Sustainability and Its Discontents: The View from the Nineteenth Century
  • Deanna K. Kreisel
Part of the Palgrave Studies in Literature, Culture and Economics book series (PSLCE)


Sustainability discourse has long been dominated by the imperative to maintain human life and civilization under conditions similar to those that we now enjoy. This focus on the needs of human beings—rather than the needs of other-than-human creatures, biospheres, or ecosystems—has come under recent attack by some ecocritics. Yet even if we grant this anthropocentric premise, the concept is haunted by unanswerable questions: which human beings? How many? For how long? And, of course, how? This chapter traces the origins of the sustainability concept in nineteenth-century discourses of population and resource management, particularly Malthus and his successors and Victorian writings on coal exhaustion. By tracing the economic roots of sustainability in the nineteenth century, this chapter helps to reveal its inherent complexities, contradictions—and, ultimately, bad faith.


  1. Alaimo, Stacy. 2012. Sustainable This, Sustainable That: New Materialisms, Posthumanism, and Unknown Futures. PMLA 127 (3): 558–564.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Alcott, Blake. 2005. Jevons’ Paradox. Ecological Economics 54 (1): 9–21.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Anonymous. 1863. The Coal Question. Littel’s Living Age, October 31.Google Scholar
  4. Araral, Eduardo. 2014. Ostrom, Hardin and the Commons: A Critical Appreciation and a Revisionist View. Environmental Science & Policy, Interrogating The Commons 36 (Feb.): 11–23.Google Scholar
  5. Armstrong, William. 1864. Address of the President. In Report of the Thirty-Third Meeting of the British Association for the Advancement of Science. London: John Murray.Google Scholar
  6. Bashford, Alison, and Joyce E. Chaplin. 2016. Malthus and the New World. In New Perspectives on Malthus, ed. Robert J. Mayhew, 105–127. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  7. Carrington, Damian. 2018. Beef-Eating ‘must Fall Drastically’ as World Population Grows. The Guardian, December 5, sec. Environment.
  8. Charbit, Yves. 2009. Economic, Social and Demographic Thought in the XIXth Century: The Population Debate from Malthus to Marx. Dordrecht and London: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Clapp, B.W. 1994. An Environmental History of Britain since the Industrial Revolution. London and New York: Longman.Google Scholar
  10. Daly, Herman E. 1991. Steady-State Economics. 2nd ed. Washington, DC: Island Press.Google Scholar
  11. ———. 1996. Beyond Growth: The Economics of Sustainable Development. Boston: Beacon Press.Google Scholar
  12. Darby, Luke. 2018. Billionaires Are the Leading Cause of Climate Change. GQ, October 11.
  13. Davies, Jeremy. 2016. The Birth of the Anthropocene. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
  14. DuPuy, Charles M. 1875. Wasted Faculties. Pamphlet Reprint. 1875 Dupuy 53647.O.25. Library Company of Philadelphia.Google Scholar
  15. Gallagher, Catherine. 2006. The Body Economic: Life, Death, and Sensation in Political Economy and the Victorian Novel. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
  16. Greenwood, Ariel. 2018. ‘Eat Less Meat’ Ignores the Role of Animals in the Ecosystem. Civil Eats, January 26.
  17. Grober, Ulrich. 2012. Sustainability: A Cultural History. Translated by Ray Cunningham. Devon, UK: Green Books.Google Scholar
  18. Hale, Piers J. 2016. Finding a Place for the Anti-Malthusian Tradition in the Victorian Evolution Debates. In New Perspectives on Malthus, ed. Robert J. Mayhew, 182–207. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  19. Haraway, Donna. 2018. Making Kin in the Chthulucene: Reproducing Multispecies Justice. In Making Kin Not Population: Reconceiving Generations, ed. Adele E. Clarke and Donna Haraway, 67–99. Chicago, IL: Prickly Paradigm Press.Google Scholar
  20. Hardin, Garrett. 1968. The Tragedy of the Commons. Science 162 (3859): 1243–1248.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Hull, Edward. 1861. The Coal-Fields of Great-Britain: Their History, Structure and Duration: With Notices of the Coal-Fields of Other Parts of the World. With Illustrations. 1st ed. Edward Stanford.Google Scholar
  22. Jevons, William Stanley. 1866. The Coal Question: An Enquiry Concerning the Progress of the Nation, and the Probable Exhaustion of Our Coal-Mines. 2nd ed. London: Macmillan.Google Scholar
  23. Jonsson, Fredrik Albritton. 2018. Learning to Scale: The Case of Victorian Britain. In Work in Progress: Economy and Environment in the Hands of Experts, ed. Frank Trentmann, Anna Barbara Sum, and Manuel Rivera, 35–46. Munich: Oekom Verlag.Google Scholar
