Advertisement

Overview of IoT Basic Platforms for Precision Agriculture

  • Ioana MarcuEmail author
  • Carmen Voicu
  • Ana Maria Claudia Drăgulinescu
  • Octavian Fratu
  • George Suciu
  • Cristina Balaceanu
  • Maria Madalina Andronache
Conference paper
Part of the Lecture Notes of the Institute for Computer Sciences, Social Informatics and Telecommunications Engineering book series (LNICST, volume 283)

Abstract

Nowadays, more than ever, agriculture area has to face difficult challenges due to numerous technological transformations used for increasing productivity and products quality. Due to the extended growth in agricultural product use, farmers and big companies operating in the “Big Data” area invest in precision agriculture by using sensor networks, drones, satellites and GPS tracking systems. Agricultural plants are extremely sensitive to climate change such as higher temperatures and changes in the precipitation area increase the chance of disease occurrence, leading to crop damage and even irreversible destruction of plants. Current advances in Internet of things (IoT) and Cloud Computing have led to the development of new applications based on highly innovative and scalable service platforms. IoT solutions have great potential in assuring the quality and safety of agricultural products. The design and operation of a telemonitoring system for precision farming is mainly based on the use of IoT platforms and therefore, this paper briefly presents the main IoT platforms used in precision agriculture, highlighting at the same time their main advantages and disadvantages. This overview can be used as a basic tool for choosing an IoT platform solution for future telemonitoring systems.

Keywords

IoT platforms Precision agriculture Cloud computing Efficiency 

Notes

Acknowledgment

This work has been supported in part by Minister of Research and Innovation Romania through project SmartAgro (contract no. 8592/2018), UEFISCDI, project number 33PCCDI/2018 within PNCDI III and through contract no. 5Sol/2017, PNCDI III, Integrated Software Platform for Mobile Malware Analysis (ToR-SIM).

