Advertisement

Extended Working Lives: Feasible and Desirable for All?

  • David LainEmail author
  • Mariska van der Horst
  • Sarah Vickerstaff
Chapter

Abstract

There is now a broad political consensus in many OECD countries that people will have to work longer on average than in the past, and governments are raising state pension ages. This issue is often presented in terms of the individual’s responsibility to work longer, but the reality is more complicated and raises serious ethical questions. Is it the responsibility of everyone to continue working into older age, when some individuals may not want or feel able to work because of health conditions that were perhaps exacerbated by a lifetime of physically arduous employment? Is it always a successful outcome if individuals remain in employment, or are there circumstances when we should not expect them to work if they feel this is the best option? This chapter addresses these questions through an analysis of the US Health and Retirement Study and the English Longitudinal Study of Ageing. This analysis shows that in both countries, significant numbers of individuals aged 65+ remain in work when they have poor health and/or do physically demanding work. Drawing on qualitative research on older UK hospitality workers doing physically demanding work, it is argued that it is not always feasible or desirable to expect people to work longer, something that policy urgently needs to recognize.

Keywords

Extended working lives Raising state pension age Working longer 

References

  1. Altmann, R. (2015). A new vision for older workers: Retain, retrain, recruit. London: Department for Work and Pensions.Google Scholar
  2. Barnes, H., Parry, J., & Taylor, R. (2004). Working after state pension age: Qualitative research. [Research Report]. London: Department for Work and Pensions.Google Scholar
  3. Burchell, B., Ladipo, D., & Wilkinson, F. (Eds.). (2001). Job insecurity and work intensification. London: Routledge.  https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203996881CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Business, Energy and Industrial Strategy. (2018). Good work. A response to the Taylor Review of Modern Working Practices. HM Government. Retrieved from http://www.gov.uk/beis
  5. Cahill, K. E., Giandrea, M. D., & Quinn, J. F. (2011). Reentering the labor force after retirement. Monthly Labor Review, 134(6), 34–42.Google Scholar
  6. Capelli, P. (1999). The new deal at work: Managing the market-driven workforce. Boston: Harvard Business Press.  https://doi.org/10.5465/ame.1999.1899556CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Carr, E., Fleischmann, M., Goldberg, M., Kuh, D., Murray, E. T., Stafford, M., et al. (2018). Occupational and educational inequalities in exit from employment at older ages: Evidence from seven prospective cohorts. Occupational and Environmental Medicine, 75(5), 369–377.  https://doi.org/10.1136/oemed-2017-104619CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  8. Clayton, P. M. (2008). Working on: Choice or necessity? In Cedefop (Ed.), Working and ageing: Emerging theories and empirical perspectives (pp. 227–251). Luxembourg: Publications Office of the European Union.Google Scholar
  9. Crawford, R., & Tetlow, G. (2010). Employment, retirement and pensions. In J. Banks, C. Lessof, J. Nazroo, N. Rogers, M. Stafford, & A. Steptoe (Eds.), Financial circumstances, health and well-being of the older population in England (pp. 11–75). London: Institute for Fiscal Studies.Google Scholar
  10. Cridland, J. (2016). Independent review of the state pension age: Interim report October 2016. Retrieved from https://www.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/559943/independent-review-of-the-state-pension-age-interim-report.pdf
  11. Department for Work and Pensions. (2014). Working longer: A framework for action background evidence. London: Department for Work and Pensions.Google Scholar
  12. Department for Work and Pensions. (2017). Pensioners’ incomes series: An analysis of trends in pensioner incomes: 1994/95–2015/16.. Retrieved from https://www.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/600594/pensioners-incomes-series-2015-16-report.pdf
  13. Giandrea, M. D., Cahill, K. E., & Quinn, J. F. (2010). The role of re-entry in the retirement process. Washington, DC: US Bureau of Labor Statistics.Google Scholar
  14. Green, F. (2006). Demanding work: The paradox of job quality in the affluent economy. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
  15. Hacker, J. S. (2006). The great risk shift: The assault on American jobs, families, health care, and retirement and how you can fight back. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  16. Haider, S., & Loughran, D. (2001). Elderly labor supply: Work or play? Boston: Center for Retirement Research at Boston College.Google Scholar
  17. Hasselhorn, H. M., & Apt, W. (2015). Understanding employment participation of older workers: Creating a knowledge base for future labour market challenges. Berlin, Germany: Federal Ministry of Labour and Social Affairs.Google Scholar
  18. van der Horst, M., Lain, D., Vickerstaff, S., Clark, C., & Baumberg Geiger, B. (2017). Gender roles and employment pathways of older women and men in England. SAGE Open, 7(4), 215824401774269.  https://doi.org/10.1177/2158244017742690CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. International Longevity Centre. (2017). Exploring retirement transitions: A research report from ILC-UK and the uncertain futures research consortium [Report]. London: International Longevity Centre.Google Scholar
