Advertisement

Human Capital

Becker the Obscure: Human-Capital Theory, Liberalisms, and the Future of Higher Education
  • Elaine Hadley
Chapter
Part of the Palgrave Studies in Literature, Culture and Economics book series (PSLCE)

Abstract

This chapter reviews the history of the “human capital” concept to argue that its contemporary neoliberal present has a nineteenth-century liberal past. Focusing on its role as a measure for education, the chapter explores the political assumptions underlying its scientific claims, which have their roots in Victorian ideologies. Thomas Hardy’s 1895 Jude the Obscure operates as both evidence and forecaster, for it not only limns the exhaustion of the nineteenth-century liberal ideal of self-cultivation but also outlines an emergent human-capital subjection formation, and thereby warns about the impoverishment implicit in Chicago-style economics and its recasting of human effort as a form of capital investment.

References

  1. Becker, Gary S. 1976. The Economic Approach to Human Behavior. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. ———. 1991. A Treatise on the Family. Enl. ed. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press. http://pi.lib.uchicago.edu/1001/cat/bib/11198854.Google Scholar
  3. ———. 1993. Human Capital: A Theoretical and Empirical Analysis, with Special Reference to Education. 3rd ed. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. ———. 1996. Accounting for Tastes. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  5. Becker, Gary S., Francois Ewald, and Bernard Harcourt. 2012. ‘Becker on Ewald on Foucault on Becker’: American Neoliberalism and Michel Foucault’s 1979 ‘Birth of Biopolitics’ Lectures. Institute for Law and Economics Working Paper 614.Google Scholar
  6. Becker, Gary S., Kevin M. Murphy, and Robert F. Tamura. 1989. Human Capital, Fertility and Economic Growth. Vol. 90-5 (PRC). Discussion Paper Series/Population Research Center; Chicago, IL: Economic Demography Group, Economics Research Center, NORC/University of Chicago.Google Scholar
  7. Becker, Gary S., and Nigel Tomes. 1986. Human Capital and the Rise and Fall of Families. Journal of Labor Economics 4 (3, Part 2): S1–S39.  https://doi.org/10.1086/298118.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Bentham, Jeremy. 1952. Economic Writings: Critical Edition Based on His Printed Works and Unprinted Manuscripts. Edited by J. Stark. London: Published for the Royal Economic Society by Allen & Unwin.Google Scholar
  9. Berry, Daina Ramey. 2017. The Ubiquitous Nature of Slave Capital. In After Piketty: The Agenda for Economics and Inequality, ed. Heather Boushey, Bradford J. De Long, and Marshal Steinbaum, 126–149. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Boag, Harold. 1916. Human Capital and the Cost of the War. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society 79 (1): 7–17.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Bourdieu, Pierre. 1990. Reproduction in Education, Society, and Culture. Edited by Jean Claude Passeron. London: Sage in association with Theory, Culture & Society, Department of Administrative and Social Studies, Teesside Polytechnic.Google Scholar
  12. Bröckling, Ulrich. 2011. Human Economy, Human Capital: A Critique of Biopolitical Economy. In Governmentality: Current Issues and Future Challenges, ed. Susanne Krasmann, Thomas Lemke, and Ulrich Bröckling, vol. 71, 247–268. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  13. Brown, Wendy. 2015. Undoing the Demos: Neoliberalism’s Stealth Revolution, Near Futures. Brooklyn, NY: Zone Books.Google Scholar
  14. ———. 2016. Sacrificial Citizenship: Neoliberalism, Human Capital, and Austerity Politics. Constellations: An International Journal of Critical & Democratic Theory 23 (1): 3–14.  https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-8675.12166.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Carneiro, Pedro Manuel, and James J. Heckman. 2003. Human Capital Policy. SSRN Scholarly Paper ID 434544. Rochester, NY: Social Science Research Network. https://papers.ssrn.com/abstract=434544.
  16. Clark, John Bates. 1908. The Distribution of Wealth: A Theory of Wages, Interest and Profits. New York: The Macmillan Company.Google Scholar