  24. Kitch, Sally, Joni Adamson, and Faculty Working Group on Humanities and Sustainability. 2008. Contributions of the Humanities to Issues of Sustainability. Arizona State University Press.Google Scholar
  25. Kreisel, Deanna K. 2012. Economic Woman: Demand, Gender, and Narrative Closure in Eliot and Hardy. Toronto: University of Toronto Press.Google Scholar
  26. ———. 2018. Response: Queering Time. Victorian Studies 60 (2): 236–242.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Lloyd, William Foster. 1980. W. F. Lloyd on the Checks to Population. Population and Development Review 6 (3): 473.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. MacDuffie, Alllen. 2014. Victorian Literature, Energy, and the Ecological Imagination. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Macfarlane, Robert. 2008. Malthusian Trap. In International Encyclopedia of the Social Sciences, ed. William A. Darity Jr., vol. 4, 2nd ed., 572–574. Detroit, MI: Macmillan Reference USA.Google Scholar
  30. Madureira, Nuno Luis. 2012. The Anxiety of Abundance: William Stanley Jevons and Coal Scarcity in the Nineteenth Century. Environment & History 18 (3): 395–421.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Malthus, T.R. 2015. An Essay on the Principle of Population and Other Writings. Penguin.Google Scholar
  32. Marx, Karl. 1952. Theories of Surplus Value. Translated by Emile Burns and G. A. Bonner. New York: International.Google Scholar
  33. Matz, Aaron. 2014. Hardy and the Vanity of Procreation. Victorian Studies 57 (1): 7–32.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Medovoi, Leerom. 2010. A Contribution to the Critique of Political Ecology: Sustainability as Disavowal. New Formations 69 (69): 129–143.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Mill, John Stuart. n.d. Principles of Political Economy with Some of Their Applications to Social Philosophy. Library of Economics and Liberty.
  36. Miller, Elizabeth Carolyn. 2015. William Morris, Extraction Capitalism, and the Aesthetics of Surface. Victorian Studies 57 (3): 395–404.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. ———. 2017. Extraction Ecologies and Victorian Literature. Keynote Address Presented at the North American Victorian Studies Association Conference, Banff, Canada.Google Scholar
  38. Miller, John MacNeill. forthcoming. The Ecological Plot: A Brief History of Multispecies Storytelling, from Malthus to Middlemarch. Victorian Literature and Culture, Open Ecologies, 2020.Google Scholar
  39. Mortimer-Sandilands, Catriona. 2010. Melancholy Natures, Queer Ecologies. In Queer Ecologies: Sex, Nature, Politics, Desire, ed. Catriona Mortimer-Sandilands and Bruce Erickson, 331–358. Bloomington, IN: Indiana University Press.Google Scholar
  40. Parham, John. 2017. A Not So ‘Stationary State’: John Stuart Mill’s Sustainable Imagination. In Victorian Sustainability in Literature and Culture, ed. Wendy Parkins, 14–31. London: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Pateman, Carole. 2007. The Settler Contract. In Contract and Domination, ed. Carole Pateman and Charles W. Mills, 35–78. Cambridge: Polity Press.Google Scholar
  42. Pickles, Matt. 2017. The Ethical Arguments Against Eating Meat, April 28.
  43. Schabas, Margaret. 2005. The Natural Origins of Economics. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Seymour, Nicole. 2013. Strange Natures: Futurity, Empathy, and the Queer Ecological Imagination. Urbana: University of Illinois Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Stoekl, Allan. 2013. ‘After the Sublime,’ After the Apocalypse: Two Versions of Sustainability in Light of Climate Change. Diacritics 41 (3): 40–57.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Warde, Paul. 2011. The Invention of Sustainability. Modern Intellectual History 8 (1): 153–170.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. ———. 2018. The Invention of Sustainability: Nature and Destiny, c. 1500–1870. New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Wiltgen, Richard J. 1998. Marx’s and Engels’s Conception of Malthus: The Heritage of a Critique. Organization & Environment 11 (4): 451–460.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Wolloch, Nathaniel. 2017. Nature in the History of Economic Thought: How Natural Resources Became an Economic Concept. London; New York: Routledge; Taylor & Francis Group.Google Scholar
  50. World Commission on Environment and Development. 1987. Our Common Future. United Nations.
  51. Wrigley, E. A. (Tony). 2010. Energy and the English Industrial Revolution. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  52. Wrigley, E.A. 2016. The Path to Sustained Growth: England’s Transition from an Organic Economy to an Industrial Revolution. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  • Deanna K. Kreisel
    • 1
  1. 1.University of MississippiOxfordUSA

Personalised recommendations