Advertisement

The Role of Aging, Age Diversity, and Age Heterogeneity Within Teams

  • Jensine Paoletti
  • Jacqueline M. Gilberto
  • Margaret E. Beier
  • Eduardo SalasEmail author
Chapter

Abstract

In the USA, baby boomers are aging and choosing to remain in the workforce longer than previous generations of workers. Likewise, many countries are experiencing demographic shifts toward a more age-diverse population. Meanwhile, organizations continue to rely on teams to accomplish tasks and solve difficult problems. Together, this means that workplaces and teams will be populated by a wider variety of ages. This chapter reviews and synthesizes the literature on aging, age diversity, and age heterogeneity in teams. The authors begin by delineating the relevant social and organizational theories that can explain findings about teams and their relationship with age diversity. This chapter will cover (a) the effects of age in teams, including performance effects; (b) challenges associated with an age-diverse team and potential pitfalls; and (c) strategies for organizational promotion and inclusion of age-diverse teammates, including leadership practices. Finally, the chapter concludes with directions for future research on aging in teams and age diversity.

Keywords

Work teams Age-diverse teams Team leadership Team performance Team communication Team identification Age-related stereotypes Team mental models Organizational culture 

References

  1. Avolio, B. J., & Barrett, G. V. (1987). Effects of age stereotyping in a simulated interview. Psychology and Aging, 2(1), 56–63.  https://doi.org/10.1037/0882-7974.2.1.56CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. Avolio, B. J., Waldman, D. A., & McDaniel, M. A. (1990). Age and work performance in nonmanagerial jobs: The effects of experience and occupational type. The Academy of Management Journal, 33(2), 407–422.  https://doi.org/10.2307/256331CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Bass, B. M. (1985). Leadership and performance beyond expectations. New York: Free Press.Google Scholar
  4. Beier, M. (2008). Age and learning in organizations. In G. P. Hodgkinson & J. K. Ford (Eds.), International review of industrial and organizational psychology (Vol. 23, pp. 83–105). Chichester; and Hoboken, NJ: Wiley.Google Scholar
  5. Beier, M. E., & Ackerman, P. L. (2005). Age, ability, and the role of prior knowledge on the acquisition of new domain knowledge: Promising results in a real-world learning environment. Psychology and Aging, 20(2), 341–355.  https://doi.org/10.1037/0882-7974.20.2.341CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. Beier, M., Teachout, M., & Cox, C. (2012). The training and development of an aging workforce. In J. W. Hedge & W. C. Borman (Eds.), The oxford handbook of work and aging (pp. 436–453). New York: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Bell, S. T., Villado, A. J., Lukasik, M. A., Belau, L., & Briggs, A. L. (2010). Getting specific about demographic diversity variable and team performance relationships: A meta-analysis. Journal of Management, 37(3), 709–743.  https://doi.org/10.1177/0149206310365001CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Bezrukova, K., Jehn, K. A., Zanutto, E. L., & Thatcher, S. M. (2009). Do workgroup faultlines help or hurt? A moderated model of faultlines, team identification, and group performance. Organization Science, 20(1), 35–50.  https://doi.org/10.1287/orsc.1080.0379CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Blustein, D. (2013). The psychology of working: A new perspective for career development, counseling, and public policy. Abingdon: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Boehm, S. A., Kunze, F., & Bruch, H. (2014). Spotlight on age-diversity climate: The impact of age-inclusive HR practices on firm-level outcomes. Personnel Psychology, 67(3), 667–704.  https://doi.org/10.1111/peps.12047CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Callahan, J. S., Kiker, D. S., & Cross, T. (2003). Does method matter? A meta-analysis of the effects of training method on older learner training performance. Journal of Management, 29(5), 663–680.  https://doi.org/10.1016/S0149-2063(03)00029-1CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Carpenter, M. A., Geletkanycz, M. A., & Sanders, W. G. (2004). Upper echelons research revisited: Antecedents, elements, and consequences of top management team composition. Journal of Management, 30(6), 749–778.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jm.2004.06.001CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Carson, J. B., Tesluk, P. E., & Marrone, J. A. (2007). Shared leadership in teams: An investigation of antecedent conditions and performance. Academy of Management Journal, 50(5), 1217–1234.  https://doi.org/10.2307/20159921CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Charness, N., & Czaja, S. J. (2006). Older worker training: What we know and don’t know. #2006-22. AARP.Google Scholar
