Advertisement

Design of Half-Ring MIMO Antenna to Reduce the Mutual Coupling

  • K. Vasu Babu
  • B. Anuradha
Conference paper
  • 34 Downloads

Abstract

We propose a novel, dual-polarized MIMO radiator, which consists of half rings, and included in the ring a square shape at the top side and half circular shape at bottom side operating from 2 to 10 GHz with a microstrip feeding. The suppression of mutual coupling is obtained by maintaining the separation between the patches around 0.25 λ0. The half-ring MIMO antenna is resonating at dual band of frequencies at 7.24 and 8.16 GHz with impedance bandwidths of 430 and 230 MHz, has |S11| < −10 dB in the MIMO range from 2.0 to 10.0 GHz and has a mutual coupling with |S21| < −20 dB. The radiator has a low ECC (envelope correlation coefficient) with values equal to approximately less than 0.025, which will prove that the half-ring MIMO radiator shows better diversity performance. The half-ring MIMO radiator has improved the parameters of reflection coefficient, mutual coupling, realized gain, group delay and real/imaginary impedances.

Keywords

Multiple input-multiple output Realized gain ECC Group delay Real/imaginary impedances 

Abbreviation

ECC

envelope correlation coefficient

GD

group delay

MIMO

multiple input-multiple output

NGD

negative group delay

UWB

ultra-wide band antenna

References

  1. 1.
    Irene G, Rajesh A (2018) A dual-polarized UWB–MIMO antenna with IEEE 802.11ac band-notched characteristics using split-ring resonator. J Comp Electron.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10825-018-1213-xCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Liu YY, Tu ZH (2017) Compact differential band-notched UWB-MIMO antenna with common-mode suppression. IEEE Antennas Wirel Propag Lett 16:593–596CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Babu KV, Anuradha B (2018) Design of multi-band Minkowski MIMO antenna to reduce the mutual coupling. J King Saud Univ Eng Sci 35:1–7Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Braaten BD, Khan MS, Ijaz B, Capobianco AD, Naqvi A, Asif S (2015) Planar, compact ultra-wideband polarization diversity antenna array. IET Microw Antennas Propag 9:1761–1768CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Chen LS, Lin GS, Sung H, Houng MP (2017) Isolation improvement in UWB MIMO antenna system using carbon black film. IEEE AntennasWirel Propag Lett 16:222–225CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Najam AI, Khan MS, Capobianco AD, Shafique MF, Shoaib I, Autizi E (2014) Compact ultra-wideband diversity antenna with a floating parasitic digitated decoupling structure. IET Microw Antennas Propag 8:747–753CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Koul SK, Sipal D, Abegaonkar MP (2017) Easily extendable compact planar UWB MIMO antenna array. IEEE Antennas Wirel Propag Lett 16:2328–2331CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Ryu KB, Lee JM, Kim HK, Woo JM (2012) A compact ultra wideband MIMO antenna with WLAN band-rejected operation for mobile devices. IEEE Antennas Wirel Propag Lett 11:990–993CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Babu KV, Anuradha B (2018) Tri-band MIMO antenna for WLAN, WiMAX and defence system & Radio astronomy applications. Adv Electromagn 7:60–67CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Toktas A (2016) G-shaped band-notched ultra-wideband MIMO antenna system for mobile terminals. IET Microw Antennas Propag 11(5):718–725CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2020

Authors and Affiliations

  • K. Vasu Babu
    • 1
  • B. Anuradha
    • 2
  1. 1.Department of ECEVVITGunturIndia
  2. 2.Department of ECESri Venkateswara UniversityTirupatiIndia

Personalised recommendations