Advertisement

Integrating the German and US Perspective on Organizational Practices for Later Life Work: The Later Life Work Index

  • Max R. Wilckens
  • Anne M. Wöhrmann
  • Caitlin Adams
  • Jürgen DellerEmail author
  • Ruth Finkelstein
Chapter

Abstract

Later life work is on the rise in most developed countries, and organizational practices are important for its successful implementation. However, an integrated holistic perspective on successful management practices is still missing. Drawing on two qualitative frameworks of organizational practices for later life work, this chapter examines similarities and differences between management of older employees in the USA and Germany. Based on evidence from the Age Smart Employer Award in New York City and the Silver Work Index (SWI) in Germany, an integrated, intercultural framework for organizational later life work practices is proposed. The comparison reflects the differences in the countries’ social systems and legislation. While Germany’s rigid social security system requires emphasis on more individualized and flexible transition solutions into retirement, U.S. practices emphasize the importance of retirement savings and health coverage. Findings suggest a revised integrated set of practices regarding organizational culture, leadership, and several specific human resource (HR) management domains including work design, health management, individual development, and transition to retirement. This integration thereby contributes to the development of a well-founded index for good organizational management of later life work. The revised index is called Later Life Work Index (LLWI) and aims to enable organizations to self-assess their capabilities regarding successful employment of older employees, to identify areas for improvement, and to serve as a source for best practices.

Keywords

Later life work Bridge employment Index Older employees Retirement Active aging Work design Working conditions Successful aging Aging at work 