  15. Ellwart, T., Bündgens, S., & Rack, O. (2013). Managing knowledge exchange and identification in age diverse teams. Journal of Managerial Psychology, 28(7/8), 950–972.  https://doi.org/10.1108/JMP-06-2013-0181CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Gellert, F. J., & Kuipers, B. S. (2008). Short- and long-term consequences of age in work teams: An empirical exploration of ageing teams. Career Development International, 13(2), 132–149.  https://doi.org/10.1108/13620430810860549CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Gurchiek, K. (2018). New census data underscores workforce implications of aging population. Retrieved from https://shrm.org/ResourcesAndTools/hr-topics/behavioral-competencies/global-and-cultural-effectiveness/Pages/New-Census-Data-Reveals-Aging-Population.aspx
  18. Harrison, D. A., & Klein, K. J. (2007). What’s the difference? Diversity constructs as separation, variety, or disparity in organizations. The Academy of Management Review, 32(4), 1199–1228.  https://doi.org/10.2307/20159363CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Harrison, D. A., Price, K. H., Gavin, J. H., & Florey, A. T. (2002). Time, teams, and task performance: Changing effects of surface- and deep-level diversity on group functioning. The Academy of Management Journal, 45(5), 1029–1045.  https://doi.org/10.2307/3069328CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Hedge, J. W., Borman, W. C., & Lammlein, S. E. (2006). The aging workforce: Realities, myths, and implications for organizations. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Hertzog, C., Kramer, A. F., Wilson, R. S., & Lindenberger, U. (2009). Fit body, fit mind? Scientific American Mind, 20(4), 24–31.  https://doi.org/10.1038/scientificamericanmind0709-24CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Hirsch, A. (2017). 4 ways for HR to overcome aging workforce issues. Alexandria, VA: Society for Human Resource Management (SHRM). Retrieved from https://shrm.org/ResourcesAndTools/hr-topics/behavioral-competencies/global-and-cultural-effectiveness/pages/4-ways-for-hr-to-overcome-aging-workforce-issues.aspxGoogle Scholar
  23. Hoch, J. E., Pearce, C. L., & Welzel, L. (2010). Is the most effective team leadership shared?: The impact of shared leadership, age diversity, and coordination on team performance. Journal of Personnel Psychology, 9(3), 105–116.  https://doi.org/10.1027/1866-5888/a000020CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Israel, M., Kamman, M. L., McCray, E. D., & Sindelar, P. T. (2014). Mentoring in action: The interplay among professional assistance, emotional support, and evaluation. Exceptional Children, 81(1), 45–63.  https://doi.org/10.1177/0014402914532231CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. James, J. B., Swanberg, J. E., & McKechnie, S. P. (2007). Generational differences in perceptions of older workers’ capabilities. Center on Aging & Work/Workplace Flexibility at Boston CollegeGoogle Scholar
  26. Joshi, A., & Roh, H. (2009). The role of context in work team diversity research: A meta-analytic review. Academy of Management Journal, 52(3), 599–627.  https://doi.org/10.5465/AMJ.2009.41331491CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Judge, T. A., & Piccolo, R. F. (2004). Transformational and transactional leadership: A meta-analytic test of their relative validity. Journal of Applied Psychology, 89(5), 755–768.  https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.89.5.755CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  28. Kanfer, R., & Ackerman, P. L. (2004). Aging, adult development, and work motivation. The Academy of Management Review, 29(3), 440.  https://doi.org/10.2307/20159053CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Kearney, E. (2008). Age differences between leader and followers as a moderator of the relationship between transformational leadership and team performance. Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, 81(4), 803–811.  https://doi.org/10.1348/096317907X256717CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Kearney, E., Gebert, D., & Voelpel, S. C. (2009). When and how diversity benefits teams: The importance of team members’ need for cognition. The Academy of Management Journal, 52(3), 581–598.  https://doi.org/10.5465/amj.2009.41331431CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Kilduff, M., Angelmar, R., & Mehra, A. (2000). Top management-team diversity and firm performance: Examining the role of cognitions. Organization Science, 11(1), 21–34.  https://doi.org/10.1287/orsc.11.1.21.12569CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Kozlowski, S. W., & Ilgen, D. R. (2006). Enhancing the effectiveness of work groups and teams. Psychological Science in the Public Interest, 7(3), 77–124.  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1529-1006.2006.00030.xCrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  33. Kraiger, K., & Culbertson, S. (2012). Understanding and facilitating learning: Advancements in training and development. In N. Schmitt & S. Highhouse (Eds.), Handbook of psychology (Vol. 12, 2nd ed., pp. 255–256). Hoboken, NJ: Wiley.Google Scholar
  34. Kram, K. E. (1983). Phases of the mentor relationship. Academy of Management Journal, 26(4), 608–625.  https://doi.org/10.2307/255910CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Kubeck, J. E., Delp, N. D., Haslett, T. K., & McDaniel, M. A. (1996). Does job-related training performance decline with age? Psychology and Aging, 11(1), 92–107.  https://doi.org/10.1037/0882-7974.11.1.92CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Kunze, F., & Bruch, H. (2010). Age-based faultlines and perceived productive energy: The moderation of transformational leadership. Small Group Research, 41(5), 593–620.  https://doi.org/10.1177/1046496410366307CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Lewen, L. J. (2007). Understanding the role of age, work context, and task demands on managers’ attitudes. Retrieved from https://smartech.gatech.edu/handle/1853/16328
  38. Levy, B. R. (2003). Mind matters: Cognitive and physical effects of aging self-stereotypes. The Journals of Gerontology: Series B, 58(4), P203–P211. https://doi.org/10.1093/geronb/58.4.P203CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Marlow, S. L., Lacerenza, C. N., Paoletti, J., Burke, C. S., & Salas, E. (2018). Does team communication represent a one-size-fits-all approach?: A meta-analysis of team communication and performance. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 144(Supplement C), 145–170.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.obhdp.2017.08.001CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Maurer, T. J., Weiss, E. M., & Barbeite, F. G. (2003). A model of involvement in work-related learning and development activity: The effects of individual, situational, motivational, and age variables. The Journal of Applied Psychology, 88(4), 707–724.  https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.88.4.707CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  41. Mesmer-Magnus, J. R., & DeChurch, L. A. (2009). Information sharing and team performance: A meta-analysis. Journal of Applied Psychology, 94(2), 535–546.  https://doi.org/10.1037/a0013773CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  42. Mitchell, G. W. (2014). The silver tsunami. Physician Executive, 40(4), 34–38.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  43. Mitchell, R., Boyle, B., Parker, V., Giles, M., Chiang, V., & Joyce, P. (2015). Managing inclusiveness and diversity in teams: How leader inclusiveness affects performance through status and team identity. Human Resource Management, 54(2), 217–239.  https://doi.org/10.1002/hrm.21658CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Mohammed, S., Ferzandi, L., & Hamilton, K. (2010). Metaphor no more: A 15-year review of the team mental model construct. Journal of Management, 36(4), 876–910.  https://doi.org/10.1177/0149206309356804CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. O’Neill, T. A., Allen, N. J., & Hastings, S. E. (2013). Examining the “pros” and “cons” of team conflict: A team-level meta-analysis of task, relationship, and process conflict. Human Performance, 26(3), 236–260.  https://doi.org/10.1080/08959285.2013.795573CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Pelled, L. H. (1996). Demographic diversity, conflict, and work group outcomes: An intervening process theory. Organization Science, 7(6), 615–631.  