  17. Convert, Bernard. 2003. Bourdieu: Gary Becker’s Critic. Economic Sociology: European Electronic Newsletter 4 (2): 6–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Cooper, Melinda. 2017. Family Values: Between Neoliberalism and the New Social Conservatism. New York: Zone Books.Google Scholar
  19. Dublin, Louis Israel, Alfred J. Lotka, and Mortimer Spiegelman. 1946. The Money Value of a Man. Rev. ed. New York: The Ronald Press Company.Google Scholar
  20. Feher, Michel. 2009. Self-Appreciation; or, The Aspirations of Human Capital. Public Culture 21 (1): 21–41.  https://doi.org/10.1215/08992363-2008-019.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Fine, Ben. 2010. Theories of Social Capital: Researchers Behaving Badly, Political Economy and Development. London: Pluto Press.Google Scholar
  22. Fogel, Robert William, and Stanley L. Engerman. 1974. Time on the Cross. Boston: Little, Brown and Company.Google Scholar
  23. Foucault, Michel. 2008. The Birth of Biopolitics: Lectures at the Collège de France, 1978–79. Translated by Michel Senellart. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
  24. Friedman, Milton. n.d. I Don’t Believe in Democracy. Interview Transcript. Accessed March 13, 2019. http://hellocoolworld.ca/media/TheCorporation/Democracy.pdf.
  25. Goldin, Claudia. 2016. Human Capital. In Handbook of Cliometrics, ed. Claude Diebolt and Michael Haupert, 55–86. Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer.  https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-40406-1_23.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Goldin, Claudia Dale, and Lawrence F. Katz. 2008. The Race between Education and Technology. Cambridge, MA: Belknap Press of Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  27. Gutman, Herbert G. 1975. Slavery and the Numbers Game: A Critique of Time on the Cross. Urbana: University of Illinois Press.Google Scholar
  28. Hardy, Thomas. (1895) 2017. Jude the Obscure. With an introduction by Morton Dauwen Zabel. Digireads.com Publishing. Citations refer to the 2017 Digireads edition.
  29. Hayek, Friedrich A.von. 1967. Studies in Philosophy, Politics and Economics. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Hodgson, Geoffrey M. 2014. What Is Capital? Economists and Sociologists Have Changed Its Meaning: Should It Be Changed Back? Cambridge Journal of Economics 38 (5): 1063–1086.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Kenton, Will. n.d. Human Capital. Investopedia. Accessed February 1, 2019. https://www.investopedia.com/terms/h/humancapital.asp.
  32. Kiker, B.F. 1966. The Historical Roots of the Concept of Human Capital. Journal of Political Economy 74 (5): 481–499.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Kuehn, Daniel. 2018. Human Capital in the Twenty First Century. European Journal of Comparative Economics 15 (1): 3–9. http://eaces.liuc.it/default.asp.Google Scholar
  34. Lazzarato, M. 2012. The Making of the Indebted Man: An Essay on the Neoliberal Condition. Vol. 13. Translated by Joshua David Jordan. Semiotext(e) Intervention Series; Los Angeles, CA: Semiotext(e).Google Scholar
  35. ———. 2015. Governing by Debt. Vol. 17. Translated by Joshua David Jordan. Semiotext(e) Intervention Series; South Pasadena, CA: Semiotext(e).Google Scholar
  36. Levitt, Steven D., and Stephen J. Dubner. 2006. Freakonomics: A Rogue Economist Explores the Hidden Side of Everything. Rev. and expanded ed. New York: William Morrow.Google Scholar
  37. Lewin, Peter, and Nicolás Cachanosky. 2018. Substance and Semantics: The Question of Capital. Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization 150 (June): 423–431.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jebo.2018.01.024.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. McGregor, Melissa. 2016. The Unwaged Labour of Love: Social Reproduction in Jude the Obscure. Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the North American Victorian Studies Association, 1–5. Phoenix, AZ.Google Scholar
  39. Milanovic´, Branko. 2013. OPINION: Junk the Phrase ‘Human Capital.’ Al Jazeera America, February 25. http://america.aljazeera.com/opinions/2015/2/junk-the-phrase-human-capital.html.
