Advertisement

Fractal Dimension of Fundoscopical Retinal Images for Diagnosing of Diabetic Retinopathy

  • B. Dhananjay
  • M. Srinivas
  • D. Suman
  • M. Malini
  • J. SivaramanEmail author
Conference paper
Part of the Learning and Analytics in Intelligent Systems book series (LAIS, volume 3)

Abstract

The present work applied different image processing techniques like green component image, background estimation and image skeletonization on the subject’s fundus images. Statistical methods like fractal dimensions, neighbourhood concept was used to distinguish between normal and abnormal fundus images in subjects (n = 45). The results show that, in normal fundus images the vein structures were clearly visible, while in the fundoscopic positive images, the vein structures were totally absent. In fundoscopic negative images the visible vein structures are observed to be thick and coiled up. No significant changes were found in Fractal Dimension (FD) values among the subjects. Neighbourhood pixels (NP) values were found to be 45 ± 0.74 (mean ± S.D.) for normal subjects, 34 ± 1.01 for fundoscopic positive subjects, 20.47 ± 0.49 for fundoscopic negative subjects. The results of this work validated the skeletonized images and support the strength of diagnosis with the help of accurate figures.

Keywords

Fractal dimensions Fundoscopy Fundus image Neighbourhood concept Skeletonised images 

References

  1. 1.
    An W, Zhang Y, Zhang X (2017) Ocular toxicity of reduced graphene oxide or graphene oxide exposure in mouse eyes. Els Exp Eye Res 174:59–69CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Galloway NR, Amoaku WMK (1999) Basic anatomy and physiology of the eye. In: Common eye diseases and their management, Springer, London, pp 7–16Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Kubota S, Kanomata K, Suzuki T, Ahmmad B, Hirose F (2015) Hybrid anti-reflection structure with moth eye and multilayer coating for organic photovoltaics. J Coat Techno Res 12:37–47CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Hayakawa S, Takaku Y, Hwang JS, Horiguchi T, Suga H, Gehring W, Ikeo K, Gojabori T (2015) Function and evolutionary origin of unicellular camera-type eye structure. PLoS ONE 10(3):e0118415CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Belmonte C, Acosta MC, Merayo-Lloves J, Gallar J (2015) What causes eye pain? Curr Ophthalmoscope Rep 3:111–121CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Greenspan H, Van Ginneken B, Summers RM (2016) Guest editorial deep learning in medical imaging: overview and future promise of an exciting new technique. IEEE Transact Medic Imaging 35:1153–1159CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Wright AA, Hegedus EJ, Lenchik L (2015) Diagnostic accuracy of various imaging modalities for suspected lower extremity stress fractures a systematic review with evidence-based recommendations for clinical practice. American J Sports Med 44:255–263CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Ogdie A, Taylor WJ, Weatherall M, Fransen J (2014) Imaging modalities for the classification of gout: systematic literature review and meta-analysis. BMJ J 74:1868–1874Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Prevedel R, Weisenburger S, Vaziri A (2017) Comparing two-photon excitation modalities for fast, large-scale recording of neuronal activity in rodents. In: Optical molecular probes, imaging and drug delivery (Paper JTu4A-7). Optical Society of America, 2–5 April 2017Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Hussain N, Edraki M, Tahhan R, Sanalkumar N, Kenz S, Akasha NK, Mtemererwa B, Mohammed N (2017) Telemedicine for diabetic retinopathy screening using an ultra-widefield fundus camera. Clin Ophthalmol 11:1477–1482CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Schindelin J, Rueden CT, Hiner MC, Eliceiri KW (2015) The ImageJ ecosystem: an open platform for biomedical image analysis. Mol Reprod Dev 82(7–8):518–529CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Thielicke W, Stamhuis EJ (2014) PIVlab – towards user-friendly, affordable and accurate digital particle image velocimetry in MATLAB. J Open Res Softw 2(1):e30Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Son J, Park SJ, Jung KH (2017) Retinal vessel segmentation in fundoscopic images with generative adversarial networks. Corn. Univ. Lib. arXiv:1706.09318Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Niall P, Tariq MA, Thomas M (2005) Retinal image analysis: concepts, applications and potential. Prog Retin Eye Res 25:99–127Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Doubal FN, Graham C, Wardlaw JM (2007) Fractal analysis of the retinal vascular network in fundus images. In: Annual international conference of the IEEE engineering in medicine and biology society EMBSGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2020

Authors and Affiliations

  • B. Dhananjay
    • 1
  • M. Srinivas
    • 2
  • D. Suman
    • 2
  • M. Malini
    • 2
  • J. Sivaraman
    • 1
    Email author
  1. 1.Medical Electronics & Instrumentation GroupNational Institute of Technology RourkelaRourkelaIndia
  2. 2.University College of EngineeringOsmania UniversityHyderabadIndia

Personalised recommendations