Advertisement

On How Instantaneous Path Loss Modeling Is a Need of Internet of Drones Based Intelligent Aerial Infrastructure

  • Purnima Lala Mehta
  • Ambuj KumarEmail author
Conference paper
Part of the Lecture Notes of the Institute for Computer Sciences, Social Informatics and Telecommunications Engineering book series (LNICST, volume 283)

Abstract

Drone technologies have become integral component to a lot of civilian and military applications. Talking of wireless communication, Aerial Base Stations are being proposed to act as relay and/or to provide cellular communications to the ground users. Most of the work has been concentrated to enhance the coverage and capacity of the network by finding the optimal parameters like aerial BS height, power etc. using definite or statistical path loss models. However, no work has been done to analyze the path loss performance of aerial BS ad-hoc network in serving moving ground users aka Place Time Capacity (PTC). A concept of hovering base stations (HANET) has been proposed previously to serve the PTC problem and in this paper, we put forward the need for instantaneous path loss modeling for network situations where both user and BS are itinerant.

Keywords

Drones Cellular communications Path loss modeling 

Notes

Acknowledgements

This paper is supported by the “Capacity building and ExchaNge towards attaining Technological Research and modernizing Academic Learning,” or CENTRAL Project, which is the Erasmus+ Capacity Building in Higher Education (CBHE) initiative under the Education, Audiovisual and Culture Executive Agency (EACEA) of the European Commission.

References

  1. 1.
    Kumar, A., Mehta, P.L., Prasad, R.: Place time capacity- a novel concept for defining challenges in 5G networks and beyond in India. In: 2014 IEEE Global Conference on Wireless Computing Networking (GCWCN), pp. 278–282 (2014)Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Kumar, A.: Active Probing Feedback based Self Configurable Intelligent Distributed Antenna System: For Relative and Intuitive Coverage and Capacity Predictions for Proactive Spectrum Sensing and Management. Aalborg Universitetsforlag (2016)Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Heterogeneous networks - Ericsson: Ericsson.com, February 2012. https://www.ericsson.com/en/white-papers/machine-intelligence
  4. 4.
    Stanze, O., Weber, A.: Heterogeneous networks with LTE-advanced technologies. Bell Labs Tech. J. 18(1), 41–58 (2013)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    On How the Internet of Drones is going to Revolutionize the Technology Applications in Business Paradigms - Research - Aarhus University. https://pure.au.dk/portal/en/publications/on-how-the-internet-of-drones-is-going-to-revolutionize-the-technology-applications-in-business-paradigms(a1a6526c-7966-4c78-b59a-f0426db9fa31).html. Accessed 17 Mar 2019
  6. 6.
    Goddemeier, N., Rohde, S., Wietfeld, C.: Experimental performance evaluation of role-based connectivity management for cooperating UAVs. In: 2014 IEEE 79th Vehicular Technology Conference (VTC Spring), pp. 1–5 (2014)Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Rohde, S., Wietfeld, C.: Interference aware positioning of aerial relays for cell overload and outage compensation. In: 2012 IEEE Vehicular Technology Conference (VTC Fall), pp. 1–5 (2012)Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Mehta, P.L.: A Self-Itinerant Intelligent Aerial Radio Architecture (SIIARA), Ph.D. thesis, Aarhus University, Herning, Denmark (2018)Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Bae, J., Kim, Y., Hur, N., Kim, H.M.: Study on air-to-ground multipath channel and mobility influences in UAV based broadcasting. In: 2018 International Conference on Information and Communication Technology Convergence (ICTC), pp. 1534–1538 (2018)Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Mehta, P.L., Prasad, R.: Aerial-heterogeneous network: a case study analysis on the network performance under heavy user accumulations. Wirel. Pers. Commun. 96(3), 3765–3784 (2017)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    McGeehan, J., Tameh, E.K., Nix, A.R.: Path loss models for air-to-ground radio channels in urban environments. In: 2006 IEEE 63rd Vehicular Technology Conference, vol. 6, pp. 2901–2905 (2006)Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Feng, Q., McGeehan, J., Nix, A.R.: Enhancing coverage and reducing power consumption in peer-to-peer networks through airborne relaying. In: 2007 IEEE 65th Vehicular Technology Conference - VTC2007-Spring, pp. 954–958 (2007)Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Košmerl, J., Vilhar, A.: Base stations placement optimization in wireless networks for emergency communications. In: 2014 IEEE International Conference on Communications Workshops (ICC), pp. 200–205 (2014)Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Al-Hourani, A., Kandeepan, S., Lardner, S.: Optimal LAP altitude for maximum coverage. IEEE Wirel. Commun. Lett. 3(6), 569–572 (2014)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Al-Hourani, A., Kandeepan, S.: Cognitive relay nodes for airborne LTE emergency networks. In: 2013, 7th International Conference on Signal Processing and Communication Systems (ICSPCS), pp. 1–9 (2013)Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Gomez, K., Hourani, A., Goratti, L., Riggio, R., Kandeepan, S., Bucaille, I.: Capacity evaluation of aerial LTE base-stations for public safety communications. In: 2015 European Conference on Networks and Communications (EuCNC), pp. 133–138 (2015)Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Guo, W., Devine, C., Wang, S.: Performance analysis of micro unmanned airborne communication relays for cellular networks. In: 2014 9th International Symposium on Communication Systems, Networks Digital Sign (CSNDSP), pp. 658–663 (2014)Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Wang, K., et al.: Path loss measurement and modeling for low-altitude UAV access channels. In: 2017 IEEE 86th Vehicular Technology Conference (VTC-Fall), pp. 1–5 (2017)Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Al-Hourani, A., Kandeepan, S., Jamalipour, A.: Modeling air-to-ground path loss for low altitude platforms in urban environments. In: 2014 IEEE Global Communications Conference, pp. 2898–2904 (2014)Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Mozaffari, M., Saad, W., Bennis, M., Debbah, M.: Drone small cells in the clouds: design, deployment and performance analysis. In: 2015 IEEE Global Communications Conference (GLOBECOM), pp. 1–6 (2015)Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    Goddemeier, N., Daniel, K., Wietfeld, C.: Coverage evaluation of wireless networks for unmanned aerial systems. In: 2010 IEEE Globecom Workshops, pp. 1760–1765 (2010)Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    Goddemeier, N., Wietfeld, C.: Investigation of air-to-air channel characteristics and a UAV specific extension to the rice model. In: 2015 IEEE Globecom Workshops (GC Wkshps), pp. 1–5 (2015)Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    Amorim, R., Nguyen, H., Mogensen, P., Kovács, I.Z., Wigard, J., Sørensen, T.B.: Radio channel modeling for UAV communication over cellular networks. IEEE Wirel. Commun. Lett. 6(4), 514–517 (2017)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© ICST Institute for Computer Sciences, Social Informatics and Telecommunications Engineering 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.IILM College of Engineering and TechnologyGreater NoidaIndia
  2. 2.Aarhus UniversityHerningDenmark

Personalised recommendations