  40. ———. 2015. Globalinequality: On ‘Human Capital’ One More Time. Globalinequality (blog), February 19. http://glineq.blogspot.com/2015/02/on-human-capital-one-more-time.html.
  41. Mill, John Stuart. (1848) 1909. Principles of Political Economy, with Some of Their Applications to Social Philosophy. London: Longmans, Green, and Co. http://hdl.handle.net/2027/mdp.39015002976382. Citations refer to the 1909 edition.
  42. Mirowski, Philip. 2009. Postface: Defining Neoliberalism. In The Road from Mont Pèlerin: The Making of the Neoliberal Thought Collective, ed. Dieter Plehwe and Philip Mirowski, 417–455. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Mirowski, Philip, and Rob Van Horn. 2009. The Rise of the Chicago School of Economics and the Birth of Neoliberalism. In The Road from Mont Pèlerin: The Making of the Neoliberal Thought Collective, ed. Dieter Plehwe and Philip Mirowski, 139–178. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Mitropoulos, Angela. 2012. Contract & Contagion: From Biopolitics to Oikonomia. Brooklyn, NY: Minor Compositions.Google Scholar
  45. Murphy, Kevin M., and Robert H. Topel. 2016. Human Capital Investment, Inequality, and Economic Growth. Journal of Labor Economics 34 (S2): S99–S127.  https://doi.org/10.1086/683779.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Nicholson, J.S. 1891. The Living Capital of the United Kingdom. The Economic Journal 1 (1): 95–107.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. ———. 1892. Capital and Labour: Their Relative Strength. The Economic Journal 2 (7): 478–490.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Offer, Avner. 2012. Self-Interest, Sympathy and the Invisible Hand: From Adam Smith to Market Liberalism. Discussion Papers in Economic and Social History 101 (Aug.): 1–27.Google Scholar
  49. Orléan, André. 2014. The Empire of Value: A New Foundation for Economics. Translated by M. B. DeBevoise. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press. http://pi.lib.uchicago.edu/1001/cat/bib/10078409.
  50. Peters, Michael A. 2016. Education, Neoliberalism, and Human Capital. In The Handbook of Neoliberalism, ed. Simon Springer, Kean Birch, and Julie MacLeavy, 297–307. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  51. Pierce, Clayton. 2013. Education in the Age of Biocapitalism: Optimizing Educational Life for a Flat World, Variation: New Frontiers in Education, Culture, and Politics. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Pigou, A.C. 1928. A Study in Public Finance. London: Macmillan and Co., Limited.Google Scholar
  53. Pyatt, Graham. 1966. Review of Review of Human Capital: A Theoretical and Empirical Analysis, with Special Reference to Education; The Residual Factor and Economic Growth; Econometric Models of Education, by G.S. Becker. The Economic Journal 76 (303): 635–638.  https://doi.org/10.2307/2229541.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Rosenthal, Caitlin. 2018. Accounting for Slavery: Masters and Management. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Schultz, Theodore W. 1961. Investment in Human Capital. American Economic Review 51 (1): 1–17.Google Scholar
  56. Smith, Adam. (1776) 1828. An Inquiry into the Nature and Causes of the Wealth of Nations. Edited by J. R. McCulloch. Edinburgh: Printed for A. Black and W. Tait. http://pi.lib.uchicago.edu/1001/cat/bib/2440331. Citations refer to the 1828 edition.
  57. Spiegler, Peter. 2015. Behind the Model: A Constructive Critique of Economic Modeling. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Welch, Finis. 1999. In Defense of Inequality. American Economic Review 89 (2): 1–17.  https://doi.org/10.1257/aer.89.2.1.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. White, Lawrence H. 2017. Human Capital and Its Critics: Gary Becker, Institutionalism, and Anti-Neoliberalism. GMU Working Paper in Economics No. 17-02. https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=2905931.

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  • Elaine Hadley
    • 1
  1. 1.University of ChicagoChicagoUSA

Personalised recommendations