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Rickey DW, Hayakawa TR, Nason W et al (2017) The role of the Imaging Physicist in implementing Three-Dimensional printing for Surgical applications. In: sixty-third annual scientific meeting of the Canadian organization of medical physicists scientific session 4B: diagnostic imaging – 01 Med Phys 44(8), OttawaGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Kamburoglu K, Yılmaz F, Gulsahi K, Gulen O, Gulsahi A (2017) Change in periapical lesion and adjacent mucosal thickening dimensions one year after endodontic treatment: volumetric cone-beam computed tomography assessment. J Endod 43(2):218–224CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Lang RM, Bierig M, Devereux RB, Flachskampf FA, Foster E, Pellikka PA, Picard MH, Roman MJ, Seward J, Shanewise J, Solomon S, Spencer KT, Sutton MSJ, Stewart W (2006) Recommendations for chamber quantification. Eur J Echocardiogr 7:79–108CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Tan LK, Liew YM, Lim E, McLaughlin RA (2017) Convolutional neural network regression for short-axis left ventricle segmentation in cardiac cine MR sequences. Med Image Anal 39:78–86CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Khened M, Kollerathu VA, Krishnamurthi G (2019) Fully convolutional multi-scale residual DenseNets for cardiac segmentation and automated cardiac diagnosis using ensemble of classifiers. Med Image Anal 51:21–45CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2020

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Electronics EngineeringMIT Campus, Anna UniversityChennaiIndia

Personalised recommendations