  20. Kannabar, R. (2012). Unretirement in England: An empirical perspective. York, UK: University of York.Google Scholar
  21. Lain, D. (2011). Helping the poorest help themselves? Encouraging employment past 65 in England and the USA. Journal of Social Policy, 40(3), 493–512.  https://doi.org/10.1017/s0047279410000942CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Lain, D. (2012). Working past 65 in the UK and the USA: Segregation into “Lopaq” occupations? Work, Employment & Society, 26(1), 78–94.  https://doi.org/10.1177/0950017011426312CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Lain, D. (2016). Reconstructing retirement. Bristol, UK: Policy Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Lain, D., Airey, L., Loretto, W., & Vickerstaff, S. (2018). Understanding older worker precarity: The intersecting domains of jobs, households and the welfare state. Ageing and Society, 1–23.  https://doi.org/10.1017/S0144686X18001253CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Lain, D., & Loretto, W. (2016). Managing employees beyond age 65: From the margins to the mainstream? Employee Relations, 38(5), 646–664.  https://doi.org/10.1108/er-04-2015-0062CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Lain, D., & Vickerstaff, S. (2014). Working beyond retirement age: Lessons for policy. In S. Harper & K. Hamblin (Eds.), International handbook on ageing and public policy (pp. 242–255). Cheltenham, UK: Edward Elgar.Google Scholar
  27. Lu, W., Benson, R., Glaser, K., Platts, L. G., Corna, L. M., et al. (2017). Relationship between employment histories and frailty trajectories in later life: Evidence from the English Longitudinal Study of Ageing. Journal of Epidemiology and Community Health, 71(5), 439–445.  https://doi.org/10.1136/jech-2016-207887CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  28. Maestas, N. (2010). Back to work: Expectations and realizations of work after retirement. Journal of Human Resources, 45(3), 718–748.  https://doi.org/10.1353/jhr.2010.0011CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  29. Marshall, V. W. (1999). Reasoning with case studies: Issues of an aging workforce. Journal of Aging Studies, 13(4), 377–389.  https://doi.org/10.1016/s0890-4065(99)00016-xCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Moen, P. (2016). Encore adulthood: Boomers on the edge of risk, renewal, and purpose. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. National Commission on Fiscal Responsibility Reform. (2010). The moment of truth: Report of the National Commission on Fiscal Responsibility and Reform. Washington, DC: US Government.Google Scholar
  32. OECD. (2011). Pensions at a glance. Paris: OECD.Google Scholar
  33. Office for National Statistics. (2012). 2011 Census: Population estimates for the United Kingdom, 27 March 2011. Retrieved January 28, 2014, from http://www.ons.gov.uk/ons/dcp171778_292378.pdf
  34. Parry, J., & Taylor, R. (2007). Orientation, opportunity and autonomy: Why people work after state pension age in three areas of England. Ageing & Society, 27(04), 579–598.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Patton, M. Q. (2002). Qualitative research and evaluation methods. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.Google Scholar
  36. Phillipson, C. (1982). Capitalism and the construction of old age. London: Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Phillipson, C. (2018). “Fuller” or “extended” working lives? Critical perspectives on changing transitions from work to retirement. Ageing and Society, 1–22.  https://doi.org/10.1017/s0144686x18000016CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Phillipson, C., Vickerstaff, S., & Lain, D. (2016). Achieving fuller working lives: Labour market and policy issues in the United Kingdom. Australian Journal of Social Issues, 51(2), 187.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Platts, L., Corna, L., Worts, D., McDonough, P., Price, D., & Glaser, K. (2017). Returns to work after retirement: A prospective study of unretirement in the United Kingdom. Ageing & Society, 1–26.  https://doi.org/10.1017/s0144686x17000885CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Pleau, R. L. (2010). Gender differences in postretirement employment. Research on Aging, 32(3), 267–303.  https://doi.org/10.1177/0164027509357706CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Smeaton, D., & McKay, S. (2003). Working after state pension age: Quantitative analysis. Leeds, UK: Department for Work and Pensions.Google Scholar
  42. Vickerstaff, S., Phillipson, C., & Wilkie, R. (Eds.). (2011). Work, health and wellbeing: The challenges of managing health at work. Bristol, UK: Policy Press.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2020

Authors and Affiliations

  • David Lain
    • 1
    Email author
  • Mariska van der Horst
    • 2
  • Sarah Vickerstaff
    • 3
  1. 1.Newcastle University Business SchoolNewcastle upon TyneUK
  2. 2.Department of SociologyVrije UniversiteitAmsterdamNetherlands
  3. 3.School of Social Policy, Sociology and Social ResearchUniversity of KentCanterburyUK

Personalised recommendations