Advertisement

Critical Evaluation of Predictive Analytics Techniques for the Design of Knowledge Base

  • K. SwapnaEmail author
  • M. S. Prasad BabuEmail author
Conference paper
Part of the Learning and Analytics in Intelligent Systems book series (LAIS, volume 3)

Abstract

The present diagnosis methods in medical fields are aided very much by the cluster analysis methods. Data Summarization techniques are used to discover the hidden patterns in huge datasets. They may be used for future interpretation in diverse aspects in different environments. In the context of medical data bases, the enormous growth of medical information and its corresponding use for disease diagnosis is a strenuous process. Therefore Disease diagnose systems requires the conventional data analysis combined which proficient knowledge of different diseases. Recent developments in Data segmentation techniques may be used to analyze the reports of the liver patients together with trends of the diseases and standard processes for resource utilization in health care problems. Development of new system based on the above analysis in turn assist the physician for better diagnosis of disease. In the present paper, various classification techniques are applied to predict the disorders in the liver functions accurately. The present paper is aimed at proposing a new method for the prediction of the diseases with a better accuracy than the existing traditional classification algorithms. It was found that these results are very much promising and more accurate.

Keywords

Clustering analysis Classification Feature selection Knowledge base Medical diagnosis Gastroenterologists 

References

  1. 1.
    Lavrac N (1999) Selected techniques for data mining in medicine. Artif Intell Med 16(1):3–23Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Xu, R, Wunsch II, D (2005) Survey of clustering algorithms. IEEE Trans Neural Netw (1045–9227) 16(3):645–678Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Rai, P, Singh, S: A survey of clustering techniques. Int J Comput Appl 7(12):1–5 (0975 - 8887)Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Ramakrishna Murty M, Murthy, JVR, Prasad Reddy, PVGD (2011) Text document classification based on a least square support vector machines with singular value decomposition. Int J Comput Appl (IJCA) 27(7):21–26Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Swapna K, Prasad Babu MS (2017) A framework for outlier detection using improved bisecting k-means clustering algorithm. Int J Electr Comput Sci IJECS-IJENS 17(2):8–12 (161102-5858)Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Dilts D, Khamalah J, Plotkin A (1995) Using cluster analysis for medical resource decision making. J Med Decis Mak 15(4):333–346Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Hayashi C, Yajima K, Bock HH, Ohsumi N, Tanaka Y, Baba Y (eds) (1996) Classification, and related methods. In: Proceedings of the fifth conference of the international federation of classification societies (IFSC 1996), Kobe, Japan, 27–30 March 1996Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Kononenko I (2001) Machine learning for medical diagnosis history state of the art and perspective. J Artif Intell Med 23(1):89–109Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Gaal B (2009) Multi-level genetic algorithms and expert system for health promotion. PhD thesis, University of PannoniaGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Machine Learning Repository http://archive.ics.uci.edu/ml/about.html
  11. 11.
    Ramana BV, Prasad Babu MS, Venkateswarlu NB (2012) A critical comparative study of liver patients from USA and INDIA: an exploratory analysis. Int J Comput Sci 9(2). ISSN: 1694-0784. ISSN (Online): 1694-0814Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Ramana BV, Prasad Babu MS, Venkateswarlu, NB (2011) A critical study of selected classification algorithms for liver disease diagnosis. Int J Database Manag Syst (IJDMS) 3(2):101–114. ISSN: 0975-5705Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2020

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of CSDr. B.R. Ambedkar UniversitySrikakulamIndia
  2. 2.Department of CS and SEAU College of Engg (A), Andhra UniversityVisakhapatnamIndia

Personalised recommendations