Advertisement

HTSA Optimized PID-Based MPPT for Solar PV System

  • Shashikant
  • Binod Shaw
Conference paper
  • 36 Downloads

Abstract

PV system is generally applied with DC–DC converter and a battery. The system is always operated at maximum power point, and its tracking is known as maximum power point tracking (MPPT). Several comparisons have been based on MPPT. In this article, a comparison has been made with conventional perturb and observe (P&O) with intelligent fuzzy logic controller. In this article, the system is designed to operate for an islanding mode without a battery which would reduce the cost of a battery. The model is simulated in MATLAB and the obtained simulated result shows that the performance of intelligent optimized fuzzy logic controller is better than conventional P&O method.

Keywords

Proportional integral and derivative (PID) Heat transfer search algorithm (HTSA) Fuzzy proportional integral and derivative (FPID) Perturb and observe (P&O) 

Abbreviations

MPPT

maximum power point tracking

P&O

perturb and observe.

PID

proportional integrator and derivative.

FPID

fuzzy proportional integrator and derivative.

HTSA

heat transfer search algorithm.

CDF

conduction factor.

COF

convection factor.

RDF

radiation factor.

TCF

temperature change factor.

References

  1. 1.
    Sharma DK, Purohit G (2012) Advanced perturbation and observation (P&O) based maximum power point tracking (MPPT) of a solar photo-voltaic system. India International Conference on Power Electronics, IICPE, pp 3–7.  https://doi.org/10.1109/IICPE.2012.6450411
  2. 2.
    Safari A, Mekhilef S (2011) Incremental conductance MPPT method for PV systems, pp 345–347Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Kim T, Ahn H, Park S, Lee Y (2001) A novel maximum power point tracking control for photovoltaic, pp 0–3Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Bendib B, Belmili H, Krim F (2015) A survey of the most used MPPT methods: conventional and advanced algorithms applied for photovoltaic systems. Renew Sust Energ Rev 45:637–648.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2015.02.009CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Appelbaum J (1996) Advantage of boost vs. buck topology for maximum power (2), pp 355–358Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Shaw B (2015) Soft computing in data science, vol 545. Springer, Singapore.  https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-287-936-3CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Veerachary M, Senjyu T, Uezato K (2003) Neural-network-based maximum-power-point tracking of coupled-inductor interleaved-boost-converter-supplied PV system using fuzzy controller. IEEE Trans Ind Electron 50(4):749–758.  https://doi.org/10.1109/TIE.2003.814762CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Patel VK, Savsani VJ (2015) Heat transfer search (HTS): a novel optimization algorithm. Inf Sci (Ny) 324:217–246CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2020

Authors and Affiliations

  • Shashikant
    • 1
  • Binod Shaw
    • 1
  1. 1.National Institute of TechnologyRaipurIndia

Personalised recommendations