References

  1. Armstrong-Stassen, M. (2008). Organisational practices and the post-retirement employment experience of older workers. Human Resource Management Journal, 18(1), 36–53.  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1748-8583.2007.00057.xCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Armstrong-Stassen, M., & Schlosser, F. (2011). Perceived organizational membership and the retention of older workers. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 32(2), 319–344.  https://doi.org/10.1002/job.647CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Armstrong-Stassen, M., & Templer, A. J. (2006). The response of Canadian public and private sector human resource professionals to the challenge of the aging workforce. Public Personnel Management, 35(3), 247–260.  https://doi.org/10.1177/009102600603500307CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Boehm, S. A., & Dwertmann, D. J. G. (2015). Forging a single-edged sword: Facilitating positive age and disability diversity effects in the workplace through leadership, positive climates, and HR practices. Work, Aging and Retirement, 1(1), 41–63.  https://doi.org/10.1093/workar/wau008CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. von Bonsdorff, M. E., Zhou, L., Wang, M., Vanhala, S., von Bonsdorff, M. B., & Rantanen, T. (2016). Employee age and company performance. Journal of Management, 44(8), 3124–3150. doi: https://doi.org/10.1177/0149206316662314CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Börsch-Supan, A., & Weiss, M. M. (2016). Productivity and the age: Evidence from the assembly line. The Journal of the Economics of Ageing, 7, 30–42.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jeoa.2015.12.001CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Börsch-Supan, A., & Wilke, C. B. (2004). The German public pension system: How it was, how it will be (NBER Working Paper Series No. 10525) Cambridge, MA: National Bureau of Economic Research.Google Scholar
  8. Bureau of Labor Statistics. (2016). Employee Tenure in 2016. Retrieved from https://www.bls.gov/news.release/pdf/tenure.pdf
  9. Bureau of Labor Statistics. (2017). Labor force statistics. Retrieved from https://www.bls.gov/cps/cpsaat11b.htm
  10. Bureau of Labor Statistics. (2018). Civilian labor force, 2016–26. Retrieved from https://www.bls.gov/emp/ep_data_labor_force.htm
  11. Cheung, F., & Wu, A. M. S. (2013). Older workers’ successful aging and intention to stay. Journal of Managerial Psychology, 28(6), 645–660.  https://doi.org/10.1108/JPM-09-2011-0062CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Conen, W. S., Henkens, K., & Schippers, J. (2012). Employers’ attitudes and actions towards the extension of working lives in Europe. International Journal of Manpower, 33(6), 648–665.  https://doi.org/10.1108/01437721211261804CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Conway, E. (2004). Relating career stage to attitudes towards HR practices and commitment: Evidence of interaction effects? European Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology, 13(4), 417–446.  https://doi.org/10.1080/13594320444000155CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Davis, M. A. (2003). Factors related to bridge employment participation among private sector early retirees. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 63(1), 55–71.  https://doi.org/10.1016/s0001-8791(02)00016-7CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Dingemans, E., & Henkens, K. (2015). How do retirement dynamics influence mental well-being in later life? A 10-year panel study. Scandinavian Journal of Work, Environment and Health, 41(1), 16–23.  https://doi.org/10.5271/sjweh.3464CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. Eurofound. (2012). Income from work after retirement in the EU. Luxembourg: Publications Office of the European Union.Google Scholar
  17. Eurofound. (2015). Job tenure in turbulent times. Luxembourg: Publications Office of the European Union.Google Scholar
  18. European Commission & Economic Policy Committee. (2017). The 2018 ageing report: Underlying assumptions and projection methodologies. Luxembourg: Publications Office of the European Union.Google Scholar
  19. Fasbender, U., Deller, J., Wang, M., & Wiernik, B. M. (2014). Deciding whether to work after retirement: The role of the psychological experience of aging. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 84(3), 215–224.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jvb.2014.01.006CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Finkelstein, R., Roher, S., & Owusu, S. (2013). Compenidum of strategies and practices. New York: The New York Academy of Medicine. Retrieved from http://aging.columbia.edu/sites/default/files/AgeSmartEmployer_Compendium.pdfGoogle Scholar