References

  1. 1.
    Ganchev, I., Ji, Z., O’Droma, M.: A generic IoT architecture for smart cities. In 25th IET Irish Signals & Systems Conference 2014 and 2014 China-Ireland International Conference on Information and Communications Technologies (ISSC 2014/CIICT 2014), Electronic ISBN: 978-1-84919-924-7, Ireland, 2013Google Scholar
  2. 2.
  3. 3.
    Deepika, G., Rajapirian, P.: Wireless sensor network in precision agriculture: a survey. In: 2016 International Conference on Emerging Trends in Engineering, Technology and Science (ICETETS), ISBN: 978-1-4673-6725-7, India, 2016Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Khairnar, P., et al: Wireless sensor network application in agriculture for monitoring agriculture production process. In: International Journal of Advanced Research in Computer Engineering & Technology (IJARCET), ISSN: 2278–1323, vol. 5, Issue 5, May 2016Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Ahonen, T., Virrankoski, R., Elmusrati, M.: In: Greenhouse monitoring with wireless sensor network. In: IEEE/ASME International Conference on Mechatronic and Embedded Systems and Applications (2008)Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Gupta, G., Quan, V., In: Multi-sensor integrated system for wireless monitoring of greenhouse environment. In: 2018 IEEE Sensors Applications Symposium (SAS), ISBN: 978-1-5386-2092-2, South Korea (2018)Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Kameoka, S., et al.: In: A Wireless Sensor Network for Growth Environment Measurement and Multi-Band Optical Sensing to Diagnose Tree Vigor, Sensors (Basel) (2017).  https://doi.org/10.3390/s17050966CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Bapat, V., et al.: WSN application for crop protection to divert animal intrusions in the agricultural land. In: Computers and Electronics in Agriculture, vol. 133, pp 88–96, Elsevier (2017)Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Ojha, T.: Wireless sensor networks for agriculture: the state-of-the-art in practice and future challenges. In: Elsevier Computers and Electronics in Agriculture 118, 66–84 (2015)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Vasisht, D., et al.: FarmBeats: an IoT platform for data-driven agriculture. In: 14th USENIX Symposium on Networked Systems Design and Implementation (NSDI 2017), ISBN 978-1-931971-37-9, USA (2017)Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Sharma, V.: Limitation associated with wireless sensor network, In: IJCST, vol. 5, Issue 1, ISSN: 0976-8491 (Online), Jan–March 2014Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Cadavid, H.F., Garzón, W., Pérez, A., López, G., Mendivelso, C., Ramirez, C.: Towards a smart farming platform: from IoT-based crop sensing to data analytics. In: Proceedings 13th Colombian Conference, CCC 2018, Cartagena, Colombia, 26–28 September 2018Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    ThingsBoard Open-source IoT Platform. https://thingsboard.io/
  14. 14.
    Jayaraman, P.P., Yavari, A., Georgakopoulos, D., Morshed, A., Zaslavsky, A.: Internet of Things platform for smart farming: experiences and lessons learnt. Sensors 2016, 16 (1884)Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Popovic, T., Latinovic, N., Pesic, A., Zecevic, Z., Krstajic, B., Djukanovic, S.: Architecting an IoT-enabled platform for precision agriculture and ecological monitoring: a case study. Comput. Electron. Agric. 140, 255–265 (2017)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Miguel, A., Antonio, F.: Skarmeta, smart farming IoT platform based on edge and cloud computing. Biosyst. Eng. 177, 4–17 (2019)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
  18. 18.
  19. 19.
  20. 20.
    Observant™, Observant™ water level monitoring brochure. https://observant.net/
  21. 21.
    Observant™, Observant™ Soil Moisture Monitoring brochure. https://observant.net/
  22. 22.
    Observant™, Observant™ solution datasheet - Soil Moisture Monitoring. https://observant.net/
  23. 23.
    Observant™, Observant™ Weather and Environmental Monitoring brochure. https://observant.net/
  24. 24.
    Observant™, Observant™ solution datasheet – Irrigation Scheduling. https://observant.net/
  25. 25.
  26. 26.
    Arable: Decision Agriculture. www.arable.com
  27. 27.
    A complete water-budgeting solution. www.arable.com/solutions_irrigation
  28. 28.
    Turn raw data from your field into actionable analytics. www.pycno.co/sensors
  29. 29.
    Quick start guide. www.pycno.co/quick-start
  30. 30.
    GSMA, Agricultural machine-to-machine (Agri M2M): a platform for expansion. www.gsmaintellgence.com/research/?file=9186f77efc0a47fe7f127d79d789c64c&download
  31. 31.
    Zhang, X., Zhang, J., Li, L., Zhang, Y., Yang, G.: Monitoring citrus soil moisture and nutrients using an iot based system. Sens. J. 17(3), 447 (2017)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Kim, S., Lee, M., Shin, C.: IoT-Based Strawberry Disease Prediction System for Smart Farming. Sens. J. 18(11), 4051 (2018)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Ferrández-Pastor, F.J., García-Chamizo, J.M., Nieto-Hidalgo, M., Mora-Martínez, J.: Precision agriculture design method using a distributed computing architecture on internet of things context. Sens. J. 18(6), 1731 (2018)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    Lee, M., Hwang, J., Yoe, H.: Agricultural production system based on IoT. In: 2013 IEEE 16th International Conference on Computational Science and Engineering, pp. 833–837. Sydney, NSW (2013)Google Scholar
  35. 35.
    Suciu, V., et al.: Analysis of Agriculture Sensors Based on IoT. In: 2018 International Conference on Communications (COMM), pp. 423–427 (2018)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© ICST Institute for Computer Sciences, Social Informatics and Telecommunications Engineering 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  • Ioana Marcu
    • 1
    Email author
  • Carmen Voicu
    • 1
  • Ana Maria Claudia Drăgulinescu
    • 1
  • Octavian Fratu
    • 1
  • George Suciu
    • 2
  • Cristina Balaceanu
    • 2
  • Maria Madalina Andronache
    • 1
  1. 1.University Polytechnic of BucharestBucharestRomania
  2. 2.Beia Consult InternationalBucharestRomania

Personalised recommendations