https://doi.org/10.1287/orsc.7.6.615CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Posthuma, R. A., & Campion, M. A. (2008). Age stereotypes in the workplace: Common stereotypes, moderators, and future research directions. Journal of Management, 35(1), 158–188.  https://doi.org/10.1177/0149206308318617CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Pytlovany, A. C., & Truxillo, D. M. (2015). Age diversity at work. In Encyclopedia of geropsychology (pp. 1–8). Singapore: Springer.  https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-287-080-3_21-1CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Richard, O. C., & Shelor, R. M. (2002). Linking top management team age heterogeneity to firm performance: Juxtaposing two mid-range theories. The International Journal of Human Resource Management, 13(6), 958–974.  https://doi.org/10.1080/09585190210134309CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Salas, E., Rosen, M. A., Burke, C. S., & Goodwin, G. F. (2009). The wisdom of collectives in organizations: An update of the teamwork competencies. In E. Salas, G. F. Goodwin, & C. S. Burke (Eds.), Team effectiveness in complex organizations: Cross-disciplinary perspectives and approaches (pp. 39–74). New York: Taylor & Francis Group.  https://doi.org/10.1177/0018720815578267CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Salas, E., Sims, D. E., & Burke, C. S. (2005). Is there a “big five” in teamwork? Small Group Research, 36(5), 555–599.  https://doi.org/10.1177/1046496405277134CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Shemla, M., Meyer, B., Greer, L., & Jehn, K. A. (2014). A review of perceived diversity in teams: Does how members perceive their team’s composition affect team processes and outcomes? Journal of Organizational Behavior, 37(S1), S89–S106.  https://doi.org/10.1002/job.1957CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Shore, L. M., Cleveland, J. N., & Goldberg, C. B. (2003). Work attitudes and decisions as a function of manager age and employee age. Journal of Applied Psychology, 88(3), 529–537.  https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.88.3.529CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  54. Simons, T., Pelled, L. H., & Smith, K. A. (1999). Making use of difference: Diversity, debate, and decision comprehensiveness in top management teams. Academy of Management Journal, 42(6), 662–673.  https://doi.org/10.2307/256987CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Smyer, M. A., & Pitt-Catsouphes, M. (2009). Collaborative work: What’s age got to do with it. In S. J. Czaja & J. Sharit (Eds.), Aging and work: Issues and implications in a changing landscape (pp. 144–164). Baltimore, MD: The Johns Hopkins University Press.Google Scholar
  56. Streufert, S., Pogash, R., Piasecki, M., & Post, G. M. (1990). Age and management team performance. Psychology and Aging, 5(4), 551–559.  https://doi.org/10.1037/0882-7974.5.4.551CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  57. Van Der Vegt, G. S., & Bunderson, J. S. (2005). Learning and performance in multidisciplinary teams: The importance of collective team identification. The Academy of Management Journal, 48(3), 532–547.  https://doi.org/10.2307/20159674CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Warr, P. (1999). Age and employment. In Handbook of industrial and organizational psychology (Vol. 4, 2nd ed., pp. 485–549). Palo Alto, CA: Consulting Psychologists Press.Google Scholar
  59. Wegge, J., Jungmann, F., Liebermann, S., Shemla, M., Ries, B. C., Diestel, S., et al. (2012). What makes age diverse teams effective? Results from a six-year research program. Work, 41(Supplement 1), 5145–5151.  https://doi.org/10.3233/WOR-2012-0084-5145CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  60. Williams, K. Y., & O’Reilly, C. A. (1998). Demography and diversity in organizations: A review of 40 years of research. In L. L. Cummings & B. M. Staw (Eds.), Research in organizational behavior (Vol. 20, pp. 77–140). Greenwich, CT: JAI Press.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2020

Authors and Affiliations

  • Jensine Paoletti
    • 1
  • Jacqueline M. Gilberto
    • 1
  • Margaret E. Beier
    • 1
  • Eduardo Salas
    • 1
    Email author
  1. 1.Department of Psychological SciencesRice UniversityHoustonUSA

Personalised recommendations