  21. Göbel, C., & Zwick, T. (2013). Are personnel measures effective in increasing productivity of old workers? Labour Economics, 22, 80–93.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.labeco.2012.11.005CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Henkens, K. (2005). Stereotyping older workers and retirement: The managers’ point of view. Canadian Journal on Aging/La Revue Canadienne Du Vieillissement, 24(4), 353–366.  https://doi.org/10.1353/cja.2006.0011CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Henkens, K., van Dalen, H. P., Ekerdt, D. J., Hershey, D. A., Hyde, M., Radl, J., et al. (2017). What we need to know about retirement: Pressing issues for the coming decade. The Gerontologist, 58(5), 805–812.  https://doi.org/10.1093/geront/gnx095CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Hennekam, S., & Herrbach, O. (2013). HRM practices and low occupational status older workers. Employee Relations, 35(3), 339–355.  https://doi.org/10.1108/01425451311320512CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Hershey, D. A., & Henkens, K. (2014). Impact of different types of retirement transitions on perceived satisfaction with life. Gerontologist, 54(2), 232–244.  https://doi.org/10.1093/geront/gnt006CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  26. Hertweck, M. S., & Sigrist, O. (2015). The ins and outs of German unemployment: A transatlantic perspective. Oxford Economic Papers, 67(4), 1078–1095.  https://doi.org/10.1093/oep/gpv031CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Jiang, K., Lepak, D. P., Hu, J., & Baer, J. C. (2012). How does human resource management influence organizational outcomes? A meta-analytic investigation of mediating mechanisms. Academy of Management Journal, 55(6), 1264–1294.  https://doi.org/10.5465/amj.2011.0088CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Jung, P., & Kuhn, M. (2014). Labour market institutions and worker flows: Comparing Germany and the US. Economic Journal, 124(581), 1317–1342.  https://doi.org/10.1111/ecoj.12118CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Karpinska, K., Henkens, K., & Schippers, J. (2013). Hiring retirees: Impact of age norms and stereotypes. Journal of Managerial Psychology, 28(7/8), 886–906.  https://doi.org/10.1108/jmp-07-2013-0223CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Klaffke, M. (Ed.). (2014). Generationen-Management: Konzepte, Instrumente, Good-Practice-Ansätze. Wiesbaden: Springer Gabler.Google Scholar
  31. Kooij, D. T. A. M., Guest, D. E., Clinton, M., Knight, T., Jansen, P. G. W., & Dikkers, J. S. E. (2012). How the impact of HR practices on employee well-being and performance changes with age. Human Resource Management Journal, 23(1), 18–35.  https://doi.org/10.1111/1748-8583.12000CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Krippendorff, K. (2013). Content analysis: An introduction to its methodology (3rd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
  33. Kunze, F., Boehm, S. A., & Bruch, H. (2013). Organizational performance consequences of age diversity: Inspecting the role of diversity-friendly HR policies and top managers’ negative age stereotypes. Journal of Management Studies, 50(3), 413–442.  https://doi.org/10.1111/joms.12016CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Loch, C. H., Sting, F. J., Bauer, N., & Mauermann, H. (2010). The globe: How BMW is defusing the demographic time bomb. Harvard Business Review, 88, 99–102.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  35. Naegele, G., & Walker, A. (2006). Guide to good practice in age management. Dublin, Ireland: European Foundation for the Improvement of Living and Working Conditions.Google Scholar
  36. OECD. (2017). Pensions at a glance 2017: OECD and G20 indicators. Paris: OECD Publishing.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Posthuma, R. A., & Campion, M. A. (2009). Age stereotypes in the workplace: Common stereotypes, moderators, and future research directions. Journal of Management, 35(1), 158–188.  https://doi.org/10.1177/0149206308318617CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Schuett, S. (2014). Demografie-Management in der Praxis—Mit der Psychologie des Alterns wettbewerbsfähig bleiben. Berlin, Germany: Springer.Google Scholar
  39. Social Security Administration. (2018). Retirement benefits (05-10035, ICN 457500). Retrieved from https://www.ssa.gov/pubs/EN-05-10035.pdf
  40. Staudinger, U. M., Finkelstein, R., Calvo, E., & Sivaramakrishnan, K. (2016). A global view on the effects of work on health in later life. The Gerontologist, 56(Suppl. 2), S281–S292.  https://doi.org/10.1093/geront/gnw032CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  41. Wang, M., & Shultz, K. S. (2009). Employee retirement: A review and recommendations for future investigation. Journal of Management, 36(1), 172–206.  https://doi.org/10.1177/0149206309347957CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Wang, M., Zhan, Y., Liu, S., & Shultz, K. S. (2008). Antecedents of bridge employment: A longitudinal investigation. Journal of Applied Psychology, 93(4), 818–830.  https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.93.4.818CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  43. Wöhrmann, A. M., Deller, J., & Pundt, L. M. (2018). Complementing AAI at the meso level: The Silver Work Index. In A. Zaidi, S. Harper, K. Howse, G. Lamura, & J. Perek-Białas (Eds.), Building evidence for active ageing policies: Active Ageing Index and its potential. London: Palgrave MacMillan.Google Scholar
  44. Zacher, H., & Yang, J. (2016). Organizational climate for successful aging. Frontiers in Psychology, 7, 1–12.  https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2016.01007CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2020

Authors and Affiliations

  • Max R. Wilckens
    • 1
  • Anne M. Wöhrmann
    • 1
    • 2
  • Caitlin Adams
    • 3
    • 4
  • Jürgen Deller
    • 1
    • 5
    Email author
  • Ruth Finkelstein
    • 6
  1. 1.Institute of Management and OrganizationLeuphana University of LüneburgLüneburgGermany
  2. 2.Federal Institute for Occupational Safety and Health (BAuA)DortmundGermany
  3. 3.South Bronx UnitedBronxUSA
  4. 4.Mailman School of Public HealthColumbia UniversityNew YorkUSA
  5. 5.Silver Workers Research InstituteBerlinGermany
  6. 6.Brookdale Center for Healthy Aging, Hunter CollegeCity University of New YorkNew YorkUSA

Personalised recommendations