Advertisement

Hybrid Coronary Revascularization

  • Elbert E. Williams
  • Gianluca Torregrossa
  • John D. PuskasEmail author
Chapter
  • 11 Downloads

Abstract

Hybrid coronary revascularization is a planned combination of minimally invasive, off-pump coronary artery bypass grafting and percutaneous coronary intervention employed together to treat patients with multivessel coronary artery disease. With the combination of these two approaches to treating coronary disease, patients benefit from the long-term advantages of coronary artery bypass grafting and the safety profile of percutaneous coronary intervention. The results of hybrid coronary revascularization have been promising, showing lower procedural morbidity and shorter recovery times when compared to conventional coronary artery bypass grafting while at the same time showing improved freedom from major adverse coronary events when compared to PCI.

Keywords

Hybrid coronary revascularization Minimally invasive coronary artery bypass grafting Multivessel coronary artery disease Off-pump coronary artery bypass grafting Percutaneous coronary intervention 

References

  1. 1.
    Weiss AJ, Elixhauser A. Trends in operating room procedures in U.S. hospitals, 2001–2011: statistical brief #171. Healthcare Cost and Utilization Project (HCUP) Statistical Briefs, Rockville, MD. 2006.Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Green GE, Stertzer SH, Reppert EH. Coronary arterial bypass grafts. Ann Thorac Surg. 1968;5:443–50.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Loop FD, Lytle BW, Cosgrove DM, et al. Influence of the internal-mammary-artery graft on 10-year survival and other cardiac events. N Engl J Med. 1986;314:1–6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Morice MC, Serruys PW, Barragan P, et al. Long-term clinical outcomes with sirolimus-eluting coronary stents: five-year results of the RAVEL trial. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2007;50:1299–304.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Shahian DM, O’Brien SM, Sheng S, et al. Predictors of long-term survival after coronary artery bypass grafting surgery: results from the Society of Thoracic Surgeons Adult Cardiac Surgery Database (the ASCERT study). Circulation. 2012;125:1491–500.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Farkouh ME, Domanski M, Sleeper LA, et al. Strategies for multivessel revascularization in patients with diabetes. N Engl J Med. 2012;367:2375–84.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Mohr FW, Morice MC, Kappetein AP, et al. Coronary artery bypass graft surgery versus percutaneous coronary intervention in patients with three-vessel disease and left main coronary disease: 5-year follow-up of the randomised, clinical SYNTAX trial. Lancet. 2013;381:629–38.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Otsuka F, Yahagi K, Sakakura K, Virmani R. Why is the mammary artery so special and what protects it from atherosclerosis? Ann Cardiothorac Surg. 2013;2:519–26.PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Gur DO, Gur O, Gurkan S, Comez S, Gonultas A, Yilmaz M. Comparison of endothelial function of coronary artery bypass grafts in diabetic and nondiabetic patients: which graft offers the best? Anatol J Cardiol. 2015;15:657–62.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Zhao DF, Edelman JJ, Seco M, et al. Coronary artery bypass grafting with and without manipulation of the ascending aorta: a network meta-analysis. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2017;69:924–36.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Albert A, Ennker J, Hegazy Y, et al. Implementation of the aortic no-touch technique to reduce stroke after off-pump surgery. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2018;156:544–54.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Calafiore AM, Giammarco GD, Teodori G, et al. Left anterior descending coronary artery grafting via left anterior small thoracotomy without cardiopulmonary bypass. Ann Thorac Surg. 1996;61:1658–63.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Subramanian VA, Patel NU. Current status of MIDCAB procedure. Curr Opin Cardiol. 2001;16:268–70.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Balkhy HH, Wann LS, Krienbring D, Arnsdorf SE. Integrating coronary anastomotic connectors and robotics toward a totally endoscopic beating heart approach: review of 120 cases. Ann Thorac Surg. 2011;92:821–7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Panoulas VF, Columbo A, Margonato A, Maisano F. Hybrid coronary revascularization: promising, but yet to take off. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2015;65(1):85–97.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Gasior M, Zembala MO, Tajstra M, et al. Hybrid revascularization for multivessel coronary artery disease. JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2014;7:1277–83.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Puskas JD, Halkos ME, Derose JJ, et al. Hybrid coronary revascularization for the treatment of multivessel coronary artery disease: a multicenter observational study. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2016;68:356–65.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2020

Authors and Affiliations

  • Elbert E. Williams
    • 1
  • Gianluca Torregrossa
    • 1
  • John D. Puskas
    • 1
    Email author
  1. 1.Department of Cardiovascular Surgery, Mount Sinai Saint Luke’sIcahn School of Medicine at Mount SinaiNew YorkUSA

Personalised recommendations